HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-20; Planning Commission; Resolution 3651li 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3651
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD LOCAL COASTAL,
PROGRAM FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL TO COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL AND OPEN SPACE AND TO BRING THE
DESIGNATIONS ON THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM,
GENERAL PLAN, AND ZONING MAP INTO CONFORMANCE
ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EAST OF ITS INTERSECTION
WITH COLLEGE BOULEVARD/FUTUFE ALGA ROAD.
CASE NAME: ENCINAS CREEK - MORGAN
CASE NO: LCPA 93-03
9 WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal !
Io
11
General Plan, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zor
12
13 WHEREAS, a verified application for an amendment to the Loca
14
Commission; and 16
dated April 20, 1994, attached and incorporated herein, has been filed with the : 15
Program designations for certain property located, as shown on Exhibit LCP!
conformance;
17 11 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for am
l8 11 as provided in Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
19 I/
20 I) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 20th day of Apr
21 I1 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the propos
22
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Con 24
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considt 23
Coastal Plan Amendments shown on Exhibit LCPA 93-03, and;
considered all factors relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment. 25 1
26
27
....
28
// 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
~
23
27
26
25
24
28
I
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines require a six week public revie7
for any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Con
of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) The State mandated six week review period, started on November 1
and ended on December 27, 1993, and no comments were receivl
C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con
DENIES LCPA 93-03 as shown on Exhibit LCPA 93-03, dated P
1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof based on the fc
findings:
Findin~s:
1. The associated General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been
Therefore there is no need to amend the Local Coastal Program as it wou
the plans to be inconsistent.
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
I ..-*
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3651 -2-
I 1
0 0
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the j
~cm-unission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 20th day of April, 1994, by the f:
vote, to wit:
1
2
3
4
5
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Schlehuber,
Welshons, Erwin & Hall.
6 I1 NOES: None.
7
8 ABSTAIN: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Betz.
9
10
11
0 fl
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMM:
12 // ATTEST:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
, MICHAEL J. HOLZMILL~R Planning Director
~
PC RES0 NO. 3651 -3-
28
r 0 APRIL 20, 19
.
*
EXISTING
LOCAL
COASTAL
PROGRAM
PROPOSED
LOCAL
COASTAL
PROGRAM
I
4
City of Carisba
P I ENCINAS CREEK-MORGAN I LCPA 93-1 I 1