HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-03-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 3752+
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3752
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
ON 5,000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM SIZED LOTS, ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE
OF THE POINSETTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN
CASE NAME: POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING
CASE NO: PUD 94-03
PUD 94-03 FOR 36 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
BATIQUITOS LAGOON WITHIN PLANNING AREA “A-1”
AREA “A- 1”
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of C
and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Plannt
Development as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the PI
Commission did on 15th day of March, 1995, hold a public hearing on property de:
as:
Lot 1 of Carlsbad Tract 94-01, in the City of Carlsbad, County
of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 13181
filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tesl
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside
factors relating to PUD 94-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1.
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the P1;
Commission APPROVES Planned Unit Development Permit, PUD 94-03, ba!
the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
I
~
~
I( 0 0
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
Findings:
1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent v
Municipal Code, the general plan, master glans, and all adopted plans of 1
and other governmental agencies. The General Plan designates resi
development for the site; the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan designates the ~
up to 41 detached single family dwelling units (36 are proposed). Therefc
project is compatible with the assigned residential densities foe its res;
residential land use classifications. The planned development permit is in s
accord with the Master Plan for the project in conjunction with the ct
environmental review associated with the master plan approval. The Master
environmental review and contents have been reviewed and approved ~
California Coastal Commission. This project conforms with all provisions
Plan.
2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to pr4
service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being
neighborhood and the community. The project represents a diversified elen
the Poinsettia Shores community. The location for this use is reflected
existing General Plan and Master Plan for the site, which was amended by
of the City Council in 1994 at public hearing after considering all testimonj
persons desiring to be heard and considering all factors relating to
discretionary actions. The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the (
development of the property while preserving the environmental resources
area. The Plan is divided into residential planning areas and open space
This Planned Unit Development Permit for Planning Area “A-1” accurate
properly implements the approved Master Plan.
3. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of p
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements
vicinity. The project is part of a comprehensive Master Plan which will p
major infrastructure and public improvements that will enhance the general v
of the vicinity. The project is designed to function to City standards and wi.
component of the Master Plan area.
4. The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum develo
standards set forth in Section 21.45.090.
5. The proposed planned development meets all of the design criteria set fo
Section 21.45.080 and has been designed in accordance with the concepts con
in the design guidelines manual as indicated through the following analysis.
design criteria for planned developments set forth in Section 21.45.080 includ
following:
(A) The overall plan will be comprehensive, imaginative and inno7
embracing land, buildings, landscaping and their relationships as ind
in the design guidelines manual, and will conform to adopted plans
I I pc RESO No. 3752
-2-
I1
0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
governmental agencies for the area in which the proposed developr
located. The plan for Area “A-1’’ allows for a functional relationship 1:
structures, landscaping and open space areas while providing mark
housing units (consistent with the Master Plan) in the southwest qI:
of the Citye The project conforms to the Master Plan which ha
reviewed and approved by appropriate municipal and state level ager
(B) The plan will provide For adequate usable open space, circulation, on
parking, recreational facilities and other pertinent amenities. Bui
structures and Facilities in the parcel will be well-integrated, orient1
related to the topographic and natural landscape features of the s
indicated in the design guidelines manual. The site was mass graded w
approval of CT 94-01 and is essentially flat with no significant feat1
environmental resources. The plan as proposed provides all the
referenced project elements and amenities in accordance with applicat
standards including all parking and recreational area requirements.
(C) The proposed development will be compatible with existing and p
surrounding land uses and with circulation patterns and open spr
adjoining properties. It will not constitute a disruptive element
neighborhood or community. The development and approval of the Poi]
Shores Master Plan accounted for the appropriateness of all planning
and corresponding circulation systems. Being consistent with the 1
Plan, this project meets the above referenced objectives and therefore Y
be a disruptive element of the Poinsettia Shores community, or
soutRwest quadrant of the City.
(D) The internal street system will not be a dominant feature in the (
design, rather it should be designed for the efficient and safe flow of VI
without creating a disruptive influence on the activity and Function 1
common areas and facilities as indicated in the design guidelines ma
The proposed internal street system meets City standards, is desigl
adequately function to serve the project and does not impact or confli<
any recreational areas, parking areas or other common areas of the p
(E) Common areas and recreational Facilities will be located so as to be I
accessible to the occupants of the dwelling units and will be well-rela
any common open spaces provided, as indicated in the design guid
manual. Private and common passive recreation areas are provided
project area. A master plan level active recreation area center in Pla
Area “M” (SDP 94-03) will also be available to the project’s residents.
(I?) Architectural harmony within the development and within the neighbo
and community will be obtained so Far as practicable. The contemr
architectural style will be in harmony with the architecture proposc
adjacent planning areas. The maximum building height of the pro
buildings is less than the height allowed by the Master Plan (30 feel
I
PC RES0 NO. 3752 -3-
/I 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
addition, the project’s setbacks, landscaping/screening and Ib
separation will enhance the architectural harmony within this plannil
as well as with adjacent planning areas.
6. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the top(
of the site which is essentially flat and lacks any sensitive or significant topol
features. Sensitive grading that typically requires a sensitive site design wa
factor in the development of this planning area.
7. The proposed project maintains and enhances significant natural resources
site by limiting development to be consistent with the requirements of the
Plan.
8. The proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of the
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmoni
disruptive element to the neighborhood as determined through the applicatil
implementation of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan.
9. The Planning Commission finds that:
a) the Project is a Residential Project consistent with a Community Ph
Poinsettia Shores Master Plan) as described in Section 15183 of the
Guidelines;
b) the Project is consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan;
c) there was a Mitigated Negative Declaration approved in connection w
prior approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan;
d) the Project has no new significant environmental effect not analy:
significant in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration;
e) none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or Supplemental EIR
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist.
10. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or 1
alternatives identified in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan which are appropr
this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project
Planninp Conditions:
I. Approval is granted for PUD 94-03, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “K, dated Max
1995, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Depart
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in
conditions,
PC RES0 NO. 3752 -4-
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
2. Approval of PUD 94-03 is granted subject to approval of CT 94-04. PUD
approved subject to all conditions of approval of CT 94-04, as contained in IF
Commission Resolution No. 375 1, incorporated herein by reference and on fi
Planning Department.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 15th day of March, 1995
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas,
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble, and Savary.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN None.
ATTEST
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIO
\
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 3752 -5-
I1