HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-02-01; Planning Commission; Resolution 2811.-
h a e
I1
1
2
3
4
5
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2811
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBJ CALIFORNIA APPROVING ANEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ASITE DEVELOPM PLAN TO DEVELOP AN APPROXIMATELY 27 ACRE COMMERCIAL/GOVERNM CENTER ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER EL CAMINO REAL AND ALGA ROAD. APPLICANT: VON DER AHE CASE NO.: SDP 86-llA (SCH #88090714)
6 /I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 1st day of February, 7
8
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider sai
and
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the informatiot
by staff, and considering any written comments received, the Planning
considered all factors relating to the Negative Declaration.
l3 (( NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1 anning Commission i
14
15
16
17
18
19
2o I
A)That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the pub1 ic hearing, tt Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Declaratiot to Exhibits "ND", dated September 9, 1988, I'PII", dated September 1 "SCH" dated October 11, 1988, attached hereto and made a part he1
~ on the following findings:
Fi ndi nqs :
1. The initial study agreed to mitigation and State Clearinghc shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project significant impact on the environment if the mitigation is i
21 2. A significant portion of the site has been previously graded
22 an earlier environmental and coastal resource analysis.
23
24
3. The streets as improved by the project are adequate in sizs
28
//// 27
26
significantly impacted by this project if the agreed mi' 25
traffic generated by the proposed project.
4. There are no sensitive resources located onsite or located
imp1 emented.
-1 -
' II 0 Q
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5. Pursuant to Section 21081 -6 of Pub1 ic REsources Code, the appl ic submit a environmental mitigation reporting and monitoring pr
review and approval by the P1 anning Director prior to the is grading permits. The program shall show how all mitigation i in Exhibits "PII" dated 9-1-88 and "SCH" dated 10-11-88 will bc
and documented to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning I
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of February
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Hall, Commissioners: Schramm, Schlehuber, H Erwin, McFadden & Marcus.
NOES : None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN : None.
ATTEST :
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2811 -2-
II
3.
.i 0
2075 IAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859
0 Exhibit "ND"
(
Caitg af hrlsbab
PUNNING DEPARTMENT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: 27 Acres located at the nort corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION! A miyed use community shopping center includes 123,400 sq. ft. of commercial/office land use, a seat theater, a 58,000 sq. ft. public library and a 22,OO ft. branch post office.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review c above described project pursuant to the Guidelines Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Ac the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carl As a result of said review, a Negative Declaration (decla~ that the project will not have a significant impact 0: environment) is hereby issued for the subject prc Justification for this action is on file in the Plz Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documer on file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas I
Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public
invited - Please submit comments in writing to the P1; Department within ten (10) days of date of issuance. \
Planning Director
DATED : September 9, 1988
CASE NO: SDP 86-ll(A)/SUP 88-1/ HDP 88-10/CUP 88-14/ CUP 88-15/ZC 88-1/ LFMP 6(A), LCPA 88-2
APPLICANT: Carlsbad Retail Associates
PUBLISH DATE: September 9, 1988
'.
\ 0 0 L.AIII.-II& I
I ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NOs.SDP 86-ll(A),SU HDP 88-10, CUP 88-14 & 1
ZC 88-1, LFMP 6(A), LCPA
DATE : SePtember 1. 19
I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLICANT: Carlsbad Retail Associates
2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 1601 Dove St.. #24
Nemort Beach. CA 92660 (714) 552-6623
3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED:
11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written
under Section I11 - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation)
- YES MAY BE
1. Earth - Will the proposal
have significant results in:
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in changes in geologic
substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or overcovering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering of
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
*. 0 .-r
2. Air - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?
3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity' of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?
-2-
0
- YES MAY BE
X
X
*. a 0 .>
- YES MAYBE
4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of -plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals?
c.' Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels?
7. Liuht and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare?
8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area?
-3 -
I.
> a 0
9. Natural Resources .- Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset - Does the proposal
involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited
radiation) in the event of an accident
or upset conditions?
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
11. PoDulation - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing?
13. TransDortation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Generation of additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
c. Impact upon existing transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
- YES
~
~~
.- . - .. .
MAY BE
-4-
,. 0 0 ..
- YES
14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Enerav - Will the proposal have significant results in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?
-5-
MAY BE
X
X
,. .. 0 0
- YES MAY BE
18. Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive
public view?
19. Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Archeolosical/Historical/Paleontoloaical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building?
21. Analyze viable alternatives to the txoposed Droiect such as
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site des
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alte: nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative.
a) The project is phased to a degree. The post office
c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for th(
library, along with pads A and B will most likely be deve1( in phases.
b) The site design is an environmentally preferred variatiol alternative site designs that were analyzed beginning in 19
c) The scale of the project has been reduced from earlier desil The scale of the project is less than antici,pated by Carlsb, General Plan and Growth Management Program.
d) Alternative uses would be inconsistent with the General : and Local Coastal Program and less appropriate given adjal roadway classifications and topographic situation.
e) This would continue the environmentally detrimental erOSiOl the site.
f) A more environmentally preferred site is not available in vicinity.
g) See (e) above. This would reduce library and post of service to unacceptable levels.
-6-
e 0
- YES MAY BE
22. Mandatorv findinss of sisnificance -
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity
in the environment?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
IC. The project utilizes topography in site design. In addii
compliance with Carlsbad's Hillside Development Regula4 will assure changes to topographic features will
insignificant.
le. The project will remedy an existing soil erosion pro1 Further, the project incorporates erosion control landscaping and detention/desilitation basins.
If. The site has created siltation in a downst detention/siltation basin which drains into Batiquitos La! The project as proposed and condition will correct
existing siltation problem.
-7-
0 e ..
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
2a. The project, by providing an appropriate mix of land u encourages "one-stop" shopping thus potentially redu vehicle emissions. The project also proposes public private bus stop, and park and ride facilities to help re vehicle emissions.
