HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-12-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 35890 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
l8 I
19 ~
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3589
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF
THE CITY, EAST OF FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, SOUTH
OF APPROVED VILLAGE "T" AND NORTH OF APPROVED
VILLAGE "W" WITHIN THE CALAVERA HILLS MASTER PLAN,
IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 7.
CASE NAME: CALAVERA HEIGHTS VILLAGE "U"
DEVELOP 138 MULTI-FAMILY UNITS ON PROPERTY
CASE NO: HDP 90-32
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad an(
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Tit1
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Plannin:
Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 1993, consider said request on propeq
described as:
A portion of Lots D of the Rancho Agua Hedionda in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to the map thereof No. 823 on file at the office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimon
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
factors relating to HDP 90-32.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissio
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commissio
recommends APPROVAL of HDP 90-32, based on the following findings an
subject to the following conditions:
...
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
e 0
Findinns:
1. That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been proper11
identified consistent with the City's Hillside Development Ordinance (Chapter 21 -9:
of the Municipal Code). The site's hillside slope conditions and undevelopable area!
have been identified on Constraints Exhibits "0' and "P", dated, December 15,1993
In addition, Exhibits "Q" - "U" provide a slope analysis and cross sections of th(
proposed hillside development.
2. That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals an(
permits are consistent with the purpose, intenty and requirements of Chapter 21.9:
and that the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepE
illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual for the following reasons
a. All manufactured cut and fill slopes are landform/contour graded and do no
exceed a height of 30 feet.
b. The project's grading is consistent with the grading concept approved for thc
buildout of this master plan. The project's cuVf3.l grading volumes of 7,032
cubic yards per graded acre falls within the acceptable range of 0 - 7,99!
cubic yds./acre.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
3.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4.
...
c. Landscaping in conformance with the City's Landscape Manual would bc
provided on all manufactured slopes to assist in visually screening the slope
and to reduce slope erosion.
d. The project meets all the requirements of the Hillside Developmenl
Regulations and Guidelines with regards to hillside grading, architecture anc
building locations.
That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property whid
are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of this codt
because all undevelopable areas have been identified and no development or gradin2
would occur in the areas containing 40%+ slopes. The project's manufacturer
slopes will be contour graded to maintain the integrity of the adjacent natura
hillside open space areas.
That the project's overall site design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance o
hillside lands because the use of narrower private streets as allowed by the Plannec
Development Ordinance verses a wider public street minimizes and reduces thc
amount of grading and disturbance of the natural topography and helps to preservc
the planning area's natural open space. The multi-family building pads and overal
grading concept allow for hillside development consistent with applicabh
regulations that can accommodate the proposed density. The manufactured slope!
would be contour graded to follow the existing topography of the area and thf
slopes will be landscaped for erosion control and visual screening.
PC RES0 No. 3589 2
.. 0 e
5. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot occur
4 Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
5 6. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
6 new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
7 additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
8 continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
9
1
2 project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the City
3 within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
7. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has 10 been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
11
12
13
8. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
14 9. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
15 of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
16
17
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7.
Unified District.
Conditions:
1. All conditions of approval for CT 90-25 as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3587 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through this
reference. 19 l8 I
20 2. Approval for HDP 90-32, as shown on Exhibits "A" - "LL", dated December 15, 1993
incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development 21 shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits.
22 11 3. Approval of HDP 90-32 is granted subject to approval of CT 90-25, and PUD 90-25.
23
24
...
25 11 "'
26 I 27
28
PC RES0 No. 3589 3
0 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Betz
Welshons, Savary & Hall. >
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
L
BAILEY NOB&, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RESO No. 3589