HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-04-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 3919e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 i I
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3919
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 115 LOTS INCLUDING 104
RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 9 PRIVATE STREET LOTS AND 2
DUPLEXUNITS ONPROPERTYGENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD BETWEEN
FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE AND THE CITY'S EASTERN
BOUNDARY WITHIN THE RANCHO CARRILLO
MASTER PLAN BOUNDARIES.
CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE E
CASE NO: CT 95-06
WHEREAS, UDC Homes has filed a verified application for certain p
COMMON RECREATION LOTS AND 104 MULTI-FAMILY
to wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19,
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
and a portion of Certificate of Compliance File/Page 87-385114
recorded July 9,1987 all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; am
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tel
Tract Map as provided by Chapter 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 17th day of April,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; an
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all test
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consider
factors relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Carlsbad Tentative Tract, CT 95-4
on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the SUI
as conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the Gene
any applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal CI
the State Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health pro1
that it is a residential, medium-high density, multi-family subdivision des
accordance with the Subdivision and Planned Development Ordinances
compliance with the recommendations of the required technical studies for !
drainage, as well as provide all public improvements necessary to serve the
generated by the development.
2. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land u
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the
Plan and the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the developmt
the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential developme
density proposed, in that the project is consistent with multi-family deve
designated for Village E by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and the mass
plan approved by Hillside Development Permit, HDP 91-17.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conj
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquire
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed sub
in that the project has been designed and structured such that there are no t
with any established easements.
5. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to tl
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
6. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future
or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that th
dominant western wind patterns/solar radiation patterns will allow utiliz
natural heating and cooling opportunities.
7. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the
proposed by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanct
housing needs against the public service needs of the City and available fi!
environmental resources.
8. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely t
substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure // PC RES0 NO. 3919 -2-
e *
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
wildlife or their habitat, in that all applicable biological mitigation measures I
by Final EIR 91-04 have been incorporated into the project and/or addec
project as conditions of approval.
9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in viol;
existing California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in
sewer and drainage requirements of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and El
have been considered and appropriate sewer and drainage facilities ha1
designed and will be secured. In addition to City Engineering Standa~
compliance with the City’s Master Sewer and Drainage Plans, National PI
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards will be satisfied to preb
discharge violations.
10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for
Carrillo Village E, is in conformance with the Elements of the City’s Gener
based on the following:
a. Land Use - The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan Res
Medium High (RMH) land use designation since the proposed densit
du/acre is below the density range of 8 - 15 du/acre specified for the
indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan, and is at o
the growth control point of 11.5 du/ac.
b. Circulation - The project is conditioned to complete all necessary on!
offsite roadway improvements prior to occupancy of any unit in eack
Additionally, all roadway improvements to serve the Rancho Carrillo
Plan must be guaranteed and substantially completed prior to occuy:
units in Village E.
c. Noise - The project provides mitigation to reduce noise levels to (
within the usable yard area of lots abutting Palomar Airport Road, i
project is conditioned to require compliance with the 45 dBA interia
standard.
d. Housing - That the project is consistent with Policy 3.6.a of the €
Element of the General Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Ordinana
Developer has been conditioned to enter into an Affordable €
Agreement to provide and deed restrict 20 dwelling units as afford
lower-income households. The project also includes six affordabl
bedroom duplex condominium units to satisfy the three bedroo
requirement for UDC Homes in Villages E, J, and K.
e. Open Space and Conservation - The project is consistent with the 1
Carrillo Master Plan and Zone 18 LFMP in that 186 acres of perf01
standard open space will be provided throughout the Master Plan.
....
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -3-
0 0
11
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
~
I f. Public safety - In accordance with the Rancho Carrillo mass gradii
(HDP 91-17) and the Village E grading plan and final soils reF
unacceptable soil conditions shall be mitigated to facilitate const
Standard engineering grading conditions will be required for all r
grading.
11. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements P
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility polic
ordinances since:
a. The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will
approved unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available
the project. In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note 1
placed on the final map that building permits may not be issued
project unless the District Engineer determines that sewer service is a\
and building cannot occur within the project unless sewer service :
available, and the District Engineer is satisfied that the requirement
Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been met insofar
apply to sewer service for this project.
b. Statutory School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school f;
in the San Marcos Unified School District. In accordance with the 1
LFMP special conditions for schools, the project is conditioned to
that the school site is deeded to the San Marcos Unified School Distl
that a financing agreement is approved by the San Marcos Unified
District guaranteeing the construction of necessary elementary
facilities in Zone 18 prior to final map recordation or grading or b
permits, whichever occurs first.
l8 I1 c. Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
d. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are requ
conditions of approval.
e. The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appr
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contr:
payment of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities
available concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
12. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, (
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any add
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared PI
to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure cor
availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created
project.
....
I/ PC RES0 NO. 3919 -4-
1 0 0
1 13. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved
of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18. 2
3 14. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or
alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this Sub5
4
15. The Planning Commission finds that: 5
Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guj
1516S(c)(2) and (e), and 15183;
b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 934
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 91-04);
c. there were EIR’s certified in connection with the prior 1994 Gener;
Update and Rancho Carrillo Master Plan;
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analg
significant in the prior EIR’s;
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist.
15 16. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or
this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Projeci 16 alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 and EIR 91-04 which are appropr
17 17. MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significal
18 adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of over
considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to
19 effects, no additional environmental document is required.
20
21
22
23
24
18. The project, as designed, implements certain objectives and mitigation me,
established by the General Plan Master EIR to reduce cumulative air quali
circulation impacts as applicable to a residential project of this scale. These in
providing links to public sidewalk systems that connect with transpor
corridors, and future schools, parks, and trail systems; providing for safe pede
and bicycle movements within the project; and designing the project to accomn
pedestrian spaces as well as proposed parking areas and building locations.
25 19. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) f
20
20. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted b 27
shall record a notice concerning aircraft noise. 26
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April, 1994, in that as conditioned the apy
Council Resolution No. 90-384.
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -5-
/I 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
i
I
I
21. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed
Developer contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, tl
exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related
project, and the extent and the degree of the exaction is in rough proportion;
the impact caused by the project.
Planning Conditions:
I 1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Tentativl
Map for the multi-family lot subdivision project entitled "Rancho CarrilloVil!
(Exhibits "A-V" on file in the Planning Department and incorporated
reference, dated April 17, 1996), subject to the conditions herein set forth. I
authorized and directed to make or require the Developer to make all corri
and modifications to the approved Documents, as necessary to make them int
consistent and conform to City Council's final action on the project. Develc
shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any prl
development substantially different from this approval, shall require an amer
to this approval.
2. Approval of CT 95-06 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 95-04 and SI
12. CT 95-06 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Comn
Resolutions No. 3919,3920, and 3921 dated April 17, 1996.
3. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, an
ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
4. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy
Tentative Map/Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body.
Tentative MapISite Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City
Mapplan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer and approved pr
building, grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occur
5. The final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the t:
such approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
6. The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council o
28, 1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to time, an
development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90
Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a g
management system or Facilities and Improvement Plan and to fulfill the subdi\
agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated September 5, 1995, a copy of
is on file with the City Clerk and is incorporated by this reference. If the fe
not paid, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and ap,
for this project will be void.
7. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures whic
required as part of the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan an(
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -6-
I1
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, in
but not limited to the following:
a. Prior to recordation of a final map within Zone 18, a parks agrl
between the City of Carlsbad and Zone 18 property owners shall be f
into;
b. All future development in Zone 18 will be required to construct any
Zone 18 storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Mast8 and revised Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Enghet
c. Prior to recordation of final map, the Zone 18 developers shall recei.
Council approval of a comprehensive financing plan guaranteei
construction of circulation improvements including Palomar Airport
Melrose Drive, and El Fuerte.
d. Prior to recordation of any final map, the designated school site sl
deeded to the San Marcos Unified School District and a financing agn
shall be approved by San Marcos Unified School District guaranteei
construction of the necessary elementary school facilities in Zone 1
provided for in the Zone 18 LFMP, if any reimbursement and/or sch
credits are to be given, the school agreementlfinancing plan shall prc
mechanism to do so.
8. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in confon
with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City’s Landscape M
The plans shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning DI
prior to the approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whic
occurs first. The Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as sha
the approved plans, and maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving cont
free from weeds, trash, and debris.
9. The first submittal of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be accoml
by the project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
10. Slope trees adjacent to Street B shall be minimum 15 gallon in size along the
slope.
11. The Developer shall provide proof of payment of statutory school fees to mi
conditions of overcrowding as part of the building permit application. The ar
of these fees shall be determined by the fee schedule in effect at the time of bu
permit application.
12. The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Direct0
I ....
I
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -7-
0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
13. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall inch
not be limited to trails, future and existing schools, parks, and streets.
14. In accordance with the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, prior to final ma
applicant shall establish both a Master and Village homeowner's associatic
corresponding covenants, conditions and restriction (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs s
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The following items s:
included in the CC&Rs for each association as indicated:
Master HOA
a. Master Homeowner's Association maintenance of the Recreational 7
Storage Lot (Lot 104 of CT 93-04).
b. The CC&Rs shall prohibit the storage or parking of recreational v
within any of the Villages except in approved RV storage areas.
11
12
13
14
15
16
c. The Master Association shall control the operation and maintenance
recreation vehicle storage area, entry signs, common slopes and
common features as identified in the Master Plan.
d. The provision of the Master CC&Rs shall be binding to the provisions
CC&Rs for the Village Associations and may not conflict. Slope areas
individual villages shall be maintained by the Master Association if e:
to major streets. The developer shall submit a master maintenanc
showing all areas to be maintained by the Master Association to be apl
by the City Engineer prior to any final map approval.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e. Provisions for the maintenance of slopes within the open space easeml
Lots 40-58.
Village HOA
a. No private development shall be permitted within open space Lots A(
within open space easement areas on Lots 40-58 inclusive.
b. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying that individual own(
property may replace original fencing on their property, however,
changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall desil
the project as graphically shown on Exhibit "F". The replacement (
fences or walls within this project must be consistent with one of the ft
or wall design types as shown in the Master Plan.
c. Provisions for HOA maintenance of open space Lots A&B.
d. All open space and landscaped areas shall be maintained in a health;
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris and shall be maint as indicated on Exhibit "E".
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -8-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
//
e. Provisions for the maintenance of the slopes within the open spa
maintenance easement on Lots 6, 7, and 21 through 30.
f. Ventilation systems are provided and should be maintained in units
would exceed the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard wit1
windows.
Signs and Identification;
15. Building identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and (
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; GI
identification and/or address shall contrast to their background color.
16. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be desig
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and ay
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
17. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Rancho Carrillo Maste
Signage shall be located in conformance with Exhibit "F" Landscape Concept :
unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director.
Environmental:
18. The Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation
mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR 91-04 that are found 1
resolution to be feasible. The Developer shall also implement, or cau
implementation of, the attached Rancho Carrillo Master Plan EIR 91-04 Miti
Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit "X1') certified by the City COUK
July 27, 1993.
19. The Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the project Site wj
project as described in the Final EIR 91-04, except as modified by this res011
20. Paleontology:
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retail
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading pl:
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy
paleontologist's report shall be provided to the Planning Director pr
issuance of a grading permit;
b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspe
of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of
of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to c
matrix samples for laboratory processing through fine screens.
paleontologist shall make periodic reports to the Planning Director duri~
grading process;
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -9-
/I 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the
an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary,
artifacts;
d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institutiou
research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural
Museum;
e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading at
of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City En
21. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct the com
theme/noise attenuation walls shown on Exhibit "E", Landscape Concept Plar
April 17, 1996 in accordance with the addendum to the "Acoustical Anal?
Rancho Carrillo Village E" dated February 14, 1996.
22. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall submit a detailec
study addressing necessary interior noise mitigation measures for Village "E",
to issuance of building permits the following mitigation shall be ensured:
interior noise levels shall be mitigated to 45 dBA CNEL when openings
exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if openings are required to be closed 1
the City standard, mechanical ventilation shall be provided; (3) the Develope
prepare and record a Notice of Restriction for those lots requiring opening
windows, doors, vents, etc.) to be closed and mechanical ventilation to be pr
in order to satisfy the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard; (4)
requiring openings to be closed and mechanical ventilation to be provided in
to satisfy the City's 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard shall be identified
sales office prior to the sale of any units; and (5) all useable exterior space ab(
first floor shall be mitigated to the adopted City standard.
23. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of bl
permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notic
this property may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or e:
Transportation Corridor (Palomar Airport Road), in a form meeting the apprc
the Planning Director and City Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the P1:
Department).
24. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of bu
permits, whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notic
this property is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating
McClellan-Palomar Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Di
and the City Attorney (see Noise, Form #2 on file in the Planning Departmc
25. The Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or
offices associated with the new development. The number and locations of said
shall be approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file i
Planning Department).
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -10-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
26. Prior to final map approval or issuance of a grading permit, whichever OCCUI
the applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Prelimina
Assessment (pp 39-40) dated December 1993 performed by GEOCON Environ
Consultants which include the performance of additional laboratory tests to (
that the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) of DDT, DD
Toxaphene does not exceed the values promulgated by Title 22 if soils
exported from the site. A report detailing the results of the remediation pr
if necessary, shall be submitted to the City.
27. Prior to approval of the final map, the Developer shall be required: (1) to
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the im
the project on the Coastal California Gnatcatcher; and (2) obtain any I
required by the USFWS. The issuance of a permit by the USFWS for the I;
Carrillo Master Plan mass grading project would satisfy this requirement.
Housing:
28. Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where
is not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots 0;
the Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the (
provide and deed restrict twenty two-bedroom and three-bedroom dwelling
(units on Lots 3, 4, 23, 24, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 69, 70, 85, 86, 95, !
and 100) as identified on Exhibit "A" dated April 17, 1996 as affordable to
income households for the useful life of the dwelling units, in accordance WI
requirements and process set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal
The draft Affordable Housing Agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Di
not later than thirty (30) days after final map submittal. The recorded Mol
Housing Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in in
29. The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent wi
project's market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of th
and the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an altt
schedule for development.
30. The Developer shall dedicate on the final map, an open space easement to thl
and landscape maintenance easement to the Master Homeowner's Associatic
those portions of lots 40 through 58 which are in slopes in their entirety to pr
any encroachment or development, including but not limited to fences, walls, I
storage buildings, pools, spas, stairways, and landscaping, other than that app
as part of landscape plan as shown on Exhibit "E" and a landscaped open spac
maintenance easement to the Village E Homeowner's Association on Lots 6, 7
21 through 30.
31. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures whic
required as part of the approved PUD 95-04 and SDP 95-12 as contain4
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3920 and 3921.
