HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-04; Planning Commission; Resolution 3680I
I (
/)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3680
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, EAST OF FUTURE
MELROSE DRIVE.
CASE NAME RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES “F”,
CASE NO: CT 93-07
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF CT 93-07, ON
“G”, AND T”
and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provide1
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the
Commission did, on the 16th day of November, 1994, the 30th day of November, 3
on the 4th day of January, 1995, hold a public hearing on property described as:
That portion of Section 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range
3 West, and Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consi
factors relating to CT 93-07.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the COI
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Carlsbad Tract CT 93-07, base’
following findings:
Findings:
I. The proposed map and its design and improvements are consistent with thc
General Plan, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP 139(E)), and with a
~
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0
provisions of Title 21, to include but not be limited to, Chapters 21.06, 21.:
21.45, 21.53, 21.90, and 21.95.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of develol
exhibited via a review of the existing General Plan and Rancho Carrillo Mas
3. Findings were not made pursuant to Section 21081.(c) of the Public Resour
that specific economic, social or other considerations make infeasible the II
measures of project alternatives identified in the environmental impact re
4. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health prc
analyzed in the Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR 91-04).
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not con
easements of record or easements established by court judgement, acquirc
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed sul
In this connection the City Council has approved via the Carrillo Ran
Agreement alternate easements for access or for use that will be provided
these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the p
6. All requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been me
the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Carrillo Ma,
(EIR 91-04). All feasible mitigation identified in EIR 91-04 will be unde
this project as designed and conditioned.
7. The proposed map meets and performs all of the requirements and conc
Title 20 and the Subdivision Map Act as all necessary design, dc
improvements, and agreements necessary to actualize such performance 1
met or been conditioned to be met via this resolution.
8. The project is not a conversion of residential real property to condl
community apartments or stock cooperatives.
9. The property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to 1
Conservation Act of 1965 so there is no necessity to make a determination
to sustain agricultural use according to the provisions of Section 66474.4 of
Government Code nor to determine exception status.
10. The proposed tentative map complies with all requirements of Hillside Dew
Permit 91-17 and therefore with all requirements of the hillside dev
regulations, Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
11. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land I:
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on thc
Plan.
12. As designed and conditioned, this project is in prior compliance with Fina
04, and would not create any additional significant environmental impact
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -2-
1
2
3
e e
l i ’ 13. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facilii
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any a
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure c
I availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts creat
LI )I project.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
14. This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of t
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
15. The Tentative Tract Map satisfies all requirements of Title 20 and 21 of the
Municipal Code (except as may be modified for affordable housing incent
the State Subdivision Map Act.
16. The proposed subdivision implements the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan MI
17. The proposed project’s design and density of the development portion of t
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmc
disruptive element to the area, because the Tentative Tract Map meet!
standards and the proposed residential densities are consistent with the Gen
and the Carrillo Ranch Master Plan. The surrounding villages and
properties are either existing residential development or are planned for rt
development, therefore, the proposed residential development would be ca
with the area.
18. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare o
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improveme]
vicinity, because the Tentative Tract Map (CT 93-07) meets all requi
standards and ordinances, all public facilities and services will be prov
adequate setbacks and buffers from the proposed nearby community park,
family residential and single family residential uses and Melrose Drive k
incorporated into the project design.
21
22
24
20. The affordable housing units required for this project under Chapter 21, 23
subdivision would be curvilinear and follow the natural contour.
19. The project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integr
the project and does not dominate the project, because the local streets P
Carkbad Municipal Code will be provided pursuant to SDP 94-01,
Commission Resolution No. 3682.
25 I/ 21. Each local agency shall consider the effect of actions adopted pursua
26
27
28
Subdivision Map Act on the housing needs of the region in which
jurisdiction is situated and balance these needs against the public servicc
its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. As the
consistent with the City’s adopted housing element which has been revi
1 )) PC RES0 NO. 3680 -3-
I! 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
approved pursuant to state law by the state, as well as this jurisdiction, to e1
consideration of regional housing needs, and is consistent with Rancho
Master Plan and the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18 which t
public service needs and available fiscal and environmental resources, the 1
in conformance with the requirement of the Subdivision Map Act.
22. The design of the lot sizes and configuration permits orientation of structu
east-west alignment for southern exposure thereby providing for passive 01
heating opportunities. This design also permits orientation of structure;
advantage of prevailing breezes to provide a passive or natural cooling OPF
I1
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
23. All approvals of permits required by Title 21 have been given or issued for
or will be given concurrently with this permit. The project site has an
Master Plan, and Hillside Development Permit. A Planned Development PC
a Site Development Plan are being processed concurrently.
Planning Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for CI’ 93-07, as shown on Exhibits “A - “S”, dated St
7, 1994, (except that within 60 days of final approval of this project the arc1
data sheets shall be revised to reflect all applicable requirements of the
Village Design Guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file in the
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless othem
in these conditions, and approved by the Planning Director or City Engin1
2. Approval of CT 93-07 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 93-06 and
01.
3. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24” x 36” mylar cc
Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative P
reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The Map copy shall be sub
the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final
improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
4. A 500’ scale mylar of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning
prior to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots a]
within and adjacent to the project.
5. This project is approved upon the express condition that the final map sh;
approved unless the City Council finds as of the time of such approval tl
service is available to serve the subdivision.
6. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits P
issued for development of the subject property unless the District
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for s
permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This not
placed on the final map.
)) PC RES0 NO. 3680 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
I
0
7. This approval shall be null and void if the property subject to this approv
annexed to the City of Carlsbad CFD No. 1 within 60 days of the a
Additionally, annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grading, I
or other permit. (Deadline could be extended for good cause as determint
City Manager).
8. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applican
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 (amende
1991) and as amended from time to time, and any development fees estab:
the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system of facil:
improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public
fee dated July 13, 1993, a copy of which is on file with the City Cler
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application wj
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be voic'
9. The project shall ensure to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that utilitic
available to the park site at all times during development unless prior a&
secured from the City. Vehicular access to the park will be provided d
phases of development to the reasonable satisfaction of the Community
Director.
10. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation required by the
Local Facilities Management Plan approved by the City Council on Marc1
incorporated herein and on file in the Planning Department and a1
amendments to the Plan made prior to the issuance of building permits.
11. Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall submit for review and ap
the Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and p
construction of the Recreational Vehicle storage facility.
12. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilitit
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed 1
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as prc
Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to
this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that tl
without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
13.
1
Prior to the issuance of the building permit there shall be a Notice of F
placed on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the
Director notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that tl
Carlsbad has issued a Tentative Tract Map on the real property own
declarant. Said notice of restriction shall note the property description, 1
the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval
any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the notice of restric
deed restrictions may be modified or terminated only with the appro'
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -5-
I_ /I * 0 I/
1
2
3
4
5
6
Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council of the City of 1
whichever has final decision authority for this project.
14. To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities on
Drive at locations subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transil
(NCTD), if such facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities shall at a I
include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. T
and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract from i
architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the ap
the Planning Director and North County Transit District. i
7
8
15. The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sa
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Dire
9
10
11
12
16. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall in(
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
17. As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant sha
a reduced, legible version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a :
blueline drawing.