3b. The project provides significant perimeter landscaping detention basins to moderate onsite runoff and absorp
rates, Offsite runoff may need more mitigation, A mitiga
condition is provided.
3e. The project will correct an existing erosion impact on sur waters of Batiquitos Lagoon. The project has the potentia
add urban runoff pollutants to Batiquitos Lagoon sur waters. A parking lot sweeping/cleaning program would miti this potential impact,
4a C c. The project by creating a llnaturalizedll landscaped corr
5a C c. on the western edge of the site will reconfigure insignificant disturbed biological habitats. A biolog survey has been conducted for the project site.
6. The project provides significant grade separation along
orientation and design of noise producing uses to miti
noise impacts.
7. The project topographic and site design reduces light and g impacts to surrounding areas. In addition, the prc proposes an extensive on and off site landscaping progra: further reduce light and glare. Signage lighting is intensity and generally of a low level.
8. The project will change the existing land use whick:
predominantly a barren graded area. Some disturbed nat
vegetation is also on the site. The project is consistent
land uses planned for the site and area,
10. The project's only potential for risk of upset could occur
the post 'office's gas tanks, The gas tanks will be insta and operated pursuant to all applicable safety standards. addition, the tanks are fenced-off from public contact.
13a. The project will generate additional vehicular movement. movement has been planned for by the City of Carlsbad's Gr Management Program, specifically, Local Facilities Managc Plan 6 (LFMP 6) . The project incorporates LFMP 6 circulz improvements along with bus and park and ride facilitie mitigate this planned 'for impact, A detailed traffic
potential impact and scope of mitigation incorporated intc pro j ect .
parking impact study has been prepared which outlines
-8-
0 0
. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
13b. The project meets the City of Carlsbad's minimum requirem for off-street parking. No parking impacts are anticipated
16d. Downstream sewer facilities may be impacted by the project
mitigation condition is provided.
16f. The project provides a recycling collection facility cansis with Agenda Bill 2020 and Carlsbad's Municipal Code 21.105.
18. The project's topographic, architectural and landscape design results in a sensitive aesthetic treatment of pu
view sheds. Several view corridors are provided by the
design.
20. As outlined in a Cultural Resources Study, the project has
potential to impact archaeological and paleontolog resources. A mitigation program is proposed that will re this potential to a level of insignificance.
IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant ef fec
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a signifil effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effl this case because the mitigation measures described on an atta sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative
Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on tl
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. is required.
7"- f38
Date
I /b& te
-9-
e 0
. V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable)
le All submittals to the City of Carlsbad to fulfill conditions of this mitigated Negative Declaration s
reference: a) the project file no. SDP ll(a); b) This Nega Declaration's State Clearinghouse No. and c) the spec mitigation number listed below.
Conditions
2. Prior to occupancy of the first structure within the projec parking lot sweeping and cleaning program that cleans site's pavement of urban runoff pollutants shall be submi to the Planning Director for review and approval.
3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant s submit a landscape plan to the Planning Director for review approval. The landscape plan shall incorporate l'coastal scrub'' type plant materials in the landscape palette along sites westerly slope. The intent of this planting is to de a corridor of Ifnaturalizedl1 bialagical habitat which aesthetically pleasing, controls soil erosion, and is nc fire hazard.
4. Prior to issuance of building permits a detailed lighting signage program shall be submitted to the Planning Director review and approval. The program shall minimize illumination to surrounding residential and adjacent roadwa
5. Prior to issuance of building permits for the commer portion of the project compliance with all public faci improvements required by the adopted Local Facili Management Plan for Zone 6 shall be shown to the satisfac of the Planning Director.
6. Archaeology -
a) The brushing and initial stages of grading shall be monitored by a SOPA certified archaeologist prepared to document and recover any significant archaeological material which might appear.
-10-
_. 0 0
MITIGA!f!ING MEASURES (Continued)
b) A SOPA certified archaeologist shall be retained by the applicant and be present at the pregrade conference and during grading activities. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the certified archaeologist shall prepare for review and approval by the Planning Director a research program that establishes procedures for archaeological resource
surveillance. The research program shall define, in
cooperation with the project developer and Carlsbad Planning Department, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of the artifacts as appropriate.
c) The project archaeologist and project developer shall
be responsible for all archaeological material
recovered during the project. All archaeological
material shall be described in a professional report which receives sufficient distribution to ensure its availability to future researchers. Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, a copy of this publication shall be submitted to the Carlsbad Planning Department for transmittal to the Carlsbad Historical Society.
d) The project archaeologist and project developer shall be responsible for all archaeological material recovered during the project to be donated to a local institution which has proper facilities for curation, display, and use by interest scholars and the general public.
7. Paleontology -
a) Prior to any grading at the project site, the project
developer shall be responsible for. a qualified paleontologist to be retained to perform a walkover survey of the ungraded portions of the site and to review the soil reports and City approved grading plans to determine of proposed grading and regrading of the site will impact undisturbed portions of the Santiago Formation.
b) The qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fossils present in the Santiago Formation, it may be necessary to collect large samples of matrix for laboratory processing through fine screens.
-11-
_. 0 0
MITIGATION MEASURES (Continued)
c) The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifacts.
d) The project developer and paleontologist shall be
responsible for all fossils collected to be donated to a public, non-profit institution with a research
interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Museum.
e) Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
8. Prior to issuance of building permits for this project downstream sewer trunk line shall be video inspected. Re] or reconstruction shall be completed prior to occupancy of portion of this project.
9. The developer shall construct detention basins concurrent * development to maintain the capacity of downstream drai: facilities per current City standards.
VI. APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING M AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
@/4s Date pL& k
ignakure
LBS : af
-12-
0 0
PLAZA PASEO REAL Revised Project Description
Plaza Paseo Real is a 27 acre master-planned mixed use cc including civic, retail and entertainment facilities. Lor at the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road, center will provide library, postal and retail services tc southern portion of the city.
