HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-06-20; Planning Commission; Resolution 3049. ll 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3049
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO
THE LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE
AREA KNOWN AS LA COSTA SOUTHWEST.
APPLICANT: ARROYO LA COSTA
CASE NO.: MP 149(0)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of June, l!
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tes
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted bq
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Con
follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning C
hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Mitigated Negative Declaration a(
Exhibit "ND", dated February 8, 1990, and "PII", dated January 10, 1991
Mitigation Monitoring Program outlined in Appendix "P" attached hereto and n
hereof, based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project I
significant impact on the environment provided that mitigating conditions of a]
complied with.
2. The proposed project only deletes references to the area known as La Costa
however this does not change the present or planned land uses of the rem;
area. The proposed amendment will allow for more in-depth analysis to occur
area within the overall Master Plan area. A mitigation measure has been inclu
document to ensure that when these areas are developed they comply with CI
policies and standards. This mitigation measure requires that a Master
environmental documentation will be approved prior to the approval of any de
permits in the Northwest or Southeast areas of the La Costa Master Plan.
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
0 e
3. The proposal will not affect any transportation systems in the vicinity. The p:
not generate additional systems in the vicinity. The proposal will not generatc
vehicular trips over that allowable under the Local Facilities Management j
Traffic impact analysis will be conducted at an appropriate time in the future
proposal is a change in the text and map boundaries, it will not affect parki
transportation systems or create traffic hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pede
4. The proposal will not affect the public utilities, schools, police, fire, emerger
public services. The site is located in Zones 6, 10, 11 and 12. Services will '
through the implementation of the zone plans.
Conditions:
1. Prior to the approval of any development permits in the Northwest or Southe
the La Costa Master Plan, a Master Plan and environmental documentatic
approved for each area. Exempt from this provision are the projects listed b
are either pending or approved. Should any pending project be withdrawn or
property will lose its exempt status.
CASE NUMBER CASE NAME STATUS
SDP 86-3
CT 86-5
CT 85-15
CT 85-21
CT 85-9
CT 89-33
CT 90-4
CT 89-18
...
...
Rancho La Costa Plaza
May Properties
Park View West
Park View East
Vista Santa Fe
Tienda de la Esquina
Tierra Santa Fe
Rancho Verde
APPROVED
WITHDRAWN
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
PENDING
PENDING
PENDING
20 (1 ...
21
22
23
24
25
26
...
...
...
...
...
27 I/ PC RES0 NO. 3049 -2-
28
,
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of th
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th day of June, l!
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber,
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSTAIN: None.
McFadden, Holmes & Hall.
-."~~"~ "__" ..... .,"- "..> .... ".--.-,* - .-.-.- - -.- .
,,' , -
SHARON SCHRA", Chairpersc
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS ATI'EST:
*
- v MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3049 -3-
28
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESSLOCATION: Area east of El Camino Real, north of Olivc
Road, west of Rancho Santa Fe Road.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Amendment to La Costa Master Plan (149(N)) dt
references to the area known as La Costa Southwest.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above des
project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environr
Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad.
result of said review, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (declaration that the proje
not have a significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject p
Justification for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009, Comment;
the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the. Planning Depar
within ten (10) days of date of issuance.
DATED: February 8, 1990
CASE NO: MP-149(0) MICHAEL J. ~~OLZ~ILLER
Planning Director
APPLICANT: City of Carlsbad
PUBLISH DATE: February 8, 1990
AML:af
.. - " .- " -. - "" ." - . - - - .... _""" . .-
2075 Las Palrnas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-4859 - (619) 438- . . " -. - . - - -. " . -. - . ".. "
a 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART I1
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. MP-149(0)
DATE : JANUARY 10. 1990
BACKGROUND
1, CX% NAME: LA COSTA MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT
2. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2075 LAS PAWS DRIVE
CARLSBAD. CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED:
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: AMENDMENT TO LA COSTA MASTER PLAN TO ELI3 REFERENCES TO THE SOUTHWEST PORTION OF THE MASTER PLAN.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires t
'ity conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a ;
may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental
Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist
checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors tha
be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with info to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental
Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City percei
substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may q
significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, llNOfl t
checked to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is subs. evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a sisnificant ef
the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative DecL however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental ' can be deemed insiqnificant. These findings are shown in the chl under the headings ~IYES-sigIl and IIYES-insiglt respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation m' appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALl Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for which would otherwise be determined significant.