13 18. As part of the plans submitted for any permit plan check, the applicant sha
14 a reduced, legible version of the Village “F”, “G”, and “P” Design Guideline!
x 36” blueline drawing.
15
16
17
18
19
19. Prior to recordation of any final map, issuance of grading or buildin]
whichever occurs first, the following shall be met: (1) The deeding of an a
school site to the San Marcos Unified School District if it is determinc
school site is warranted; and, (2) A financing plan approved by San Marc0
School District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elemental
facilities in Zone 18. As provided for in the Zone 18 LFMP, if any reimb
and/or school fee credits are to be given, the school agreement/financing 1
20 iI provide a mechanism to do so.
21 20. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of tl
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time oj
22 permit issuance.
23
28
policy subject to the Planning Director’s approval prior to final map appl 27
22. The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City’s st] 26
on the Landscape Maintenance Exhibit. 25
21. All open space areas, slopes, and landscaped areas shall be maintained a! 24
Specific Onsite Conditions:
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -6-
.-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 ~
0 0
23. Elevations and floor plans shall be submitted in compliance with the
architectural review standards established in the Rancho Carrillo Master P
shall comply with the Village “F, “G”, and “P” Design Guidelines. After r
these plans and determining that they are in conformance with the approve(
Guidelines, staff will present the floor plans and architecture to the 1
Commission per the process described in Title 21.45.160. Prior to or co
with the delayed architectural review process, the applicant shall decide wht
51 will be restricted so as not to permit construction of a dwelling unit (in
comply with the building separation requirements of Section 21.45.090(!
Carlsbad Municipal Code). If it is determined that Lot 51 will not be deve
open space easement shall be recorded on the lot. If the lot is to be retained
space, the lot shall be improved with landscaping as approved by the 1
Director.
24. All fences and walls for this project shall be in substantial conformance
fencing and wall details as well as the approved locations for each as shov
Landscape Concept details. All required fencing and/or walls shall be COI
by the developer prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on a uni
basis.
25. Prior to final map, the applicant shall establish Master and Village horn
associations and corresponding covenants, conditions and restrictions. Saic
shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The followi
shall be included in the CC&Rs:
(A) No private development shall be permitted within open space lots 1
open space easement areas.
(B) The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying that individual c
property may replace original fencing on their property, howel
changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall d
the project. The replacement of any fences or walls within this pro
be consistent with one of the fencing or wall design types as she\
Master Plan.
(C) All open space and landscaped areas shall be maintained in a he
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris and
maintained.
(D) Master Homeowner‘s Association maintenance of the Recreation:
Storage Lot.
(E) No parking is allowed within the courtyard area.
26. Elevations, floor plans, and building layouts must comply with the Design ;
for this project pursuant to the approved exhibits and design guidelines.
1 PC RES0 NO. 3680 -7-
I
.-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
Landscape:
27. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval o
or building plans, whichever occurs first.
28. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the L
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on fil
Planning Department.
29. All landscaping shall comply with the landscape requirements of the Carrill
Master Plan and the City’s Landscape Guidelines Manual.
30. The developer shall include top-soil preservation and rollback and redi,
cutlfill slopes and open space areas proposed for native revegetation tl
stability and growth subject to the approval of the City Engineer and 1
Director. The topsoil shall be stockpiled on-site and protected against el
the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Director.
31. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condit!
from weeds, trash, and debris.
32. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as req
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
33. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include buildil
improvement plans and grading plans.
34. All building pad and street areas of Villages “F”, “G, and “P that are grad1
HDP 91-17 and remain vacant or undeveloped for a period of more than 6
after the grading operation is completed shall be seeded to reduce erosion ar
impacts. If grading is phased, the six months time period shall star
completion of each individual grading phase.
Signs and Identification:
35. Building identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road;
identification and/or address shall contrast to their background color.
36. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be desi
conformance with the City’s Sign Ordinance and shall require review and i
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
1 37. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Rancho Carrillo Mas1
Signage shall be located in conformance with the Landscape Concept Plan
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -8-
.-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 1
0 0
Environmental:
38. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures j
within the attached mitigation monitoring report and reporting program
“l”), which are required as part of Environmental Impact Report for thc
Carrillo Master Plan EIR 91-04, certified by City Council on July 27,199
39. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, :
soils contamination report shall be prepared and submitted to the City f
and approval by the City Engineer. The detailed soils contamination rei.
include a soils contamination remediation plan. If remediation is determil
unnecessary, the report shall so indicate.
40. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall constru
attenuation walls consistent with the noise study prepared by Recon datec
1992, on file in the Planning Department. Noise mitigation measures shal
with Planning Department Policy 17 or other adopted City noise policy in
the time of building permit.
41. Prior to final map the applicant shall submit a detailed noise study at
necessary interior noise mitigation measures for Village ‘IF” and “P”.
issuance of building permit: (1) the interior noise levels shall be mitiga
dBA CNEL when openings to the exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if
are required to be closed to meet the City standard, mechanical ventilation
provided; and, (3) all useable exterior space above the first floor shall be a
to the adopted City standard.
42. Prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building
whichever occurs first, the owner of record of the property within the boun
this tentative map shall prepare and record a notice that this property is s
overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Paloma1
in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City h
The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and 1
offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of s
shall be approved by the Planning Director.
43. Consistent with EIR 91-04, impacts to sensitive and significant habitat
mitigated under the review and supervision of the California Department of
Game, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and any other applicable resourct
The mitigation plan must be approved by the involved resource agencies pri
recordation of final map. Grading plans shall reflect the resource agencit
and approval. If modifications are required by the agencies, the applicanl
required to apply for an amendment to this Tentative Map and/or
Development Permit or apply for new discretionary permits.
~ PC RES0 NO. 3680 -9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
44. All outdoor lighting shall be directed away from open space areas v
potential to disturb wildlife exists.
45. Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant/developer shall be requir
consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) rega
impact of the project on the coastal California gnatcatcher and; be is
permits required by the USFWS.
46. Prior to grading, the applicant shall retain the services of a qualified biolc
on-site when surveying and staking of native habitat impact areas occ
biologist is to ensure that the limits of grading are flagged or otherwise n
assure that impacts form grading and construction do not exceed those apl
part of the project.
47. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall show eviden
City Engineer of a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers.
48. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits or final map, whichever occurs
applicant shall submit for review and approval to the City Engineer a
Mitigation Plan. The Riparian Mitigation Plan may include participatic
City's Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplisha
satisfaction of the City and in accordance with the requirements of Sectiol
seq. of the California Fish and Game code and Section 404 of the Fedel
Water Act. If such plan includes on-site mitigation the applicant shall SZI
review and approval by the Planning Director a data recovery program
4691B if disturbed by the mitigation plan.
