HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 3558..
\' ' ll * 0
1
2
3
4
5
~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3558
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A HILLSIDE
176 APARTMENT UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND NORTH OF
CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR 186 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AND
I CASE NAME: MARINERS POINT
6
7
CASE NO: HDP 91-25
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad an(
8 referred to the Planning Commission; and
9 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Titlf
lo 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
I.1 /I WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
12 II Commission did, on the 17th day of November, 1993, consider said request on propem
described as:
13
14
15
16
Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 12 south, Range 4 west
San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State of
California, according to the official plat.
17 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
I.8 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
19
20
21
22
23 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
24 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
APPROVES HDP 91-25, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
factors relating to HDP 91-25.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissior
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
25 I
26
27 PC RES0 NO. 3558 1
28
-,. e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Findin=:
1. That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properll
identified because the site's hillside slope conditions and undevelopable areas have
been identified on a slope constraints exhibit.
2. That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
pennits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapta
and that the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concept!
illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual for the following reasons
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
a. All manufactured cut and fill slopes are land form/contour graded and
do not exceed a height of 30 feet.
b. The project's cut/fill grading volumes of 8,915 cubic yds. per graded
acre falls within the "potentially acceptable range" of 8,000 - 10,000
cubic yds./acre. Included in these volumes is 43,200 cubic yds. of
grading for Alga Road which is a circulation element roadway. When
Alga Road is subtracted out of the grading calculations, the project's
grading volumes are reduced to 8,481 cubic yds. per graded acre and
are still witbin the "potentially acceptable range".
Based on engineering requirements to meet specific fixed vertical and
horizontal alignments for proposed Alga Road and the extension of
Camino de las Ondas, which is a non-loaded collector road traversing
across the entire project, the Planning Director and City Engineer
approve the proposed grading volumes.
c. Landscaping in conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan would be
provided on all manufactured slopes to assist in visually screening the
slopes erosion and to reduce erosion.
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
d. All structures and roofs within the project would be earth tone in
color to reduce visual impacts.
e. A percentage of the homes along the north/south trending and gently
sloping ridgeline would be one-story in height and all homes would
have varying roof lines.
f. Homes are setback from the top of manufactured slopes from a range
of 17 to 50 feet.
3. That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which
are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of this code
PC RES0 NO. 3558 2
I
28
1, . I* e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
because all undevelopable areas have been identified and no development or gradin
would occur in the areas containing 25 to 45%+ slopes. The project contains 11
wetland areas, riparian or woodland habitats, floodways, major power transmissio
easements, beaches, or permanent bodies of water.
4. That the project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside land
because the proposed grading would create building pads that are terraced for view
and step down the slope. A majority of the local streets and manufactured slope
are cunring and are aligned to follow the north/south trending contours. The stree
alignments and curving land form graded slopes would reduce visual impacts createc
by the grading and help simulate the natural slope conditions.
5. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to thi
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless thl
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building canno
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Plannin?
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of tht
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project
6. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, 0:
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by an!
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepare(
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensurc
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impact
created by the project.
7. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it ha,
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Loca:
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
8. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbac
Unified District.
9. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
10. AI1 necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required a!
conditions of approval.
11. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriatt
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
PC RES0 NO. 3558 3
-:
I.. e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Conditions:
1. AU conditions of approval for CT 91-12 as contained in Planning Commissiol
Resolution No. 3556 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through thi
reference.
2. Approval for HDP 91-25, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "OO", dated November 17
1993, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Aq
proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval a
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this pennit.
5' I/ 3. Approval of HDP 91-25 is subject to approval of CT 91-12 and SDP 91-1 1.
9 8 I/ PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
10
11 by the following vote, to wit:
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of November, 1993
12 AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Betz
Welshons, Savary & Erwin.
13
14
15
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Hall.
16 II ABSTAIN: None.
17
18
19
I 20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
n
BAILEY NOBfE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
A
MICHAEL J. MLZMIMER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3558 4
I I I1