HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-04; Planning Commission; Resolution 3681> I1 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3681
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
DESIGN GUIDELINES, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD,
EAST OF FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE.
CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES “F”,
CASE NO: PUD 93-06
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PUD 93-06 AND
“G”, AND T’’
and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provide
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the
Commission did, on the 16th day of November, 1994, the 30th day of November,
on January 4, 1995, did hold a public hearing on property described as:
That portion of Section 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range
3 West, and Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission con:
factors relating to PUD 93-06.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Cc
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF PUD 93-06, based on the following fi~
subject to the following conditions:
C) That the Design Guidelines for Villages “F, “G, and “P” are hereby rea
for adoption.
....
6' 0 0
1 j/ Findings:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent
Municipal Code, the general plan, applicable specific plans, master plans,
adopted plans of the city and other governmental agencies. The general p'
use for the project is a combination of open space and residential uses w
planned development accurately reflects. The project is compatible with the i
residential densities for its respective residential land use classificatior
planned development permit is in specific accord with the master plan for thl
as modified by the requirements of the certified Environmental Impact
regarding input from other governmental agencies. I 2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to p
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-bein
neighborhood and the community. A community is a society of peoplc
common rights and privileges, the district in which they live, and suggests a
possession or enjoyment. The use proposed is residential which is an 1
stabilizing element for any general long-term well-being for a neighborhoc
is the ordinary result of the allocation of home ownership which this
presupposes, and this project is necessary and desirable to accomplish this
location for this use is reflected in the existing General Plan and Master
the site, which was amended by action of the City Council in 1993 at public
upon hearing and considering all testimony of all persons desiring to be hc
considering all factors relating to those discretionary actions. The purpo
Master Plan was to provide for the orderly development of the propel
preserving the environmental resources of the area. The plan is divi
residential villages and open space areas. The planned developmenl
accurately reflects those respective areas.
3. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare oj
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvemer
vicinity. On the contrary the project as part and parcel of the Master 1
provide major infrastructure and public improvements that will enhance thl
welfare of the vicinity. The Master Plan project is tasked with pro
connection of Melrose Drive from Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road, the 1
of a school site, and the dedication of 16.4 acres of park land adjacent to tht
10.5 acre park site, all of which will serve to improve the general welfare 01
residing or working in the vicinity. All improvements will be constructed to
applicable federal, state, and local health and safety criteria.
24
25
4. The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum devt
standards set forth in Section 21.45.090 as modified by the site developm
26
(SDP 94-01) per Section 21.53.120 and 21.06.
in the design guidelines manual as indicated through the following analq 28
Section 21.45.080 and has been designed in accordance with the concepts c 27 5. The proposed planned development meets all of the design criteria set
PC RES0 NO. 3681 -2-
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
design criteria for planned developments set forth in Section 21.45.080 incl
following:
(A) The overall plan shall be comprehensive, imaginative and in]
embracing land, buildings, landscaping and their relationships as i
in the design guidelines manual, and shall conform to adopted pla
governmental agencies for the area in which the proposed develo]
located. As noted previously under the Master Plan section of the sta
the planned development is in conformance with that documen
planned development incorporates a number of the suggesta
techniques. The building setbacks have been varied which helps c
attractive rhythmical streetscape by undulating the otherwise mol
plane of the building facade. Within the multi-family portion of the
development the units have been oriented and turned in a varieQ
which will avoid the monotony of linear building patterns and create
of diversity and interest. The clustering of units creates more op
without reducing the project’s overall density.
(B) The plan shall provide for adequate usable open space, circulation,
parking, recreational facilities and other pertinent amenities. B
structures and facilities in the parcel shall be well-integrated, orie
related to the topographic and natural landscape features of tht
indicated in the design guidelines manual. As part of the Master 1
acres are identified as open space. The multi-family componel
planned development includes multiple recreation areas, while tl
family has one centralized location. As indicated in the stafi
discussion of the project’s conformance with Title 20 the parcels
have been oriented and related to the topographic and natural featu
site thereby allowing the structures proposed to do the same. The n
off-street parking spaces meets the requirements of the parking o
Circulation is more fully discussed in the following sections.
(C) The proposed development shall be compatible with existing and
surrounding land uses and with circulation patterns and open
adjoining properties. It shall not constitute a disruptive elemel
neighborhood or community. As part of the Master Plan this
development was designed in concert with the goals iterated hc
circulation patterns and open space are an integral part and coordin
the adjacent properties both within and without the Master Plan as
through a review of the Master Plan document.
(D) The internal street system shall not be a dominant feature in tt
design, ratRer it sRould be designed for the efficient and safe flow o
without creating a disruptive influence on the activity and functic
common areas and facilities as indicated in the design guideline!