49. Paleontoloa
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be re
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A cc
paleontologist's report shall be provided to the Planning Director
issuance of a grading permit.
b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic in;
of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature
of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary t
matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screen
Paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Directo
the grading process.
c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in th
an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary
artifacts. I
I PC RES0 NO. 3680 -10-
I I
.-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
I
0 0
d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institu
a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natura
Museum.
e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the
activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
Affordable Housing:
50. This project must comply with all requirements of SDP 94-01 in the prc
affordable housing units.
51. This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required inclusion
shall be constructed concurrent with the project market rate units, unless
final decision making authority of the City and the developer agree, w
Affordable Housing Agreement, to an alternate schedule and/or loca
development. Any request for locational modification of Affordable Housi
granted standards modifications shall be presented to the Planning Commi
the process described in Title 21.45.160, for a major amendment.
52. Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or whe
is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots
the applicant shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with th
provide and deed restrict 15% of the total number of dwelling units as affo.
lower-income households for the useful life of the dwelling units. The k
Housing Agreement shall be required to be submitted by the applicant to
The agreement shall be approved by the Community Development Direct
on a recommendation from the Planning Director and Director of Hou
Redevelopment, and completed and recorded as a deed restriction (
individual lots or units of the project which are designated for the locatio1
income affordable units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be bind
future owners and successors in interest.
The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to include, but not bl
to, the following:
(a)
(b)
(4
(dl
(e) (9
(g)
(h)
The number of inclusionary lower-income dwelling units;
The units sizes (square footage) and the number of bedrooms per incl
dwelling unit;
The location of the inclusionary units;
The schedule for production of the inclusionary units;
The tenure of affordability (useful life of the dwelling units);
Incentives (i.e. density increases, standards modifications, and
resources) provided by the City;
Rules and procedures for setting rents, sales prices, and marketing of
units;
Terms and conditions governing the initial sale and resale of
inclusionary units; and
~ PC RES0 NO. 3680 -11-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
~ I
(i) An administration, monitoring, and management plan.
Engineering Conditions:
53. This project is located within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. All devc
design shall comply with the requirements of that plan.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
1
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirt
the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project,
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pa4
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
If the applicant chooses to construct out of phase, the new phasing must be
and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner’s assoc
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an int
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identiwng the resp
shall be placed in the CC&Rs.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. If any finr
recorded for this project prior to the tentative map expiration date,
expiration date of the conditionally approved tentative map shall be extl
accordance with Section 66452.6(a) of the Subdivision Map Act. If a final
not been recorded, an extension may be requested by the applicant. Said c
shall be approved or denied at the discretion of the City Council. In appr
extension, the City Council may impose new conditions and may revise
conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall defend, indemnifil and hold harmless the City and it
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the C
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approv
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought ag
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivi:
Act.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivi
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance 1
Council Resolution No. 91-39.
Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall pay all current fees and
required.
i PC RES0 NO. 3680 -12-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
62. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding
harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to appro’
final map or issuance of any grading permit for this project.
63. Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to :
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval For grading
accordance with City codes and standards.
64. Upon completion of any phased or project specific grading, the applicant Sh;
that an “as-graded” geologic plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The 1
clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading operation, all
corrective measures as actually constructed and must be based on a con
which represents both the pre and post site grading. This plan shall be :
both the soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan shall be prc
a 24” x 36” mylar or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent 1
65. No grading For private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the su
unless an agreement to grade is executed by the developer and the owne
affected properties. If the applicant is unable to obtain the agreement to 1
grading permit will be issued. In that case the applicant must either ar
tentative map or change the plan so grading will not occur outside the pr
in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
66. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed con
site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regarc
hauling operation.
67. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of thj
to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be pro
accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. R
Chapter 11.06.
22 68. Rain gutters must be provided on structures located on lots with less tha
23
24
25
the City Engineer. 26
69. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures
setback from the perimeter OF the structure to the lot flowline, in accorda
City Standard GS-15 to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage c
street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
provided or installed prior to, or concurrent with any grading as may be req
27 I/ 70. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public str
28 easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. 7
I1 PC RES0 NO. 3680 -13-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project or by
document. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear o
and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already 1
not required to be rededicated.
71. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these c
are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisitio
or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the
Municipal Code.
72. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the ou
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundar
site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscapin1
No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
73. The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National
Discharge Elimination System (NPDFS) permit. The applicant shall pro.
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approvc
City Engineer prior to approval of the final map. Said plans shall include
be limited to the following, which shall be included in the project’s CC&R
A. The homeowner’s association shall coordinate the use of the City’s esl
program to assist residents with the removal and proper disposal of 1
hazardous waste products.
B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, rn
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and 01
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or in
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pc
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such 4
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requiren
prescribed in their respective containers.
C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and
improvements.
74. Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall provide for sight distance c
at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shal
the following statement in the project’s CC&Rs:
“NO structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 31
above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within
identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Str
The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition.”
ii PC RES0 NO. 3680 -14-
0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
!~
The above statement shall be placed on a non-mapping data sheet on the fi
75. In accordance with the Rancho Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Repor
grading of natural habitat should not occur during the nesting seaso
endangered avian species. All grading within 500’ of coastal California gn
occupied habitat and within 200’ of riparian habitat, occupied by least Bc
and willow flycatcher, should be restricted to the period between Septeml
February 15 of any given year.
76. Prior to approval of the final map, drainage outfall end treatments for any
outlets where a direct access road for maintenance purposes is not provic
be designed and incorporated into the grading/improvement plans for th
These end treatments shall be designed so as to prevent vegetation gro
obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consist of a modified outlet
consisting of an extended concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbi
radially designed rip-rap, as a method of preventing vegetation growth d
front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
77. Prior to approval of the final map, a Certificate of Compliance and Adjust]
No. 444 shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
78. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Engineer mr
an engineering evaluation of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The e
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any reco
improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be complel
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
79. Prior to approval of any final map, the following improvements as requil
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plar
for Zone 18 shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Enginee
improvements unless otherwise modified by the final decision-making bod!
substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to (
of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
A. Melrose Drive - Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prim
standards.
Construction of a median and two lanes in each direc
intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City EI
B. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary
I
. Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to majo
standards.
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -15-
.- e @
1
2
e Construction of full major arterial standards from the int
with Melrose Avenue to the entrance to Village “J” and the sc
3 I1 C. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 18
4 I1 . Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width.
5
6
0 Construction of one lane in each direction from the
boundary of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village “T.
7 11 D. Sewer Facilities, including
8
9
10
11
12
m
0
e
e
e
0 . .
12” main in Melrose Drive
12” main in, or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane
BuendSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A
BuendSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C
BuendSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D
BuendSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F
BuendSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G
North La Costa Lift Station
l3 ll E. Water Facilities, including:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
0 A portion of the proposed potable 24-inch main in tl
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
. The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast
Zone 18.
I
0 The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line in the
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
. A portion of the proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in the
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
0 The proposed reclaimed 38-inch main in the proposed alignn
Fuerte within Zone 18.
. The proposed potable 12” main from Melrose to El Fuertc
service Area E.
