HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989-09-20; Planning Commission; Resolution 2915- I z
1
2
3
4
5
6
'1
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
3.7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2915
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBP CALIFORNIA, DENYING TWO VARIANCES WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE -
INTO THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCA AT 3571 DONNA DRIVE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA. APPLICANT: FOLSOM
REQUIREMENT FOR A TWO-CAR GARAGE, AND ALLOW A STRUCTURAL INTRUS:
CASE NO. : V 89-2
WHEREAS, a verified appl ication for certain property, to wit:
Lot 11 of Village Home in the City of Carlsbad according to #4165 fjl ed in the office of the County Recorder of Sari Di County.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, and referred to the
Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as p)
Title 21 of the Carl sbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of Septerr
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to con:
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and consic
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be h
Commission considered all factors relating to V 89-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commis!
City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public he Commission APPROVES Resolution No. 2915 DENYING V 89-2, based on th findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinqs:
1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances ap
vicinity and zone since the subject property is similar in sh
to other developed properties in the vicinity and is not top( constrained.
this property that do not apply generally to other property
.a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1.0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a e
2. The variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjc substantial property right possessed by other properties in thl but which is denied to the property in question since, the 1( sufficient areas that are level and buildable and pl acemc existing dwelling unit does not preclude expansion of the re
3. The granting of this variance could be materially detriment; properties in the vicinity in which the property is located '
carport is visible from the public right-of-way and adjoining
for such a variance rather than design their projects to CI City standards and ordinance requirements.
and approval of this variance could encourage other properti
4. The granting of this variance could adversely affect the co General Plan by creating incompatibility within the R- permitting intrusions into the required front yard setbacks.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of tl
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2
September, 1989, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES : Chairman Hall, Commissioners: Marcus, Holmes, Er
NOES: None. McFadden.
ABSENT: Commissioners: Schlehuber E Schramm.
ABSTAIN : None.
MATTHEW HALL, Chairman CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 2915 -2-