Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-03; Planning Commission; Resolution 3547// r. e e 1 2 3 4 5 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3547 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS. CASE NAME: COSTA DO SOL DEVELOP 112 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 40 CONDOMINIUM CASE NO: PUD 92-01 7 8 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6136 in the City of Carlsbad, County of County RecordeJs Office, July 6, 1977. 9 San Diego, California, filed and recorded in the San Diego 10 11 12 13 14 15 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 16 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of November, 1993 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 18 19 20 21 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission 22 as follows: 23 recommends APPROVAL of PUD 92-01, based on the following findings and subject 25 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 24 A) That the above recitations are true and correct. 26 to the following conditions: 27 28 .* 0 0 FindiIlS: 1. The project is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan since the overall proposed site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or below the growth control point of 6. 1 2 density of 5.3 dus/acre is within the density range of 4-8 dus/acre specified for the 3 4 5 2. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since: 6 7 a 9 The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the Cig Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot OCCUI within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project, IO 3. The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Final Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significanl 11 adverse environmental impacts. 12 13 14 15 4. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, 01 new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by anJ additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan preparec pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensurf continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impact: i created by the project. 1 16 17 5. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it ha: been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Loca: Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. l8 I/ 6. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbac 19 I Unified School Disirict. 2o 21 7. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval. 8. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required a: 22 conditions of approval. 23 24 9. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriatc condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and paymenl of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be availablc 25 concurrent with need as required by the general plan. 26 10. The project complies with all requirements of Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbac 27 28 Municipal Code. PC RES0 NO. 3547 -2- I/ r, e 0 1 2 3 4 11. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent wit Chapter 21.45, the Zone 20 Specific Plan, and all adopted plans of the City an other governmental agencies, because the project is consistent with Chapter 21-41 the Zone 20 Specific Plan, the General Plan, and the Local Coastal Program, becaus it meets all the Planned Development standards, and single-family and multi-fami residential land uses would be developed at the appropriate lot size and residenti density. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 12. The proposed use is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility whic will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the neighborhood and tl community, because the development of small lot single-family homes an condominiums would provide a balance and mix of residential land uses within th Zone 20 Specific Plan. A majority of the residential development planned for th specific plan area would be standard single-family homes on 7,500 to 10,000 s( ft. lots. The development of higher density condominiums would also provide som affordable housing for lower income households which would create a mor diversified and balanced community. 13. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persor residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in th vicinity, because the project is designed to avoid the riparian drainage area in tE northwestern comer of the site. This open space would connect with the ope space on Poinsettia Park to the north. Drainage facilities would be provide concurrent with development of the project to reduce erosion and flooding. A manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and to visually scree: the slopes. 14. With the exception of private street width as discussed in Planning Commissio Resolution No. 3548 for the project's Site Development Plan, the proposed planne development meets all of the minimum development standards set forth in Sectio 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 21 -45.080, and has been designe in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design Guidelines Manual for th following reasons: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 a. The local streets in the single-family portion of the project would have cur gutters, and sidewalks on both sides, and have 36 to 40 feet of paving. Thi exceeds the 30 foot minimum street width standard. b. The project would provide a mixture of one and two-story homes, an( condominiums units which have varied roof lines, and a variety of fron building elevations and front yard setbacks. c. Adequate recreational vehicle storage space would be provided in one are; and be sufficiently screened from the public right-of-way and surroundin; properties. 27 "" 28 PC RES0 NO. 3547 -3- I - ji e 0 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 d. The single-family homes would have two and three car garages which woul meet the parking and storage requirements of the ordinance, and gue: parking would be provided on both sides of the streets. The condominim have garages and carports for the residents with guest parking dispersc along the central driveway. e. A 10 foot landscaping setback is provided adjacent to Hidden Valley Ro: and Camino de las Ondas. In addition, a six foot high masonry wall i conjunction with a heavily landscaped, 12 to 16 foot setback, would k provided along the northern property line to buffer the project from tk Poinsettia Community Park to the north. The community park also contait a 20 to 25 foot landscaped setback adjacent to the common propa between the two land uses. 15. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natur; topography of the site, and maintains and enhances sigruficant natural resources a the site, because the project meets all the requirements of the Hillside Developmer Regulations and Guidelines. The manufactured slopes would be landscaped, the lo would terrace down the slope towards the northwest to conform with th topography. The homes have roof lines that are varied and relate to th topography. In addition, the northwestern comer of the site would be preserved t protect the riparian drainage that flows to the north. 16. The project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated wit the project and does not dominate the project. The local streets in the projec would have 30 to 40 feet of paving and connect to Hidden Valley Road which is non-loaded collector street. All the local, collector, and major streets within thi area would be constructed to full public street width standards, and hav underground utilities. The 30 foot central driveway within the condominiu portion of the project is adequate to handle the vehicular traffic and accommodatc emergency vehicles. 17. The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site i compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious o disruptive element to the neighborhood, because the proposed project meets all Ci? standards and the proposed residential density is consistent with the General Pla (5.3 dus/acre). The proposed residential land uses are compatible in scale architecture, and building materials with the multi-family residential developmen to the west and south. Public street improvements would be provided tl accommodate traffic generated by the project and the project must comply with al the circulation and public facility requirements of Local Facilities Management Pla Zone 20. The adjacent properties to the west, south, and east have either existin1 multi-family residential development or are planned for multi-family residentia development, therefore, the proposed small lot single-family and multi-famil! residential development would be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood A six foot high masonry wall and adequate landscape buffers and setbacks woulc be provided along the northern property to minimize impacts between th~ residential and community park land uses. PC RES0 NO. 3547 -4- 1 ll a 0 /I General Planning Conditions: 1. Recommendation of approval is granted for PUD 92-01, as shown on Exhibits "A" Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless othenvisc noted in these conditions. 1 2 "TT", dated October 6, 1993 incorporated by reference and on file in the Planninl 3 4 5 7 3. All conditions of approval for the CT 92-01 as contained in Planning Resolution Nc 6 and HDP 92-10. 2. Approval of PUD 92-01 is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-01, SDP 93-01 3546 are applicable and incorporated through this reference. a PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannin; 9 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of November, 1993 lo by the following vote, to wit: 11 12 AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Betn Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall. 13 14 NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 15 16 17 18 19 ABSTAIN: None. - i 1 - *d% i\ ", ,. 7 n6 BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 20 22 21 ATTEST: - 23 MICHAEL J. HOLZMILMR PLANNING DIRECTOR 24 25 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 3547 -5- 11