25
e Proposed box culvert under Melrose Drive. 26
F. Drainage Facilities, including.
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -16-
.-
1
2
I
l
e 0
0 Detention basins, channel and flood control improver
necessary to mitigate for erosion and protect on site Master
off site downstream properties from significant impacts.
3
4
VILLAGES “F”, “G, AND “P - SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
80. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever OE
was submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and receive
5 the developer shall submit proof to the City Engineer that a “Notice of 1
6
7
from the City Engineer of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
81. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Palomar Airport Road, Melrose D
a P-B/G-B Street shall be waived on the final map.
9 82. This project is specifically approved as three (3) units for recordation puq
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, shall be guaranteed for construcl
public facilities needed to serve each unit, in accordance with City Stand 10
11 to recording of a final map for this project.
12
13
14
15
83. Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall provide an acceptable n
maintaining the private easements within Village “F and all of thi
improvements located therein. The costs of such maintenance shall be di
in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within Vi
Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included within the
subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
l6
17
84. This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall 1
non-mapping data sheet of the final map. 18
Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This note shall be placed on a
for the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the pro1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
85. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvement
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to approval of the f
in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install or agree to i1
secure with appropriate security as provided by law, all improvements shov
tentative map and necessary to service the proposed villages including,
limited to:
PHASE I
I. Village “F On-Site Improvements
A. Village “F” Frontage Improvements to Palomar Airpol
including:
s No. 3 eastbound vehicular travel lane . Eastbound bicycle lane
ll PC RES0 NO. 3680 -17-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~
. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (south side)
e Landscape raised median . Community theme wall (south side)
Landscape area between sidewalk and theme wall
Street light standards (south side)
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant t
reimbursement for one-half of the raised median hardscapd
improvements from the fronting property owners on the nortl
Palomar Airport Road.
B. Half street plus 12 ft. improvements to P-B Street Along th
“F Frontage terminating at the Village “F” entrance, includ
. Two vehicular travel lanes (36’ width)
Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (one side)
0 Street light standards (one side)
e All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lan
C. All public storm drainage facilities necessary to convey drain
approved drainage course.
D. All sewer and water facilities required to service the Village
2. Village “F Off-Site Improvements
A. Village “P” Frontage Improvements to Palomar Airpol
including:
0
e
* . .
e .
No. 3 eastbound vehicular travel lane
Eastbound bicycle lane
Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (south side)
Street light standards (south side)
Landscape raised median
Community theme wall (south side)
Landscape area between sidewalk and theme wall
All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel Ian1
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant tc
reimbursement for one-half of the raised median hardscapeh
Improvements from the fronting property owners on the north
Palomar Airport Road.
B. Temporary emergency access improvements, off-site
Village “E”, including:
~ PC RES0 NO. 3680 -18- I
ll a a
1
2
3
. Two vehicular travel lane asphaltlconcrete pavement (28
width).
e Temporary emergency access easement must be obtained to
this emergency access construction and use.
4
5
. This emergency access shall be gated to the satisfaction o
Marshal and City Engineer.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
If this temporary easement cannot be obtained, then off-site impr
will have to be constructed to facilitate emergency and/or public
accordance with all applicable City Standards and to the satisfacti
City Engineer.
C. Full improvements to Village “E” “B” Street and “I” Street
Village ‘IF” Project Boundary to Palomar Airport Road. Side
be limited to one side on an interim condition.
D. A fully actuated traffic signal at the intersection of “I” St
Palomar Airport Road.
I
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant t
proportionate share reimbursement for the above traffic sigl
benefitting property owners to the north and south of Palomar Airp
PHASE I1
1. Village “P” On-Site Improvements
A. All public streets within the Phase I1 boundary including 2
water, and storm drains.
B. Pedestrian/bicycle trail improvements, including:
21
22 2. Villae “P Off-Site improvements
0 D/G surface (8’ minimum width)
23
24
A. Full improvements to G-B Street from the Village “P” project 1
to Carrillo Way.
25
26
B. Full improvements to Carrillo Way from “G-B Street to
Drive. Sidewalk may be limited to one side only on an interi
27
28
In accordance with the City’s cul-de-sac standard, improvements
above shall be required only if complete construction of Village “P’ {
a single phase of development. If Village ‘‘P’J is only construc II PC RES0 NO. 3680 -19-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Il
a 0
maximum of 50 units at a 1200 ft. maximum distance then improb
and B above can be deferred until such time as the remainder of
is completed.
C. Remaining improvements to P-B Street, along the Village ‘
frontage, from the Village “F entrance westerly to the proj,
boundary, including:
. 12 ft. of roadway pavement (Total 48 ft. width)
0 Curb, gutter and sidewalk (one side)
b Street Light Standards (one side)
D. Full improvements to P-B Street, along the Village “F”
frontage, from the Village “F entrance easterly to the
Village “F” boundary, including:
. Two vehicular travel lanes (48’ width)
0 Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (both sides)
* Street light standards (both sides)
PHASE I11
1. Village “G” on-site imurovements
A. All public streets within the Phase I11 boundary including I
water, and storm drains.
B. Pedestrian/bicycle trail improvements, including:
s D/G surface (8’ minimum width)
C. Frontage improvements to Melrose Drive, including:
. No. 3 northbound vehicular travel lane
Northbound bicycle lane . Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (east side) . Street light standards (east side)
b Landscape raised median
0 Landscape area between sidewalk and east right-of-way line
....
~ ....
1
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -20-
II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
e e
2. Villwe “G off-site improvements
A. Full improvements to Carrillo Way from Village boundary tc
Drive. Sidewalk may be limited to one side on an interim 1
86. All conditioned improvements must be specifically shown on the Cc
Tentative Map to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
87. A copy of all of the above improvement conditions shall be placed on a non,
data sheet on the final map in accordance with the provisions of Section 6
the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be construct1
eighteen (18) months of approval of the secured improvement agreemen
other time as provided in said agreement.
88. The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved b:
Engineer prior to approval of the final map for this project. The structur,
of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based 01
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the Cib
standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to
of the final map for this project.
89. Prior to approval of the final map for Villages “F’ or “P”, the develo]
reimburse the City for the proportionate share of frontage cost of construc
street improvements on City Project No. 3166, Palomar Airport Roa
reimbursement shall be less the non-discretionary funds designated for the
construction as determined by the City Engineer and Finance Director.
90. Prior to final map approval, the owner of the property on behalf of itself I
its successors in interest shall execute and record a notice of disclosure a1
harmless agreement on Village “G” noticing any future owners of the pres1
mitigated geologic hazard and indemnify the City of Carlsbad, agents, offic
employees from any action that may arise through any subsequent geologii
ground water seepage, or land subsidence and subsequent damage that m
on or adjacent to Village “G, due to its construction, operation, or maintel
notice to this effect and a reference to the recorded document shall be inc
a non-mapping data sheet of the final map.
91. Prior to final map approval, public open space easements shall be place
conforming tentative map on slopes adjacent to all public roadway!
satisfaction of the City Engineer and in conformance with the Rancho
Villages “F, “GI’ & “P” Landscape and Maintenance Responsibility exhibit
Fire Conditions:
92. Prior to the issuance of building permits, complete building plans shall be SI
to and approved by the Fire Department.
