Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-07-01; Planning Commission; Resolution 3398+ I/ 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 LO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3398 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISION THAT PROPOSED SUBSTANTIAL, CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND ALGA ROAD. CASE NAME: AYRES SENIOR CENTER APPEAL OF A REVISIONS TO CUP 88-21 (A)/SUP 89-5(A) ARE NOT IN PLANNING DIRECTOR DECISION CASE NO: CUP 88-21(A)/SUP 89-5(A) WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbac and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of May, 1992, the 3rd day of June, 1992, the 17th of June, 1992, and the 1st day of July, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 72-34 Unit No. 1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 8350, as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County dated July 28, 1976. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to an appeal of a Planning Director Decision pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code, Section 21.54.140 that proposed revisions are not in substantial conformance with the Planning Commission approval of CUP 88-21(A)/SUP 89-5(A). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. . e 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, ,the Commissio~ DENIES the appeal and upholds the decision of the Planning Director tha proposed revisions to CUP 88-21(A)/SUP 89-5(A) are not in substantia conformance with the previous approval. Findings: 1. Enclosure of the patios and balconies to turn them into sun rooms eliminates al private outdoor space for each unit, adds additional building floor area of ove 8,997 square feet which when added to the total square footage already approva administratively exceeds 10 percent of the total building area, and changes thf exterior building elevations which is not in conformance with the approved projec exhibits. i 9 amount of export by 15,000 cubic yards which is more than double the amouni 10 2. Increasing the earthwork quantities for the project as proposed increases the tota PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning 12 grading quantity hm 20,000 cubic yards to 35,000 cubic yards and increases tht approved and considered in the Negative Declaration for the project. 11 13 14 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of July, 1992, by thc following vote, to wit: 15 16 17 I8 11 AYES: Chairperson Erwin, Commissioners: Noble & Savary. NOES: Commissioners: Schlehuber & Schramm. ABSENT: Commissioner Welshons. 19 II ABSTAIN: Commissioner Hall. 20 21 22 23 24 ATTEST: TOM ERWIN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 25 26 27 28 PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RES0 NO. 3398 -2-