Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-20; Planning Commission; Resolution 3651li 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3651 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL, PROGRAM FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND OPEN SPACE AND TO BRING THE DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM, GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH COLLEGE BOULEVARD/FUTUFE ALGA ROAD. CASE NAME: ENCINAS CREEK - MORGAN CASE NO: LCPA 93-03 9 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal ! Io 11 General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zor 12 13 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Loca 14 Commission; and 16 dated April 20, 1994, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the : 15 Program designations for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit LCP! conformance; 17 11 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for am l8 11 as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 19 I/ 20 I) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 20th day of Apr 21 I1 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the propos 22 testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Con 24 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considt 23 Coastal Plan Amendments shown on Exhibit LCPA 93-03, and; considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment. 25 1 26 27 .... 28 // 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ~ 23 27 26 25 24 28 I WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines require a six week public revie7 for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Con of the City of Carlsbad, as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) The State mandated six week review period, started on November 1 and ended on December 27, 1993, and no comments were receivl C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con DENIES LCPA 93-03 as shown on Exhibit LCPA 93-03, dated P 1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on the fc findings: Findin~s: 1. The associated General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been Therefore there is no need to amend the Local Coastal Program as it wou the plans to be inconsistent. .... .... .... .... .... .... .... I ..-* .... .... PC RES0 NO. 3651 -2- I 1 0 0 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the j ~cm-unission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 20th day of April, 1994, by the f: vote, to wit: 1 2 3 4 5 AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Schlehuber, Welshons, Erwin & Hall. 6 I1 NOES: None. 7 8 ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Betz. 9 10 11 0 fl CARLSBAD PLANNING COMM: 12 // ATTEST: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 , MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL~R Planning Director ~ PC RES0 NO. 3651 -3- 28 r 0 APRIL 20, 19 . * EXISTING LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PROPOSED LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM I 4 City of Carisba P I ENCINAS CREEK-MORGAN I LCPA 93-1 I 1