Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-12-01; Planning Commission; Resolution 3578dr I + /I e e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3578 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ROUGH GRADE THE NEIGHBORHOODS AND MAJOR STREETS OF THE THIRD PHASE OF THE AVIARA MASTER PLAN ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG FUTURE AMBROSIA LANE NORTH OF EXISTING ALGA ROAD. CASE NAME: AVIARA PHASE I11 CASE NO: HDP 92-04 WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit: A portion of the east half of the southeast quarter of Section 22, and a portion of the north half of Section 27, all in Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California according to official plat thereof, as shown on Record of Survey No. 10774, recorded in the Office of the San Diego County Recorder, October 30, 1986. has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of November: 1993, and on the 1st day of December, 1993, hold a duly noticed public hearing a: prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimon) 1 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a1 i ~ factors relating to the HDP 92-04; and I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning CommissioI as follows: I A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planninl Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of HDP 92-04, based on the followin1 findings and subject to the following conditions: I I e< I/ e 0 FiIldhs: 1. That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properly 1 2 identified, as shown on Exhibits "I" - "M", dated November 17, 1993. 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 2. That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and permits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 3. That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of this code. 4. That the project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside lands. 5. That the project design substantially conforrns to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual. lo 11 6. The site is impacted by unusual geotechnical and soils conditions that necessitate 11 I1 corrective work and is impacted by a Circulation Element roadway. 12 /I General Planning Conditions: l3 /[ 1. Approval for HDP 92-04, as shown on Exhibits "A1 - "M", dated November 17, 1993 14 15 16 incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. Approval of HDP 92-04 is granted subject to the approval of MP 177(G), LCPA 92- 01, GPA 93-06, and CT 92-03. HDP 92-04 is approved subject to all conditions of MP 177(G), LCPA 92-01, GPA 93-06 and CT 92-03, Planning Commission Resolutions No's. 3574, 3575, 3576, and 3577, incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning Department. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... PC RES0 NO. 3578 -2- v’ e 1 II PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of December, 1993, by the following vote, to wit: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Betz, Welshons, Savary, Erwin & Hall. I NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST: CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 14 15 l6 I1 PLANNING DIRECTOR I.7 ll I.8 !I 19 1 20 21 22 23 24 I! 25 26 27 28 PC RES0 NO. 3578 -3-