HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-12-13; Planning Commission; Resolution 3856*
’ ’ // e e
t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3856
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MASTER PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF LA
COSTA AVENUE, NORTH AND ]EAST OF THE CITY OF
ENCINITAS, AND WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 23.
CASE NAME GREEN VALLEY MASTER PLAN
CASE NO. MP 92-01
WHEREAS, Carlsbad Partners Limited has filed a verified applicati
the City of Carlsbad and which has been referred to the Planning Commission; an
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Mas1
as provided by Section 2138.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the P
Commission did, on the 19th day of January, and the 2nd day of February, 1994,
13th day of December, 1995, consider said request for a Master Plan on property de
as:
A portion of Section 2, Township 13 South, Range 4 West; and
a portion of Section 35, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego,
State of California.
WHEREAS, a Reduced project Alternative has been proposed
applicant which reduces the project’s proposed commercial square footage by
300,000 square feet and increases the residential portion to 55.8 acres; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearings, upon hearing and consider
testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Coml
considered all factors relating to MP 92-01.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P
28 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
I1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 *
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Master Plan, MP 92-01, according to
"C", and MP 92-01 dated November 29,1995, based on the following
and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed development as described by Master Plan MP 92-01 is ca
with the provisions of the General Plan and any applicable specific plans, in
proposed land uses and location of proposed land uses are consistent wit
identified on the General Plan Land Use map and inclusion of those land USE
Master Plan implements the goals and policies of the General Plan.
2. That all necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with ne
adequate provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the
Improvement Program applicable to the subject property, in that the Mast
includes conditions requiring the completion of infrastructure identified in tt
Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 23 and will be guarantm
financing plan approved by the City Council for LFMP Zone 23.
3. That the residential and open space portions of the community will consti
environment of sustained desirability and stability, and that it will be in harmc
or provide compatible variety to the character of the surrounding area, and '
sites proposed for facilities such as parks, are adequate to serve the anti
population and appear acceptable to the public authorities having jurisdiction 1
in that the public authorities having jurisdiction have reviewed the project a1
not required any facilities over and above those provided within the Mastel
4. ghat the proposed commercial uses will be appropriate in area, location, and
design to the purpose intended, that the design and development are SUE
create an environment of sustained desirability and stability, and thi
development will meet performance standards established by Title 21, in
future development shall be reviewed for consistency with the Master Plan a
all standards for development found within the Master Plan are equal to 4
restrictive than or comparable to Title 21.
5. That the streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to c8
anticipated traffic thereon, in that; the anticipated ADT and distribution cn
the implementation of the Master Plan has been evaluated and the street sys
been designed to accepted standards to meet the demand. Specifically Levant
has been designed as a collector with a 68 feet wide right-of-way; Calle Barcel
been designed as a collector street with an 84 and 96 feet wide right-of-v
street "A" has been designed as a collector with a 60 feet wide right-of-way.
6. That the proposed commercial development can be justified economicall]
location proposed and will provide adequate commercial facilities of the types
PC RES0 NO. 3856 -2-
e *
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
at such location proposed, in that; the proposed Community Comme
consistent with the General Plan Land Use map and that the Market 1
prepared by P&D Technologies dated January 11, 1993 and reviewed by I
Ford and Associates December 14, 1993 identified adequate market absorp
the proposed use at buildout.
7. That the area surrounding the development is or can be planned and z
coordination and substantial compatibility with the development, in that; bui
provided through the Master Plan designation of land uses, the uses prop(
consistent with the General Plan, and the surrounding uses are similarly zo
or developed with uses that are found in the Master Plan.
8. That appropriate measures are proposed to mitigate any adverse enviro
impact as noted in the adopted Final Program Environmental Impact Rep(
92-03) for the project, in that the mitigation identified in the EIR has been i
as conditions of approval or incorporated into the project and will be mc
according to an adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
Conditions:
1. The following language shall be incorporated into the Master Plan to the sati
of the Planning Director prior to Final Map issuance and/or any City of C
administrative or discretionary permit:
2. Approval is granted for the Green Valley Master Plan, MP 92-01, as desc
Ordinance No. (Exhibit "C") which has been amended to reflect the :
Project Alternative as described in the Final Program Environmental Impacl
EIR 93-02.
3. A reproducible copy minus redlines and strikeouts of the Master Plan as 2
to reflect any modifications required by the Planning Commission and City
shall be provided to the City within thirty (30) days of adoption.
II .*** 21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3856 -3-
.. e e
9
1 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a special meeting of the P1
2
by the following vote, to wit: 3
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 13th day of December
4
5
AYES: Chairperson Welshons, Commissioners Compas, N
Nielsen, Noble and Savaly
6
7
NOES: Commissioner Erwin
ABSENT: None
8
9
10
11
12
ABSTAIN: None
KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
~
CARLSBAD PLANNINGCOMMI
13 // ATTEST:
14
15
16 11 Planning Director
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11 PC RES0 NO. 3856 II -4-
,.
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e EXHlBl December 13, *
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GREEN
VALLEY MASTER PLAN FOR PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH AND EAST OF THE
CITY OF ENCINITAS, SOUTH OF LA COSTA AVENUE$
AND WEST OF EL CAMINO REAL IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 23.
CASE NAME: GREEN VALLEY MASTER PLAN
CASE NO: MP 92-01
WHEREAS, Carlsbad Partners Limited has reviewed and considered a P
Plan as provided by Chapter 21.54 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the requirements of 12
City Council has determined that the public interest indicates that said plan be apF
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, Cal
does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That the Green Valley Master Plan, MP 92-01 on file
Planning Department is incorporated by reference herein, is approved.
SECTION 11: That the findings and conditions of the Planning Corn]
in Planning Commission Resolution No 3856 shall also constitute the findings and con
of the City Council.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days a
adoption, and the City Clerk shall certiQ to the adoption of this ordinance and cau
be published at least once in the Carlsbad Sun within fifteen days after its adoptic
....
....
....
....
....
i ..
1
* *
, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held 01
2
AYES: 3
day of , 1995, by the following vote, to wit:
NOES: 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
ATTEST:
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City Clerk
(SEAL)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PC RES0 NO. 3856 -2-