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -21-
a 0
’ 1; 93. Additional onsite public hydrants are required.
2
3
4
5
6
7
94. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, whii
location of required, proposed and existing hydrants.
95. Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval (
driveways and general traffic circulation.
96. An all-weather access road shall serve the project during construction.
97. All required fire hydrants, water mains and appurtenances shall be operatic
to combustible building materials being located on the project site.
~ I 8 98. All private driveways shall be kept clear of parked vehicles at all times,
9 have posted “NO ParkingFire Lane” pursuant to Section 17.04.020,
Municipal Code. 10
11 99. Brush clearance shall be maintained according to the specifications contair
City of Carlsbad Landscape Manual. Applicant shall provide brush clear;
12 to the Fire Department for approval.
13
14
100. Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, extinguishing
15
to the Fire Department for approval prior to construction.
automatic sprinklers, and other systems pertinent to the project shall be s
Department a map, showing the street network, conforming to the followin1 16
101. Prior to submittal of water improvement plans, the applicant shall submit tc
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
* 400’ scale * Photo reduction on mylar * At least two existing streets and/or intersections shall be reference
* Maps shall include the following information: map (not a separate vicinity map)
Street centerlines
Street names
Fire hydrant locations
102. Fire suppression areas shall be provided as shown on Exhibit “N”, attach4
staff report.
24
25
Carlsbad Municiaal Water District Conditions:
103. The entire potable and non-potable water system/systems for subject projed
26 evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity and pressure for d
27
28
landscaping and fire flow demands are met.
PC RES0 NO. 3680 -22-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I I/
0
104. The developer’s engineer shall schedule a meeting with the District Enginec
City Fire Marshal and review the preliminary water system layout
preparation of the water system improvement plans.
105. The developer will be responsible for all fees and deposits plus the maj
charge which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The 1
shall pay a San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge whic
collected at issuance of application for meter installation.
106. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits v
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district SE
development determines that adequate water and service is available at tb
application for water service and will continue to be available until
occupancy.
107. Sequentially, the developers engineer shall do the following:
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire E
requirements.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the
Department for processing and approval.
c. Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comn
approval of the preliminary system layout usage (G.P.M. - D.D.U.)
potable, reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the prepar
improvement plans.
....
....
....
*...
I...
....
....
....
....
....
I 1 PC RES0 NO. 3680 -23-
I1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 m
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meetir
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 4th of January, 195
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Cornpas.
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
%d&
KIM WlkSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMB
ATTEST
t
- MICHAEL J. HO~~MILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
11 PC RES0 NO. 3680 -24-
0 0 EXHIBI1
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
Environmental Impad Report
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
-
A. Agricuiture
1.. j.
Impact. Possible soil contamination from agricultural chemicals formerly used or stored on t
site.
Mitigation. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigation recommendations, if necessary, to Cj
Planning Department ana -7sur.ty Health Department. 2) Mitigation to be made a condition
tentative maps approved under the Master Plan. 3) Report on completed remediation to
submitted to City Planning Department and County Hdth Department upon completion.
Master Plan ImpZementafion. A soils report for the property owned by Continental Homes a
the property being dedicated for park purposes has been received by the Planning Departmer
Any mitigation required for soils contamination indicated by this report will be remedied pri
to issuance of a grading permit. Impacts may OCCUT if additional pesticide concentrations andh
hazardous waste materials or containers are found during development, in which case tl
referenced mitigation would be appiicable. Soils reports for other properties within the Mast1
Plan will be required with the submittal of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan. :
Approval of each tentative map under the Master Plan. 3) Completion of construction of eat
tentative map subdivision.
ResponsibZe Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approved without necessary conditions. 2) No fin:
maps, building or grading permits issued until remediation report submitted.
~ ~ ~~ ~~~
Impact. Possible conflict between earlier stages of Master Plan development and continue
4 'A agricultural use of other portions of the site, including agricdtural chemical use, irrigatio' I! I runoff, and odor.
Mitigation. Each tentative map must provide a list of performance and impact criteria specifie
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and buffering, to ensure the phasing development 1
compatible with continued agricultural use.
Master Plan Implementation. There will be no impact if applicant(s) indicates that consister
with its practice since 1991, it intends to abandon farm use.
1
0 0
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan. 2
Approval of each tentative map under the Master Pian. 3) Construction of each tentative ma.
subdivision.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be approved without neceSSary conditions. 3) Inspecti01
of construction by grading inspectors. . NO building permits issued mtil performance criteria an
implemented.
I
B. Biology
c ',
~~~ ~~ ~
General Note. To ensure the implementation of alI mitigation for potential impacts to biological
resources, the applicant for each tentative map proposed under the Master Plan shall prior tc
approval of each tentative map, as appropriate, show evidence to the City Planning Departmenl
that a qualified consulting biologist has ken retained to monitor all relevant mitigation, assure
compliance with mitigation requirements, supervise implementation of mitigation, and file 2
report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Director upon completion of majo1
components of biological mitigation requirements.
.- Impact. Implementation of the Master Plan will directly impact wetlands on-site and, bl
construction of a sewer line in the right of way for Carrillo Way to the west, off-site.
Mitigafion. The applicant for the project shall either restore and enhance riparian habitat at an
appropriate area ratio to impacts or shall participate in a city-wide mitigation program through
the City's Habitat Management Plan. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the
City and in accordance with the requirements of Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish anc
Game Code and Section 404 of the Federal CIean Water Act.
Master Plan Implementation. No mitigation required for offsite under sewer alignment
currently proposed by applicant north of Carrill0 Way alignment. Such alignment has no
wetland impacts.
Checkpoints. Approval of the first tentative map or grading permit affecting wetlands on- ox
off-site under the Master Plan.
Responsible Patty. City Planning and Engineering Departments, California Department of
Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Sanctions. No grading map under the Master Plan.
1. 2 wk
0 0
~ ~-~ ~
Impact. If the project is not reconfigured to substantially avoid popuIations of San Die
thornmint and thread-leaved brodiaea, development wdl significantly impact those species.
Mitigafion. TO partially mitigate impacts, the mitigation pIans for San Diego thornmint a
thread-leaved brodiaea shall be implemented, modified as specified in the EIR and after revit
and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of approval of tentative maps under the Master Pla
To the maximum extent possible, mitigation shall be accomplished prior to construction resulti
in impacts.
1, .'3
Master Plun Implementation. Villages T and U have been reconfigured to avoid impact
thornmint. Village G has been reconfigured to minimize impacts to Brodiaea.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approval of tentative maps. 3) Prior
construction causing impacts.
ResponsibZe Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning a
Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consulting biologi
Sanctions. 1) No approvai of tentative maps for Wage G without acceptable mitigatic
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
~~
Xmpacr. Potential for future disturbance of open space areas.
7: -1 Mitigation. Dedication of an open space easement over natural open space, biological mitigatic areas, buffer areas, 'and naturalized areas to avoid disturbance of the natural habitats as
condition of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
ResponsibZe Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without depiction of acceptable open spa
easements and condition to dedicate consemation easements over natural open space.
