Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-03-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 37540 0 1 II PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3754 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ON 5,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM SIZED LOTS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE OF THE POINSElTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN CASE NAME POINSETI’IA SHORES PLANNING CASE NO: PUD 94-04 PUD 94-04 FOR 49 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES BATIQUITOS LAGOON WITHIN PLANNING AREA “A-2” AREA “A-2” 9 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of ( 10 11 and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Plam l2 11 Development as provided by Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 13 II 14 I1 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the 1 15 16 as: Commission did on 15th day of March, 1995, hold a public hearing on property d 17 18 Lot 2 of Carlsbad Tract 94-01, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map No. 13181 filed in the office of the San Diego County Recorder. l9 II WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tc 20 21 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consic 22 I1 factors relating to PUD 94-04. 23 Commission APPROVES Planned Unit Development Permit, PUD 94-04, 27 26 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 25 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the the following findings and subject to the following conditions: 28 .... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 Findings: 1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent v Municipal Code, the general plan, master plans, and all adopted plans of 1 and other governmental agencies. The General Plan designates resi development for the site; the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan designates the up to 50 detached single family dwelling units (49 are proposed). Therefc project is compatible with the assigned residential densities for its res residential land use classifications. The planned development permit is in accord with the Master Plan for the project in conjunction with the c environmental review associated with the master plan approval. The Mastel environmental review and contents have been reviewed and approved California Coastal Commission. This project conforms with all provision! Plan. 2. The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to pr service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-beinl neighborhood and the community. The project represents a diversified elel the Poinsettia Shores community. The location for this use is reflected existing General Plan and Master Plan for the site, which was amended bJ of the City Council in 1994 at public hearing after considering all testimon persons desiring to be heard and considering all factors relating tc discretionary actions. The purpose of the Master Plan is to provide for the development of the property while preserving the environmental resources area. The Plan is divided into residential planning areas and open spacc This Planned Unit Development Permit for Planning Area “A-2” accurat properly implements the approved Master Plan. 3. Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of 1 residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvement vicinity. The project is part of a comprehensive Master Plan which will major infrastructure and public improvements that will enhance the general of the vicinity. The project is designed to function to City standards and WI component of the Master Plan area. 4. The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum devel standards set forth in Section 21.45.090. 5. The proposed planned development meets all of the design criteria set 1 Section 21.45.080 and has been designed in accordance with the concepts co in the design guidelines manual as indicated through the following analysi design criteria for planned developments set forth in Section 21.45.080 inch following: (A) The overall plan will be comprehensive, imaginative and inn embracing land, buildings, landscaping and their relationships as in in the design guidelines manual, and will conform to adopted plan PC RES0 NO. 3754 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 governmental agencies for the area in which the proposed develop^ located. The plan for Area “A-2” allows for a functional relationship 1 structures, landscaping and open space areas while providing marl housing units (consistent with the Master Plan) in the southwest q1 of the City. The project conforms to the Master Plan which hr reviewed and approved by appropriate municipal and state level age] (B) The plan will provide for adequate usable open space, circulation, ol parking, recreational facilities and other pertinent amenities. Bu structures and facilities in the parcel will be well-integrated, orienl related to the topographic and natural landscape features of the indicated in the design guidelines manual. The site was mass graded I approval of CT 94-01 and is essentially flat with no significant feat environmental resources. The plan as proposed provides all thc referenced project elements and amenities in accordance with applica‘ standards including all parking and recreational area requirements. (C) The proposed development will be compatible with existing and 1 surrounding land uses and with circulation patterns and open SI adjoining properties. It will not constitute a disruptive element neighborhood or community. The development and approval of the Po Shores Master Plan accounted for the appropriateness of all plannir and corresponding circulation systems. Being consistent with the Plan, this project meets the above referenced objectives and therefore be a disruptive element of the Poinsettia Shores community, or southwest quadrant of the City. (D) The internal street system will not be a dominant feature in the design, rather it should be designed for the efficient and safe flow of 1 without creating a disruptive influence on the activity and function common areas and facilities as indicated in the design guidelines n The proposed internal street system meets City standards, is desi adequately function to serve the project and does not impact or confl any recreational areas, parking areas or other common areas of the (E) Common areas and recreational facilities will be located so as to be accessible to the occupants of the dwelling units and will be well-re any common open spaces provided, as indicated in the design gu manual. Private and common passive recreation areas are providec project area. A master plan level active recreation area center in P Area “M” (SDP 94-03) will also be available to the project’s residenl (F‘) Architectural harmony within the development and within the neigh1 and community will be obtained so far as practicable. The contel architectural style will be in harmony with the architecture prop adjacent planning areas. The maximum building height of the p buildings is less than the height allowed by the Master Plan (30 fc I PC RES0 NO. 3754 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 addition, the project’s setbacks, landscapinglscreening and 1 separation will enhance the architectural harmony within this planni as well as with adjacent planning areas. 6. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the top of the site which is essentially flat and lacks any sensitive or significant top( features. Sensitive grading that typically requires a sensitive site design w factor in the development of this planning area. 7. The proposed project maintains and enhances significant natural resource site by limiting development to be consistent with the requirements of the Plan. 8. The proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of thc compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmol disruptive element to the neighborhood as determined through the applical implementation of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. 9. The Planning Commission finds that: a) the Project is Residential Project consistent with a Community P Poinsettia Shores Master Plan) as described in Section 15183 of the Guidelines; b) the Project is consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan; c) there was a Mitigated Negative Declaration approved in connection 7 prior approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan; d) the Project has no new significant environmental effect not ana! significant in the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration; e) none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or Supplemental E11 CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist. 10. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan which are appro1 this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Projec Planning Conditions: 1. Approval is granted for PUD 94-04, as shown on Exhibits “A” - “M, dated M1 1995, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Depa Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted i conditions. PC RES0 NO. 3754 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 2. Approval of PUD 94-04 is granted subject to approval of CI' 94-05. PUD 9 approved subject to all conditions of approval of CI' 94-05, as contained in PI Commission Resolution No. 3753, incorporated herein by reference and on filc Planning Department. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 15th day of March, 1995, following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Welshons; Commissioners Compas, Monroy, Nielsen, Noble, and Savary. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. ATTEST KIM Wl!5LSHONS, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIOI . MICHAEL J. HWZMI~LER Planning Director I1 PC RES0 NO. 3754 -5-