HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-03; Planning Commission; Resolution 3548.? ll * e
1
2
3
4
5
6
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3548
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DEVELOP
ON PROPER= GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL
NORTE AND NORTH OF CAMINO DE MS ONDAS.
CASE NAME: COSTA DO SOL
112 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND 40 CONDOMINIUM UNITS
i CASE NO: SDP 93-04
7!!
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
8
9
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6136 in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, California, filed and recorded in the San Diego
County Recorder's Ofice, July 6, 1977.
lo 11 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
l1 I1 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
12 I1
13 I1 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
14
15
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 16
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of November, 1993
I'i'
18
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
19 I
20 I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
21
22
24
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 23
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
recommends APPROVAL, of SDP 93-04, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
25
26
as follows:
27
28 II I1
. /. 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I
~
FhdiIlp:
1. The project is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan since the overall propose(
density of 5.3 dus/acre is within the density range of 4-8 dus/acre specified for th(
site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at or belov
the growth control point of 6.
2. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to thi
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the Ciq
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot OCCUI
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of thf
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project
I
10 3. The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Fina:
Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significanl
I1 adverse environmental impacts.
12
13
14
15
4. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, 01
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by an;
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepare(
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensun
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
16
17
5. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
l8 I/ 6. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
19 I Unified School District.
2o
21
7. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
8. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
22 conditions of approval.
z3
24
9. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan. 25 I I/ 26
27
10. The project complies with all requirements of Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
28
PC RES0 NO. 3548 .2 -
li
,- I .. .. 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11. That the project is in confomity with the General Plan and adopted policies ani
goals of the City, and it would have no detrimental effect on public health, safeq
and welfare for the following reasons:
a. The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Zone 20 Specific
Plan, and the project would not have a significant impact on thf
environment.
b. The condominium buildings would maintain a 15 foot setback from thd
public right-of-way and a 5 foot setback from internal driveways.
c. The project would provide adequate onsite parking and circulation to serve
the needs of the residents and their guests, and it would not impact the
availability of offsite street parking.
I d. Sidewalks and drainage facilities would be provided along the project's public
street frontages to serve the project.
e. The existing Planned Development Ordinance requires at a minimum 30 fool
wide private street/driveways, howevery the Planning Commission finds thal
the proposed 24 foot wide private driveway would be adequate to providt
safe and efficient traffic circulation and vehicle turn movements to tht
parking area and Recreational Vehicle storage area. The City's Parkin2
Ordinance requires a minimum standard width of 24 feet for a two-wal
traffic aisle containing ninety degree parking on both sides. A 24 foot
driveway aisle provides adequate separation and distance for vehicles backing
out of garages and guest parking spaces and adequate separation for two-way
traffic (12 feet per travel lane).
f. A pedestrian circulation system that is separated from the 24 foot wide
driveways is also provided that would allow sufficient and safe access to the
adjacent public streets.
g. Adequate emergency access would be provided by the central 30 foot wide
driveway which is wide enough to accommodate emergency vehicles. The
project would be conditioned to prohibit parallel parking along this central
access way. The project has been reviewed and approved by the Fire
Department.
General Plannin~ Conditions:
1. Recommendation of approval is granted for SDP 93-04, as shown on Exhibits "A" -
"TT", dated October 6, 1993 incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise
noted in these conditions.
....
i 1
PC RES0 NO. 3548 -3-
r: IC
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
2. Approval of SDP 93-04 is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-01, PUD 92-0'
& HDP 92-10.
3. All conditions of approval for the CT 92-01 as contained in Planning Resolution Nc
3546 are applicable and incorporated through this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannin
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of November, 1992
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Bets
Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
ATTEST:
-Y\
r-
BAILEY NOB@, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
u MICHAEL J. HOLZMILVLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3548 -4-