Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-01-03; Planning Commission; Resolution 38640 0 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3864 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDINGAPPROVALOFANAMENDMENTTO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO; (1) RE- SUBDIVIDE CONDOMINIUM LOT NO. 115 OF CT 92-01 INTO 7 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, AND; (2) REDESIGN THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING AREA AND THE RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE LOT, ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE AND NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 203 IN THE SOUTHWEST QUADRANT OF THE CITY. CASE NAME COSTA DO SOL CASE NO: PUD 92-01 (A) WHEREAS, Greystone Homes Inc. has filed a verified application for l2 ll property to wit: 13 14 Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6136 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, California, filed and recorded in the San Diego County Recorder's Oflice, July 6,1977. ' 5 16 with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; a1 17 ll WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a 1 18 Development Permit Amendment to replace 40 condominium units with 7 single-fam 19 redesign the recreational vehicle storage parking area and recreational open spac 20 shown on Exhibits "A-U", dated January 3, 1996, on file in the Planning Departm, 21 22 incorporated by this reference ("Planned Development Permit Amendment for Costa PUD 92-01(A)) as provided by as provided by Section 21.45.160 of the Carlsbad MI 23 Code; and 24 25 Ii WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of Janual 26 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all te 27 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; 2 28 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consid ll 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I factors relating to the Planned Development Permit Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the I: Commission as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amer PUD 92-01(A), based on the following findings and subject to the fo conditions: Findina: 1. The Planning Commission finds that: a. the project is a subsequent residential development within an a1 Specific Plan (SP 203) pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guic b. the project is consistent with Specific Plan 203 as amended accordin! 203(A); c. there was an EIR certified in connection with the prior approved Specii 203; d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analy significant in the prior EIR, e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or Supplemental EIR CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist. 2. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or 1 alternatives identified in the certified Final EIR 93-03 which are appropriate Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project. 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for P1 Ol(A) is in conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based following: a. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the prc: density of 4.14 du/acre is within the density range of 4 to 8 du/acre sp for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Pla is at or below the growth control point of 6 du/acre;. b. Circulation - The local cul-de-sac street leading to the 7 single-family 1( 36 feet of paving, 56 feet of public right-of-way, and connects to Hidden PC RES0 NO. 3864 -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i ~ 0 0 Road which is a non-loaded collector street. All the local, collectc major streets within this area would be constructed to full public stree standards, and have curb, gutters, sidewalks, and underground utilitie proposed street system is adequate to handle the project’s pedestri; vehicular traffic and accommodate emergency vehicles; c. Noise - A noise study was completed for the project, and traffic nois Interstate 5 and Paseo Del Norte would not adversely impact the resi development; d. Housing Element - The project is consistent with the Housing Elemen General Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance since the De has been conditioned to enter into an Affordable Housing Agreen purchase 21 Affordable Housing Credits in the Villa Loma project; e. Open Space and Conservation - The project is designed to avoid the r drainage area in the northwestern corner of the site. This open spacc connect with the open space on Poinsettia Park to the north. A 20 fo easement is also provided along the project’s western property accommodate Citywide Trail Link No. 37, which connects the future si along Camino De Las Ondas with the future Poinsettia Community : f. Parks and Recreation - The project is required to pay park-in-lieu fees foot high masonry wall in conjunction with a heavily landscaped ea would be provided along the northern property line to buffer the proje the Poinsettia Community Park. The community park also contains 25 foot landscaped setback adjacent to the common property between land uses. City Wide Trail Link No. 37 through the project is alil connect with Trail Link No. 29 located within the park; and g. Public Safety - The proposed project is required to provide sidewalks lights, and fire hydrants, as shown on the tentative map, or inch conditions of approval. 4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements PI applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility polic ordinances since: a. The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available 1 the project. In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note ! placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is av and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service I available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirement: Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar apply to sewer service for this project; PC RES0 NO. 3864 -3- . 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 b. Prior to final map approval the developer is conditioned to enter i agreement with the appropriate school district to ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve the project; c. Park-in-lieu fees are required; d. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are requ conditions of approval; and e. The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appr( condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contrz payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan. 5. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any ad<: requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pi to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure co1 availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts createc project. 6. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20. 7. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted 1 Council Resolution No. 90-384. 8. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, tl exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportion the impact caused by the project. 9. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consiste Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, maste: and all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in tl project is consistent with Chapter 21.45, Specific Plan 203, the General P1; the Local Coastal Program, because it meets all the Planned Development sta~ the single-family residential land uses would be developed at the appropriate and residential density. 10. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to 1 a service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-beinl neighborhood and the community, in that the development of small lot single homes would provide a balance and mix of residential land uses within Sped 203. A majority of the residential development planned for the specific pl; would be standard single-family homes on 7,500 to 10,000 sq. R lots. PC RES0 NO. 3864 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 development of smaller lot single-family homes would create a more diversifi balanced community. 11. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general we1 persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvl in the vicinity, in that the project is designed to avoid the riparian drainage the northwestern corner of the site. This open space would connect with th space in Poinsettia Park to the north. Drainage facilities would be PI concurrent with development of the project to reduce erosion and floodin manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and to visually the slopes. 12. That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum develc standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in I 21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts containec Design Guidelines Manual, in that: a. The local cul-de-sac street leading to the 7 single-family lots would ha gutters, and sidewalks on both sides, and have a minimum pavemen of 36 feet. This exceeds the 30 foot minimum street width standard; b. The project would provide a mixture of one and two-story homes, an varied roof lines, and a variety of front building elevations and fro1 setbacks, c. Adequate recreational vehicle storage space would be provided in 01 and be sufficiently screened from the public right-of-way and surro properties; d. The single-family homes would have two and three car garages which meet the parking and storage requirements of the ordinance, ant parking would be provided on both sides of the streets; and e. A 10 foot landscaping easement is provided adjacent to Hidden Valle and Camino de las Ondas. In addition, a six foot high masonry conjunction with a heavily landscaped easement would be provided all northern property line to buffer the project from the Poinsettia Corn Park. The community park also contains a 20 to 25 foot landscaped I adjacent to the common property line between the two land uses. 13. That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resou the site, in that the project is located on an existing graded building pad an is not a need for significant additional grading. 14. That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of is compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmor disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the proposed project meets ~ PC RES0 NO. 3864 -5- I1 0 0 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 standards and the proposed residential density is consistent with the Gener; (4.14 ddacre). The proposed residential land uses are compatible in architecture, and building materials with the residential development to the Public street improvements would be provided to accommodate traffic generr the project. The adjacent properties to the west, south, and east have either e residential development or are planned for residential development, therefc proposed small lot single-family residential development would be compatib the surrounding neighborhood. A six foot high masonry wall and ad landscape buffers and setbacks would be provided along the northern propel to minimize impacts between the residential and community park land uses 15. That the project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well intc with the project and does not dominate the project, in that the local cul-de-sa( leading to the 7 single-family lots would be short and curved, would have 36 paving width, 56 feet of public right-of-way, and connect to Hidden Vallq which is a non-loaded collector street. All the local, collector, and major within this area would be constructed to full public street width standards, ar curb, gutters, sidewalks, and underground utilities. The proposed street sy adequate to handle the project's pedestrian and vehicular traffic and accoml emergency vehicles. 1 3 11 Planning Conditions: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The Planning Commission does hereby RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the P Development Permit Amendment for PUD 92-01(A) entitled "Costa Do Sol" as on Exhibits "A" - "U" on file in the Planning Department and incorporated reference, dated January 3,1996, subject to the conditions herein set forth. A conditions and approvals of said prior permit as amended to date and not ar by this action remain in full force and effect. Exhibits "A" - "U", dated Jan 1996 replace Exhibits "A" - "VV" dated October 6, 1993. Staff is authoriz directed to make or require the Developer to make all corrections and modifi to the exhibits and/or documents, as necessary to make them internally co1 and conform to City Council's final action on the project. Development shd substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed develc substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment approval. 2. Approval of PUD 92-01(A) is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-01(A 92-01(A), SP 203(A), and the Negative Declaration. PUD 92-01(A) is subjec conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3863,3865,3 CT 92-01(A), SDP 92-01(A), and SP 203(A). .... 27 ll ...a 2a jj -..- PC RES0 NO. 3864 -6- c 1 0 e PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P 2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January, 3 3 the following vote, to wit: 4 5 6 7 AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Nielsen, Noble, and Welshons NOES: Commissioner Monroy 8 9 ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin ABSTAIN: None 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIO ATTEST: Planning Director 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // PC RES0 NO. 3864 -7- II