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -11-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e
32. To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities on R
Airport Road at locations subject to the satisfaction of the North County 'I
District (NCTD), if such facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities sha
minimum include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus sto
The bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as not to detract frc
basic architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject
approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
33. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval
Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and pha5
construction for the recreational Vehicle Storage facility. Prior to occupancy
first unit within Village "E, at minimum, 2,080 square feet of recreational 1
storage space shall be provided on Lot 104 of Village "Q' unless an 1
temporary recreational vehicle storage facility has been approved by the P1;
Director.
34. The buildings shall comply with UBC Sections 503.2 and 709.4 (1994 ed. UE
35. The buildings shall comply with the latest edition of the Model Codes adopted
City of Carlsbad at the time plans are submitted for building permits.
General:
36. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable secti
the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at t
building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
37. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally inte
and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent propertie
streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6,
satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building.
38. The Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City's street
policy subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map approva
39. Prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit the Developer shall provide all ref
passive and active recreational areas per the approved plans, including lands
and recreational facilities.
Landscape:
40. All landscape and irrigation plans shall be prepared to conform with the Lanc
Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file i
Planning Department.
....
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -12-
e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Engineering Conditions:
General:
41. This project is located within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan. All develc design shall comply with the requirements of that plan.
42. The developer shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirc
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
43. The developer shall be responsible for coordination with SDG&E, Pacifj
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
44. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner's associal
on commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an indiv
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the respon
shall be placed in the CC&Rs.
45. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months frc
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension r
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Counc
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to :
20.12.110(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
46. The developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its 2
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the Cig
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought agai~
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivisio
Act.
47. Rain gutters must be provided to convey roof drainage to an approved dr,
course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
48. The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors at all street intersectj
accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following staten
the project's CC&Rs:
I
"NO structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30
inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach
within the area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance
with City Standard Public Street Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The
underlying property owner shall maintain this condition."
The above statement shall be placed on a non-mapping data sheet of the fina
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -13-
0 0
1 49. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply wj
2
3
requirements of the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and wht
a program is formally established by the City.
Note; Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering con(
4 upon the approval of the proposed major subdivision, must be met prior to a]
5 I! of a final map.
6
7
8 51. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivis
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance w
Fees and Agreements:
50. The owner shall execute a hold harmless agreement for geologic failure.
9 Council Resolution No. 91-39.
10
11
52. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
53. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding t
12 harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property.
13
14
15 No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
54. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the own
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundarie
site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Grading:
55. Upon completion of grading, the developer shall ensure that an "as-graded" i
plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan shall clearly show all the
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a 24" x 36" mylar or
drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
56. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the sub
unless a grading or slope easement or an agreement to grade is executec
developer and the owners of the affected properties. If the developer is UI
obtain the grading or slope easement or agreement to grade, no grading pel
be issued. In that case the developer must either amend the tentative map 0:
the plans so grading will not occur outside the project site, in a manne
substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by 1
Engineer and Planning Director.
~
27
28
57. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed cons
site within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval f
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -14-
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply F
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards
hauling operation.
58. In accordance with the Rancho Carrillo Final Environmental Impact Report (
grading of natural habitat should not occur during the nesting season
endangered avian species. All grading within 500’ of Coastal California Gnat(
occupied habitat and within 200’ of riparian habitat, occupied by Least Bell’
and Willow Flycatcher, should be restricted to the period between Septembe
February 15 of any given year.
Dedication and Improvements:
59. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures s
provided or installed prior to, or concurrent with any grading as may be requ
the City Engineer.
60. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public stre#
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. Tk
shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project or by s(
document. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of :
and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already pul
not required to be rededicated.
61. The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National PC
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provi
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level I
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved
City Engineer. Said plans shall include, but not be limited to notifying pers
owners and tenants of the following:
a. All homeowners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or wc
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of to
hazardous waste products.
b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, mo
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and 0th
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or intc
drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pe>
fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such cl
treatments shall meet Federal, State, County, and City requirem
prescribed in their respective containers.
c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce
pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and
improvements.
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -15-
a 0
1
2
3
4
5
62. Drainage outfall end treatments for any drainage outlets where a direct accc
for maintenance purposes is not provided, shall be designed and incorporal
the gradinglimprovement plans for the project. These end treatments s
designed so as to prevent vegetation growth from obstructing the pipe
Designs could consist of a modified outlet headwall consisting of an e:
concrete spillway section with longitudinal curbing and/or radially designed or other means deemed appropriate, as a method of preventing vegetation
directly in front of the pipe outlet, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
6 63. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Engineer may
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any recom
8 improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be complete(
9 satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7 an engineering evaluation of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The evi
10
11
12
13
64. The following improvements as required in the Rancho Carrillo Master Pla
and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for Zone 18 shall be guaral
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These improvements unless otherwise n
by the final decision making body shall be substantially completed to the sati
of the City Engineer prior to occupancy of the first dwelling unit within th
project.
14 I1 a. Melrose Drive - Alga Road to Palomar Aimort Road
15
16
17
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime
standards.
0 Construction of a median and two lanes in each directi
intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engl
l8 I1 b. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary
19
20
21
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major
0 Construction of full major arterial standards from the intersect standards.
Melrose Avenue to the entrance to Village J and the school I
22 // C. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 18
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width.
0 Construction of one lane in each direction from the southerly b
of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village T.
d. Sewer Facilities. including
0 12" main in Melrose Drive
0 12" main in, or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A 11 PC RES0 NO. 3919 -16-
ll e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
a Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C
a Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D
9 BuenaDan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G
0 North La Costa Lift Station
e. Water Facilities, includinq
a A portion of the proposed potable 24-inch main in the
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
Zone 18.
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
Fuerte within Zone 18.
service Area E.
The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast co
The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line in the PI
a A portion of the proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in the PI
a The proposed reclaimed 38-inch main in the proposed alignme
a The proposed potable 12" main from Melrose to El Fuerte t
13 /I f. Drainage Facilities, including:
14
15
16
a Proposed double 5' x 5' box culvert under Melrose Drive.
a Detention basins, channel and flood control improvements ne
to mitigate for erosion and protect on site Master Plan and
downstream properties from significant impacts.
17
18
Village - "E" - Specific Conditions:
General:
19
Note: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering con( 20 upon the approval of the proposed major subdivision, must be met prior to a1
21 of a final map.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
65. The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the
easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, streel
storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute th
of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the pro
within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be in
with the CC&Rs subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
66. This project is specifically approved as one (1) unit for recordation purposc
public facilities needed to serve this unit, iin accordance with City Standards
the satisfaction of the City Engineer, shall be guaranteed for construction.
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -17-
e e
1
2
67. An adjustment plat shall be processed aligning the westerly property line F
Road to the southerly right of way line of proposed Street "Bl'.
proposed centerline of Street "I" along the project frontage from Palomar
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
Grading:
68. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever oca
the developer shall submit proof to the City Engineer that a "Notice of In1
was submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and receive a
from the City Engineer of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan.
Dedication and Improvements:
~ 69. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Palomar Airport Road and Street "I"
Lot "D", Street "A") and Street "B1 shall be waived on the final map.
