The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-01-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 2965I1 m 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2965 qA La, LC, ! - ., c A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF E DECLARATION FOR A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, SPECIAL USE PERMIT, AND STANDARDS VARIANCE TO DEVELOP A 42 UNIT CONDOMINIUM ON 7.8 ACRES OF LAND IN p...>+* A2 -/!&L4t 0 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE qzi i 4 2 4 5 THE PC ZONE. CASE NO.! CT 89-13/PUD 89-5/SUP 89-7/SV 89-3 CASE NAME: THE HAMPTONS 6 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to con 7 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day 0' request, and a 9 WHEREAS, at said pub1 ic hearing, upon hearing and consi, 10 13 Commission considered all factors relating to the Negative Declarat 12 submitted by staff, and considering any written comments received, th 11 testimony and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Corn 14 fol 1 OWS: 15 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, th Commission hereby APPROVES the Conditional Negative Decl aratior to Exhibit I'ND", dated November 15, 1989, and I'PII", dated 0 1989, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program outlined in Apl attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the followin and subject to the following condition: Fi ndi nqs : 1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidenc project may have a significant impact on the environment pro mitigating conditions of approval are complied with. 2. The site has been previously graded. 3. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic general proposed project. 4. There are not known sensitive resources located onsite or loc to be significantly impacted by this project. .... I II II e 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Condi ti on 1. A monitor shall be required onsite during all grading activity have the authority to halt operations should any evidence be 1 would indicate that an archeological resource may be present implemented to determine the extent of resources and eva significance of the deposit in accordance with the Californ Resources Code, the environmental guidelines applicable to th Carlsbad, and Appendix K of the California Environmental Qual ii event that resources are found, a subsurface testing program PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of thc Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17, January, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES : Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehubl Hal 1 , McFadden, Holmes & Marcus. NOES : None. ABSENT! None. ABSTA I N : None. %.. " ~ - ..,_ .. -".*_"_ ," ". .," ' " CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSI ATTEST: /['p ; y ",:! .I ;A j\ { 1 f ,^ , ,," ~ 7 ,. -. ~~~~~L~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~ {., ;&;ir*!d,:pp ,' Y : P !{.- 2 ,,* MICHAEL J. HO-LZMILLE@ PLANNING DIRECTOR -. PC RES0 NO. 2965 -2- 0 Exhibit IIND" CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: Southeast corner of Marina Drive and Park Driv PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The development of 42 condominium units on 7.8 acr land located south of Park Drive and east of Marina Drive in the PC Zone. 207-101-01 The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above desc project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the Calif Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of thc of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, a Conditional Negative Declar (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact o environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification foi action i s on fi 1 e in the P1 anni ng Department. A copy of the Conditional Negative Declaration with supportive documents file in the Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, Cali1 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in w1 to the Planning Department within thirty (30) days of date of issuance. DATED: NOVEMBER 15, 1989 CASE NO: CT 89-13/PUD 89-5 P1 anni ng Director APPLICANT: H. R. REMINGTON PROPERTIES PUBLISH DATE: NOVEMBER 15, '1989 CW: af 2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad. California 92009-4859 - (619) 43 - , -. , I - - . .-, .__ "._ NOTICE c! OOWPLETIOY - EWIROWWENTAL WaZENT F *- 1 sa#- See NOTE Be , 1. Project Title The Hmtons (CT 89-13/PUD 89-51 2. Lead Agency: Citv of Carlsbid 3. Contact Person: Christer westman 3a. Street Address: 207'5 Las Palms Dr. 3b. City: Carlsbad 3c. County: San ~iebo 3d. Zip: 92009 3e. Phone: (619) 438-1161 PROJECT LOCATION 4. County: San Di-0 4a. City/Curmunity: Carlsbad 4b.