The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1991-04-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 3217a <I1 0 a 1 2 3 4 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTTON NO. 3217 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING LOT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE LA COSTA HOTEL & SPA RESORT. CASE NAME: LA COSTA HOTEL & SPA CASE NO: CUP 258(B) 6 I1 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of April, 1991, hold a duly noticed public hearing tc consider said application on property described as: Lot 3 La Costa Condominium Unit 4 and a Parcel of land being a portion of Lot 14, Section 35, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian in that City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according to the official plot. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP 258(B). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CUP 258(B), based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: I I I 28 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8~ 9 10 11 12 13 Findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary or desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; since it is accessory to an existing recreational commercial resort and provides additional parking to serve the needs of the existing resort as well as the additional parking demand created by major annual sports events held at the resort. The parking lot addition will also bring the La Costa Hotel and Spa into conformance with the City's current parking standards; I 2, That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use; since it has been designed to comply with City standards, development guidelines, and zoning requirements regulating parking stall size, aisle width, setbacks, and landscaping; 3. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; since 30% of the project consists of landscaping including additional berming along El Camino Real to screen the parking lot from view and bollard lighting is being provided to reduce additional roadway glare; 14 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all 15 traffic generated by the proposed use since no additional traffic will be generated by the use and the additional parking provided by the parking lot should alleviate 16 any traffic impacts to the street system serving the La Costa Hotel and Spa resulting from the major sports events held at the resort. 17 18 19 1. Approval is granted for CUP 258(B), as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "C", dated April 17, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Conditions: 20 Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise 01 noted in these conditions. fiL II 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy oi the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The Site Plan shall reflecf the conditions of approval by the City. The plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to building, grading or improvement plan submittal, whicheve1 occurs first. .... PC RES0 NO. 3217 -2- I1 0 0 1 2 3 4 3. All conditions of approval imposed upon CUP 258 and CUP 258(A) as stated Planning Commission Resolution No.’s 2366 and 2678 shall apply as conditions approval for Cup 258(B) except as modified by Condition No. 7 below. 4. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which m be required as part of the Zone 6 Local Facilities Management Plan and a amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 5 5. Approval of CUP 258(B) is granted subject to the approval of SUP 90-12 a: SUP 90-13. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 1 6. AU conditions of approval imposed upon SUP 90-12 and SUP 90-13 as stated Planning Commission Resolutions 3218 and 3219 shall apply as conditions approval for CUP 258(B). 7. This conditional use permit is granted for a period of 15 years. This conditio1 use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does I have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the puk health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has su sigdicant adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that t Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be hea: add additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. TXS perr may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use 1 a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public’s hea: and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This perr may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 15 years up written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to t expiration date. In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall fi that no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s hea and welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. I: substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health a welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an original application a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of extensions 1 Planning Commission may grant. 8. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed conformance with the City‘s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and appro of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs. 24 11 .... 2511 a*-- 26 ll 27 !i PC RES0 NO. 3217 -3- 28 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 9. Prior to approval of grading permit, the applicant shall revegetate the creek are2 where vegetation has been removed with the following native hydroseeded mix 01 revegetation if a permit is required. (A copy of the required permit must bf submitted to the Engineering Department prior to issuance of grading permit). comply with the Department of Fish and Game permit requirements fo~ 10. Parking shall be for the sole use of La Costa employees and guests indudin1 spectators of annual sports events. - - Native Hydroseed Mix Artemisia douglasiana Mugwort Elymus triticoides Beardless Wild Ryegrass Stipa lepida Foothill Stipa Stipa pulb Purple Stipa Bromus carinatus California Brome PM& lemmonnii Lemon Canary Grass" Rumex fueginus Golden Dock scirpus californim California Bulrush Scripus robutus Bull Tule 11 *Makesurewn~livespedesofCanaryGrassarenotd. Thgespeciesareiumsive - - I' '1 14 11 .... 15 16 17 18 .... .... .... .... 19 I .... 20 21 .... 22 23 *-** .... 24 .... 25 .... 26 27 PC RES0 NO. 3217 -4- 28 I' ' * ll 0 e PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannin Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of April, 1991, b 1 2 3 I/ the following vote, to wit: 4 5 6 AYES: Vice-Chairperson Erwin, Commissioners: Schlehube: Schramm, McFadden, Marcus & Hall. NOES: None. 7 ABSENT: Chairperson Holmes. a ABSTAIN: None. 9 10 %L 11 TOM ERWIN, Vice Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 12 13 14 15 16 PLANNING DIRECTOR 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTEST: I PC RES0 NO. 3217 -5 -