HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-07-09; Planning Commission; Resolution 3047e /I 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3047
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSB
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO SUBDMC
1.58 ACRE LOT AND CONSTRUCT THREE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES AN
COMMON LOT PFWATE DRTVEWAY ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCK
SOUTH OF LA COSTA AVENUE AND WEST OF LA CORUNA PLACE.
CASE NAME: LA CORUNA
CASE NO: PUD 89-12
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Lot 180 of La Costa South, Unit No. 1, in the City of Carlsbad, San Diego Cor
according to Map no. 6117 as recorded on June 13, 1968.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; 2
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Tit
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of June, 1990, the
June, 1990, and the 9th day of July, 1990, hold a duly noticed public hearing as presc:
to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tes
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considerel
relating to the Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning CommissioI
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commissior
PUD 89-12, based on the following findings and subject to the following co
Findings :
1. The project is consistent with the City‘s General Plan. The proposed projec
3.67 du’s/acre is below the density range of 4-8 du’s/acre allowed by the 1
Plan Designation because the site is topographically constrained. The projecl
intent of developing the subject site for single family residential uses.
...
II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development
is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development E proposed.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the Citys Planned Development 0
also complies with the Design Guidelines Manual.
4. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition tc
ensured that the final map will not be approved unless the City Council fin
service is available to serve the project. In addition, the Planning Commissil
a condition that a note shall be placed on the final map that building per
be issued for the project unless the City Engineer determines that sev
available, and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer sei
available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements
Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they ap
service for this project.
5. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the School District.
6. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
7. AU necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required
of approval.
8. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an approprk
to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment oj
enable this body to find that public facilities will be available concurrent 1
required by the General Plan.
9. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future lanc
surrounding properties are designated for Residential Low Medium anc
Medium development on the General Plan.
10. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and
Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on April 5, 1990 and .
the Planning Commission on July 9, 1990. In approving this Negative Dec
Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis,
mitigation measures and any written comments received regarding the signi
this project could have on the environment.
11. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public faciliq
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by an
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continuer
of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the
PC RES0 NO. 3047 -2-
" I/ e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
12. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as
conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the LOC
Management Plan for Zone 6.
13. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Co
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure t
treatment of the Ciws hillside resources.
Conditions:
1. All Conditions of approval for SDP 89-11 and HDP 89-32 as contained
Commission Resolution No's. 3046 and 3048 are incorporated herein by refc
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannkg
of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 9th day of July, 1990, by the follow
wit:
AYES: Chairman Schramm, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Holmes, McFad
Erwin, Marcus, and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
:; ., , ..
ATTEST:
-. . A ? ..","
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIOl
:i ~ / 2 _, ,, ' .,!,~ -, ' ,
, " L.b"wj"\,' ,! ,,:-=."j- 'i,/ .\&4yJ&.&L%"
'>.I
/ I ;'I ,I.\ ,I .; /;. ., ; ~,* i : , ~ &e:-: I' J :-
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3047 -3-