Surroundinq Land Uses
The project site is bounded on the east by El Camino Real Westbluff Plaza. Northeast of the site across El Camino and north of existing Dove Lane are three condomi complexes: Paseo de la Costa, Westbluff Hills and West: North. South of the site, across Alga Road, between Manz, and Mimosa are the Seaport Villas condominiums. Sout Seaport Villas are the Seaport detached homes. Carlsbad RI
Associates (CRA) has met with residents from each of ' communities. A summary of these meetings is attache
Appendix A.
West of and above the project site is a proposed single fi residential project by Westana Development. The nort boundary of the project is defined by a curvilinear fl extension of Dove Lane east of El Camino Real which follol existing swale off to the northwest to tie into anc north-south collector in the Pacific Rim project near elementary school site. The property north of Dove Lar zoned for residential use.
Previous Amrovals/Existinq Conditions
The southern two-thirds of the site was graded in 1983-8
anticipation of a previously approved retail and reside] project. This previous approval included a 90,050 sq. retail center on 9.5 acres fronting El Camino Real ar condominium units on 7.25 acres behind the retail center. addition to grading both the retail and condo parcels, previous owner installed an access road and utility service: the residential development. Storm drains and inlet struc. were also installed to convey upstream drainage through site.
The northern third of the site has not been graded except the (installation of the storm drainage structures disc above. Extensive erosion is evident on this portion of the from runoff from El Camino Real and surrounding areas.
I.' e 0
-2-
Existincr and Proposed Zoninq/Proiect ApDrovals
The western portion of the site is designated RM (Medium Densi
Residential) on the General Plan and zoned RD-M (Residenti Density-Multiple Zone). A condominium tract map (CT 82-23) recorded on a portion of this area.
The eastern portion of the site is designated C (Communi
Commercial) on the General Plan and zoned C-2 (Q) (Gener Commercial, a Q suffix denoting special site plan review) .
site development plan (SDP 82-44) was previously approved f the neighborhood retail center discussed above.
The planned project includes a future post off ice branch and city library on the western portion of the site and a communi shopping center on the eastern portion of the site. The pa office and library uses are consistent with the General P1 designation of RM. A zone change is requested to R-P ( (Residential-Professional with Q suffix).
Per Chapter 21.18 of Zoning Code, the intent and purpose of t R-P zone is to:
(1) Provide areas for the development of certa low-intensity business and professional offices and related us
in locations in conjunction with or adjacent to residenti areas; and
(2) Provide transitional light traffic-generati
commercial areas between established residential areas a near-by commercial or industrial development. (Ord. 93 Section l(part) t 1974)
Libraries are specifically permitted in the zone (21.18.020(8
A post office branch appears to meet the intent t
21.18.020 (12) : I'Public buildings other than schools. 'I The suffix will insure that any other use subsequently proposed f this area would require discretionary approval by the Planni Commission.
Conditional use permits are also required for both the PO office and the library pursuant to Section 21.42.010(1) of t Zoning Code. The General Plan and Zoning Code designations the shopping center area are appropriate for the planned us An adjustment to the zone boundary is requested to provi, flexibility in site design for the market and the library.
(
e 0
-3-
A revised site development plan approval pursuant to the suffix is requested for the entire site. Detailed design fc the library and post office facilities may require subsequer minor adjustments to the approved master site plan.
The final approval requested is a tentative parcel map/minl
resubdivision to reparcelize the site into lots far the purpo of sale of the two parcels for the library and the post of fic
This map would supercede the previous final map (CT 83=22) the 7.26 acre site in the western portion of the project,
A scenic overlay along El Camino Real Corridor requires that t project comply with the policies and standards established the Scenic Corridor Development Guidelines (21.40). Exhibit provides a consistency analysis of the project with the standards and policies.
Proiect Desian
In response to the existing topography and preferred acc points from surrounding roads, the center has evolved intc two-tiered design. This two-tiered site design allows proposed project to respond to the site's natural topography that topography's relationship to the previously graded pa Buildings IlC" and "Dl' take a full grade-break allowing dir
access on two levels. These should be thought of as IIHillsi or at least site-sensitive architecture.
The lower level (at elevations from 162 - 166 msl) is acces
from Alga Road at Manzanita Street. This lower level I include a major grocery store anchor, a minor anchor (probab:
9 - 10,000 sq. ft. drug store), a family style restaurant approximately 8,000 sq. ft. and in-line retail sh accommodating a variety of smaller tenants. An outdoor plaz- the corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road provides acces: the bus shelter and a visual focal point for motorists 01 Camino Real and Alga Road.
The upper level (at elevations from 180-190 msl) is acm primarily from an extension of Dove Lane west of El Ca Real. Dove Lane, as it heads west from El Camino Real , has
realigned from previous design alignments to now turn and fc a small canyon to the north allowing it to swing up and ov ridge to the east without excessive hillside grading. The 1 level of the shopping center will include a movie theatre (4 screens/l, 500 seats), a drive-through restaurant, a sit. dinner house restaurant and in-line retail shops. restaurant and the shops facing north which are accessed the upper parking area are stacked above retail shops whit]
~.
0 0
-4-
accessed from the lower parking area9 The focus of t upperlevel of the center is an outdoor plaza with pub1
seating, areas for displays and special events and
architectural theme tower. This theme tower will not prov.
any habitable space pursuant to Section 21.46.020. This pli is connected to the lower level of the center by stairs and
elevator.
On the western portion of the upper level on a raised 1 (approximately 190 msl) , is the planned 58,000 sq. ft. south,
library. This facility has a separate employee and service a: which is accessed from Dove Lane. The visitor entry is loca off of a plaza and drop-off area oriented toward the theater El Camino Real.
The final component of the upper level is a future post off
branch of up to 22 , 000 sq. ft. This facility will have acc
from the internal loop road for lobby patrons and automok mail drop (snorkel lane) from Alga Road. Screened and secu
areas are located in the rear of the building.