(optional) Assessor8s Parcel No. 207-101-01 4c. Railways: ATgSF Schools Kelly Elerr 5a. Cross streets: Park Drive/Marina Drive 5b. Nearest Ccmnnity: Carlsbad 6. Uithin 2 miles of: a. State Huy Ma. 5 b. Airports e. Uateruays Asua Hedianda Lasoc 7. DOCUMENT TYPE 8. LOCAL ACTION TYPE . 10. DEVELOPMENT TYPE - CEQA 01 - General Plan Update 01 X Residential: Units 42 Acre 01 - NOP 02 - New Element 02 - Office: Sq. Ft. 02 - Early Cons 03 - General Plan Amendrent Acres Errployees . 03 X Neg Oec 06 - Master Plan 03 - ShoFging/Comnercial: Sq. Ft. 04 - Draft EIR 05 - Annexation Acres Enp L oyees 05 - Supplement/ 06 - Specific Plan 04 - Industrial: Sq. Ft. (if so, prior SCH # 07 - Redevelopnent Acres Enployees Subsequent EIR 1 08 - Rezone 05 - Sewer: MGD NEPA 09 -X- Land Division 06 - Uater: MGD (SuWivision, Parcel Map. 06 - Notice of Intent Tract Map, etc.) 07 - Transportation: Type 07 - Envir. Assessment/ 10 - Use Permit 08 - Mineral Extraction: Mineral FONSI 08 - Draft EIS 11 - Cancel Ag Preserve 09 - Pouer Generation: Wattage OTHER - 12 X Other Pled Unit Typc: 09 - Information Only Developnent 10 - Other: 10 - Final DOcunent 9 TOTAL ACRES: 11 - Other: 11. PROJECT ISSUES DISCUSSED IN DOCUIIENT 01 - Aesthetic/Viswl 08 - Gcalogic/Seismic 15 - Sewer Capacity 22 - Uater S 02 - Agricultural Land 09 - Jobs/Housing Balance 16 - Soil Erosion 23 X Vet 1 ant 03 - Air Quality 10 - Minerals 17 - Solid Uaste 24 - Uildlii 04 X Archaeological/Historical/ 11 - Noise 18 - Toxic/Hazardow 25 - Growth Paleontological 12 - Pubtic Services 19 - Traffic/Circulation 26 - Incompr 05 X Coastal 13 - Schools 20 - Vegetation 27 - Cunulal 06 - Fire Hazard 14 - Septic System 21 - Uater Quality 28 - Other 07 X Flooding/Drainage 12 FUNDING (approx.) Federal S State S Total S 13 PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING: VACANT/PLANNED COCICIUNITY/RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM HIGH 14 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 42 CONDOMINIW UNITS UITH CAPE COO STYLE ARCHITECTURE ON 7.8 ACRES OF LAND ADJACENT T LAGOON. 15. SIGNATURE OF LEAD AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: jLjk Date: 11.4 W V NOTE: Clearinghouse will assign identification nur&rs for all new projects. If a SCH Nunber already exist project (e.9. from a (Notice of Preparation or previous draft docunent) please fill it in. m Resources Agency - Air Resources Board A Conservation X Fish and Game X Coastal Commission Cal trans Di strict Cal trans - Planning Caltrans - Aeronautics California Highway Patrol Boating and Waterways - Forestry State Water Resoruces Control REVIEWING AGENCIES w CTRPA (Cal TRPA) - TRPA (Tahoe RPA) Bay Conservation & Dev’t Cornm Parks and Recreat i on X Office of Historic Preservation Native American Heritage Comm State Lands Comm Public Utilities Comm Energy Comm Food and Agriculture - Health Services Statewide Health P1 anning (hospital s) Board - Headquarters Regional Water Qual i ty Control Board, Region Division of Water Rights (SWRCB) Division of Water Quality (SWRCB) Department of Water Resources Recl amat i on Board - Solid Waste Management Board Col orado River Board Housing and Community Dev’t Corrections General Services Office of Local Assistance Pub1 ic Works Board Office of Appropriate Tech. (OPR) Local Government Unit (OPR) - Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Other FOR SCH USE ONLY Date Received at SCH Catalog Number Date Review Starts Proponent Date to Agencies Consultant Date to SCH Contact Phone Clearance Date Address Notes: 0 a Exhibi ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1 (TO BE COMPETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 89-13/PUD 89, - DATE : OCTOBER 25, 198' I. BACKGROUND 1. APPLICANT: H. R. Reminaton ProDerties 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 8 Monarch Bay Plaza (6191 476-1889 Suite 202 South Lasuna, CA 92 3. DATE CHECK LIST SUBMITTED: 11. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all Affirmative Answers are to be written under Section I11 - Discussion of Environmental Evaluation) - YES MAY BE 1. Earth - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering of modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in which may modify the channel or a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? siltation, deposition or erosion w 2. & - Will the proposal have significant results in: - a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to, temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? -2- W - YES MAY BE NO - X x X X X X X X X X X W a YES MAY BE 4. Plant Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: - a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c, Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5. Animal Life - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, insects or microfauna)? fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Noise - Will the proposal significantly increase existing noise levels? 