HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 3224e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3224
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIN~ COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOWING
THE REMOVAL OF A PARCEL FROM THE EXISTING PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF IMPALA DRTVE AND ORION WAY
CASE NAME: BALDWIN ENGINEERING
CASE NO: SDP 78-1(D)
7
8 referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
9 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
lo 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
XI. /I WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
12
13
14
Commission did, on the 15th day of May, 1991, consider said request on property
described as:
15
16
A resubdivision of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 10060 filed in
San Diego County on May 23, 1980;
17 I/ WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
18
19 factors relating to SDP 78-1(D).
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
21
22
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
23
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
APPROVES SDP 78-1(D), based on the following findings and subject to the 24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
25 ll following conditions:
26 11 ---
27
28
0 0
1 Fhdings; I
2
3
1. The existing development is still properly related to the site, surroundings, and
environmental setting, consistent with the various elements of the general plan, not
detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area, and not
the subject parcel because the subject parcel is not related to the existing 4
5
detrimental to the site, surroundings, or traffic circulation, despite the removal of
devleopment with respect to parking or circulation.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2.
3.
~
The existing development site is still adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
existing development because the proposed project complies with all applicable
ordinances regarding site development standards while keeping with the existing
constraints of the site, therefore not requiring adjustments to the existing
development.
All yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust
the proposed development to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood
will be provided and maintained as the site design is compatible with neighboring
developments and all existing and proposed landscaped areas are conditioned to be
provided and to remain intact.
l3
14
4. The street system serving the existing development is still adequate to properly
handle all traffic generated by the proposed development as the site is served by
fully improved, local streets that are not proposed to change with the new
15 development.
16 Conditions:
I" 1. Approval is granted for SDP 78-1 (D), as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "D", dated
18 May 15, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
19 conditions.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
I 20
21
22
23
24
2. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
3. Approval of SDP 78-1(D) is granted subject to the approval of SDP 91-4.
SDP 78-1(D) is subject to all conditions of SDP 914, Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3223, incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning
Department.
25
26
....
27 )I PC RES0 NO. 3224 -2-
28
I. 0 @
1 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
2
3
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of May, 1991, by the
following vote, to wit:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Schramm, Savary, Noble, Erwin & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
1
ABSTAIN: Nontp””y *Ba
ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
13
14
ATTEST:
w 16 MICHAEL J. HOLZMI~ER PLANNING DIRECTOR 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 3224 -3-