Architecture
The architectural style of all structures is classi
mediterranean in keeping with the themes established by the
Costa Resort and the recently approved Pacific Rim project.
pedestrian arcade will be defined by true arches accented I metal canopies at key entries. Variegated terra-cotta and c: tile mansards interspersed with stucco parapets will cr
screens for roof equipment. All rooftop equipment wells vis from El Camino Real will be screened by louvers or trell matching the color scheme of the adjoining parapet or mansard
delivery vehicle parking, employee parking and truck load
I
The elevations for the library and post office are concept
It is anticipated that the City and U.S. Postal Service
each retain their own architects who will generally follow architectural style depicted in the conceptual elevations.
The two pad buildings will also be required to substantj
conform to the architecture of the other retail buildings will not exceed the maximum building heights shown for Buil
A. Trash enclosures will be finished in stucco to match
buildings and covered by wood framed trellises.
Landscape Architecture
The(.landscape plan responds to both the City street€
standards and the architectural design of the project. LC
plane trees are the dominant street tree along El Camino 1 Eucalyptus is also included to mirror the existing stands 01 east side of the street. The Alga Road streetscape is domil
0 0
-5-
by various types of pines with Chir pines in the median. pines in the median will be densely planted to screen headli
from the right in/right out Alga Road entry.
In order to provide increased landscaped screening and secu for the Seaport Villas units facing Alga Road, CRA has off to implement a landscape screening plan on the south sidt
Alga Road. The conceptual plan to be approved by the Sea
the common area between the rear fences and the stucco w Selected shrubs include sweet hakea, natal plum, silver b
and bougainvillea. In addition, clusters of street t: including Canary Island pines will be planted in the dirt s
agreed to maintain these plantings including the street trees
Entries to the project are denoted by clusters of queen p and mexican fan palms. The interior loop road is accentec colorful jacaradas. Plaza areas and key architectural cor are softened by special accent trees. Parking areas include a variety of trees in raised planter strips or boxes.
Villas Homeowners Association includes dense screening shrub
between the sidewalk and the curb, Seaport Villas HOA
The perimeter slopes on the western edge of the site wil: planted with drought tolerant trees and ground cover to re erosion.
Sisnase and Lishtinq
A comprehensive sign program with specific criteria regula the number, size, type and location of monument, ten directional and code required signs is included. The program criteria balance the need for tenant visibility with
desire to maintain architectural integrity and respond to objectives of the .scenic corridor policies of the LCP ordinance.
Lighting for parking areas and security will be controllec preclude spillage or glare from reaching sensitive receF (Seaport Villas, proposed single family detached homes above west of the site, and condominiums north and east acros! Camino Real).
Circulation/Sewice
Vehicular circulation within the center is facilitated by a drive which circles the entire project. Ample vehic stacking distance is provided at all entry points to pu streets. A reciprocal easement/ access agreement providing uses/owners use of the loop drive will be entered into bet the owners of the three parcels,
0 0
-6-
offsite circulation improvements will include: completing I frontage along El Camino Real; upgrading the intersection Dove Lane/El Camino Real to include full four way movemef including a northbound left turn pocket on El Camino Re?
removing the existing curb on the north side of Alga Road I dedicating and constructing a third westbound lane :
completing all frontage improvements: planting and irrigat the existing median in Alga Road; signalizing or bonding fo~ signal at Alga RoadlManzanita and the project entry; dedicat
and constructing Dove Lane from El Camino Real to the proj entry and from the project entry to the western edge of
library parcel dedicating the southern half right of way building the southern half section plus ten feet of paving the northern half section with a temporary asphalt cu upgrading the intersection of Alga Road/El Camino Real provide additional peak hour capacity as recommended in Linscott, Law & Greenspan traffic study.
Parking is provided in excess of code requirements and arrar for convenient access to the various uses. A reciprocal par? agreement will be entered into between the owners of the tl parcels to provide for shared use between the various pro: components as discussed in Project Operations below.
Pedestrian circulation is enhanced by covered acrades througl most of the project. Both upper and lower levels of the cen
core of the center can be accessed on faat without CrOSSi] parking area. Pedestrian connections between the central and ,the other buildings, including the library and post off are well defined by enriched paving and other features such trellis leading to the library entry. A bus shelter is loc adjacent to the restaurant pad (Pad A) on El Camino Real direction from North County Transit District staff.
Truck service is provided to all uses on site. The n grocery includes a screened truck well which can accommc three trailers at the dock as well as screened, off-st: waiting areas for at least two additional trucks., Both library and the post office have self contained service
loading areas which will be screened from surroun uses/streets. Most retail shops are front loaded due to 4 changes and locations along public streets. Loading zone: provided proximate to each group of line shops. Pad buil have their om loading zones. The internal circulation s
is designed to accommodate the appropriate sizes af trucks.
(’
e 0
-7-
Delivery frequencies will vary widely with the particular u
The major grocery will have the most frequent service inten
with UP to fifty trucks per week including all sizes rang from small bread trucks to tractor-trailers. The post off will be serviced from the downtown station. Two delivery tru will bring in presorted mail each day. Library service w include an occasional tractor-trailer with primarily smal trucks and vans. It is anticipated that inter-library sen
will occur on a daily basis. Among the remainder of the US the restaurants will have several deliveries each day. Serv to other retail uses will be substantially less frequent.
Trash pick-up from the major grocery and the restaurants will on a daily basis. All other uses will have weekly pick-up.
Development Phasinq
Initial construction activity will include removal of roads ,
utilities installed on the 7.26 acres in the western portion
the property and grading (or regrading) the entire 28 ac: including the alignment of Dove Lane to the western edge of - library site. Upon completion of grading, utilities i drainage and siltation control improvements will be installc Base and rough paving for the loop road will also be completed
Landscaping will be installed along all perimeter slopt setbacks, at project entries and along the interior loop ro; The .landscape screening for Seaport Villas will also installed at this time. Completion of this t8master1v s development phase is expected to take three to four months.