7. Lisht and Glare - Will the proposal sig- nificantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? .. -3- w w - YES MAYBE - NO 9. Natural Resources - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 8 b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? >( 10. Risk of Uwet - Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 2 11. Powlation - Will the proposal signif- icantly alter the location, distribu- tion, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? >( 12. Housinq - Will the proposal signif- icantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? x 13. Transportation/Circulation - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facili- ties, or demand for new parking? X c. Impact upon existing transportation systems? X d. Alterations-to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X -4- .. 0 a - YES 14. Public Services - Will the proposal have a significant effect upon, or have signif- icant results in the need for new or' altered governmental services in-any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Enerav - Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. Utilities - Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? -. d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health - Will the proposal have significant results in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? .. -5- MAY BE 0 0 18. 19. 20. 21. a) b) c) d) - YES MAY BE - NO Aesthetics - Will the proposal have significant results in the obstructi.on of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in creation of an aesthetically offensive public view?. . Recreation - Will the proposal have significant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Archeoloaical/Historical/Paleontoloaical - Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological, paleontological or historical site, structure, object or building? X Analyze viable alternatives to the DroDosed Droiect such as: a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site designs, c) alternate scale of development, d) alternate uses for the site e) development at some future time rather than now, f) alter- X - - - nate sites for the proposed, and g) no project alternative. The scope of the project does not make phasing viable. All infrastructure must be provided prior to any residential construction. Alternate site designs could be developed. However the view corridor requirements would be a constraint that would not allow much variation. Proposed construction could be held to single story development, however, that would decrease the view corridor potential and potentially reduce densities below the General Plan designations. The site is..intended per the General Plan and zoning for multi- family residential development. e) The site is vacant and the soil has been disturbed. Delayed development would maintain undesirable existing conditions. f) The site is intended for this type of development. g) No development would maintain undesirable current conditions. -6- _. m 0 - YES MAY BE 22. Mandatory findinss of sisnificance - a. Does the projecf have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species,, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en- dangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the dis- advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) environment is one which occurs in a c. Does the project have the possible environmental effects which are in- dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? (*!Cumulatively con- siderable!! means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial either directly or indirectly? adverse effects on human beings, a. 111. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION EARTH - A geotechnical feasibility evaluation was prepared for th site. The determination of that report indicated that in its pres the southerly portion of the site is unsuitable for development. with a regrading and compaction of fill the soils would be ci accommodating development. The report was prepared by Ninys ai January 5, 1989 project no. 101069-01. .. -7- W DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) WATER - Because the project will introduce impervious surfaces: concrc asphalt and buildings, there will be some change to the absorption rate surface water run-of f- However, the project has extensive open space ar which will mitiYate any potential prob,lem to insignificance. All str drainage will be directed away from the lagoon. A study and Special Permit are required to evaluate the effect of the project on the 100 y flood plain. PLANT LIFE AND ANIMAL LIFE - The site has been previously graded and th is no indication of plant or animal life on the site, NOISE - Although the site will not generate noise, it is within the th: mile radius of the Palomar Airport. Because of the proximity to the airpl standard mitigation measures will be applied to the project. LIGHT AND GLARE - Lighting for the project will be of lower intensities c will be directed inward to the project, LAND USE - The project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning 2 will be compatible with existing development. NATURAL RESOURCES - There are no known natural resources on the site. RISK OF UPSET - There are no hazardous materials that are a part of tk proposal. POPULATION - The residential character of the proposal does not have t potential of significantly altering location, density or distribution human population. HOUSING - The project will provide housing. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION - The project is estimated to genera approximately 336 daily trips. Park Drive is capable of accepting t additional ADTs. Parking will be provided onsite. PUBLIC SERVICES - Any services required as a result of the project will 1 provided under the City's Growth Management Program. ENERGY - New energy sources will not be required nor will the project U: substantial amounts of fuel or energy. UTILITIES - Utilities will be required through implementation of the City' Growth Management Program. HUMAN HEALTH - There are no health hazards related to the project. AESTHETICS - The construction of buildings south of Park Drive will obstruc views of the Aqua Hedionda Lagoon. The Local Coastal Program, however requires view corridors to allow for unobstructed views, these corridor have been included in the design of the project. .. -8- 0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued) 0 RECREATION - The project will provide for public access to the Agua I Lagoon and improve the beach front. All improvements to the lagoo] the 100 feet buffer shall be done in consultation with the Depart Fish and Game. - ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL - A cursory survey h( completed for the site and an initial determination has been made th are no visible archeological resources. However, the report stal there may be subsurface artifacts. I' -9- e e IV. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and-a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. x I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 10. ZG *M, Date I 1 /cl l0q date Plann&g Dfiector V. MITIGATING MEASURES (If Applicable) A monitor shall be required on site during all grading activity who would the authority to halt operations should any evidence be found that would ind that an archeological resource may be present. In the event that resource found, a subsurface testing program would be implemented to determine the e of resources and evaluate the significance of the deposit in accordance wit California Public Resources Code and the Environmental Guidelines of the Ci Carlsbad. -10- "r 7 - =TIGAT- (con&cq 0 - vx. flms 'THIS IS TO CERTZFY TH)rT I HAVE RENEWED THE VE HITIGATXNG MEA AND CONCUR WI?PH"THE ADDITION OF THBSE Date 1 mt 82 . -11- ENVIRONML~~TAL MITIGATION MONlTORlNC CHECKLIST -7 0 L tLa, 4-c, c, vc, V) '"I- ? w m- 0 7 *r LY4- nu- w3 Cn-CLC . - Y v) L CJ t v) ~~ W a, *I- nu OL c, z vws 0 mu-o m m cow c,u c mm :.q w mi. i I LC 03 m v) wcu >cu 4- -I- d 03 E-0 v, 7 4" hO fdu = c IZ cn >=a0 a= 000 0 fd E? v, q.fm == ~WZ: 03 v-5 -re: w 9, c, 32 E G. H m 0 g.? 2 la 2 z- v) QlfI z-2 vs 2 &ge E?, wz ,%x, 0% $7 W 0 gzz: 9) S U .I- cmEh .Qc, 0. c 0 cs .r p.25 0:: ea 7 a ps"m 5: L c, c 0 aw u -I- Wc, v, rc- rcc, .I- m La I v)o 0 WE >w ma \v 0 g;: *I- c m 7 .. n. \a cqz 3v aw d mw o +"I coz ZeI- E r m - a c 0 c 7 e-5; wa -I- =nu *. I- LnH u" mo en al ma3 z mo -C Ln zv 3 z= -de v- w -r t L -7 t m m LQ) - UM LLw m=c v) g*- * mz a, Ep % u W E* 2 2 p5 EgzmL +a w QZ 0 5.5 E4 m - .- c, 7 > 0 L .I- rs m.r ,v) -I- -I- > ,w 3 m *-am* + cc, u-I- != 7 ww w z E vu 0 m v, Ob v) m .I- a V z> L <e wc, w-I- ECLJ L7 cw3- 00 4-v) wz L-I- m L ou v) w x< Le I-- -I- w W w m =-I- e++@ .I- .I- m -r d c,rc = E E- =3 E 'I- .I- L ZZEF ul- .. w .. m.r moL -r 0 1 v) B =s 2 g €.E: E 0 -1 I-< - 0.Q E -7 7 c, .I- o> c, wo 0 Em reL - TW 0)s h oa wu vc-, cza s L m.I- a< I- 0 wo 5:d -I- c, -I- U c, W m -0 W c m w .w -u LU- 3wm v) c, .I- m mc, w w .I- Er w .I- . cc c .? n .I- omwo QW +-, fd W? m -I- m -I- L ml" E &-I- 3 0 -I- c, rc E-- C !Z c €.I- L-I- 3 fd I-L I-wow V c, *?- v) 0 c, 7 -I- L"-c L m 34 0 n 4- e- m EW L 3wo m- c, -I-vww roc - L EL &.I-? v) ocnw3 -r-c nm Ec, E w 0 -I- E LSWO 0 m war 3n V-C Evrcc rc-nc, nm w mm ? E mar a o-cc, WSWE c3L 003m v) v) fd-r Q-C v) I= w a0 LWEm -I- c - ro .I- .I- =)E.% c 34 0 wcnm * cnm mv) we w-I- 3 .I- L .I- fd > E+.Q 4 0 e €4 mom - -.r S JUc, w 0, E r m-c r 3 w 03.- v €-I- n -L-r L c, c, II -I- v) mmEsV En om C .- W C-I- W .I- oawc,u u m =m m E 113c,L wo EO I * II w4- re c,nv)wm -c, E 1 ;;y 2 LOWv) w II 0 .I- Y n US4-L Q I" w-I-3-I-m w I-TLn>Cz = =COLE ? ~O-CWW a