HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-12-21; Planning Commission; Resolution 3736I3 I1 a 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3736
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
WITHIN THE AVIARA MASTER PLAN AT THE SOUTHERN
END OF BLACK RAIL COURT.
CASE NAME: ALDEA Il
CASE NO: PUD 94-02
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
Parcel 6 of Parcel Map No. 16451, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County on April 15, 1991, in the
City of Carlsbad, State of California
APPROVAL OF A 9-LOT/54-UNIT PLANNED UNIT
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Planned Uni
Development pursuant to Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of December, 1994
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony anc
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factor?
relating to the Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commissior
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission recommends
APPROVAL of PUD 94-02, based on the following findings and subject to the following
conditions:
i Findinm:
1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with Chapte~
2 1.45 of Title 2 1, the general plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all adoptec
plans of the City and other governmental agencies. The proposed development is 2
multifamily residential development as anticipated by the General Plan designatio1
II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
of RM and the Aviara Master Plan. The proposed density is consistent with thc
density allowed by the General Plan and the Aviara Master Plan.
2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a servicc
or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the neighborhooc
and the community. The proposed project is necessary and desirable at the proposer
location to implement the General Plan and the approved Master Plan whicl
designate this site for multifamily residential development. The propose4
multifamily development will benefit the community by contributing to the provisio~
of a range of housing types and price ranges.
3. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare o
persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements i]
the vicinity. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, o
general welfare of persons in the vicinity, nor injurious to property or improvementl
in the vicinity. The proposed Tentative Tract Map meets all required City stank&
and complies with all applicable regulations. All required public facilities ani
services will be provided, and the project has been designed to provide adequatt
setbacks from the neighboring uses (golf course).
4. The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum development standards se
forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 21.45.080, and has beer
designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Design Guidelines Manual
The proposed project meets all of the minimum development standards set forth h
Chapter 21.45.090, including building height restrictions, setback requirements
minimum distance between structures, parking requirements, recreation arer
requirements, and street design requirements. The proposed project also has beel
designed in accordance with the Design Guidelines Manual to include stepped pads
curvilinear street design, enriched paving at the entry area, private and commol
recreation areas, varied building orientations, and architectural relief.
5. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natura
topography of the site, and enhances significant natural resources on the site. Thl
proposed project incorporates stepped building pads and a combination of two
three, and four-plex designs to avoid single large pads. The proposed project wil
enhance the natural resources on the site by trading a small open space resourcc
area for a larger area of equal or better quality which is also contiguous to othe~
open space resource area.
6. The project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with tht
project and does not dominate the project. The circulation system will providc
adequate access to all units, adequate room for vehicular movement, 2-car garage!
for each unit for resident parking, and more than adequate guest parking in i
manner which is dispersed throughout the project for maximum convenience. Thc
project utilizes cunilinear street design and short private driveways so that thc
street system does not dominate the project.
I
PC RES0 NO. 3736 -2-
? I1 e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7. "he proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site !
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious (
disruptive element to the neighborhood. The proposed project's design and density su
consistent with all applicable regulations and are compatible with surroundin
development (golf course). The project will not create a disharmonious disrupti~
element to the area because the project is designed in a manner which is sensitil
to its hillside location and is bounded by open space areas on the three sides adjacel
to the golf course.
Conditions:
1. PUD 94-02 is approved subject to the approval of CT 94-03.
2. All of the conditions contained in CT 94-03, Planning Commission Resolution Nc
3735, are included herein by reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plannin
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 2 1 st day of December 1994, by th
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Savary; Commissioners Welshons, Noble, Erwi~
Compas, Nielsen, and Monroy.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATI'EST:
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3736 -3-