CRA will deliver finished pads, including any crib or retainj walls, to both the City and the U. S. Postal Service. Each 1
will be graded and unpaved with curb breaks a* designated poi1 from the interior loop road and Dove Lane. Utilities will stubbed out at a mutually agreed upon location. The timing construction of the library building, post office branch i related onsite improvements is at the discretion of the City 2
U.S. Postal Services, respectively.
Construction of all buildings in the shopping center wl commence at or near the end of the ltmasterll site developmt phase with the possible exception of Pad A and Pad B. The buildings may be built at a later time depending on leas3 negotiations with specific users. All offsite improvements wl be completed prior to occupancy of the shopping cente
/
0 0
-a-
Completion of the shopping center structures and onsite shop
center improvements and of fsite circulation improvement: expected to take nine to twelve months.
Project Operations
Most retail shops will be open from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. except the major grocery and the restaurants which may be open ea1 (if breakfast is served) and which will likely be open late the evening, No discos or nightclubs will be permitted. I
allowed as an ancillary part of a dinner house restaurant.
The theater will be open for typical show times incli weekend matinees. The library is expected to operate fr a.m. to 9 p.m. Monday through Thursday and from 9 a.m. to 5 Friday and Saturday. Peak hours for the theater are Frida! Saturday evenings while peak hours for the library are Mc through Thursday between 11 a.m. and 7 p.m. and Saturday be. noon and 3 p.m. This off peak relationship will ensure ample parking is available for both uses.
The post off ice counter is expected to operate from 9 : 30 a .I
5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Limited operation on Sat1 morning may also occur. No mail sorting is 'expected oca
this facility. Pre-sorted mail will be delivered from the station downtown and transferred to the carriers who will
and curb-side mail drop facilities are open at all hours.
The project will be managed by a professional property ma who will be responsible for maintenance, security operations.
live entertainment (piano, jazz, or chamber music) ma:
the site mid-morning and return by late afternoon. The
t
t""""
L.. . ...
,I
II '11 I1 I I 'I I .I' e I 1: :i I 1 7
If '11 ;; i ;I 11; I!$ 1 g t i - ! 5:;; ... -. ; .: fr i ir i dl 1:: I! i! fi i ;I llt ;I I 11 1,; it!;: . -.
1 I f ;;It: 1, 1: I;, li I Irj :Ill 1;ji g i ,i... .. 11 I ;;I llll \I!' I!! !! !I!! !! ili st 81 I! 1:: ;;
I \$I 11 I [I' 9 I I k,fr I1 lfl If !i: iill l1 1,liI li :fi;/ @ ; ;:I I!;;!, !) 111 li , I $1 11 f l:t I ti ;; 1. I I ,!I I i I./ -1 I I 1 iil.jl .sIi. it 1 I: il i I]; i! i f . . . . . . .
; 1 I 11::-I I !f
I
-4 - Y
'T.lL;x:x\,? z3@3dk5a?@-- -d!!lp\\ gqx,rylr,-, rJp;+r; rq->rfLi-5
f / L,:-i.,Q fl ' LTL! A : r' I c, : $$; t,$&z , >& q q 1-f $$-j :-$7, , , I ~- Y i / -.\q (Ly% /- 'f _I jf I
!I
""""_ -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-OFFICE OF THE GOVERhc.. e 0 GEORGE DEUK -
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
'1400 TENTH STREET
SAUIAMENTO, CA 95814
QT 4," L.,f j ;.:; . ., . I. . ..
Lance, Schul te
City of Carlsbad 2975 Las Palmas Drive
Carl sbad, CA 92009
.... _._
).' ,. I. , , ., Oc%ober 11,
Subject: Carlsbad Retail Associates - SCH# 88090714
Bar, Mr. Schul te:
The State Clearinghouse has submitted the above named proposed Negative Dec: to selected state agencies for review. The review period is now closeC
comments from the respnding agency(ies) is(are) enclosed. Sn the encloset of Completion form you will note that the Clearinghouse has checked khe that have commented. Please review the Notice of Completion to ensure t! comment package is complete. If the cment package is not in order, pleas
the State Clearinghouse imediately. ?emember to refer to the project's eig
State Clearinghouse number SG that we may respond promptly.
Please note that Section 21104 of the California Public Resources Code I
that:
''a responsiile agency or other pdblic agency shall only make substanti comments regarding those activities involved in a project which 2
within an area of expertise of the agency or which are required to
carried out or approved by the agency."
Commenting agencies are also required by this section to support their cm
specific documentation-
These eaxsnts ars fGiWZdSd for your use in adopting your Negative i&ciaral you need more informztion or clarification, we recommend that you cor
conrnenting agency at your earliest convenience.
This letter acknowldyes that you have cm?lisd Hith the State Clearinghcuz requirements for draft, environmental documents, pursuant to the Cal
Environmental Nzlity Act. Please contact Ksith Lee at 916/445-0613 if you
questions reqarding thz environmental revisw process.
Sincerelqr,
Fz-G- (J-" /
David C. Wnenkamp
Chief Office of Permit Assistance
Enclosures
cc: €&sources Zqency
.. I) .: L State" sf California e 0 The Reu
c" Memorandum
To * : 1. Projec'ts Coordinator Resources Agency
Date : October 4, 1
2. City of Carlsbad Planning Department 2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
kom : Department of Fish and (iame
Subject: Negative Declaration: Carlsbad Retail Associates, San Diego County - SCH 88090714
The Department biologist familiar with the project area has reviewed the Negative Declaration for Carlsbad Retail Associates, a proposed community shopping center at the northwest corner of El Camino Real and Alga Road in the City of Carlsbad. We recommend that the following mitigation measure be included to avoid short-term and long-term adverse . impacts to Batiquitos Lagoon:
"Detention/siltation basins created by the project shall be maintained as long as needed during construction and thereafter to prevent sediment transport into Batiquitos
Lagoon. Dekention/siltation basins shall contain 'grease catching' devices to prevent urban pollutants from entering the Lagoon."