I
e 0
Impact. Possible predation or disturbance of California gnatcatchers or other sensitive wildli
species by future residents or domestic pets.
Master Plan Implementation. No approval of Tentative Maps for affected Villages with0
mitigation condition, if any, required by California Department of Fish and Game or U.\
Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Mitigation. As determined by above referenced agency.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No Tentative Map approved without mitigation, if any, imposed by reference
lead agency set forth as a condition.
f
,/; ,/ r -~,
(j ’
i . _- , \1. !5
~~~~ ~
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant areas by non-native ‘landscaping species.
Mitigation. As a component of the landscaping pians for affected Villages, revegetation pia
for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be prepared by a qualified biologist, and landscapin
plans for tentative maps shall be reviewed by the biologist.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Completion of landscaping and revegetalior
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments, consuIting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without satisfactory landscaping and revegetatic
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habitat areas during grading and construction.
I ‘I
,,7. 1; and monitor grading and construction.
! Mirigarion. The consulting biologist shall supervise surveying and staking of native habitat are3
i
I1
,,7 3 . i - \ : ,"i : 0 0 - - (1 ' '._ Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Report by CO~Sdting biologist.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulting biologis
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper mitigation condition. 2) 1
issuance of building or occupancy permits until consulting biologist's report is submitted to t
Planning Department.
Impact. Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading a
construction.
,-I '4: Mitigation. Due to conflicting biologist's opinions regarding mitigation, final mitigation pk (>, - if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fish and Wildlife andor California Department of Fish a
Game, as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or construction in restricted area, if any.
~
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife species by outdoor lighting.
-
(7 1-1 '\ Mitigation. Outdoor lighting near native habitat areas should be .shielded and directed aw
from conservation easement areas.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improvement plan chech.
Construction of improvements near conservation easement areas with report to PIann
Department by consulting biologist.
'i
e 0
ResponsibZe Party. 1) City planning and Engineering ~epartments. 2) Consulting bioiogisl
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without rnitigatlon conditions. 2) No approw
of grading or improvement plans without proper mitigation specified. 3) NO issuance
building or occupancy permits without properiy accomplished mitigation.
Impact. Potentid for impacts to off-site sensitive habitat areas from erosion and sedimentatic
from the project.
Mifigation. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
CJteckpoints. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Responsible Party. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. See hydroiogy and water quality mitigation.
~
C. Cultural Resources -
Impact. Possible vandalism due to increased human presence to archaeological site Sf
12,740B. \ i' , I
,u Mitigation. The site shall be capped with fabric, soil, and vegetation as a condition of t
tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retain
by the tentative map applicant.
Master Plan Implementation. This site is located on site to be dedicated to City of Carlsb
for parkland. The capping of this site wilI be the responsibiiity of the City of Carlsbad.
oleckpoints. 1) Submittal of development plans for park site. 2) Approval of such pia
3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon cornpleti
of work and prior to commencement of development of park site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Deparanents. 2) City Planni
Department. 3) Consulting archaeologist, City planning and Engineering Departments.
1
0
Sanctions. 1) No approval of site development pian without mitigation plan. 2) No gradi
permits to be issued until mitigation 'report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to C
Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaeologid site SDI-4691B.
Mitigution. A data recovery program as specified in the EIR must be required as a conditi
of the tentative map including the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeoiog
retained by the tentative map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the si
t - ('1 Master Plan Implementation. Mitigation of this site wiIl not be required unless this area
i. disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Clzeckpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting archaeolog
submitted to City Planning Department upon completion of work and prior to any grading
construction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No build]
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consuiting archaeologist is submitted to C
Planning Department.
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaeological site SDI-4687.
Mitigution. Capping of the site as specified in the EIR as a condition of any tentative n
affecting the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained by the tentat
map applicant and completed prior to any construction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentat
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitred to City Planning Department ul
completion of work and prior to any grading or construction affecting the site.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tenta'
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department u;
completion of work and prior to any grading or construction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consul
archaeologist.
,!2, c
'i
0 0 Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map not compke without mitigation pian. 2) P
approval of tentative map without mitigation pian. 3) No building pennits to be issued un
mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City planning Departments.
Impact. Encroachment of proposed deveiopment of the Master Plan on the rural, "ear
California" setting of the Leo Canillo historic site.
Mitigation. Establishment and implementation of a special design district as required und
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigation monitosing and reporting program.
Checkpoints. See Land Use Compatibility section,
Responsible Party. See Land Use Compatibility section.
Sanctions. See Land Use Compatibility section.
-
I ' :As
,.
D. Paleontological Resources
Impact. Potential destruction of significant fossils, especially in the Santiago and Lusar
Formation, by grading and construction.
i 'I) ', Mitigation. Monitoring of grading by a paleontologist, with recovery and curation of a
significant fossils discovered, as specified in the EIR. Monitoring is to be performed under t
direction of a qualified paleontologist retained by the applicant for each tentative map.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consulting paleontolog:
upon completion of grading.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) Consulti
paleontologist.
e 0
Sanctions. 1) Approval of tentative map not comptete without mitigation pian. 2) No buildi
permits to be issued until mitigation report by consulting paleontologist is submitted to Ci
Planning Department.
E. Hydrology and Water Quality ""- d ~~
Impact. Major drainage facility design will be required to avoid potential adverse effects
erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
Mitigation. As a condition of approval each tentative map, the applicant shall submit
hydrology analysis addressing required flood attenuation, runoff flow reductiodsiitation, a~
L \ proper sizing of drainage facilities.
Muster Plan Implementation. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the enti
Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tentative map.
Responsible Party. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map condition of approval.
Impact. Major drainage facilities will have to be constructed to avoid potential adverse effe
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed site.
r. 7
,., r- Masfer Plan Imple&enfafion. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the ent
/- Master Plan area.
Mitigation. The final decision-making body shall approve a Financing Plan addressing t
source and use of funds for the construction of all required drainage facilities prior to recordi
the first Final Map or the issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever is firs1
Clzeckpoints. Recording of first final map or issuance of fmt grading or building permit. ea
tentative map.
Responsible Party. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No recording of final map or issuance of grading or building permit without
Financing Plan guarantee for construction of required drainage facilities.
e e Impact. Potential erosive or flooding damage to structures in Leo canill0 Ranch Park due
runoff from the developed site entenng the drainage south of the park.
Mitigation. An hydrology analysis for the drainage south of the park shall be submitted wi
. '7 the applicable tentative map or prior to issuance of advanced grading pennit for Melro: ' Avenue, and an appropriate drainage system shall be required prior to the issuance of the fix
grading permit affecting the area and constructed concurrent with the grading of the affectr
area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative maps. 2) Issuance of first grading pem
Responsible Party. 1) Engineering Department. 2) Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper mc system shown. 2) b
issuance of building permits until dramage system implemented.
E. .
I
0 e
Hyhology nnd Waxer Qual@
Impact. InstaIlation of the proposed storm drain between Villages R and T in Open Space Area 13
would disturb sensitive biological resources in the open space area.