I 10 70. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements .
the developer shall install or agree to install and secure with appropriate sec
the proposed project including, but not limited to:
11
provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map and necessary to 12
prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with City St;
13
14
15 71. Palomar Airport Road frontage improvements, including:
Village "E1 Frontage Improvements:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
0 No. 3 eastbound vehicular travel lane
0 Eastbound bicycle lane
0 Curb, gutter, and sidewalk (south side)
0 Street light standards (south side)
0 Landscape raised median
0 Community theme wall (south side)
0 Landscape area between sidewalk and theme wall
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain reimbur
for one-half of the raised median hardscape/landscape improvements frc
fronting property owners on the north side of Palomar Airport Road.
23
24
72. Street "I" frontage improvements from Palomar Airport Road to the Villi
entrance, including:
25
26
27
0 Two vehicular travel lanes (48' curb-to-curb width)
0 Curb and gutter (both sides)
0 Street light standards (both sides)
0 Sidewalk (east side only)
0 All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lanes.
28
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -18-
e I)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
73. Street "I" frontage improvements from the Village "E" entrance to Stn
including:
8 Two vehicular travel lanes (at one-half street plus 12') (36' curb-to-curb
8 Curb and gutter (east side only)
8 Asphalt/Concrete Berm (west side only)
8 Street light standards (east side only)
8 Sidewalk (east side only)
8 All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lanes.
74. Street "B" frontage improvements from Street "I" to the easterly proper
including:
8 Two vehicular travel lanes (at one-half street plus 12') (36' curb-to-curb
8 Curb and gutter (north side only)
8 Asphalt/Concrete Berm (south side only)
8 Street light standards (north side only)
8 Sidewalk (north side only)
8 All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lanes.
75. All public storm drainage facilities necessary to convey drainage to an ay
drainage course.
14
15
76. All sewer and water facilities required to service the project.
/I Village "E" Off-Site Improvements: 16
'7 I1 77. Temporary Emergency Access Improvements, Off-Site through Village "F', inc
18
19
20
21
22
23
8 Two vehicular travel lane asphaltlconcrete pavement (28' minimum v
8 Temporary emergency access easement must be obtained to facilita
0 This emergency access shall be gated to the satisfaction of the Fire M emergency access construction and use.
and City Engineer at Palomar Airport Road.
If this temporary easement cannot be obtained, then off-site improvements wi
to be constructed to facilitate emergency and/or public access in accordance I
applicable City Standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
24 I1 78. A fully actuated trafflc signal at the intersection of "I" Street with Palomar I
Road.
25
26
27
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain propor
share reimbursement for the above traMic signal from benefitting property 1
to the north and south of Palomar Airport Road.
28 ....
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -19-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A list of the above improvements shall be placed on an additional map sheei
final map in accordance with the provisions of Section 66434.2 of the Subc
Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within eightel
months of approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other
provided in said agreement.
79. The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by t
Engineer prior to approval of the final map for this project. The structural
of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on 1
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City,
standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to a
of the final map for this project.
80. The developer shall reimburse the City for the proportionate share of frontr
of constructing half street improvements on City Project No. 3166, Palomar
Road. Said reimbursement shall be less the non-discretionary funds design;
the frontage construction as determined by the City Engineer and Finance D
Final Map Notes:
81. Notes to the following effects shall be placed on the final map as non-mappin
a. All improvements are private and are to be privately maintained vc
exception of the following:
(1) Palomar Airport Road
(2) Street "I"
(3) Street "B"
b. This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit s:
issued for the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant
provisions of Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
C. Geotechnical Caution:
(1) The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its suc
in interest has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the
Carlsbad from any action that may arise through any geological
ground water seepage or land subsidence and subsequent dama
may occur on, or adjacent to, this subdivision due to its constr
operation or maintenance.
82. The Developer shall provide the following note on the final map of the subc
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
"Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth
Management Control Point for each General Plan land use 11 PC RES0 NO. 3919 -20-
a 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
designation. Development cannot exceed the Growth Control Poin
except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land use designation fo
this development is RMH. The Growth Control Point for thi
designation is 11.5 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
Village E’s 15.2 developable acres were used to calculate the intensity of devel
under the General Plan and Chapter 21.90. Subsequent redevelopn
resubdivision of Village E must also include Village E’s 15.2 developable acre;
the General Plan and Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.”
83. The following note shall be placed on the Final Map: “Prior to issuance of a 1
permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the Developer shall pa!
time special development tax in accordance with the City Council Resolution
39.”
General:
84. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their term
implemented and maintained over time; if any of such conditions fail tc
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have tl
to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition i:
of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certific
occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institc
prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek d;
for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a succe
interest by the City’s approval of this Resolution.
17
18
21
20
19
NOTE: The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, in
Code Reminder:
but not limited to the following:
85. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this
to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provi
accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer.
22
23
24
25
26
27
86. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these con
are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has su
title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition
or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Ct
Municipal Code.
Fees:
87. The Developer shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
28 88. The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as requ:
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -21-
e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Fire Conditions:
89. An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehic
be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of 1
Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather c
reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction opt
cease until the condition is corrected.
90. All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operationa
combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
91. Prior to final inspection, all security gate systems controlling vehicular access
equipped with a "Knox", key-operated emergency entry device. Applica
contact the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals I
installation.
92. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain fire dep:
approval of a wildland fuel management plan. The plan shall clearly i
methods proposed to mitigate and manage fire risk associated with native vef
growing within 60 feet of structures. The plan shall reflect the standards prc
in the fire suppression element of the City of Carlsbad Landscape GUI
Manual.
93. Prior to occupancy of buildings, all wildland fuel mitigation activities n
complete, and the condition of all vegetation within 60 feet of structures four
in conformance with an approved wildland fuel management plan.
94. The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the fo
requirements: A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improv
and at least two existing intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly
street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names.
Water Conditions:
95. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system s
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demal
be met.
96. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. T
Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuz
application for meter installation.
97. Sequentially, the Developer's Engineer shall do the following:
....
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -22-
a 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire prc
requirements. Also obtain G.P.M. demand for domestic and irrig
needs from appropriate parties.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the P
Department for processing and approval.
c. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water impro
plans, a meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for
comment and approval of the preliminary system layouts and usage!
GPM - EDU).
98. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits 7
be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district sen
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are aT
at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will cont
be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final
99. The developer shall be required to adhere to all conditions of the water anc
analysis on file at Carlsbad Municipal Water District Engineering Departme
# reference CMWD 86-502).
100. The developer shall install minimum 8" DIA waterlines in streets A, B, C, 1
G, H, I and Palomar Airport Road. Exact sizes shall be established via a Villi
analysis.
101. This village must provide all offsite water, sewer and reclaimed systems
completely independent of other proposed developments.
....
....
....
....
....
....
~
....
....
....
....
PC RES0 NO. 3919 -23-
e m
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day c
1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, I
Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
hLk%&W Lvpd
WILLIAM COMPAS, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
c
MICHAEL J. HOLMILLER
Planning Director
~ 11 PC RES0 NO. 3919 -24-
- - - e
Rancho Cadlo Master Plan
Environmental Impact Report ExmlT)
Mitigation Monitoring and-Repo&g Program
-.
A. Agriculture
~ ~~ ~
Impacf. Possible soil contamination from agxidtud cfrernjcais fmdy used or stored on tk
j'. i. site.
Mitigaiion. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigation ncommcndations, if n(xessary, to Ci
Planning Department ana hxy Health Deparanent. 2) Mitigarion to be made a condition i
tentative maps approved under the Mantr PIah 3) Report QI completed remediation to t
submitted to City Pianning Department and County Wth Dqartmmt upon completion.
