HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 37450 0
1 I1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3745
2
3
4
5
6
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A ZONE
CODE AMENDMENT TO CREATE A PARKING STANDARD
FOR BIO INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
CASE NAME: BIO INDUSTRUiL RESEARCH AND
CASE NO: ZCA 94-05
DEVELOPMENT
7 11 WHEREAS, the Planning commission did on the 15th day of February, 15
a a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
9
10
11
12
13
14
relating to the Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RIESOLVED by the Planning Corn
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testin
arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by st
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all
l5 11 as follows:
16
17
18
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the P
Commission hereby recommends APPROVAL of the Negative Dec
5, 1994, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following 1
19 according to Exhibit “ND”, dated December 12, 1994, and “PII”, dated De
20
21
22
23 significant impact on the environment.
Finding:
1. The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may
z4 // ...
25
26
27
28
...
t..
...
PC RES0 NO. 3745
0 a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
'
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 1
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on. the 15th day of February, 199:
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons, Ccmmissioners Compas, Erwin, :
Nielsen, Noble and Savary
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
KIM mLSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMI:
Planning Director
I
PC RES0 NO. 3745 2
I1
0 e
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Proposed zone code amendment to create parking standards
for biomed research and development.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California :Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbald. As a result of said review, a
Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact on the
environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justificatio:n for this action is on file in the
Planning Department.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the Planning
Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public
are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 30 days of
date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Adrienne Landers in the Planning
Department at (619) 438-1 161, extension 4451.
DATED: DECEMBER 12, 1994
CASE NO: ZCA 94-05 Planning Director
CASE NAME: BIOMED PARKING
PUBLISH DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1994
ALvd
2075 Las Palmas Drive - Carlsbad, California 92009-1 576 - (61 9) 438-1 161
0 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
BACKGROUND
CASE NO. 2
DATE: Decembc
1. CASE NAME: Biomed Parking
2. APPLICANT City of Carlsbad
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT 2175 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1 161
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: N/A
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Code Amendment to create parking standards for biomec
uses.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Envir
Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect 'on the environment. The EnvG
Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any
biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with in
to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declarai
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project
its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO will be checked tc
this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantiall evidence that any aspect of tl
may cause a significant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative Declaration
if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed insignificant. These fini
shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and "YES-insig" respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the fol
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attentian should be given to discussing n
for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant.
0 0
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY YES YES
(sig) (@&
1. Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards? " -
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of Surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
" -
" -
" -
" -
" -
" -
" -
" -
" -
" -
.2-
NO
X -
- X
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X -
X
X
-
-
x
0 m
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
(si&
12. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
13. Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
14. Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop or affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
15. Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
16. Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
"
"
"
"
"
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
(si&
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fue, emergency or other
public services?
"
"
A -3-
YES
(insig)
-
-
-
YES
(insig)
-
-
NO
X -
X -
X -
x
X -
NO
X -
x
0 0
HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY: YES
(sig)
19. Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems? -
20. Increase existing noise levels? -
2 1. Produce new light or glare? -
22. Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
23. Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area?
24. Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
-
-
-
25. Generate substantial additional traffic? -
26. Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
27. Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
28. Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
29. Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
30. Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
-
-
-
-
31. Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
32. Affect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
-
-
-4-
YES
(Mi9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NO
X -
X
X
-
-
X -
X -
x
x
X -
x
X -
x
x
x
x
a 0
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
of the environment, substantidy
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advaritage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
YES
(sig)
-
-
-
YES NO ciig)
X -
- x
- x
X - -
-5-
0 0
. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
This Zone Code Amendment will change the restrictions in Chapter 21.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal
creating parking requirements for biomed research and development. No development will occur concu
this amendment; future projects will be individually reviewed to evaluate environmental impacts.
Physical Environment
1-4. This amendment is purely administrative and does not approve or condone any eaahwork,
5-8. Since this Zone Code Amendment is not project specific and does not involve development of
no impacts to air quality, climatological indices, or water flows or sources will result.
9-10. This administrative amendment will have no affects on any natural resources or energy reservl
1 1-16. As this amendment to the zoning Ordinance does not include or allow any site-specific develo]
impacts to historical, archeological, paleontological sites will result, nor will there be any affec
or fauna in the City.
17. The proposed Zone Code Amendment has the potential to minimally change land uses in a:
reducing the parking requirements for biomed research and development land uses. Biomed res
development constitutes only a small percentage of industrial land in the city and the minor rec
parking proposed by this Zone Code Amendment is negligible.
18-19. Since no development is proposed with the amendment, there will be no affect on any public
including, but not limited to, utilities and sewer systems.
20-22. As no site-specific development will be sanctioned through this amendment, there will be no i~
existing noise levels, light or glare. There will also be no release of hazardous substances or a~
upset.
23-24. This Zone Code Amendment has no affect on residential development and therefore will not 3
population density or housing supply.
25.-30 This Zone Code Amendment does not involve any site-specific development, and, as such,
generate any traffic, affect any emergency response plans, nor create any traffic hazards.
31. No development is proposed with this amendment and therefore there will be no effect on sce
or public views.
32. No recreation opportunities will be impacted by this amendment, since no development is pro€
33. See 11-16 above.
34-35. There will be neither short-term nor long-term affects to the environment because of this projec
is purely administrative and does not involve any project development. No cumulative impacts v
either.
-6-
.. e
.36. As no development is proposed, and no affect on aesthetics will result, no direct or indirect im
human beings are expected.
-7-
e 0
- ANALYSIS OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
c) alternate scale of development,
d) alternate uses for the site,
e) development at some future time rather than now,
f') alternate sites for the proposed project, qd
g) no project alternative.
It has been determined through this initial study that this project will not have any significant advers
therefore, an alternative analysis is not warranted nor required.
-8-
e *
. DETERMINATION (To Be Completed By The Planning Department)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
- X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NE(
DECLARATION will be prepared.
- I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a signiticant effect on the environment, bec environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction with PI
certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is required. Therefore,
of Determination has been prepared.
- I find that although the proposed project 'could have a significant effect on the environment, there w
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
- I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONM
IMPACT REPORT is required.
/34,lrr l&h&7u&-/1(&&
-
Date Signature
P/?/q*
Date '
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE)
ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM mi APPLICABLE)
-9-
0 0
APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
Date Signature
axd
-10-