0 e
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES YES
(sig) (insig)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters) ?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site, structure or object?
-2-
0 e
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
W. J THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: 'fES sig)
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants) ?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any agricultural crop or affect prime, unique or other farmland of state or local
importance?
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
16. Introduce new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES (sig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services?
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
20. Increase existing noise levels?
21. Produce new light or glare?
-3-
yp. lnslg)
YES (insig)
0 0
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
W: J THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY! YES YES (sig) (insig)
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
23. Substantially alter the density of the human population of an area?
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
25.
26.
27.
28.
2p
30.
31.
32.
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Affect the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
-4-
e a
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
YES (sig) YEEnsig)
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild- life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or en= dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) X
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
-5-
0 0
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
The proposal is to amend the La Costa Master Plan (LCMP) by eliminat zferences to the southwest portion of the Master Plan. This propos< remove all text regarding the southwest section and change the bow
of the overall Master Plan accordingly.
The southwest section will be referred to as Arroyo La Costa. Th:
will be closely analyzed under a separate Master Plan and ass1
Environmental Impact Repart,
The remainder of the LCMP will be analyzed in further detail at some
date, under a separate Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report.
Due to the nature of the proposal and its affect upon the area, the p
will not significantly affect the environment.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Earth - The proposal is a change in the text and map boundaries of
Costa Master Plan. Geotechnical feasibility evaluation will be co
at a future date. An in depth analysis will occur under a separate Plan and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) at the appr time. The proposal will have no impact to earth stability, top
erosion, deposition or natural resources.
Air - - The proposal will not create objectional odors or produce em
that will affect the ambient air quality. The proposal is a change
and map boundaries, therefore, it will not affect the air quality.
Water - The proposed text change and map revisions will not author
development that could affect the quality or the demand for water. issues will be addressed at a future date when detailed deve
proposals are analyzed.
Natural Resources - The proposal will not affect on any natural res
Previous studies have indicated that there are no natural resources
vicinity.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
Plant and Animal Life - Since the proposal is a change in text i
boundaries, it will not alter or affect any biological resources.
appropriate time an EIR will be prepared which will specifically
animals and insects).
Aqriculture - The proposal will not affect any agriculturally des land.
agriculture, plants, microflora and any animals (birds, land animals
-6-
0 a DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Continued)
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
dand Use - The change in text and map boundaries will not change the
or planned land uses of the area. It will, however, allow for more j
analysis to occur on specific areas within the overall Master Pla A mitigation measure has been included in this document to ensure tt
these areas are developed they comply with current City polic.
standards. This mitigation measure requires that a Master P:
environmental documentation w&J be approved prior to the approval
development permits in the Northwest or Southeast areas of the L
Mater Plan.
Utilities - The proposal will not affect the public utilities, s
police, fire, emergency or other public services. The site is loc
Zones 6, 10, 11 and 12. Services will be provided throc
implementation of the zone plans.
Noise - An acoustical analysis will be prepared at a future date tc that any projects conform to the current standards at the t
development. The current proposal has no affect on the site at thi
Human Health - The proposal will not involve the use of explor
hazardous materials.
Lisht and Glare - The proposal will have no affect on the amount o and glare in the vicinity. This issue will be addressed at a futu
with the appropriate EIR.
dousinq - The proposal will not alter the density of human popula,
affect housing demand more than that which has been approved unc
overall La Costa Master Plan.
TransPortation/Circulation - The proposal will not affect any transpo
systems in the vicinity. The proposal will not generate add
vehicular trips over that allowable under the Local Facilities Man
Plan zones. Traffic impact analysis will be conducted at an appr
time in the future. Since the proposal is a change in the text
boundaries, it will not affect parking facilities, transportation
or create traffic hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians,
Fuel and Enerqv - Since the proposal is a change in text and map bou only, it has no affect on fuel and energy consumption.