Master P&n Implementcztion. A sods report for the propcay med by Continental Homes a~
the property being dedicated for park purposes has becn dvcd by the Planning Deparuntr
Any mitigation required for sails contamhion imikami by tbit report will be remedied pri
to issuance of a gradiig permit, Impacts may OCCUT if additional pesticide concentrations and
hazardous waste matmiab or containen art €bund during devdopmart, in which case t
referenced mitigation would be appiicable. Soils qorts for other propertiw within the Mas1
Plan will be required with the submittal of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) SubmittaI of eacfi tentative subdivision map under the Master Plan.
Approvd of each tentauve map under the Master Ran. 3) Completion of construction of ea
tentative map subdiujsion.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Enginering Deparrm#lts.
Sanctions. 1) No tentative maps to be appnwed without ncarsary canditions. 2) No fi
maps, building or grading permits issued until nmediation report submitted.
Impact. Possible conflict between eariier stages of Masta plrrn deveiqrnent and contin! t , A agricultural use of other portions of the site, .iiuding agricUlturaI chemical use, inigat
Mitigation. Each tentative map must provide a lisl of performance and impact critesia spec?
in the EIR, such as access, drainage, and baaing, to easm the phasing developmen
compatible with continued agricultural use,
Master Plon ImpZmntation. There will be no impact if applicant(s) indicates that consis
with its practice since 1991, it intends to abandon farm use.
r. runoff, and odor.
'I
0 e
Clteckpoinrs. 1) Submittal of each tentative subdivision m;lp undn tbe mtsr Plan- 2
Approvai of e& tentative "p under tRt Masgr Ph, 3) Consrnrtioa Of cacfi &NahVt RE&
subdivision. - . .
Respondle Parry. 1) City Planning and EnSineaing D93arm3am,
Sanctiuns. 1) No tentative maps to be appmvtd without necssaq cooditi0nS. 3) InVCQOl
of construction by grading inspecton. No building pvmits id until Wce criteria a~
implemented.
~~~
B. Biology
Geneml Note. To ensure the implementation of all mitigation far potential impacts to biological
resources, the applicant for each tentative map proposed under the Master Plan shall prior to
approval of each tentative map, as appropriate, show evidence to the City Planning Departmen1
that a qualified consulting biologist has been retained to monitor all rehut mitigation, assure
compliance with mitigation requirements, nrpervise implementation of mitigation, and file a
report on mitigation compliance with the Planning Dirtaar apoa completion of majos
components of biological mitigation rcquimncnts.
j5 I
.- Impact. Implementation of the Master Plan win directly impaa wetlands on-site and, by
1J 2 " construction of a sewer line in the right of way for Canillo Way to the west, off-site.
Mitigation. The applicant for the projcct sM1 either restore and arhanct riparian habitat at an
appropriate area ratio to impaas or shall participate in a city-wide mitigafion program through
the City's Habitat Management Ph. Mitigation shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the
City and in accordance with the fcquhmnts of Section 1600 et sq. of the California Fish and
Game Code and Section 404 of the Ftdcral Qcan Watcr ACL
Master Plan Implanerclation. No mitigarion nquired for offsioe under sewer alignment
currently proposed by applicant north of canill0 Way alignment. Such alignment has IK)
wetland impant,
Checkpoints. 'Approval of the l5st tentative map or grading permit affecting wetlands on- or
off-site under the Master Plan.
Responsible Pmy. City Phning and Engineering Dqartmmts, California Departmatt of
Fish and Game, U.S. Amy Corps of Enginccn.
Sanctiuns. No grading map uhder the Mast# Plan.
0 0
Impucz. Ifii project. is not nconfigured to sabstantially zv~id populations of sari Dieg
thornmint and thrcad-leaved brodiaca, development will mtly impact those spa5es.
1Mitigarion. To parually mitigate impacts, the mitigab plans for San Diego thornmint an
thread-leaved brodiaca shaiI be impiemcntui, modified as speafied in the EIR and after revie
and acceptance by CDFG, as conditions of apprmml of tentative map3 under the Mastcr Ph
To the maximum extent possible, mitigation rfiall be accarnpiiskd prior to construction nsuitir
in impacts.
Master Plon Implementation. Villages T and U have bem zeconfigurcd to avoid impact
thornmint. Village G has been nconfigund to mini& impacts to Brodiaea.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentative maps. 2) A@ of fcIltatve maps. 3) Prior
construction causing impacts.
Responsible Parry. 1) City PIanning and Engineering Departmarts. 2) City Planning a
Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning and Engineaing Departments, consulting biologi
Sanctions. 1) No appmval of tentative maps for Vi G without acceptable miagatl
reviewed by California Department of Fish and Game.
7. .3
Impact. Potential for future dimrbancc of apa! spacc areas.
7- -1 Akf&&fimz. Dedicarion of an open space eaxmcnt over naturaf open space, biological mitigat areas, buffer areas, .and naturalid areas to avoid dismbance of the natural habitats a:
condition of tentative maps.
Checkpoints. 1) Approvai of tentative maps.
Responsible Parry. 1) City Planning and Engineering Deparanenff
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without depiction of acceptable open sp
aements and condition to dedicate conservatioa easunents OVQ nafural open space.
>
0 0
Impact. Possible predation or disturbma of caiifornia gmcatcficrs or other scnsitive wildlife
species by funue residents or domestic pert.
Mater P&n ImpZement4tion. No appd dTcnfative Maps for affected Vihges whbt
mitigation condition, if any, required by Calif& Department of Fisb and Game M U.S.
Department of Fisfi and Wddlife.
- ._
f r'\
,' ! ' Mitigalion. As determined by above rdacnced aga~cy. (2
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Planning and Eqkmg Departments.
Sanctions. 1) No Tentative Map apprwed witbart mitigation, if any, imposed by referemxi
lead agency set forth as a condition.
~~-~ ~
Impact. Possible invasion of native plant arcas by non-mive landscaping species.
Mifigation. As a component of the landscaping plans for affected Villages, revegetation pian
i
I -- k for disturbed and mitigation areas shall be prrppcd by a quaiifid biologist, and landscaping 6 plans for tentative maps shall be reviewed by tk bioiogia
Checkpoinfs. 1) Approval of tentative maps 2) Common of landscaping and revegetation.
Responsible Partg. 1) City Planning and Enginming Departments, consulting biologist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative maps without satisfactory landscaping and revegetation
plans.
Impact. Possible disturbance of native habitat am during grading and construction.
, .n.
\j and monitor grading and construction.
! diirigaton. The consulting bioiogin shall supcrvk surveying and slaking of native habitat arms
I
.I
tr 0 0
c I i‘ .-‘ ’” : I, ’ - otrcboints. 1) Approvai of tcnrative maps. 2) ~eport by d~ hoiogi*
Reqon&e *. 1) City planning and h@lCCrhg maa 2) cmsulting bio1ogist.
sa~c~o~s, o-. NO approval of tartative mag witbout proper &tigat;On ~w~tim- 2) NO
Planning Depanrnent.
issuance of building or ~pancy permits Untd Umstdting bioiogig’s Vn is submitted to the
Impact. Potentially significant noise and activity impacts to Gnatcatcher during grading and
construction.
0 ‘; Mitigation. Due to conflicting biologist’s opinions rrgarding mitigation, !%I& mitigation plan, i; . if any, shall be as approved by U.S. Fi and Wildlife andlor Caiifornia Department of Fish and
Game, as appropriate.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning ad Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Halt or redirect grading or constnrction in dcW, m, if my.