Given inclusion of this additional mitigation measure, we find that a Negative Declaration of project impact would be appropriate. If the project proponent is unwilling to include this mitigation measure as an enforceable condition of certification of the Negative Declaration, then we find that the project has potential'to result in significant adverse environmental impacts and we would recommend the preparation of an EIR for the project in lieu of the Negative Declaration presently under consideration.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact Fred Worthley, Regional Manager of Region 5, at 330 Golden Shore, Suite 50, Long Beach, CA 90802 or by telephone at (213) 590-5113,
Q4.p*2?M Pete ontadelli Director
..
1. ‘. e 0
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUK
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION
915 CAPITOL MALL, ROOM 288
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
(916) 322-7791
September 29, 1988 Lq2 !” 1 ‘””” c.,; ij
Mr. Lance Schulte
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, California. 92009
re: SCH #88090714-Carlsbad Retail Associates
Dear Mr. Schulte:
Although a search of the sacred lands file maintained at this office
number of culturally sensitive areas within San Diego County, the
Native American Heritage Commission submits this letter of
response. The sacred lands file is comprised of site information
supplied by local Indians, tribal groups and elders and is separate
and apart from other collections and repositories of cultural
resource information or data. The information in the file is
classified and is employed in the review of environmental
documents..
The concern of the Native American Heritage Commission is in thosc
places where the prehistoric sites underlie areas which have been
previously developed and thought to be free of cultural resources.
Sites have been covered by natural causes, flooding would be one
example, over a period of centuries. The aiiuvial buiidup has provide
a buffer zone between the present surface and the prehistoric site.
Structures have been placed on some, the soil covering others has
been cultivated over many years. When an older structure is
replaced with a modern building, or an old underground water or
sewer line is upgraded to meet present needs is when the problem c
impacting such a location takes place. When a foundation is dug to
comply with the building codes and requirements of today, or utilit!
lines are buried to meet health and safety standards, previously
undisturbed soil becomes impacted.
In a situation, such as the proposed Carlsbad Retail Associates
Project, where certain portions of the property are undisturbed and
failed to disclose the presence of cultural resources, due to the higt-
, e 0 - II.
covered with heavy vegetation, a cursory archaeological study is
often not enough. There are roughly eleven thousand, (11 ,OOO),
known and recorded archaeological sites within San Diego County. I
has been estimated, based on recovered artifacts, that some of thesc
sites were occupied as far back as twenty thousand, (20,000), years
Previously undiscovered Native American sites are encountered
within that general region with a greater frequency than most other
parts of the state. The likelihood of discovering previously
undetected cultural resources is a possibility which should be fully
investigated and fully addressed in any environmental review or
study originating in that area.
The California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix K, deals with thc
discovery of archaeological sites and the procedures to follow. It
also contains the instructions to follow when human remains are
found during any phase of development.
The Native American Heritage Commission has prepared a pamphlet
for use by lead agencies, planners, developers and property owners.
It provides an easy-to-read breakdown of the California Codes
pertaining to Native American human remains and their disposition.
I have included a copy of this brochure for your use.
If you have any questions or if you need additional information,
please contact this office.
Sincerely, , . d&%pJ- William Ant Y o Joh on
Staff Analyst.
enclosure
I- ,. . '6 m vl
4 z 0 5P @ 8" lz PC 4
e8 ;&S Q2%! v& &@$a &$ 42$ gFgg
gk 9
WZZQ
FO4cn g4
0 wrd Coo" "'2 8.sq x
n2 0.- h0.G zm b %ql 8 ZU.@
0 -0 2 3 gg - '6 9
2
s
ZM
n W 0 Er:
[3 c
2 E
3
E
e
0
c;l 2
8
2 E
4
$2 'd 2%
wg k & cn .=
wag E% BW& ea: zq-
EC4m aL3
3 g
;Et;
& E
C n g
2 H
is
i% E
e, * *.= a g-z
YXe €3.2
VJ wz 55 t -e e B
a p.8 UOE
.e 3 of
wf
= .m VJ
-0rn
gw 2z.g mig
b.m h
UL'
32;
FE
E,g
.I 3:
g5
.- Z8 a
$5 n3
X8 oc
h cp
$$=EO s
of 0.43 s $mr$QB kg 85% 2 gE4gg *tSaaL I.& Lm6
g B w".-* u 0 88
c gEs a
goa v* M= a*: a gc 85 g
*U$ Ezc
ML -
0) 0.- w of *a E E'
VJhV
G a"
.- %
CI E 3% -3 &-z .- a \EX g
z *z 'E
0 8'8
gEo a€
GeV
n P
.- &",3 Y
EegS Q
E-5 f& "=&is
332ES$ 5 pg.5
&.s +*
cEef82 .- 8 ._ E.==% a= e32
p .P of.- Y
so% E hV cB%c
n U
2 E 8
c1 3
V w
cz; 3 % 2 c
cn g 2 0 cz; 0 V
E
5g
s2
Eg
uw 2g
Wc;l e*
ea
0
z*
E
?n
ZU a -hi:
JL u QEno E, zEtp 8L-88 p 2 ys 2.; 8UkgeE +&'x, e55 t 3 E 92Tg .
as 2; gsE
'c: 0 a- -1: L =& z pg ;1 E oy 683 a =Yl 0 of"" ht-4.S-UU M
h a
cn E
s
5 E
5 d b
0 V
V
cn E s 0
b h @
0 E
E
s $85
"E eggs:,
E3E:e
"2 8"
8% F.E 2 0, "Oeg8 !$%~*~ hs
WE$2&2 =soaea
-Y =*E 0 1
u mo g.3 2~ E
'FIE- EZP
z LCS n6
n 8
W c1 2 A, 3 E2
Z s W-4
i;iEEB
E0"pg
zz 8a
em=V us CJ
WEB 5
euaL w U:: k z Y
5
=A 8= -a
y E-13
a,
Y
0 E3 a.2
-e g g F? $ g 0 5 35.2 ;-:pa, -
EJSJ.= a a 0) 0 v a.2
c1 ouaz 5 c a c =.-
'-O.SgwEo vu a E Zw-u Eeu
w Q d ~.~.e E
2 E 2 L W
n
3 2.2s 9 m
$s?E$%gg-.wa3 s3 gg -sea>
Z'N3 gs €in3 3 ,s 9 u. 3 c) 3- $? 5- eB"Aa gg,J ,,,o,Wp15 3 6.S < " 3: ".g.&E.gs 5.3 moq m $ @gg l!g 83 E a@.! =e,.
