HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-05-18; Planning Commission; Resolution 3663rc t II 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3663
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM OFFICE TO TRAVEL
SERVICES COMMERCIAL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE EAST OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AT
ANACAPA.
CASE NAME: SEAPOINTE RESORT
CASE NO: ZC 93-05
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property, to wit:
A portion of Lots 1 and 2 in fractional Section 20, Township
12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian,
in the City of Carlsbad, in the County of San Diego, State of
California, according to official plat thereof.
11 has been filed with the City of Carlsbad, as shown on Exhibit "B", dated May 1
12 attached and incorporated herein and referred to the Planning Commission; anc
13 WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request as provided by T
l4 the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
15 11 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 18th day of May, 1'
16 11 a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t
17
18
19 li I' and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission cons
20
21
factors relating to the Zone Change; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Co
22 /I as follows:
23 //
24 I1 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
25 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Ca
recommends APPROVAL of ZC 93-05, based on the following fin(
26 Findinns:
27
28
1. The proposed land use is similar in intensity to the existing land use.
2. The nearby Encina Wastewater Treatment Facility has successfully take
reduce by-product odors.
Il
.- 0 0
3. There are sufficient buffers surroun* the project site to accommd
1 impactive development.
2
3
4. The South carlsbad State Beach campground is similar to the proposed us
both encourage visitors to the California coast.
4
5
6
7
5. A hotel generates less daily traffic than an office and therefore will have
impact on adjacent roadways and intexsections.
6. Potential impacts to adjacent properties caused by future development of
like noise, visual quality and light can be mitigated through design.
7. The proposed land use wiU support the local tourist trade.
8 8. Development of the site as travel services commercial is not anticipated 1
9 significant impacts to the area.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
PASSED, APPROVED7 AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 1
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 18th day of May, 199L
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners: Betz, Erwin, Hall,
Schlehuber & Welshons.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMIS,
ATTEST:
24
25
I
26
27
Planning Director
28
PC RES0 NO. 3663 -2-