HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-12-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 35937 II 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 ~
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3593
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SITE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, 76
TOWNHOMES, 72 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72 APARTMENT UNITS,
AND TWO FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY SITES, ALL ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE,
NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, SOUTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE
20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
CASE NO: SDP 92-06
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad an(
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Titlc
~
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
l3 I1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Plannin;
14
15
16
17
18
19
Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 1993, consider said request on propert
described as:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60 acres of
the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 12
South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government
Survey, approved October 25, 1875, according to the Official Plat
thereof.
~
20 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimon
21
22
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
23
24
25
factors relating to SDP 92-06.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissio
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
26
27
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
28
ll 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of SDP 92-06, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
Findins:
1. The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to thi5
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannoi
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project
2. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, o
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by an
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan preparec
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensurl
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impact
created by the project.
3. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it ha
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Locz
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
4. School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsba,
Unified District.
5. To ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad Unified School Distri(
the applicant will submit evidence to the City that impacts to school facilities wi
be mitigated in conformance with the City's Growth Management Plan to the exter
permitted by applicable state law for legislative acts.
6. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
7. All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required i
conditions of approval.
8. The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropria
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payme.
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be availab
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
PC RES0 NO 3593 2
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9. The project provides affordable housing units that will be available to low income
households and the modification to the Hillside Standard for slope height would no1
have a detrimental effect on public health, safety or welfare because the creation oj
a 43 foot high manufactured fill slope that exceeds the 30 foot standard does no1
pose a health and safety problem if the recommendations of the projects?
geotechnical report are adhered to. The slope height standard of 30 feet is ar
aesthetic regulation intended to minimize visual impacts created by large
manufactured slopes. The overheight slope would be contour graded anc
adequately landscaped to provide for visual screening, thus, offsetting any visua
impacts created by the additional 12 feet of slope height.
10. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings an(
environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of tht
general plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specificall;
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will no
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation because the project i
consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan. The project would no
have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed residential land use
are compatible in scale, architecture, and building materials with the multi-fami;
residential development to the south the future community park to the west. Publi
street improvements would be provided to accommodate traffic generated by tht
project and the project must comply with all the circulation and public faciliq
requirements of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20.
11. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate th(
use because the project complies with all City ordinances and polices except for th(
Hillside Ordinance's slope height standard as explained in Section C(2) of thi
report, therefore, the parcel is adequate in size, shape and slope to accommodatl
the proposed land uses.
12. That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other feature
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in th
neighborhood will be provided and maintained because the project would b
conditioned to provide a solid wall or fence, and landscaped windbreaks along th
perimeter of any future developable area that abuts property under "open field
cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance effects of adjacent pesticide sprayin
and dust generation from farm operations and for the following reasons:
Area "B" and "c" - Single-family Residential:
a. Standard R-1 Zone front, side and rear setbacks would be provided for eac
home, and all homes would have at least a two-car garages to satisfy of
street parking requirements.
PC RES0 NO 3593 3
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. The front yards of all the lots would be landscaped with a minimum of :
street trees of varying sizes, and the 50 foot setback along Alga Road wouk
be landform graded and heavily landscaped.
Area "A" and "D" - Multi-Family Residential And Community Facility Site:
a. The bulk and scale of the proposed two-story condominiums, townhouses
and apartment buildings would be compatible with the existing anc
surrounding residential development to the south. The proposed multi-fan@
townhomes would provide an appropriate transition between the proposec
single-family land use to the east and the future community park land use tc
the west.
b. The design of the project would assure a unique mix of residentia
development, and enhance the aesthetic quality of the area as follows:
i. The street setbacks would be landscaped with a combination of tree
and shrubs to partially screen the residential structures from th
public streets.
u. The building elevations would have textured stucco exteriors and til
and metal roofs, varied roof lines, architectural accent features an
building forms, and varied building facades.
..
iii. The dwelling units would be orientated at various angles along th
driveways to provide an enclosure of space between the buildings an
to provide more visual interest when the project is viewed from th
public streets.
12. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle a
traffic generated by the proposed use for the following reasons:
Area "B" and "c" - Single-Family Residential:
All the local, collector, and major streets, both within and offsite of this projec
would be constructed to City standards, have underground utilities, and contai
public sidewalks. A pedestrian access is provided between Lots 47 and 48 in Are
"c" to allow access to future Hidden Valley Road and Poinsettia Community Par1
Area "A" and "D" - Multi-Family Residential And Community Facility Site:
a. The project would provide adequate onsite parking (498 parking spaces) an
circulation to serve the needs of the residents and their guests, and it woul
not impact the availability of offsite street parking.
PC RES0 NO 3593 4
e 0
b. Sidewalks and drainage facilities would be provided along the project's streel
1 frontages to serve the project.
2
3
4
5
6
c. The proposed 30 to 45 foot wide central private driveways would bt
adequate to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, vehicle turr
movements, and emergency access.
d. An intemal pedestrian circulation system that is separated from tht
driveways within the multi-family projects would be provided and allov
sufficient and safe access to the recreation facility and adjacent public streets
7
8
9
10
e. Adequate access for emergency vehicles is provided by the central 30 to 4!
foot wide private driveways that service the multi-family projects. The 3(
to 45 foot wide driveways are also wide enough to accommodate emergenq
vehicles, and the project would be conditioned to prohibit parallel parkin1
along the 30 foot wide driveways. The project has been reviewed ant
approved by the Fire Department.
ll // conditions:
12 1. All conditions of approval for CI' 92-02 as contained in Planning Commissio~
Resolution No. 3591 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through thi
13 reference.
l4 2. Approval for SDP 92-06, as shown on Exhibits "A" - IWY", dated December 15
15 1993, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Departmen1
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Aq
16 proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval a
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit. 17
18 3. Approval of SDP 92-06 is subject to approval of CI' 92-02, PUD 92-03, and HDP 92
03.
19
20
21
22
23
24
4. The approval for the apartment portion of the Site Development Plan shall becom
null and void if building permits are not issued for this portion of the project withi
one year from the date of final map recordation creating Lot 133, unless otherwis
stated in an approved affordable housing agreement for the site.
....
..I.
25
26
. . ..
PC RES0 NO 3593 27
28
5
// 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Betz,
Welshons, Savary & Hall.
NOES: Commissioner Erwin.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
“n
r- BAILEY NOBLE Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO 3593 6