Mitigation. The storm drain shall be relocated to run south from Vilage Q to connect to a storm
drain in either El Fuerte Street or Choriito Stree~
L\, F Muster Pian Implementation. This stm drain has been relocated into areas that wiIl be graded as
part of the development of Villages Q and R wherever possible to avoid sensitive habitat.
Checkpoints, 1) Submittal of tentative map for VilIages Q and R including the storm drain. 2)
Approval of Village Q and R tentative map. 3) Completion of storm drain construction.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineering Depamnent. 2) City Engineering Department. 3) Citj
Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map not complete without showing storm drain in proper
location. 2) No approval of tentative map without storm drain shown in proper location. 3) No
issuance of building permits for tentative map until storm drain properly constructed.
~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~
Impact. Potential for increased on-site erosion and increased sedimentation downstrean when groui
surface is disturbed during grading and construction.
/’ Mitigution. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must be prepared for each development
\. 2 t :--- submittal, approved by the City Engineer, and implemented during construction.
?’ Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement plan in the Master Plan area
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Department.
Sanctions. No approval of any grading penpits without Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
Impact. Potential impacts of urban pollutants from the developed site affection water quality in
Batiquitos Lagoon.
~ I Mitigation. Discharge of runoff from developed areas into ~tudied channels and public educatic L information distributed to property owners.
Master Plan Implementation. A detailed Hydrological Study must be approved prior to issuance o
grading permit for the grading necessary to construct the Circulation Element Roadways.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicable tentative maps. 2) Completion of construction of drainagc
channels. 3) Close of escrow to propeaty owners.
* e
Hyriroiogy and Warn Qdiry
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Depment-
3) Developers
Sanctium. 1) No approval of tentative maps without proper design of runaff drainage facilities. 2)
No issuance of building permits unless runoff drainage facilities properly constructed.
-
E.. ,1
Impact. Potential for grease, oil, and other trafEic4ated pollutants from paved surfaces to reach
Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff.
Mitigation. Best management practices shall be employed to prevent urban pollutants from entering
City waterways in compliance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System municipal
stormwater permitting requirements.
Checkpoints. Approval of any grading or improvement plan in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Depamnent.
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permits without Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils
Impact. Geologic conditions potentially unsuitable for development on the site without rernediation
include soils unsuitable for load-bearing or with adverse settlement potential, old landslide areas anc
ciaystone beds, and high-groundwater in alluvial soils.
1 ''\ Mitigation. Remedial grading will be needed to establish firm footings for structures and fills and t(
correct adverse settlement and alluvial soils over shallow groundwater. A soils engineer and
engineering geologist shdl be retained by each tentative map appiicant to review detailed grading
plans, prepare a.detaiied soil and geologic investigation, monitor construction, and assure compliancf
with the Master Plan geologic investigation and the City Grading Ordinance.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of each tentative map. 2) Approval of each tentative map and issuance c
grading permit. 3) Completion of construction.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department. 3)
Consulting soils engineer and engineering geologist, City Engineer.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative map submittal not complete without detaiied soil and geologic investigation
2) No tentarive map approval without soil and geologic investigation and appropriate conditions. 3)
No issuance of buiIding penits without evidence of proper mitigation.
I
0 e
Air Quaiiry
. G. Air Quality
Impact. Potential for significant direct impacts to regional air quality due to increases in pollutant
emissions caused by project traffic.
, Mifigalion. Implementation of Master Ran measures ind- Vie lanes and pedestrian Uails, and
lA I requirement for applicants for future tentative maps to work with North County Transit District to k ' provide bus routes and st0ps.a~ appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) Approvd of tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Depments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments,
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative maps not complete without appropriate mitigation measures. 2
No approval of tentative maps without application conditions.
H. Land Use
~ ~~ -~~ ~
Impact. Development of the Master Plan would encroach on the "early California" setting of Carril
Ranch Park, including the elimination of the northern enay to the ranch compound.
Mitigalion. A Special Park Design District shall be established for development surrounding the pa
including special conmls on setbacks, landscaping, and architectural details and an entry through tb
park through Village S. The design district standards will be included in the Master Plan and
subsequent tentative maps will be evaluated for conformance by the Planning Commission.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of the Master Plan. 2) Approval of tentative maps that include part of
the design district.
ResponsibZe Parties. 1) City Planning Department. 2) Ci Planning Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of the Master Plan without establishment of a park design district and
development standards. 2) No approval of tentative maps containing part of the design district
without setting forth district deveiopmem standards.
t, '\
Impact. The City of Carlsbad has no review authority over Village S, which is in the park design
district, if it is developed as a school site by the San Marcos Unified School Dismcr. ,
c 0
Lad Use
Mitigation. Agreement with the school district on design standards is encouraged, but cannot be
enforced by the PIanning Commission. Without review of all development within the design district
it is not within the power of the Lead Agency to assure that possible impacts are mitigated or avoid(
,: Checkpoinfs. No Lead Agency checkpoints without agreemem with the school district. \A, x’
Responsible Parties. Responsibility for mitigation is within the authority of another jurisdiction anc
not the City of Carisbad.
Sanctions. None available to the City of Carisbad under present circumstances.
Impact. Dedication of the open space link at the southwest comer of the property, where the link
crosses from one zone to an adjacent ownership, is not assured under the proposed Master Plan.
Mifigufion. Assure continuance of the open space link as part of the Master Pian.
t! ,:
;# Master Plan Implementation. Carisbad‘s Open Space Advisory approved the open space link
proposed by the Master Plan at their February I993 meeting.
Checkpoinfs. 1) Approval of Master Plan. 2) Approval of tentative map including Village T.
Responsible Parties. Planning Depamnem.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan without open space link.
~~
Impact. Appiicants for the Master Plan must obtain a letter from the San Marcos Unified School
District accepting the site proposed by applicants as possible school site area in compliance with the \ Zone 18 Local FaciIities Management Plan.
k- ‘\ MiCigclfon. Agreement with the San Marcos Unified School District as part of Master Plan approva
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
Responsible Parties. Planning Department.
Suncti’ons. No approval of Master Plan without agreement with the school district that complies wit
the Zone 18 Local Facilities Managemem Plan.
I
m e
Viiual AesrhericsiGrading
I. Visual AestheticsiGtading
~
Impact. Grading proposed by the Master Plan requires findings justifying grading voIumes to be 7. -
\ approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer according 10 be Hillside Development Ordin2
‘Mitigation. Approval of findings for the proposed grading voiuma prior to approval of the Master
Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Master Plan.
Responsible Parties. Planning Director and City Engineer.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required findings.
Impact. Proposed grading for the Master Plan would exceed Hillside Development Ordinance
allowances €or slope height and encroachment into 40 percent slopes witbout specified findings by th
decision making body.
/’ 2 Mitigation. Approval of findings for the proposed grading concurrent with approval of the Master J Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of the Master plan.
Responsible Parties. Decision making Body.
Sanctions. No approval of the Master Plan without the required fmdings.
’\
.r ,2
~
Impact. Potential impacts of Master Plan development on the visually sensitive Carrillo Ranch Park
site, including Villages S, 0, and Q.
