HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-08-02; Planning Commission; Resolution 29011
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2901
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSE CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ALL SIX SEGMENTS OF THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COA!
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN TO PROHIBIT ON-SHORE OIL AND GAS SUPPORT FACILITIES.
CASE NO.: LCPA 89-1
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coas
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal
conformance;
WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the LOC
Plan has been filed with the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for
as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 2nd day of August,
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider th
Local Coastal P1 an Amendments shown on Exhibi t(s) "A" through "F",
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be t
Commission considered all factors re1 ating to the Local Coastal Plan
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week put
period for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1 anning Commis
City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That the State mandated six week review period, was provide on May 24, 1989, and ending on July 5, 1989 and, staff has f the Planning Commission a summary of the comments received.
C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hc Commission recommends APPROVAL of LCPA 89-1 as shown on E through 'IF", dated August 2, 1989, attached hereto and made a based on the following findings:
I1 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Findinqs:
1. The proposed Local Coastal P1 an Amendment is consistent with pa the Coastal Act in regard to protecting the environment from si adverse impacts.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 2nd day of August, 19t
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chai rman Hal 1, Commi ssi oners: Schl ehuber, Schramm, McFadden, Holmes & Marcus.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
MATTHEW HALL, Chai rman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
l3 (( ATTEST:
14
15
16 P1 anni ng Director
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 2901 -2-
a 0 EXHIBIT "A"
DATED AUGUST 2,
MELLO I SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
SECTION ACT I ON
2. Standard Pacific (p. 3)
3. Uccidential Land, Inc, (p, 8)
Add Pol icy 6: Ons Oil and Gas Suppor Facilities.
Add Policy 5; Ons
Oil and Gas Suppor Facilities.
4. Rancho La Costa (Hunt Properties) (p. 18) Add Pol icy 7: On5
Oil and Gas Suppor Facilities.
Proposed Policy: ON-SHORE OIL AND GAS SUPPORT FACILITIES
Since the location and maintenance of on-shore oil and gas support facil including, but not limited to, processing plants, refineries, storage facili transfer stations, pipelines, warehouses, offices, tanker facilities, helicl pads and other support facilit4es present adverse environmental impacts 1 may include catastrophic environmental damage to the marine ecosystem Carlsbad's coastline and such further adverse environmental impacts as incr
adverse impacts, such on-shore facilities are prohibited except upon a fi by the City' Council that all of the following are true:
air pollution, water pollution, noise, traffic, visual, scenic and aest
(a) Approval of the proposed project and faci 1 i ti es will pose no c to life and property to residents of the neighborhood, communi City.
(b) Approval of the proposed project will not pose a potenti a1 1 of damage or injuries to nearby residents.
(c) The benefits of the proposed project clearly outweigh the PO adverse environmental effects.
(d) There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed project.
(e) The location and approval of the on-shore facilities a particular location clearly outweigh any potential harm to
persons residing or working in the neighborhood or community an not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighbo community or to the general welfare of the City, and
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfi
(f) The proposed project is permitted within the underlying zonc
0 @EXHIBIT "B"
DATED AUGUST 2, l!
MELLO I1 SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
SECTION ACTION
9. Exhibits
Create new Section 9
Change to Section Exhibits.
Title new Section
Onshore Oil and G Sutwort Facilitie
and establ ish
Pol icy 9-1.
Proposed Policy 9-1 ONSHORE OIL AND GAS SUPPORT FACILITIES PROHIBITED
Since the location and maintenance of on-shore oil and gas support facil.
including, but not limited to, processing plants, refineries, storage facili.
transfer stations, pipelines, warehouses, offices, tanker facilities, helicc pads and other support facil ities present adverse environmental impacts 1
may include catastrophic environmental damage to the marine ecosystem
Carlsbad's coastline and such further adverse environmental impacts as incrl
air pollution, water pollution, noise, traffic, visual, scenic and aestl adverse impacts, such on-shore facilities are prohibited except upon a fi~
by the City Council that all of the following are true:
(a) Approval of the proposed project and facilities will pose no d to life and property to residents of the neighborhood, communi
City.
(b) Approval of the proposed project will not pose a potenti a1 t
of damage or injuries to nearby residents.
(c) The benefits of the proposed project clearly outweigh the PO:
adverse environmental effects.
(d) There are no feasible a1 ternatives to the proposed project.
(e) The location and approval of the on-shore facilities a
particular location clearly outweigh any potential harm to 1
health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfa persons residing or working in the neighborhood or community an
not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighbo
community or to the general welfare of the City, and
(f) The proposed project is permitted within the underlying zone
e EXHIBIT "C"
DATED AUGUST 2,
AGUA HEDIONDA SEGMENT OF THE
LOCAL COASTAL PLAN
SECTION ACT ION
111. Land Use Plan, Section 1. (p. 17) Add policy 1.11
Policy 1.11
Since the location and maintenance of on-shore oil and gas support facil- including, but not limited to, processing plants, refineries, storage facilil
pads and other support facilities present adverse environmental impacts may include catastrophic environmental damage to the marine ecosystem Carlsbad's coastline and such further adverse environmental impacts as incr air pollution, water pollution, noise, traffic, visual, scenic and aest adverse impacts, such on-shore facilities are prohibited except upon a fi by the City Council that all of the following are true:
transfer stations, pipe1 ines, warehouses, offices, tanker facilities, helicc
(a) Approval of the proposed project and facilities will pose no d to life and property to residents of the neighborhood, communi City.
