HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-01-03; Planning Commission; Resolution 38640 0
1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3864
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDINGAPPROVALOFANAMENDMENTTO
A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO; (1) RE-
SUBDIVIDE CONDOMINIUM LOT NO. 115 OF CT 92-01
INTO 7 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, AND; (2) REDESIGN
THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING AREA AND
THE RECREATIONAL OPEN SPACE LOT, ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO
DEL NORTE AND NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS,
WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN 203 IN THE SOUTHWEST
QUADRANT OF THE CITY.
CASE NAME COSTA DO SOL
CASE NO: PUD 92-01 (A)
WHEREAS, Greystone Homes Inc. has filed a verified application for
l2 ll property to wit:
13
14
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 6136 in the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, California, filed and recorded in the San Diego
County Recorder's Oflice, July 6,1977. ' 5
16
with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; a1
17 ll WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a 1
18 Development Permit Amendment to replace 40 condominium units with 7 single-fam
19 redesign the recreational vehicle storage parking area and recreational open spac
20 shown on Exhibits "A-U", dated January 3, 1996, on file in the Planning Departm,
21
22
incorporated by this reference ("Planned Development Permit Amendment for Costa
PUD 92-01(A)) as provided by as provided by Section 21.45.160 of the Carlsbad MI
23 Code; and 24
25 Ii WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of Janual
26
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all te 27
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; 2
28 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consid
ll 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
factors relating to the Planned Development Permit Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the I:
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Planned Development Permit Amer
PUD 92-01(A), based on the following findings and subject to the fo
conditions:
Findina:
1. The Planning Commission finds that:
a. the project is a subsequent residential development within an a1
Specific Plan (SP 203) pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guic
b. the project is consistent with Specific Plan 203 as amended accordin!
203(A);
c. there was an EIR certified in connection with the prior approved Specii
203;
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analy
significant in the prior EIR,
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or Supplemental EIR
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist.
2. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or 1
alternatives identified in the certified Final EIR 93-03 which are appropriate
Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
3. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for P1
Ol(A) is in conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based
following:
a. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the prc:
density of 4.14 du/acre is within the density range of 4 to 8 du/acre sp
for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Pla
is at or below the growth control point of 6 du/acre;.
b. Circulation - The local cul-de-sac street leading to the 7 single-family 1(
36 feet of paving, 56 feet of public right-of-way, and connects to Hidden
PC RES0 NO. 3864 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i
~
0 0
Road which is a non-loaded collector street. All the local, collectc
major streets within this area would be constructed to full public stree
standards, and have curb, gutters, sidewalks, and underground utilitie
proposed street system is adequate to handle the project’s pedestri;
vehicular traffic and accommodate emergency vehicles;
c. Noise - A noise study was completed for the project, and traffic nois
Interstate 5 and Paseo Del Norte would not adversely impact the resi
development;
d. Housing Element - The project is consistent with the Housing Elemen
General Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance since the De
has been conditioned to enter into an Affordable Housing Agreen
purchase 21 Affordable Housing Credits in the Villa Loma project;
e. Open Space and Conservation - The project is designed to avoid the r
drainage area in the northwestern corner of the site. This open spacc
connect with the open space on Poinsettia Park to the north. A 20 fo
easement is also provided along the project’s western property
accommodate Citywide Trail Link No. 37, which connects the future si
along Camino De Las Ondas with the future Poinsettia Community :
f. Parks and Recreation - The project is required to pay park-in-lieu fees
foot high masonry wall in conjunction with a heavily landscaped ea
would be provided along the northern property line to buffer the proje
the Poinsettia Community Park. The community park also contains
25 foot landscaped setback adjacent to the common property between
land uses. City Wide Trail Link No. 37 through the project is alil
connect with Trail Link No. 29 located within the park; and
g. Public Safety - The proposed project is required to provide sidewalks
lights, and fire hydrants, as shown on the tentative map, or inch
conditions of approval.
4. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements PI
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility polic
ordinances since:
a. The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will
approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available 1
the project. In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note !
placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued
project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is av
and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service I
available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirement:
Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar
apply to sewer service for this project;
PC RES0 NO. 3864 -3-
. 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b. Prior to final map approval the developer is conditioned to enter i
agreement with the appropriate school district to ensure that adequate
facilities are available to serve the project;
c. Park-in-lieu fees are required;
d. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are requ
conditions of approval; and
e. The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appr(
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contrz
payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities
available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
5. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee,
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any ad<:
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pi
to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure co1
availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts createc
project.
6. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved
of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
7. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted 1
Council Resolution No. 90-384.
8. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, tl
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related
project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportion
the impact caused by the project.
9. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consiste
Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the General Plan, applicable specific plans, maste:
and all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in tl
project is consistent with Chapter 21.45, Specific Plan 203, the General P1;
the Local Coastal Program, because it meets all the Planned Development sta~
the single-family residential land uses would be developed at the appropriate
and residential density.
10. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to 1
a service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-beinl
neighborhood and the community, in that the development of small lot single
homes would provide a balance and mix of residential land uses within Sped
203. A majority of the residential development planned for the specific pl;
would be standard single-family homes on 7,500 to 10,000 sq. R lots.
PC RES0 NO. 3864 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
development of smaller lot single-family homes would create a more diversifi
balanced community.
11. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general we1
persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvl
in the vicinity, in that the project is designed to avoid the riparian drainage
the northwestern corner of the site. This open space would connect with th
space in Poinsettia Park to the north. Drainage facilities would be PI
concurrent with development of the project to reduce erosion and floodin
manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and to visually
the slopes.
12. That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum develc
standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in I
21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts containec
Design Guidelines Manual, in that:
a. The local cul-de-sac street leading to the 7 single-family lots would ha
gutters, and sidewalks on both sides, and have a minimum pavemen
of 36 feet. This exceeds the 30 foot minimum street width standard;
b. The project would provide a mixture of one and two-story homes, an
varied roof lines, and a variety of front building elevations and fro1
setbacks,
c. Adequate recreational vehicle storage space would be provided in 01
and be sufficiently screened from the public right-of-way and surro
properties;
d. The single-family homes would have two and three car garages which
meet the parking and storage requirements of the ordinance, ant
parking would be provided on both sides of the streets; and
e. A 10 foot landscaping easement is provided adjacent to Hidden Valle
and Camino de las Ondas. In addition, a six foot high masonry
conjunction with a heavily landscaped easement would be provided all
northern property line to buffer the project from the Poinsettia Corn
Park. The community park also contains a 20 to 25 foot landscaped I
adjacent to the common property line between the two land uses.
13. That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resou
the site, in that the project is located on an existing graded building pad an
is not a need for significant additional grading.
14. That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of
is compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmor
disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the proposed project meets
~ PC RES0 NO. 3864 -5-
I1 0 0
<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
standards and the proposed residential density is consistent with the Gener;
(4.14 ddacre). The proposed residential land uses are compatible in
architecture, and building materials with the residential development to the
Public street improvements would be provided to accommodate traffic generr
the project. The adjacent properties to the west, south, and east have either e
residential development or are planned for residential development, therefc
proposed small lot single-family residential development would be compatib
the surrounding neighborhood. A six foot high masonry wall and ad
landscape buffers and setbacks would be provided along the northern propel
to minimize impacts between the residential and community park land uses
15. That the project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well intc
with the project and does not dominate the project, in that the local cul-de-sa(
leading to the 7 single-family lots would be short and curved, would have 36
paving width, 56 feet of public right-of-way, and connect to Hidden Vallq
which is a non-loaded collector street. All the local, collector, and major
within this area would be constructed to full public street width standards, ar
curb, gutters, sidewalks, and underground utilities. The proposed street sy
adequate to handle the project's pedestrian and vehicular traffic and accoml
emergency vehicles.
1 3 11 Planning Conditions:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1. The Planning Commission does hereby RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the P
Development Permit Amendment for PUD 92-01(A) entitled "Costa Do Sol" as
on Exhibits "A" - "U" on file in the Planning Department and incorporated
reference, dated January 3,1996, subject to the conditions herein set forth. A
conditions and approvals of said prior permit as amended to date and not ar
by this action remain in full force and effect. Exhibits "A" - "U", dated Jan
1996 replace Exhibits "A" - "VV" dated October 6, 1993. Staff is authoriz
directed to make or require the Developer to make all corrections and modifi
to the exhibits and/or documents, as necessary to make them internally co1
and conform to City Council's final action on the project. Development shd
substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed develc
substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendment
approval.
2. Approval of PUD 92-01(A) is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-01(A
92-01(A), SP 203(A), and the Negative Declaration. PUD 92-01(A) is subjec
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3863,3865,3
CT 92-01(A), SDP 92-01(A), and SP 203(A).
....
27 ll ...a
2a jj -..-
PC RES0 NO. 3864 -6-
c
1
0 e
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the P
2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 3rd day of January, 3
3 the following vote, to wit:
4
5
6
7
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Nielsen, Noble,
and Welshons
NOES: Commissioner Monroy
8
9
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin
ABSTAIN: None
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST:
Planning Director
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
// PC RES0 NO. 3864 -7-
II