HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-07-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 3271* *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3271
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A
32 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONSISTING OF 29
RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
EL CAMINO REAL NORTH OF CAMIN0 HILLS DRNE.
CASE NAME: EAGLE CANYON
CASE NO: HDP 91-2
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
A portion of Lot F of Rancho Agua Hedionda according to
Map No. 823, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
on November 16, 1896,
has been filed 4th the Cky of Carlsbad and referred to the PIanning Commission; an
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided 1
Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of July, 199'
consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony an
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
factors relating to the Planning Commission Determination; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissio:
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commissior
hereby recommends APPROVAL of HDP 91-2, based on the followin1
findings and subject to the following conditions:
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Filldinm:
1. Hillside conditions have been properly identified on the constraints map/hikidl
development permit exhibit.
2. Undevelopable areas of the project site, such as slopes over 4% have bea
properly identified on the constraints map/hillside development permit exhibit an(
were determined to be excluded from the Hillside Development Regulations b1
Sections 21.95.090(a)(1),(2) and (3).
3. The development proposal and all applicable development approvals and pennit
are consistent with the purpose, intent and requirements of the Hillsidc
Development Reguladons.
4. The hding that no development or grading will occur in those portions of the sit4
which are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Sectio~
21.53.230(b) can be made as slopes over forty percent were excluded from densit
calculations as required and were excluded from the Hillside Developmenl
Regulations by sections 21.95.090(A)(1)(2) and (3).
5. Grading design minimizes disturbance of hillside areas to the greatest e.xten1
possible given the fact that portions of the site have been altered by previousls
authorized grading and the widening of El Camino Real a Circulation Elemeni
Road is required.
6. The project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts illustratec
in the Hillside Development Guidelines as follows:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
g- h.
1.
Rounded slopes are proposed in areas.
Where possible undulating slopes are proposed.
Earth berms at the top of slopes are proposed to mitigate noise and visual
impacts.
Single story units are proposed for Lots 21 and 22 closest to El Camina
Real as well as for Lots 1 and 29 at the project entrance.
Extensive landscaping is proposed on all manufactured slopes.
Units will, in general, screen proposed manufactured slopes but not rise
above the horizon.
The proposed units provide a varied articulated tile roof.
The major slope along El Camino Real will be part of an open space lo1
with easements and will be maintained by a home owners association.
The width of drainage benches on slopes are varied to accommodate
landscaping for additional visual screening.
PC RES0 NO. 3271 -2-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
7. The project is consistent with the City‘s General Plan since the proposed densi
of 3.2 du’s/acre is within the density range of 0 - 4 du’s/acre specified for the si
as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below tl-
growth control point of 3.2.
8. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since ti
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at tl
density proposed.
9. The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to th
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the Cit
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot oca
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Plannin
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element (
the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for th
project.
10. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in th
Carlsbad Unified School District.
12
14
12. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required a l3
11. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
conditions of approval.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
13. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriatc
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and paymen
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be availablc
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
14. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses sina
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the Genera
Plan.
15. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Conditional
Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on January 3,1991
and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on July 17,1991, Ir
approving this Conditional Negative Declaration the Planning Commission ha:
considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures anc
any written comments received regarding the significant effects this project could
have on the environment.
....
PC RES0 NO. 3271 -3-
28
II 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan
prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will
ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative
impacts created by the project.
17. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 24.
18. This project was subject to Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Hillside
Ordinance) and meets all the requirements of that Chapter to ensure the sensitive
treatment of the City's hillside resources.
Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for HDP 91-2, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "X", dated
July 17, 1991, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these
conditions.
2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy oi
the Site Plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The Site Plan shall reflecl
the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to the
City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits or improvement plan submittal,
whichever occurs first.
3. Approval of HDP 91-2 is granted subject to the approval of ZC 91-5, CT 91-2, anc
SUP 91-2.
4. All conditions of the Conditional Negative Declaration, ZC 91-5, CT 91-2 anc
SUP 91-1 are incorporated by reference herein.
....
....
....
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3271 -4-
II 0 *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannin,
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of July, 1991, b
the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Holmes, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Savaq
Erwin, Noble and Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Schramm.
ABSTAIN: None. """ "
ROBERT HOLMES, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3271 -5-