3 ~oq Z;gwu ""o=":o"~.$ z5,s "*io" 2 0 80! 2 J gpgbss.g $;g&,gsggs 2 6-"Z:&3 zg -
0 * sgm -.2 .4 -&Qv g i.ppp"""3 EREs4 E ; oggg= Em- RE qs - K E58 zE..z.g; 2 E.Z= E ggz. t? B3.3 p, E%m3.z$R 0ms FJzg 01 5 E&@g,,P sL;e,gEv g 3.8" Egg" 2 @gJg 9;s g p@s ==,s E€ .B$ 8 OgLnS$ m=ow 2g.m 9sR mab,giz 0, j.gzg iP0'ibE"Pa a 3% 8" 2 g 8L-N
c~ND3a= oq (D gpS$.3:~ B t&i$ pz e "ksm
5 3 ag ~ E.=g 6:s 5- s E.,8%3 $9 R' gma e: ZA~G $'$.;
$@&$BUg@R i qgEg Eg ""58 gpgq ,g.g,J 8GEZ 5 2 i E:'gs E,' e: 0 os0 3g.p LO 2..2 Ei ~ gag Ra3 go.c"&P;gs: z m s&s E." sq 36 3g. !33 2s zg fl gg;; 3= a,o
9.0 -sin " ~n ms.gg g5 Fig 5on 8pBo" $ED.$ dP zseg5 g; D' 9 2. gz i;. QJpo 53 $2 - -g Q QO9S 2%
8 3 8' !5 $3 3l nags a!. P k
gg@S rn 8 um < v)Qp.v. p
009g nuw o IC0
sag ;.p3u mu. i; a *d
z5xg REO
EKng E.?
42 \D=v g
85 " z B
m"Gg3g ogoz
1o 8s 5.g s$ gm g
Sam' mE n= 9ZK:;E wm v, 2.
$
v)
F=s8
9.a 9 5.g " s.ggg a-3 ua = g5.f 3 ng.
. os 9,
$spa " s c! 3 8 WW g2&q'g$ E$3e.&g.e, $2 $.E...=Q?5 &@$$.: g.3 $8 pa" 3.4 sE%$a m 0 k. 5s go" 58 0" m"BSe552vl
3 gaa p: gp35 Q 5 &:Q8g.~"y~Wg g $ Es 0 /gg,R 8..gg g E. $ 5 5' hg2p &-g5gE !g op &. ;38.g $?gg a,ssgpoa g333 us E, WL gg 1o ~-"pgwc P1&E Ei gpP* oa g@*3b =.x fqa gg s ij. W g.g5.a g Q.g$gg asgg: E: k:ys.g ggg s 0; %ma% sgEg.g
&,gg =" E43 -2 g.$g:"g g g g gig$@ %.g ET cp ge 5 0 e." v1 -
5.50 Q qgqg - 3.g is3 g ' %:~303 =I-3 3 g5 z$~.~'$g~~03~3 0 g to g".'i=sgg; z 3 a2
2g w E 3s %@g+2 !p;$g g 2 gipg E?. 3. 6' P.gingg-gS"" 5,=.-las0< $,ad B 352 9 8.W 6;' E a g. t?.W 5 " 3 2.E: 2 3&=. 2 2 ,z,ssgg sg"8Zlz'gg.Y "3 g.gg; gEsg a 8 s E'gg Fig, Bgggg 5 g ggp
4. 0 02 "8 gg m" g 2,s
~~ ge2.a g 5 a" bey2 3 Fa3 e. " $B%p ssg dB;$;@sqo5.8 zg.BO9" r? gF$$ 2! 0.3 g s. w 3 c. E."W ;gza.. 2 z g g Ei, gs g 8 g. .$g 3 g*" g -r: 0 %g $gs.%Ss 6 o"m 3 E$Pp 2.pv E3 ~.3"-cp~ = gg 63 i f%$ gnE E.e g
in =B 5g $ gse2 88 5 O<"O =.in J gggQ@2 ""q8 %8S I. f$?
" - 3 sa r.0
2. a- 0
bjps 8 g 4'
gs
L - Y
ZfO $3 g.g gS"g$p E$Qzg 8 g E.gg esz u mwo 53 2.g 0 E, 2.0 g.: zg -.3in3~q~@g~~a~~~~.pw- -3s 83 B% &.82-ZE:j$~,,~ @"s.$.;&gm ,"Qin-$.2~ gg a isgagP E gz B$gg%p& 23 " E8 --qg.gEs4ggw B 3 2 3.g3.g 5.9 e, E< $E =
q:g6h"zj-=gp Ei. g "S5-p4-ggqqj fig
LR. f!ag,go" 3 !"P;lgsin %ea,. 8 3 kU.g 5.j.Q.3 g @.$g g in g g.8 t 3a.s -3;aagj. g.g.gp ; gsg 2g-o - %&f;Zrn 6 5 oc g3.g 8 dQWP6.
c " =.'E 8.FO.S s 63 29E 0 0 3.~ng~~~s.~.~E 3s gsp 5 segu.g ?Egg 8 E;' g g; p ~="4p,e-SPgnzC&& E.P%" J g g p339,gsg 3 = 5 'J ,"s.gPEga Be cI gj ssga S.8 3 !?"US. g$2gg6 s.8 8,, ,in u.3 g.g.3 J" 3 3 v) 0 s i! E= =E. =
;&gyg3g@ p.¶ 3c0 2-e Q.sjwhEij ggmin&gc)I.3J i;' ""ES@g-,E. <=g.s"*8z"g. . go 33g .-g$geg$ gZq"in=3h gg 5'g &Q nii9E. ins &?:e ".e3 @ qg "sg.g
EP zgjgoe,
ZSbB
mg 3 9 a 2.32 [iz.m sg,- 2 0 agqgg gg. ta s8i;FSin
o~=ogo,3s.gz 3, E 4
Egg8 g.
