HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-11-02; Planning Commission; Resolution 37160 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3716
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
YEAR EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONTINUE THE OPERATION OF A POLICE FIRING RANGE
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE FUTURE
VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK.
CASE NAME: POLICE FIRING RANGE
CASE NO: CUP 256x2
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad an
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A FIVE-
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for extension of CU
256 as provided by that CUP; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Pla.nninl
Commission did, on the 2nd day of November, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing tc
consider said application on property described as:
A portion of Lot F of Rancho Agua Hedionda in the City of
Carlsbad, State of California, according to Map No. 823 recorded
November 16, 1896 in the office of the San Diego County
Recorder.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony anc
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor:
relating to CUP 256x2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissior
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES
CUP 256x2, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
1 Findings:
I 1- That the findings of Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2355 and 2938 are stili
applicable to the continued operation of the police firing range, except, currently the
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
facility is not used exclusively by the City’s Police Department. The Polit
Department allows other law enforcement agencies to train at the facility, whic
provides an important regional service and helps pay for the facility’s maintenant
and operation costs.
2. The Planning Commission finds that the conditional use permit extension
categorically exempt from further environmental review according to Section 153(
of the CEQA guidelines, and the environmental impacts of this project have head
been considered during the original approval of CUP 256, resulting in the approvi
of a Negative Declaration dated September 26,1984. The continued operation of th
f&g range is within the scope of the original environmental document, and ther
are no additional significant adverse impacts to the environment.
3. There will be no substantial adverse impacts on surrounding land uses or to th
public’s health and welfare due to the continuation of this use. The facility is use
on a limited basis, during fair weather, and does not significantly impact the existin
dirt access road.
4. The applicant has satisfactorily complied with all conditions of approval impose
upon CUP 256 as stated in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2355 and 2931
The Planning Commission has reviewed these conditions and determined that the
are adequate and shall apply as conditions of approval for CUP 256x2.
Conditions:
I. All conditions of approval imposed upon CUP 256 as stated in Planning Commissio
Resolution Nos. 2355 and 2938 shall apply as conditions of approval for CUP 256X:
except Condition No. 4 of Planning Commission No. 2355, which is replaced b
Condition No. 2 below.
2. This conditional use permit is extended for a period of five years. This conditional us
permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if a
conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a significar
detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If th
Planning Director determines that the use has such significant adverse impacts, th
Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing th
permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate the significar
adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it j
found that the use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and th
public’s health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. Thi
permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five years up01
written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date
In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adversc
affect on mounding land uses or the public’s health and welfare will result because o
the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse affect on surrounding land
uses or the public’s health and welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as ai
PC RES0 NO. 3716 -2-
e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
original application for a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number c
extensions the Planning Commission may grant.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannin
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2nd day of November, 1994, by t€
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary, Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Emir
Compas, Nielsen, and Momoy.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
u MICHAEL J. HOLMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3716 -3-