HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-01-03; Planning Commission; Resolution 3876E
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3876
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 8 SECOND
SUBDIVISION TO SATISFY THE INCLUSIONARY
HOUSING REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 21.85 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE, ALL ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS
ONDAS, EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, AND SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN
203, IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE
20.
CASE NAME: MAR VISTA
CASE NO: SDP 94-10
WHEREAS, McReynolds has filed a verified application for certain p
DWELLING UNITS WITHIN A 49 LOT SINGLE-FAMILY
to wit:
Parcel C of Parcel Map No. 2949, in the City of Carlsbad, County of Sar
Diego, State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of Sar
Diego County, August 9, 1974, as File No. 74-216632 of official records.
with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; a:
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for
Development Plan to subdivide a 34 acre parcel into 49 single- family lots with a mi
lot size of 7,500 square feet and 1 open space lot, and provide 8 second dwelling u
shown on Exhibits "A-J", dated January 3, 1996, on file in the Planning Departme
incorporated by this reference ("Site Development Plan for Mar Vista" SDP 94.
provided by Section 21.53 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 3rd day of January
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; a1
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tes
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside
factors relating to the Site Development Plan.
....
/I 0 0
1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the 1
2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
3
4
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con
5 APPROVES SDP 94-10, based on the following findings and subje,
following conditions:
6
7
8 1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundin
environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objective
in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely
Findings:
9
the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that 10
General Plan, will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically pe
11
12
13
a. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan since the PI
density of 2.45 du/acre is less than the density range of 4 to 8 c
specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the C
Plan, and is below the growth control point of 6 du/acre;
14
15
16
17
18
b. Circulation - The local streets serving the project have 51 to 60 feet ol
right-of-way, and connect to Hidden Valley Road which is a non
collector street. All the local, collector, and major streets within th
would be constructed to full public street width standards, and haw
gutters, sidewalks, and underground utilities. The proposed street sy;
adequate to handle the project’s pedestrian and vehicular traff
accommodate emergency vehicles;
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. Noise - A noise study was completed for the project, and noise frc
airport and Palomar Airport Road can be mitigated with sound wa
building construction techniques;
d. The project is consistent with the Housing Element of the General PI;
the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance since the Developer has been condi
to enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement to construct 8 second &
units. The remaining .647 fraction of an inclusionary dwelling unit
satisfied through the payment of a fee equal to the fraction (.647) tin
average subsidy needed to make affordable to a lower-income househo
newly constructed typical housing unit;
e. Open Space and Conservation - The project is designed to avoid thc
slopes surrounding the mesa and riparian drainage area in the western
canyon. This 19.24 acre open space lot would connect with the open sp
Poinsettia Park to the north. City Wide Trail Link No. 29 would be a
I
PC RES0 NO. 3876 -2-
r
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I I I I,
e 0
to the east to minimize gnatcatcher, coastal sage, and riparian impac
western finger canyon. Native habitat impacts have been red
mitigated by the design of the project, in that the Cherry Blosso
alignment is the most sensitive in terms of habitat and slope in
follows:
1) The 0.05 acre take area is located outside of any Preserve E
Areas (PPAs);
2) The habitat loss will not preclude connectivity between areas
habitat values since this area is not included as a part of a :
Planning Area (LPA);
3) The habitat loss will not preclude or prevent the preparatiol
Carlsbad Habitat Management Plan in that the area is not a
a Linkage Planning Area, makes no contribution to the
preserve system and will not significantly impact the use of
patches as archipelago or stepping stones to surrounding PPI
4) Mitigation for the loss of the 0.05 acres of Coastal Sage Scrul
will be in the form of the acquisition of habitat credits as di:
above. The loss of habitat on the MSP California LLC prope
not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recc
the gnatcatcher;
5) The habitat loss is located in a disturbed area that is directly a
to Hidden Valley Road and the Poinsettia Community Park, th.
large blocks of habitat will not be lost and fragmentation v
occur; and,
6) The habitat area being impacted is at the periphery of a larg
habitat area; it is not in the center where the loss of habitat wc
more important.
f. Parks and Recreation - The project is required to pay park-in-lieu fee
g. Public Safety - The proposed project is required to provide sidewalks
lights, and fire hydrants, as shown on the tentative map, or inch
conditions of approval.
2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommod;
use, in that the lots are a minimum of 60 feet wide and the second-dwellinl
would have exterior access, be incorporated into the second-story of the p
home, and utilize a portion of the three-car garage for parking.
3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features neces;
adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhol
PC RES0 NO. 3876 -3-
I'
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
be provided and maintained in that the second dwelling units would be in
into the primary dwelling units and meet all the development standards of
7500 Zone.
4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly h:
traffic generated by the proposed use.
Planning Conditions:
1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Site Deve!
Plan for the SDP 94-10 project entitled "Mar Vista". (Exhibit "A" - "J" on fil
Planning Department and incorporated by this reference, dated January 3
subject to the conditions herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed .
or require the Developer to make all corrections and modifications to the ex1
documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and conform
Council's final action on the project. Development shall occur substantially a
on the approved exhibits. Any proposed development substantially differe
this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of SDP 94-10 is granted subject to the approval of the ReciI
Mitigated Negative Declaration, ZC 94-04, LCPA 94-04, CT 94-11, and HDl
SDP 94-10 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Res
Nos. 3872,3873,3874,3875, and 3877.
3. Prior to approval of the final map the Developer shall deed restrict Lots No. :
24, 28, 32, 35, and 44 to require the construction of a second dwelling
conjunction with the primary dwelling unit in compliance with the floor pla
architectural elevations of Site Development Plan SDP 94-04. Any changes
lot designations, or approved floor plans and architectural elevations of the
dwelling units shall require the approval of a minor amendment to SDP 94-04
Planning Director.
4. Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where
is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots 01
the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the (
provide and deed restrict the 8 lots for second dwelling units (including: Lo
18,24,28,32,35, and 44) in accordance with the requirements and process st
in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The recorded Affordable H
Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest.
Upon showing by the developer that an onsite contribution is not appropriate
project, a second inclusionary housing option available to the developer shall 1
prior to final map approval, the developer shall enter into an agreement w
City to purchase affordable credits from Villa Loma or participate in an
combined inclusionary project within the southwest quadrant and as appropr
accordance with the requirements set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Ca
Municipal Code, the Zone 20 Specific Plan, and City Council Policies 57 s
PC RES0 NO. 3876 -4-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
I
27
28
I
a e
dated September 12, 1985. Prior to City Council approval, the develol
submit a signed Affordable Housing Agreement to the Housing and Redevc
Director. The recorded Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding on a
owners and successors in interest.
5. The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent
project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making authoril
City and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreemen
alternate schedule for development.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meetint
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 3rd day of January, 199(
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Monroy, Nielsen
Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Erwin
ABSTAIN: None
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMM
ATTEST:
Planning Director
I
PC RES0 NO. 3876 -5-
ll