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife spccics by outdoor lighting.
./;I, ‘\ Mitigarion. Outdoor lighting near native habitat areas should be shielded and directed away 0 from conservation easement areas.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps. 2) Grading and improvement pian check. 3)
Construction of improvements neaf conservation casement areas with report to Planning
Department bi consulting biologist.
\
*
0 0
Responsible Party. 1) City plyrrmy and Engineering - 2) €onsulting biolow
SUC~~ORS. 1) No approval of tmtalive map without xmtjpkm conditiw. 2) NQ qpm
building or occupancy pcnnitl without pmperiy ~CCQ- mitigation.
Of grading a. improvement plans without propa -a spaeifkd. 3) NO issuanc~ 01
~
Impact. Potentia for imp- to Off-~itt sensitive tat m from erosion and dim-~on
from the project.
Mitigaron. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Checkpoints. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Responsible Patty. See hydrology and water quality mitigation.
Sanctions. See hydrology and water quality mitigation,
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~
C. Cultural Resources
Impact. .Possible vanchiism due to increased human pmce to archaeological site SDI-
12,740B. \ I" ,
" Mifigm*on. The si& shall be cappal with fabric, soil, and vcgeoltion as a condition of the
tentative map including the site. Work must be supavised by a quaiifid archaeologist retained
by the tentative map. applicant.
Master Plan Implementarioa. This site is located 011 site EO be dedicated to City of Carisbad for parkland. The capping of this site will be the rqomibility of the City of Carisbad.
Clteckpoints. 1) Submitmi of development plans for park site, 2) Approval of such plans.
3) Report by consulting archdogist submitted to City PSauning Department upon completion
of work and prior to commencunent of development of park site.
Responsible P-. 1) Civ manning and Ea- Departments, 2) City Planning
Department. 3) Consulting ardracologist, City planning d - Departments.
.I
0 0
Sanctions. 11 NO appro~al of site devdapment pb witfrout mitigadon $an. 2) NO grading
pennits to be-issued until mitigation report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to city
Planning Dtpanmcnt. - .. .
~ ~~
Impact. Direct impacts of deveJopment on archacoiogicai site SDI"4691B.
"itigatn. A data recovery program as specified in the EIR must be required as a condition
of the tentative map including the site. Work must be svpavlsed by a qualified archatologist
retained by the tentative map applicant and cornplcrcd prior to any construction affecting the site.
- L:L Lvmer Plan Implementati4n. Mitigation of this site W~II not tx required unless this area is (_I disturbed by onsite riparian mitigation.
Clreckpoints. I) Approval of applicable tentative map. 2) Report by consuiting archaalogisl
. submitted to City Planning Department upon completion of work and prior to any ,piing for
construction affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) No approval of tentative map without mitigation plan. 2) No building
permits to be issued until mitigatron report by consulting archaeologist is submitted to City
Planning Department.
~~
Impact. Direct impacts of development on archaeological site SDI-4687.
Mitigarion. Capping of the site as specified in the EIR as a condition of any tentative map
affecting the site. Work must be supervised by a qualified archaeologist retained by the mtative
map applicant and completed prior to any ConstNCtioIL affecting the site. /$ r.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of appiicabie tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting arcfiaeoiogist submitoed to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or consmaion a&cting the site.
Ozeckpoinfs. 1) Submittal of applicable tentative map. 2) Approval of applicable tentative
map. 3) Report by consulting archaeologist submitted to City Planning Department upon
completion of work and prior to any grading or COIlStMCtiOLl affecting the site.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineaing Departments. 2) Consulting
archaeologist.
1
0 0
Sanctions. I) Submittal of tmrativc map ao(; compka without mitipion pian. 2) N
approval of tentative map without mitigah pia 3) No budding mts to be id uni
mitigation nport by consulting archactologist is spbrnittcd to City piauning Dcptmcnts.
Impuct. Encroachment of proposed developman of the Masfcr Phl On tht SWd, 'a
California" setting of the LC0 carrill0 historic siot.
, . :A "
Mitigczlion. Establishment and irnpIcmcntatioa of a sped design district as required und
Land, Use Compatibility in this mitigation matiming and reporting program.
Checkpoints. See Land Use Compatibility sa#im.
Responsible Party. See Land Use Compatibility Kction.
Sanctions. Set Land Use Cornpatlbility scctioll.
D. Paleontological Resources
Impact. Potential destruction of significant fd, espe&dy in the Santiago and Lus
Formation, by grading and construction.
f I) "itigation. Monitoring of grading by a palaratoiogist, with recovery and curation of
significant fossils discovered, as specified in the EIR. Monitoring is to be performed under
direction of a qualified paleontologist retained by the appiicant for each tentative map.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of applicabie tentark map. 2) Report by consulting @tontolo
upon cornpietion of grading.
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and Engineering Dcpartmats. 2) ConsuI
paleon toiogist.
I
0 0
Soncrions. 1) Approval of tffltative map ~#t compkte witlwut mitigatMn pb. 2) No buildinr
permits to be issued until mitigation repon by consulting paicontolo@ is submitted to Ciq
Planning Dqxkment.
-.
E. Hydrology and Water Quality
~ ~~
Impact. Major drainage facility design will be nquind to avoid potatial advarc effects o
erosion, Sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the devciopcd site.
Mitigotion. As a condition of approval each tentative map, the applicant shall submit :
hydrology anaiysis addressing required ffood muation, runoff flow reductiodsiltation, anc
f \ proper sizing of drainage facilities, G
Master Plan ImpZement&n. Appricant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire
Master Plan area.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tentative map.
Responsible Pam. 1) City Engineering Department. 2) City Eqmetring Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentative Map condition of approval.
Impact. Major drainage facilities will have to be constructed to avoid potential adverse effects
of erosion, sedimentation, scouring, and flooding from the developed sits.
r' 7
I ;c Muszer Plan ImpZe&zrcrrion. Applicant may submit one hydrology analysis for the entire - Master Pian area.
Mitigntion. The final decision-making body shll wve a Financing Plan addressing the
source and use of funds for the conmuch of all nquind dramage facilities prior to recording
the first Finai Map or the issuanec of the fint grading or bdding permit, whichever is first.
CAeckpoints, Recording of fm final map ca ifzrtanct of first grading or building permit. each tentative map.
Responsible Pmy. City Enginaxing Department.
Sanctions. No recording of hi map or issumcc of grading or building permit without
Financing Plan guarantee for cmstrudm of reqttired drainage facilities.
\
0 0 Impact. Potentiai erosive or flooding damage to m in Leo Carib Ranch Park due u)
runoffbromtfiedevdopedsteenrmnl:tbedrainagcsoutboftbe~ ..,
Mitigazion. An hyhiogy analysis for the drarpage south of tbc park sb;lll be submitted with
7 the applicable tentative map or prior t~ issuawr of advywrd piing parnit far Mclmsc
grading permit affecting the area and ammwal con- with the grading of the affected area.
r. ' '' Avenut,and~-apptopriatedrainagc~rhallbcrequutdpriar~the~~oftfiefira
C'feckpoinfs. 1) Approval of applicable ttntativt maps, 2) W of fkt gdiig permit.
Responsible Porn. 1) Engineving Departmat. 2) Enginnaing Department.
Sanctioks. 1) No approval of tentative map without proper drainage system shown. 2) NO
issuance of building permits untiI drainage system implemeneed
'.
