HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-12-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 3592., 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ll
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3592
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-
FAMILY LOTS, 76 TOWNHOMES, 72 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72
APARTMENT UNITS, AND TWO FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY
SITES, ALL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO
DEL NORTE, NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, AND SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
PLAN ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
CASE NO: PUD 92-03
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60
acres of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to United States Government Survey, approved October 25,
1875, according to the Official Plat thereof.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 1993
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Planned Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
....
I I
*. 0 0
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commissior
1 recommends APPROVAL of PUD 92-03, based on the following findings and subjec to the following conditions: 2
3 Findinns:
4 l-
5
6
7
8
9
The project is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan since the RM designatio1
allows the development of low density apartment, condominium, or townhomf
developments that range in density from 4 to 8 dus/acre with a 6 dus/acre growtl
management control point. The RLM designation allows single-family homes tha
range in density from 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre with a 3.2 dus/acre growtl
control point. The net density in the RLM portion of the project is 9.18 dwelliq
units per acre and the net density in the RM portion is 4.4 dwelling units per acre.
The project contains a combination of an overall net density of 5.8 dus/acre,
therefore, the project, exclusive of the density bonus request, is consistent with thc
growth management dwelling unit allowance for the parcel.
lo
11
2. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the 14
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning 13 District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot 12 project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
15
16
17
18
19
20 I
3. The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Final
Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significant
adverse environmental impacts.
4. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
21
22
23
6. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad 24
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
25
created by the project.
5. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Unified School District.
26
27 PC RES0 NO 3592
28
2
2, 0 0
I.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
7. To ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad Unified School Distric
the applicant will submit evidence to the City that impacts to school facilities wil
be mitigated in conformance with the City's Growth Management Plan to the exten
permitted by applicable state law for legislative acts.
8. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required a:
conditions of approval.
9. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriatr
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and paymen
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be availabk
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
10. The project complies with all requirements of Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbac
Municipal Code.
11. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent witl
Chapter 21.45, the Zone 20 Specific Plan, and all adopted plans of the City and
other governmental agencies.
12. The proposed use is necessary and desirable to provide a service or facility which
will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the neighborhood and the
community, because the development of two community facility sites, single-family
lots, condominiums, townhomes, and apartments would provide a balance and mix
of land uses within the Zone 20 Specific Plan. A majority of the residential
development planned for the specific plan area would be standard single-family
homes on 7,500 to 10,000 square foot lots. The development of higher density
multi-family units in close proximity to natural open space, Poinsettia Community
Park, and future Alga Road, in addition to the provision of apartment units
affordable to lower income household would create a more diversified and balanced
commllnity.
13. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, because the project is designed to preserve the coastal sage scrub habitat
located along the eastern portion of Area "A". This open space would connect with
the larger open space located in the central canyon. Drainage facilities would be
provided concurrent with development of the project to reduce erosion and flooding.
AU manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and to visually
screen the slopes.
14. The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Section 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section
21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the
PC RES0 NO 3592 3
28
-. a 0
Design Guidelines Manual for the following reasons:
a. The local streets in the single-family portion of the project would have curb
1
2 gutter, and sidewalks on both sides, and have 36 to 40 feet of paving. Thi!
3 exceeds the 30 foot minimum private street width standard.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
15.
b. The project would provide a mixture of one and two-story homes, and the
multi-family buildings would have varied roof lines, and a variety of fronl
building elevations and front yard setbacks.
c. Adequate recreational vehicle storage space would be provided within the
individual projects and be sufficiently screened from the public right-of-waj
and surrounding properties.
d. The single-family homes would have, at a minimum two car garages which
would meet the parking and storage requirements of the ordinance, and
guest parking would be provided on both sides of the streets. The
condominiums and townhomes all have two covered parking spaces,
including garages and carports for residents, and guest parking is dispersed
along the internal driveways.
The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on
the site, because the project meets all the requirements of the Hillside Development
Regulations and Guidelines, except the 30 foot slope height standard as permitted
per the Site Development Plan. The manufactured slopes would be landscaped, and
the single-family lots would terrace down the slope towards the west to conform
with the topography. The homes have roof hes that are varied and relate to the
topography. In addition, the northeastem corner of the site would be preserved to
protect the coastal sage habitat and to provide open space in the central canyon.
l8 16. The project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
19 the project and does not dominate the project the local streets in the project
I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 i
17. The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood.
General Planning Conditions:
1. Recommendation of approval is granted for PUD 92-03, as shown on Exhibits "A' - 'YYY", dated December 15, 1993 incorporated by reference and on file in the
Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.
PC RES0 NO 3592 4 1 28
. " e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
~
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1 2. Approval of PUD 92-03 is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-02, SDP 92-06
HDP 92-03, and the Conditional Negative Declaration.
3. All conditions of approval for the CT 92-02 as contained in Planning Resolution No
3591 are applicable and incorporated through this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planninl
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairman Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Betz, Welshons
Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None. -me
BAILEY NOBIE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
,
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO 3592 5
28