HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-12-20; Planning Commission; Resolution 38701
2
3
4
5
6
7
a e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3870
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
LOT 93 OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FUTURE POINSETI'IA LANE AND BLACKRAIL COURT WITHIN THE ZONE 20
SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES.
CASE NAME: OCEAN BLUFF
CASE NO: SDP 93-07
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 93-07 ON FUTURE
8
certain property described as future lot 93 of; 9
WHEREAS, Ocean Bluff Partnership has filed a verified applicat
10
11
12
13
14
15
Lot 3 in Section 22, Township 12 south, range 4 west, San
Bernadino base and meridian in the County of San Diego, State
of California, excepting therefrom those portions thereof lying
north of the south boundary line of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as
said south line was established May 5, 1913, by decree of the
Superior Court of the State of California, in and for San Diego
County, in that certain action (No. 16830) entitled Kelly
Investment Company, a corporation, vs. Clarence Dayton
Hillman and Bessie Olive Hillman.
16
18
Development Plan approval as shown on Exhibit "H-I", dated December 20,1995 on 1 7
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for
the Planning Department and incorporated by this reference ("SDP 93-07") as provi{
19 // Chapter 21.53 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 20
21
22
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tesf 23
Commission did, on the 20th day of December, 1995, consider said request;
24 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considel
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the P1;
factors relating to SDP 93-07.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pk
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
II
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn1
APPROVES Site Development Plan, SDP 93-07, based on the fo
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findinm:
1. All findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3869 for C:
are incorporated herein by reference.
2. That the requested use is: a) properly related to the site, surroundin;
environmental settings, b) is consistent with the various elements and objed
the General Plan; c) will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses spec
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located; and d) v
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that;
a. The 16 unit affordable apartment project is properly related to the si
surrounding single family residential development since: (1) it is con
with the City's Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the :
Ordinance) due to its proximity to future Poinsettia Lane, a major cim
arterial and within one-two miles of three major industrial centers o
employment opportunities. All public facilities, including the construc
Poinsettia Lane and Blackrail Court, necessary to serve the project 1
provided; (2) it will consist of two separate multi-family structures tc
12,160 square feet with ample open space area surrounding each str
which will be compatible in scale with the proposed single
development; and (3) the project is located at the southwest corner oft
where access to the apartment units will be provided from a non-loadel
street which will provide direct access to Poinsettia Lane, a major a
roadway. The project's location is therefore oriented so that apartment
will not be required to circulate through the single family neighborho
bl. The 16 unit apartment housing project located within the Zone 20 SI
Plan, which will be affordable to lower income households, is consisten
Policy 3.6a of the Housing Element in that it represents 15% of thc
units in the Ocean Bluff project. The project, which requires a 11.8% d
increase above the growth control point, is also consistent with Hc
Policy 3.8 in that the allocation of "excess units" to housing developmt
low income households is given the highest priority.
b2. The provision of onsite affordable units results in a project density
dwelling units per acre which exceeds the Growth Management Control
of 32 dwelling units per acre and requires approval of a 11.8% d
increase. The proposed density increase is therefore consistent with :
3.7.i allowing discretionary consideration of density increases throug
processing of a site development plan in accordance with and implem
by Chapter 2153.120 of the Zoning Ordinance for affordable housing pr
of any size.
I1 PC RES0 NO. 3870 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e e
b3. The proposed density increase of 11.4 dwelling units above the (
Management Control Point for the purpose of providing 16 atX
apartment units onsite to satisfj. the project’s inclusionary i
requirement is consistent with Policy 3.8 allowing excess dwelling uni
allocated with the top priority being housing development for low a1
low income households.
c. The project is compatible with surrounding vacant and agric
development in that it will not impact agricultural uses due to sep
from these uses by road rights-of-way and buffers in the form of
separation and/or 6’ walls. The overall project, including the I
apartment project, is within the low-medium General Plan residential
range which will be consistent with future development of surra
properties also designated for low-medium residential density. Compr
is also achieved since both the project and surrounding properties
developed with standard single family or clustered multi-family units
d. The project site is currently not served by a public road and surroundi
are limited to agricultural and residential dwellings. The 16 unit apa
project will not be detrimental to surrounding residential uses since all
facilities including the construction of Poinsettia Lane and Blackrail
necessary to serve the project will be constructed which will provide
and utilities to the site, and 25’ separation between uses and interne
walls will mitigate potential conflicts between residential and agric
uses.