0 0
HyhW md Wwt Qdip
Impact. InstaiIation of the proposed stocm drab bawem Wages R aDd T ht Open SP~ Area 13
would disturb sensitive biological remrces in the ope0 space ana
“itgarion. The stom drain shall be ni0C;neb to NIL sou& from village Q to connect to a Storm
drain in either El Fuene Street or Cbrb h E &\ Muter Pl~n Impkmc~rrtion. Ilk sum dram hu been rdacated *m ana^ that will be graded as
part of the development of Villages Q ad R whemrer possible to mid sensitive habitat.
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tecrtativc map for Villages Q and R Wudii the storm drain. 2)
Approval of Village Q and R teraative map. 3) Coxuplaion of st~m dnin comaion.
Responsibk Pames. I) City Engin#ring Deprmnent 2) City Engin- Depamnmt. 3) City
Engineering Department.
Sanctions. 1) Subminai of tentative map not complae without showing storm drain in proper
location. 2) No approval of tentazive rmp witlxntt storm drain shown in proper location. 3) No issuance of building permits for tenutiyc map uprtil sfam drain pmmy amagd.
Impact. Potential for increased on-sitc erwioa ind increased sediion downsueam when grow
surface is disturbed during grading ad aLlStNQiOn.
M~gation. An Erosion and Sedimcm;stioa Coaaoi Plan must be prepared for each deveiopment
i .;I submittal, approved by the City Engineer, and ixnpiunented during consmaion. J \.
” ’ Checkpoints. Approval of any @i or impmanmt plan in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Pa-. City Engineering Depuancnt.
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permitt without Erosion ad Sediion Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
Impact. Potential impacts of urban poiIutants ftom the devdoped site affection water quality in Batiquitos Lagma
~ C Mitigation. Discharge of nxnoff 6nnn deveioped anas intu nannali cham& and public educatior
\;. infomarion distributed to property ow~cn,
Mater Plan Impiemetotion. A ddd Hydroiogical Study unast be approval prior to issuance of
grading permit for the grading nm to co~~srm~ the Circulation Elemax Roadways.
chrckpoints. 1) Approval of appiide tcntPive qs. 2) Completion of construction of drainage channels. 3) Close of escrow to piopary owners.
0 0
.,
HydmbacrndWwQvOliry 1,
Responsible M. I) City Engineering Dcppmwa. 2) City Engineaias Deptrmrcat.
3) Developen
Szncrions. 1) No approval of tentative maps withom pmpa design of moff drainage ficilities. 2)
No issuance of building permits unless mff draimgc frilities properly commd.
-
Impact. Potential for grease, oil, and other traffic-rdned pollutants from pavai surEaces to reach
Batiquitos Lagoon in runoff. ..
Mitigation. Best management practices UI be a~ployed to prevent urbrn pit- from entering
City waterways in compliance with National Pollum~ Dischatge Eiimimion System Ilrunicipal E.. I stomwater permitting quircmcntr.
Checkpoinu. Approval of any grading or impm~ plan in the Master Plan area.
Responsible Paaies. City Engineering Depam#at
Sanctions. No approval of any grading permiu without Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~
F. Geology and Soils
d
Impart. Geologic conditions potentially unsoinble fa development on the site without mediation
include soils unsuitable for Ioad-bearing or wirh ahuse sesdement potmri;ri, old landslide areas and
claystone beds, and high-groundwater in ailuviai soik. I! Mitigm'on. Remedii grading wiSl be needed to snblii firm footings bt suuaures and fills and to correct adverse senlaneat and alluvial soils m shrllwv groundwafer. A soils engineer and
engineering geologist shrll be retained by each teotpive map applicant to review detailed grading
plans, prepare a ddsd soil and gwiogic invcstigaim, monitor wnsuuaion, and assure compliance
with tfie Master Plan geologic investigation rpd the Cii Grading Ocdimnce.
Checkpoints. 1) Submiial of each tentative mq. 2) Approval of earh ttptativt map and issuance of
grading permit. 3) Campletion of collStCPCtjOO
Responsible Pa-. 1) City Engineering - 2) City Enrpinrcrinp Deparancnt- 3)
Consuiting soils engines and eqhedq ~logiu, Ciq Engineer.
Suncn'uns. 1) Temative map submimi m aolpglae widrout detailed soil ad geologic investigation
2) No tentative map approval without soil ad g&ogic invatigatioa ad appprke conditions. 3)
No issuance of building pennits witbout evidence ofpropa mitigation.
'I
0 0
Air Qualiry 1.
I
G. Air Qudity .
. -
Impaa. Potentiai for significam di impacts to regiopri air quality due to increase in pollumnt
emissions caused by project uaf€ic.
\ Miligorian. Impiementation of Master Pb mctsufe~ ind- bike IUS a~d pedestrian trails, and ? ' requirement for applicants for fi~m tentative maps t~ work with Nod Coumy Transit District to ' . provide bus routes and stops as approprint.
Checkpoints. 1) Subminal of tenrative maps. 2) Approwl of tczltatve rmps.
Responsible Parries. 1) City Planning and Engmeering Depnmcw. 2) City Planning and
Engineering Depanmem.
Sonctions. 1) Submittai of tentative maps oot complete without appropriate mitigation measures. 2)
No approval of tentative maps without appiicaion conditions.
H. Land Use
fmpud. Development of the Master plan dd encroach OQ tbt 'early Catifornit" sating of Carrillo
Ranch Park, ' inciudmg the dimination of the dm eopp t~ the ranch compound.
Mitigcrtion. A Speciai Park Design Disuia &ail be espblishcd for development surrounding the park tj ' including special comh on setbacks, hdscaping, and architecarral details and an enay through the
park through Village S. The design disaia stmdatds will be included in the Mater Pian and
subsequent tentative maps will be evdd for conformvlce by the Phug Cammission.
Checkpoints. I) Approvzl of the M- Plat 2) Appovd of teatarive mapJ that hciude Pm Of
the design district,
Responribls Pd. 1) Cii Planning Dcpamnent. 2) City Planning Depanmm
Sonrtioru. 1) No lppovri of the Masm Pilo without esoblishmeftt of a park design diet and
development standardr 2) No approvd of me maps comticliag plrt of the deign disaict
without setting fonh district developmas stdards.
Impad. The City of Carlsbad has 110 rnritw authority over Village S, which is in the park design
district, if it is developed as a schooi site by the San Mar- Unified School Disain.
1
0 e
kud Use 1.
Mag&on. Agreement with the schi distrin on design amAtnk is ammgcd, but cannot be
enforced by the Plarining Commission. WW miew of ail devdopmmt within the design district,
it is not within the power of the Lead Aomcg to ;ubpn dut possible impacts are mitigated or avoided
\'. ,.' ,? chrckp~ints. NO Lead Agency &&pipa witbut - with the schod district.
R8sponriblc Padies. Respusibaify fir miriparkrn & a @ m af mthcl, juwI&n &
not the City of Carisbad.
Sonctionr. None available to the City of hisbad der present dtamrspnces.
Impact. Dedication of the open space lint at the &west coepef of the property, whae rhe link
crosses from one zone to an adjacax ownashi, is pot assured under the proposed Master Plaa.
Mitigation. Assure continuance of the open space link as part of the mer Plan.
I, t' 1. Muster Plan Zmpkmenfcrtion. Car"$ Open Space Advisory approwd the open space link
proposed by the Master Plan at their Fcixaary 1993 rneuing.