'DE gap "e, W g
1
i i
i 1
: 1
i
i
i i
1
i
I
1 I
I
1 I " 1 i
/I
I I
Eiga""e
gs,3;p 2.- e! ZY y 8 sg g.23 gB g E.-
2 $$.& gp gg gg.2 0
u"Q CD 5.2 EJ- g : B E. 1.g 8.58 -
oms 3 f q g
t;.g >" 3 <Is
2 E;' g 3.
52. 5' 3 Q 2qgg.s
-m 0'5
-eo-wo- 2.n; g ,a - gza
.g zg QQg;
a gWq@g;;
gm.8 Fg;zg S.S -0"
EE.SS'"Z€
Y 0.8 2 5.3 g b' 0' S.$-gE --g $5
a 92.0 gp, gggp E$ 3 E'S8 @ & 8 z. g 5% "89 €5 5.9ff g qg g53.g 0 $0 E
gg!$p.s3 in f.q
u 30 9% 233 8.B g g. p- $ I,7 (.e
E@ E 3 B $=-- !4?8>S
53s B+% % r': 2 3 m 2.3
:as w$$.a
PO g E..E ab 2 = mS@ 2 G: gaF23.R B BmnE=& Q EB s E.
Qss-0 gqgg
8 g2.g &
-v) E2fg"a =-3 "gqp E.
g
g B q.$i u =%
e 8 E?:
09 gg fp
gpgi
i! Eg:
F2ps s
.. z 5g-E sg ij.e
>"e \o
0 &St Pb
-
Fnr., tu
E?.eo f
qu q
E' E. g 5. SSQWZ
80 58 g-0%
c PF
283
" ET A'
VJ c
4 2
h c,
P
e 2
P
3
G
v: E z
4
v)
L 5 x
i 1 -.
'1
I 1;
j i
._. .- 8 0 Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 .enth Street, Rm. 121, Sacramento, CA 95814 -- 916/445-0613
I
NOTICE OF COHPLETIOW AND EWVIRONMEWTAL DOCUHEWT FORH I See NOTE Be I SCW #
I
1. Project Title Carlsbad Retail Associates
2. Lead Agency: City of Carlsbad 3. Contact Person: Lance Schulte
3a. Street Address: 2075 Las Palmas Drive 3b. City: Carlsbad
3c. County: San Dieso 3d. Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: 619-438-1161
PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: San Dieso 4a. City/Community: Car lsbad
4b.(optional) Assessor's Parcel No. 4c. Section: Twp. Range
5a. Cross Streets: El Camino Real & Alga Rd. 5b. Nearest Community:
6. Within 2 miles of: a. State Hwy No. b. Airports Palomar c. Waterways
7. DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE
For Rural,
CEQA
01 - NOP
02 - Early Cons
03 X Neg Dec
05 __ Supplement/
(if so, prior SCH #
-
04 - Draft EIR
Subsequent EIR
1
NEPA -
06 - Notice of Intent
07 - Envir. Assessment/
FONSI
08 - Draft EIS
OTHER
09 - Information Only
10 - F i na 1 Document
11 - Other:
01 - General Plan Update 01 - Residential: Units - Acres
02 - New Element 02 - Office: Sq. Ft.
03 _. General Plan Amendment Acres Employees -
04 - Master Plan 03 -x- Shopping/Commercial: Sq.Ft. -
05 - Annexation Acres 19 Employees N/
06 - Specific Plan 04 - Industrial: Sq. Ft.
07 __ Redevelopment Acres Employees
08 X Rezone 05 - Sewer: MGD
09 X Land Division 06 - Water: MGD
(Subdivision, Parcel Map.
Tract Map, etc.) 07 - Transportation: Type
10 X Use Permit 08 - Mineral Extraction: Mineral -
11 - Cancel Ag Preserve 09 - Power Generation: Wattage -
12 X Other Site Plan Type:
10 X Other: Gov. - Post Offices &
9 TOTAL ACRES: 27
11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUMENT
01 X Aesthetic/Visual 08 __ Geologic/Seismic 15 - Sewer Capacity 22 - Uatel
02 - Agricultural Land 09 - Jobs/Housing Balance 16 - Soil Erosion 23 - Wet 1:
03 X Air Quality 10 - Minerals 17 - Solid Waste 24 - Ui ldl
04 X Archaeological/Historical/ 11 - Noise 18 - Toxic/Hazardous 25 - Grow'
Paleontological 12 X Public Services 19 X Traffic/Circulation 26 - I ncol
05 X Coastal 13 - Schools 20 - Vegetation 27 - Cumu
Othe
07 -x- Flooding/Drainage
06 - Fire Hazard 14 - Septic Systems 21 -X- Water Quality 28 -
12 FUNDING (approx.) Federal S State S Total S
13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: Present land uses - vacant disturbed and undisturbed land. Present
commercial and multiple density residential.
14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A mixed use commercial shopping center which includes 123,400 sq. ft. of co
land use, a 1,500 sq. ft. theater, a 50,000 s a 22,000 sq. ft. branch post
detailed project description and site plan att
15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: Date: d-6- 02
- NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identificati ojects If a SCH Number alread