3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommod
two-story 16 unit apartment project in the R-1 zone, since coverage of the .I
site is 23.6%, (well below the 60% maximum coverage allowed by the Specific
and front, side, and rear setbacks exceed the minimum required.
4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features news
adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhc
be provided and maintained, since the 16 unit apartment project will excc
minimum required setbacks and 36.7% of the site consists of landscaped co
Additionally, a minimum of 200 square feet per unit of private and cc
recreational open space and 34 parking spaces to satisfy the Parking Orc
standard for multi-family dwellings will be provided.
5. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly ha]
traffic generated by the proposed use, in that ingress and egress to and fr
project will be provided from a non-loaded public street (Street A) providing
access to Poinsettia Lane which will operate at an acceptable level, and
circulation in accordance with City Standards will be provided.
....
e...
PC RES0 NO. 3870 -3-
0
1 Conditions:
0
2 11 Planning Conditions:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend APPROVAL of the
Development Plan for the affordable apartment project entitled "Ocean
subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed tc
or require the Developer to make all corrections and modifications to t
Development Plan Documents, as necessary to make them internally consistc
conform to City Council's final action on the project. Development shal,
substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed develc
substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment
approval.
2. Approval of SDP 93-07 is granted subject to City Council approval of LCPA
ZC 93-04, CT 93-09, and HDP 93-09 and the Housing Commission's recommer
of approval for the requested density increase incentive. SDP 93-07 is subjec
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3867,3868,38(
3871 dated December 20,1995.
3. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, an
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
14 4. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy
15 Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body. The Site Plan shall
the conditions of approval by the City. The Plan copy shall be submitted to tl
16 Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improveme1
17 submittal, whichever occurs first.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
5. The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent w
project's market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of tl
and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alt
schedule for development.
6. The project shall comply with the Zone 20 Specific Plan Architectural Standa;
building materials and colors.
Fire Conditions:
7. All buildings having an aggregate floor area in excess of 10,OOO square feet m
protected by automatic fire sprinkler systems. Plans and specifications m
approved by the fire department and a permit obtained prior to installation.
26
27
8. Proposed multi-family residential buildings must be protected by fire alarm sy
Plans and specifications must be approved and a permit obtained prior to instal
28 9. A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway indicati 1) PC RES0 NO. 3870 -4-
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
l addresses of the buildings on site.
10. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Fire Department shall evaluate b
plans for conformance with applicable fire and life safety requirements of tk
and local Fire Codes.
~
I 11. Provide additional public fire hydrants at intervals of 300 feet along public and private driveways. Hydrants should be located at street intersection:
possible, but should be positioned no closer than 100 feet from terminus of i
or driveway.
12. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all re
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including lands 1 and recreational facilities.
Water Conditions:
~
1 13. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system s
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demar
be met.
~
14. The developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permits. TI
Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issua,
application for meter installation.
~ 15. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshall and establish the fire pro1
requirements. Also obtain G. P. M. demand for domestic and irrig;
needs from appropriate parties.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the P1;
Department for pressing and approval.
c. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improk
plans, a meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for I
comment and approval of the preliminary system layouts and usage!
GPM - EDU).
16. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits w
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district sed
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilitic
available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permi
continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed (
final map. ....
~ PC RES0 NO. 3870 -5-
& e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
~
27 28 I
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting t
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 20th (
December, 1995, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Welshons, Commissioners Cornpas, :
Monroy, Nielsen, Noble and Savary
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
&d&
KIM WELSHONS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
5 ..
Planning Director
~
PC RES0 NO. 3870 -6-