Archeolosical/Historical/Paleontolosical - The proposal will not aff
archeological, historical or paleontological sites. Since the propos
only affect the text and map boundaries, the above issues will be adc
at the appropriate time in the future.
Aesthetics/Recreation - The proposal will not affect the site aesthe,
or affect the quality or quantity of recreational opportunities.
issues will be addressed at a future date.
-7-
e 0
ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH A:
a) Phased development of the project, b) alternate site e) alternative scale of development, d) alternate uses fl
e) development at some future time rather than now, f) a. sites for the proposed, and.g) no project alternative.
a) This project is the first phase of an overall review and re7
of the La Costa Master Plan. The northwest and southeast p( of the Master Plan will be reviewed at some future date.
b) This project is a revision to the approved La Costa Master :
to eliminate any reference to the southwest portion of the c
Master Plan. Site design is not a part of this project. A:
site designs will be addressed at a future date under a new Plan and environmental studies.
c) The scale of the project has been determined by the origina:
Master Plan. The La Costa Master Plan was divided into thrt
sections: Northwest, southeast and southwest. The project c
allow for a more detailed analysis of the southwest section,
d) This project does not address the uses of the site. It mere
allow for the elimination of all references to the southwest from the overall Master Plan. Alternate uses for the site h
be addressed at a future date under a new Master Plan and
environmental studies.
e) The proposed Master Plan Amendment does not authorize any
development. It merely deletes any reference tothe southwes
portion of the La Costa Master Plan.
f) The site of the project has been determined by the La Costa Master Plan. The project will not change the boundaries of
southwest section but will remove any reference to the
southwest from the overall Master Plan.
9) The no project alternative would leave the existing La Costa Master Plan in existence for all areas of La Costa. The exi La Costa Master Plan does not comply with current City ordin
and policies. The deletion of the southwest area from the L Costa Master Plan is the first step in bringing this Master
into conformance with current ordinances and standards.
-9-
0 0
.DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
" I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
x I find that although the proposed project could have a significa: effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect this case because the mitigation measures described on an attache sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
d,ho /I& &A- 'Date c/ Signature/
211 140
Date
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
Prior to the approval of any development permits in the Northwe
Southeast areas of the La Costa Master Plan, a Master Plan and environ:
documentation shall be approved for each area. Exempt from this pro
are the projects listed below which are either pending or approved.
any pending project be withdrawn or denied, the property will 10s
exempt status.
-10-
1 e 0
1 CASE NUMBER CASE NAME APN
SDP 86-3 Rancho La Costa Plaza 223-060-28,29 2T 86-5 May Properties 223-060-31,32 CT 85-15 Park View West 223-060-40
CT 85-21 Park View East 223-060-50,51 CT 85-9 Vista Santa Fe 255-031-18
CT 89-33 Tienda de La Esquina 255-031-20
CT 90-14 Tierra Santa Fe 255-031-22,23 CT 89-18 Rancho Verde 264-220-71
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEAS AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
;// @//" j
71 $0
Date g a ure
AML: af
-11-
I
h
0
Cn d
-
H
n x
18
v)
w ry
m z 3 z
w A
LL W
c, c
E a
-U S a
e E
S m
n -
k c,
v) m TT
m c,
v)
V 0
J m
W E
..
9
I-
w V
3 0 cc n
..
V W 0
W CY z
A s E t;
z 0 V
n
.. w + 25
4 A
0
P nc
n a
-- or SLW
rcc, c, vc, fA ".I- 7
a v)-
0 y -r
no- LAG
as wrrc .