The most desirable street system, according to the manual, is de
provide access to individual units from private or local streets.
1 PC RES0 NO. 3681 -3-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
streets feed into collector streets which, in turn, feed into seconc
major arterials. The planned development proposed accomplis
objective. The street system has been designed to not only be functic
also to be visually attractive and integrated with the project. Cu
streets help create a more interesting and varied street scene 2
functionally control traffic by discouraging speeding. Curvilinear st1
also provide interesting vistas while driving through a project. Th
have been designed to follow the natural contours of the hillside FI
design manual points out is highly desirable.
(E) Common areas and recreational facilities shall be located so as to b
accessible to the occupants of the dwelling units and shall be well-r
any common open spaces provided, as indicated in the design gl
manual. As noted previously the multi-family portion of the
development has multiple recreational open space areas which al
relationship required by the design manual. The Master Plan de
requirement for common recreational facilities for Village “G due 1
sizes exceeding 7,500 square feet. Village “P”, although essentially a
single family development with lots ranging in size from 6,000 t
square feet, with an average lot size of 8,000 square feet, has the
trail system adjoining its southern and eastern boundaries withir
open space lot, as well as a common recreation lot on its nortl
thereby providing multiple opportunities for recreation.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
(F) Architectural harmony within the development and within the neigl
and community shall be obtained so far as practicable, and has bee
overriding Master Plan document. The Master Plan recognizes thc
and unique Southern California vernacular community charact’
architectural styles deemed appropriate for the site include C
Mediterranean, California Ranch, Early California/Monterey,
Colonial, Spanish Eclectic, Prairie, Mission, and Craftsman.
6. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with thl
topography of the site as the project conforms to the grading previously
via the Master Plan and the Hillside Development Permit which mimicked t
condition. Both the circulation system and the building envelope placeme
contour and curvilinear grading.
23
24
7. The proposed project maintains and enhances significant natural resources c
per the requirements of the adopted Master Plan and the previously
25
Environmental Impact Report for that Master Plan, which retains appn
36% or 250 acres in open space.
26 8. The proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of t
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharm 27 disruptive element to the neighborhood as determined through the applicat
28 planned community standards and the Master Plan process. /I PC RES0 NO. 3681 -4-
e 0
1 9. The proposed project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient i
integrated with the project and does not dominate the project when compan
2
3 under 5D above.
as identified within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. Please see the di
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
10. As all open parking spaces are on the street there is no requirement to scrt
from the public right of way.
11. All requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act have been me1
the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Rancho Carrillo Mas
(EIR 91-04). All feasible mitigation identified in EIR 91-04 will be under
this project as designed and conditioned.
~
Planning Conditions:
1. Approval is granted for PUD 93-06, as shown on Exhibits “A through ‘I!
September 7, 1994, (except that within 60 days of final approval of this pr
architectural data sheets shall be revised to reflect all applicable requiremel
approved Design Guidelines) incorporated by reference and on file in the
Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherw
in these conditions.
2. Approval of PUD 93-06 is granted subject to approval of CT 93-07 and SI
PUD 93-06 is approved subject to all conditions of approval of CT 93-07, SI
MP 139(E), EIR 91-04, and HDP 91-17, incorporated herein by reference a1
in the Planning Department.
3. Unless specifically allowed via the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan or SDP
development modifications to the development standards of Section 21.45.1
be permitted.
19
20
4. The number of dwelling units in a planned development shall not exceed th
21
22
23
24
permitted by the Master Plan without amendment of said document.
5. All units adjacent to Palomar Airport Road shall maintain as a minimum a
setback.
6. Corner lots shall have a ten foot side yard setback from the street.
7. All building setbacks from open parking areas shall not be less than five
will be screened from adjacent residences.
25 11 8. Lighting adequate for pedestrian and vehicular safety and sufficient to 1
26
9. There shall be separate utility systems for each unit. 27
security problems shall be provided.
28
PC RES0 NO. 3681 -5-
e t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 1
/I
10. Separate storage space of three hundred ninety two cubic feet shall be pro
each unit. This space shall be separately enclosed for each unit, meet built
requirements, and be conveniently accessible to the outdoors. Garagc
directly on a private driveway that have less than a twenty foot setback
equipped with an automatic garage door opener.
11. Centralized refuse-pickup areas may be required.
12. No individual antennas shall be permitted. Each project shall have 1
antenna and/or cable television hookup. Individual satellite television ante
permitted subject to the provisions of Chapter 21.53 of the Carlsbad IV
Code.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meetinl
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 4th of January, 199:
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN None.
n % &&v KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIC
ATTEST:
MICHAEL JXOLZMLLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3681 -7-