Mitigation. Applicable tentative maps to indicate an accepthie detailed landscape plan to reduce
potential impacts. Implement Special Park Design District recommended in EIR Land Use section.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps
Responsible Pmies. 1) City Planning Department. 2) City Planning Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative map submittal not complete without derailed landscape plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map withoy appropriate detailed landscape plan.
e e
4
Vi AesthericdGrading
Impacr. Potentially significant impact of recreational vehicle storage in Open Space kea 13 on viep
from existing residences.
Mifigulz'on. Detailed landscape pian as part of tentative map for Villages Q and R to effectively
cy (\ screen views of recreational vehicle storage. \ /
Checkpoints. 1) Subminal of tentative map inciuding recreational vehide storage. 2) Approval of
tentative map including recreational vehicle storage.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning Department. 2) City Planning Department.
Sanctions. 1) Submittai of tentative map not complee without appropriate landscaping plan. 2) NI
approval of tentative map without appropriate landscaping pian.
Impact. Potential significant visual impact of noise barriers over six feet in height.
Mifigation. Detailed landscaping plan for tentative maps to provide adequate cover, texture, and
variation of vegetation to screen walls.
'( ,'\ '' Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of any tentative map showing noise barriers over six feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tentative map showing noise banien over six feet in height.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Enggeering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative maps not complete without appropriate landscaping
plan. 2) No approval of applicable tentative maps without appropriate landscaping plan.
~~~ ~ ~~
J. Cillculation
Impact. The intersection of Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real is projected to have a level (
service F in the year 2000 afternoon peak hour. No additional improvemMts to this intersection are
4,- ~\
5, currently proposed in the LFMP.
J Mifigation. The City will continue to monitor traffic to determine conformance with LFMP standarc
and to identify and implement improvements necessary to meet the staxiard.
Checkpoints. Construction of improvements.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Department.
a e
W
Viual AesrhericslGrading
Sanctions. No issuance of buiiding permits if Growth Mqument standards for traffic lev& of
service are not met.
Impacts. Spacing of the first intersection on Palomar Aw Road is 200 feet C\QS~~ fim ab
standards allow.
Mifigatiun. Tentative maps shall comply with City road alignment and intersection spacing standarc
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2 Master Plan Implementation. The location shown on the proposed Master Plan has not been revise
.L,
and has been approved by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. City Engineering Depamnent.
Sanctions. No approval of tentative maps that do not compiy with City road alignment and
intersection spacing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Zmpuct. As proposed, development of the Master Plan Wd require traffic signals at Palomar
Airport Road/access road to Village E and at Melrose Avemrdentrances to Villages H, 0, and L.
/< ?I Mitigntion. Condition tentative maps to construct the necessary signals and improvements, or
4 j. determine the need for signals in traffic studies for tentative maps.
Checkpoinis. 1) submittal of applicable tentative maps. 2) Approval of appiicable tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Engineering Department.
Sandions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without applicable conditions.
Zmpuct. Certain revisions of the internal circulation system described in the EIR may be preferable
for environmental or circulatory reasons. ,/ \,J ',-. I '1 3 Mitigaton. Traffk studies for appiicabie tentative maps MI determine in consultation with City st:
whether specified changes in the circulation patem should be implemented as conditions of applicab!
tentative maps.
Master Plan Implementation. Revisions to the Master Plan Circulation and proposed tentative map!
have already been made to addr'css the recommendations of the EIR and approved by the City
Engineer.
e 0
v
Circularion
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps withoat applicable conditions.
K. Noise
Zmphct. Certain areas adjacent to major roads in tk Master Plan area amid experience future MI(
noise in excess of the City standards of 60 dBA CNEL.
Mitigation. Tentative maps shall show appropriate mise barriers as specified in the EIR or to City
standards to attenuate noise. If grading shown in the Master Plan for development in areas of 1;- ' excessive unattenuated noise is modified by tentative maps, the modifications shall be reviewed by th
City Engineer and a new acoustical study shall &e paformed and appropriate mitigation implemented
if indicated. Tentative maps applicants shall have dre aption of requesting a reduction in height of
barriers over six feet to no less than six feet to reduce visual implcts per City policy.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Inspeaion of constructed improvements.
Responsible Pakes. 1) City Planning and Engin" Departmeas. 2) City Engineering
Depamnent.
Sanctions. 1) No approval without proper barriers as a condition. 2) No issuance of subsequent
permits.
~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~
Impact. Second floors of some residential units adjacent to Cidation EIement roadways could
experience interior noise levels in excess of the 45 dBA CNEL standard.
\c .I'
2- Mitigation. Proposed tentative maps shall be shown to have designs for multi-story residences next 1
Circulation Element roadways which would achieve interior noise iev& of 45 (LBA CNEL or less f0
second or higher stories. Acoustical studies to denrarrstrate compliance may be required by the City
Engineer.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Inspaion of Q)lhttTocred improvements.
ResponsibIe Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineaing Depamaents. 2) Building Department.
Sanctions. 1) No approval without proper banien as a condition. 2) No issuance of subsequent
permits.
=.
”
L. t
1” . * r\
s .3 1, .
e 0
Public Facilities and Services
L. Public Facilities and Services
Impact. There is a potential for the LFMP performance standard for park faciiities to be exceed&
depending on the timing of development and the stams of other future parkland in City Park Distr
4.
Mitigation. Prior to the recordation of any finai map under the Master Plan, sufficient parkland
be dedicated within Zone 18.
Checkpoints. Recordation of first find map under the Master PIan.
Responsible Purties. City Planning, Engineering, and Parks and Recreation Departments.
Sanctions. No recordation of final map withoat dedication of safficiem parkland within Park Di!
4.
Impact. The LFMP performance standard requires that a school site in Zone 18 be deeded to th
Marcos Unified School district (SMUSD) and that a financing plan be approved by the SMUSD
to recordation of any find map or issuance of any grading or kidding permit in Zone 18.
Mifigation. Compiiance with the Zone 18 requirement.
Checkpoints. 1) Recordation of the first final map under the Master Plan. 2) Issuance of any
grading or building permit in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. City Planning And Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. No Final map recorded without LFMP requirema being met.
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~
Impact. Sewage generation could exceed treatment capacity if residential development occurs il
Master Plan area after 2005.
Mitigation. Implement measures specified in the LFMP for any tentative maps causing the pot1
impact to be realized.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps after 2005. 2) Approval of tentative maps subm
after 2005.
Responsible Purties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Departments. 1
0 0
'v public Facilities and Servim 1
Sanctions. No approval of tentative maps after 2005 without aditions requiring conformance with
LFMP requirements.
M. Solid Waste Disposal
Impact. Depending on regional planning for the expasion of 1-1 capacity, there is a ptfatid f\
solid waste generated from the Master Plan area to exd disposai capacity.
\, Mitigdion. Applicants for tentative maps proposed in the Master Plan area shall demonstrate hat ?' ~
means of feasible solid waste disposal are avaiiabie.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps for the Master Plan area.
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without denonstration of existing disposal capacity.
I