HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-09-20; Planning Commission; Resolution 2913'L. 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2913
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSB! CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW REDUCED FRONT, REAR 1 SIDE YARD SETBACKS FOR A FOUR GUEST ROOM ADDITION TO AN EXIST THREE ROOM BED AND BREAKFAST INN GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NO1 SIDE OF WALNUT AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 60 FEET EAST OF LINCOLN STRE' APPLICANT: HALE CASE NO. : V 89-3
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
All that portion of Tract 219 of Thum Lands, in the City
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according Map thereof No. 1681, filed in the office of the County Recor of San Diego County, December 9, 1915, described as follows: The northeasterly 50.0 feet of the southwesterly 170.0 feet therefrom the northwesterly 100.0 feet thereof.
has been filed with the City of Carl sbad, and referred to the
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as p'
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of Septen
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to con
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consi
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be t
Commission considered all factors relating to V 89-3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commis
City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the pub1 ic h€ Commission APPROVES V 89-3, based on the following findings and SUI following conditions:
Findinqs:
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or applicable to the property or intended use that do not app' to the other property in the same vicinity and zone because
.14 ll 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
will combine two adjacent parcels and incorporate the primal structures on each into the finished operation. By con parcels, the width of the project site increases and pursi zoning ordinance the required side and rear yard setbacks a1 since they are a function of lot width. The existing strut utilized on the eastern portion of the site presently does n required front yard setback, therefore the variance is nt modify the structure. The project has a residential scal appear less dominant than many of the high density apartment the neighborhood.
2. Such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjo substantial property right possessed by other property i vicinity and zone because without the setback variances tl
removed or substantially a1 tered while there are numerot throughout the neighborhood of projects whose setbacks d current standards as close as immediately across the street. and neighborhood impact of the project as designed, whic existing structures on the site, would not be substantiall, than it exists now.
structures, one of which is less than three years old, would
3. The granting of such variance will not be materially detrime public welfare or injurious to the property or improveme vicinity and zone in which the property is 1 ocated becausc requirements have been met including parking, building heig coverage in addition to screening of adjacent properties to east and west.
4. The granting of such variance will not adversely affect the co plan as it will a1 low the remodel ing of existing structur combination of parcels resulting in a total lot area of .253 will not preclude the implementation of general plan goals-
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for V 89-3, as shown on Exhibit "A", date( 1989, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwi these conditions.
2. Approval of this variance is contingent upon approval of CUF conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution Ne hereby incorporated into this Resolution. ....
....
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 2913 -2-
/I * e
// PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of thc 1
2
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20
September, 1989, by the following vote, to wit:
3
4
5
6
7
8
AYES : Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Marcus & McFadden.
NOES: Commissioners : Erwin & Holmes.
ABSENT: Commissioners : Schlehuber E Schramm.
ABSTAIN : None.
MATTHEW HALL, Chairman
9 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
10
11
12
ATTEST :
13 PLANNING DIRECTOR
14 11 15
16
17
I* II 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 2913 -3-