c ns
LC co (c" .Fez
","N
0 a g.I- b- 0
az.5m
0 2;:
g U_r= --a$ 2 .z 3 2
gs: u" ZLS 2" E c,z 8.-
0 &SZ
+$g.cz
0; Ll- E$ :z E- p
o =z p.2 z g,"';3:
v) :-I-
m-.: v amxg Ezu w sac, a OEmL s gzc mL 0 0.- v) -7 ">a3
*E a zs
@+.E $
?::E =€E Sc,
g E.zg
.I- v
GUS . wed
7 mw = c >sa,
c,
Pa Pa
+-
ma 0
we
vc
V
* as
-r. E.pu S" an
-0" -0 a ma
La
.==E% *I-
me
2 $2
J -I- w 0
c, cc,
w .r. E: - a- a a .r
e -I- L ac, a-r. EELS casu
.- a
a m =*I-
mar .I- o mo L
-I- -I- SQ -I- =@@- - 00 E - c, -r
rcL 0 €W
c L m-I- au v0
I- 0 au
a r '>,
ENV
Y v)
L
(d 5 ry
0 I=
WQ
-I- c, am
-s .r a LE aa ="
€
-r
c(
m
-r 0 e*
LQ oa *O
S 0 r:
.F
a
3 L
w
a ld
r
S 0
c,
(21 Us
c,
E
--
.I-
.I-
~I~ENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING C~LIST "I I LIvuln r
n
3v) am .- a >L am
LU
r
7s
S= c, a: E: E%
LInW
'F L c =-or0 CV-7 aJ 'b -a a E.? k
c., uw 3 =c,
XQItU LLE
0, S
S
m c
L
-r
?
_r= WV .l- -I- h Q)
7-Q 3 mc, -cc EC
c, SE3V -
ac,L L?sa . gw a crc a 0-I- v) omc,o AXE3 Q)v)-I-c, mac, ZSmQQW WCJm >+E m E a 3 *a& 'Lul c,
Q)orlsrxv,-rJo -=io aJw.rQ) c,
a
v) 0 0-u c
-E ->GQ 03E
? 0 mc, PL x +c,nw a v nu a
7 3 a m 0 L"c, mrc,c,_r= L 0 3.I-
OLmam maa L or: E a a en w nZ S =-I- o
r6aQLO SV r w-I-+ a a a? a4 0 > L P." r vsum 0" c,E aw LL3
0 "1uooc % -~-m >sap
c, w E L-rc, mc,
.I-L m oaso OEc,Srrr> wn
n noPa nm nn L a+? a L L a L
$&SZ .wLma
OZL?rn.r, c,v) L a me
>0CnSVP
P moL@U@?
L -I- C P-I- a -r. Q, C, 0 a PW-r C L
w r: s
W
v) 4 0
ez LLI
II
z 3
W
v)
m
5
a N m
7 n
m c, wc,
oc,= L ma3
0 .I-
sn 0 L>
VY
g-!! 12
A na
5 2% txEn
m S
S U wa c, QWL
w ml-ru
3sama c, CL
a mum=- .- m > mmo
Yc, c L v mu LC
Lwaac m -r .7 .r m
-I-
2LLmma,
nz-I-I-cc
m -4 m Q)
8 mHNCnmdH w1111111 cowmmmcnom
n ~a3Q)cocomco
Ob-l-l-I-I-++ mououuuv
v)
C
U -I- 1 I
-r c,
c
l-
W x
'age 1
" a.
=a w c,-
(d (d-
€ aJU. TI. CS om
Lrn?
*- - -@U (d Qlr tJ)- r
-7 a. c, -I- -- c, E .r
L a-
s;
-a1 mF
V sn (
*r- t u c .I i :I- i g34
(d €7 I=
0- -I
S(
CO1
LI
-e -- r OW(
a- -c f Cc, f 0 .r E- v)s LCC omc
-- u <
rcl==I
ac -en
U
n os *I- wsc
PS c 00 c3f
wcnn aa LWE
.C
IC hac
c JC v L-r
awn * mm I: a$< Q).r
.r L E+
lda c, 0 c-i
7 "7 3+"~ a E
E I= m~
v €*I- 3 e, m3
c,c, I1
mm E E n L -I-
sm C .- a C -r
C II 3c: m cm
0 E ' 11 a -0 E c, Pw a v a cl-
'3 F E
Le
on ac:
an a CI
o mow
n-- TU
c, cZ
ne o L
Loa 11 0
a -- 3 -7-
+Ern> hoc a