(b) Approval of the proposed project will not pose a potential t of damage or injuries to nearby residents.
(c) The benefits of the proposed project clearly outweigh the por
(d) There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed project,
adverse environmental effects.
(e) The location and approval of the on-shore facilities a. particular location clearly outweigh any potential harm to I health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfa persons residing or working in the neighborhood or community an not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighbo community or to the general we1 fare of the City, and
(f) The proposed project is permitted within the underly.ing zone
m 0 EXHIBIT "D"
DATED AUGUST 2,
i
EAST BATIQUITOS LAGOON/HUNT PROPERTIES
SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
SECTION ACTION
a. Land Uses Permitted Pursuant to a
Master P1 an (Page 1) Add the proposed an ment 1 i sted below 'F
reads "Speci f i call3
the uses shall be E foll ows: II
to the sentence whi
ProDosed Amendment:
Since the location and maintenance of on-shore oil and gas support facil including, but not limited to, processing plants, refineries, storage facili transfer stations, pipelines, warehouses, offices, tanker facilities, helic pads and other support facilities present adverse environmental impacts may include catastrophic environmental damage to the marine ecosystem Carlsbad's coastline and such further adverse environmental impacts as incr air pollution, water pollution, noise, traffic, visual, scenic and aest adverse impacts, such on-shore facilities are prohibited except upon a fi by the City Council that all of the following are true:
(a) Approval of the proposed project and facilities will pose no c to life and property to residents of the neighborhood, commun. City.
(b) Approval of the proposed project will not pose a potential 1 of damage or injuries to nearby residents.
(c) The benefits of the proposed project clearly outweigh.the por adverse environmental effects.
(d) There are no feasible a1 ternatives to the proposed project.
(e) The location and approval of the on-shore facilities a particular location clearly outweigh any potential harm to health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general we1 fz persons residing or working in the neighborhood or community an not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighbo
community or to the general welfare of the City, and
(f) The proposed project is permitted within the underlying zonc
.L m * EXHIBIT “E“ DATED -AUGUST 2, :
WEST BATIQUITOS LAGOON/SAMMIS PROPERTIES
SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
SECTION ACT I ON
Land Use (p. 5) Add Section R. Onshore Oil and G support facilitie
Proposed Section R. Onshore Oil and Gas SuDDort Facilities
Since the location and maintenance of on-shore oil and gas support facil. including, but not limited to, processing plants, refineries, storage facilii transfer stations, pipelines, warehouses, offices, tanker facilities, he1 icc pads and other support facilities present adverse environmental impacts \ may include catastrophic environmental damage to the marine ecosystem i Carlsbad‘s coastline and such further adverse environmental impacts as incrl air pollution, water pollution, noise, traffic, visual, scenic and aestl adverse impacts, such on-shore facilities are prohibited except upon a fil by the City Council that a1 1 of the following are true:
(a) Approval of the proposed project and facilities will pose no d to life and property to residents of the neighborhood, communi City.
(b) Approval of the proposed project will not pose a potential t of damage or injuries to nearby residents.
(c) The benefits of the proposed project clearly outweigh the pos adverse environmental effects.
(d) There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed project.
(e) The location and approval of the on-shore facilities a’ particular location clearly outweigh any potential harm to I health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfa persons residing or working in the neighborhood or community an
community or to the general welfare of the City, and
not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighbol
(f) The proposed project is permitted within the underlying zone
*b a EXHIBIT 'IF"
DATED AUGUST 2, 1
THE VILLAGE DESIGN MANUAL (REDEVELOPMENT AREA)
SEGMENT OF THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
SECTION ACT I ON
V. Design Guidelines for the Village
Redevelopment Area (p. 3) Add a new paragra foll owing paragra three. Onshore o and gas support facilities prohi bi ted.
Since the location and maintenance of on-shore oil and gas support facili including, but not limited to, processing plants, refineries, storage facilit
pads and other support facilities present adverse environmental impacts P may include catastrophic environmental damage to the marine ecosystem ; Carlsbad's coastline and such further adverse environmental impacts as incrl air pollution, water pollution, noise, traffic, visual, scenic and aestl adverse impacts, such on-shore facilities are prohibited except upon a fil by the City Council that all of the following are true:
transfer stations, pipe1 ines, warehouses, offices, tanker facilities, he1 icc
(a) Approval of the proposed project and facil i ties wi 11 pose no d to life and property to residents of the neighborhood, communi City.
(b) Approval of the proposed project wi 11 not pose a potenti a1 t of damage or injuries to nearby residents.
(c) The benefits of the proposed project clearly outweigh the pos
(d) There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed project.
(e) The location and approval of the on-shore facilities a particular location clearly outweigh any potential harm to I health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, and general welfa persons residing or working in the neighborhood or community an not be detrimental or injurious to property in the neighbo, community or to the general welfare of the City, and
adverse environmental effects.
(f) The proposed project is permitted within the underlying zone