HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-01-05; Planning Commission; Resolution 3610* (I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3610
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
GRADE A 184 UNIT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED 0.25
MILES WEST OF EL CAMIN0 REAL AND 0.75 MILES SOUTH
OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 21.
CASE NAME: POINSETTIA HILL
CASE NO: HDP 93-02
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
The northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 23,
Township 12 south, Range 4 west, in the City of Carlsbad, San
Diego County.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 5th day of January, 1994,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the HDP 93-02; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of HDP 93-02, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
....
I
I/ m 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Findin~s:
1. That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properly
identified because the site's hillside slope conditions and undevelopable areas have
been identified on the constraints exhibits.
2. That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
permits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of Chapter 21.95
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and that the project design substantially conforms
to the intent of the concepts illustrated in the hillside development guidelines
manual.
3. That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which
are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code as all developable areas have been identified and no grading wiU
ocm in the areas containing slopes with an inclination of 40 percent or greater,
with the exception of those small, isolated ravines where there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
4. That the project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside lands
because the proposed grading will create multifamily building pads that are terraced
and step down the existing slope and the internal street system generally follows the
terrain of the site.
Plannin~ Conditions:
5. Approval for HDP 93-02, as shown on Exhibits "A" - 'IT", dated January 5, 1994
incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. Development
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed grading
and/or development substantially different from this approval as determined by the
Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit.
6. Approval of HDP 93-02 is granted subject to the approval of CT 93-03, CP 93-02,
and SDP 93-02. HDP 93-02 is approved subject to all conditions of CT 93-03, CP
93-02, and SDP 93-02, Planning Commission Resolutions No's. 3607, 3608, and
3609, incorporated herein by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
....
....
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3610 -2-
I a e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 5th day of January, 1994, by 1
2
3 II the following vote, to wit:
4
5
6
AYES: Chairperson Savav, ~ommissioners: Schlehuber, Betz, Noble
& Hall.
NOES: Commissioners: Erwin & Welshons.
7
8 ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: None.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ATTEST:
3 PEGGY 9 A Y, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMM~SSION
PLANNING DIRECTOR
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 PC RES0 NO. 3610 -3 -
28