Checkpoints. I) Approval of Master Pia. 2) Approv;ri of dve map including Wage T.
Responsible Pamis. Planning Dep~rmm.
Suneti4m. No approvai of Master Ha without opco space link.
~-
Impact. Applicants for the Master Plan 1101151 obcain a leaa from the San Marcos Unified Schooi District accepting the site proposed by appkam as possible school sire area in compliance with the 1 Zone 18 Local Facilities Managanax pfta
'\: 'I Mitigurion. Agreement with the Sm Mams Uaifial school District as put of Master Ran approval.
Ckckpoints. Approval of Mastcr Pia
Rcsponriblr Portics. Planning Depamms.
Sanctions. No approval of Master Plan without apeemas with the school district that compiies with
the Zone 18 Local Facilities Managemm Phn.
1
0 0
.*
. Vu& Aesxherics/Gr&g 14
-_
P I. . Visual AestheticdGrading
~~
Impad. Grading proposed by the Master PIa reqoim m jam grading vo\~~ ta & \ approved by the Planning Director and city Engmeeer 1ctoniing to the EiU Development Ordinance
<. .
Mitigat'on. Approval of findings hr the proposed gndins vaimpcs prim t~ approval of the Master Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of Maser Plan.
Responriblc Purties. Planning Director and City Ensinctr,
Sanm'ans. No approval of the Master Ran without the requid findings.
fmpaa. Proposed grading for the Mastcr Plan would exd Hillside Dcvjopment Ordinance allowances for slope height and encroachment into 40 percent dopa without specified findings by the
decision making body.
/' 2 Mitigation. Approval of findimp for tht proposed grading conamas with approval of the Master J Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of the Master Ran.
Responsible Pam'ts. Decision making Body.
Sanctions. No approval of the Masta PIan without the required findings.
Impact. Potential impacts &Master P!an development on the visually sensitive Carriilo Ranch Park
site, including Villaga S, 0, ami Q.
Mirigation. Applicabie tamfive maps to indicate an neptable dded landscape pian to reduce - ,7_ potential impacts. Impiewpt spea?l Rrk Design Dha ncommaxiai in EIR Land Use seaion. ' '\
Checkpoints. 1) Submithi of appiiie tentative maps. 2) Approval of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Patties. 1) City Plauning Department. 2) City Pbaing Department.
Sanctions. 1) Tentathe map submittal not complete withom dcoiled tydscape plan. 2) No
approval of tentative map withoq appropriate detailed landscape plan.
0 0
viapl Aolhrria/Gmding ti
-.
Impacr. Potentiaily significant imp= of rccr&md vehide storage in OpCa Space Ana 13 on views
from existing residences,
Mifi.g&on. Detailed landscape pian as pat oftmathe map fat Villager Q and R to effdvely
f [\ screen views of recseatiod vaide sfonsc. \ /
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of tentativt m?p iduding nacatiod vchide storage. 2) Approval of
tentative map inciuding recreaiouai vehicle nonSe.
Responriblc Parnit. 1) City Planning hpzrmwat. 2) City Planning Depptment.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of tentative map mt complae without appmpriac Ilpdscaping pia. 2) No
appmvd of tentative map without appropriate hdsaping pia.
Impact. Potential significant visual impacf of mise Mas wer six fa in height.
Mitigation. Detailed landscaping plan for teanaive maps to provide aiapate cover, texture, ami
variation of vegaasion to screen wdls. f. /i ' Checkpoinu. 1) Submittal of any tdve arq showing mise banien M six feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tentative map showing mise Mas ova six fea in w
Responsible Parties. 1) City Planning and Eqineuing Depamnena. 2) City manning and
Engineering Departments.
Sanctions. 1) Submittal of applicable tuxatbe map not complete witban appropriate landscaping
plan. 2) No approval of applicabte tdve rmps without appropriate Uscaping pian.
X Cirrulation -
Impad. The intusaion ofpJomzr Airport Rpad and El Camiw Red is projected to have a level of serviceFinthcyep2000affaaoonpeakhour. NodditinnliimprovmaastOthisiMtrSectionare
: currently proposed in the LFMP. .A; '
Mitigotion. me Cii wiil continue to rooaim uafk to datrmint codmunce with LFMP standard
and to identify and implanea! improvcmemt 0efcst;rry to meet the spodtfd.
Checkpoints. Coluauction of impvanents.
Responsibrr Pmk. City Eqikxhg Dcpprman,
e 0
. ,,
Vi Acnhaia/Gnnihg If
Sanaions. Nsisswnce of building pennits if Growch hhagmaa smiards for Mc leveb of
service are not mcr,
~ ~~ ~ ~~
Impcts. Spacing of the first intusecsioa on plloma Ai Rod is 200 fea dose than City
standards allow.
Mitigotion. Tentative maps shaIl comply with City rod aiii and imersestioa spacing staadards
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Mer PIan Implemeratioe. 'Ihe location Jbown a0 the proposed Master Plan has not been revised
and has been approved by the City Engineer.
Checkpoints. Approval of tentative maps.
Responn'blr Pu&. City Engineering Deparrmem.
Sundions. No approvai of tcrnative maps that do pot comply with City road alignment and
intersection spacing to the satisfaction of the Cay En-.
5 '24,
~ ~-~~
fmpuct. As pmposed, development of the Mazer Plan wadd rrqoin affic signals at Palomar
Airport Road/access road to Village E and at Meircxe AvePle/ePoanccs to Villages H, 0, and L.
/< ?I M@ption. Condition ftmPiYe maps to CO- &e necas;rry signals and improveme'ntr, or J. determine the need for si@ io Mc studies for tamhe map.
Cheekpuints. 1) submid of appiicable tentative maps. 2) Appromi of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Pu*. 1) aty Engineering I)- 2) city Eagin&ng Department.
Suncrions. 1) No approvrl of tmtative maps without appijuble conditions.
Impact. Certain revisiim of the intcrrui cixahtioa sysaep describsd in the EIR may be preferable for emrironmentj or circpimory reasons. ,:/ q
", * d M@&n. Traffic sendies hr appiicabie teatative maps ShJl danmine in consultation with City staf
whether specified changes io the cirdation pattern shouid k impleplentsd as corditions of applicable
temative maps.
Muster Pian Implrmcrrtolfor. Revisions to the h4asta pl;m Cjatioa and proposed tentative maps
have atready been made a, addrrss the rccommcodatiQns of the EXR and approved by the City Engineer.
0 e
. ,I
a* 1'
Checkpints- 1) AppawJ of trrmtiw maps. -
RcsponsiblrPuttks. l)CityPhnnkgaadEn@mhg~.'t) CieymdgM
Engineering Dcpycmgtt.
Spnrtianr. 1) No appm~li of tcmztivt maps witba ppri m.
K. Noise - "
Impuct. Certain areas ldjacan to major mads in ib Masm Plat ana amid experience fume traffic
noise in excess of the Ci standards of 60 dBA CNEL
Mitigotion. Tentatiw maps shall show appmpdate mise byriar as specifisd in the EER or OD q
standardstoanmuatenoisc. Ifgradiigshowuintas~plafordcvdopmer#inareasof b- ' excessive umenuated nod is modified by tm map, the m~dlf.i~pom MI be reviewed by the City Engineer and a new a#ntstica~ study SUI be perfam~d ad rppropriat mitigation *I- if indicated. Tentative maps applicants shall have da apion ofreqmiag a nduction in height of
barriers over six ftam no less tbvr six fea to ndpobvittl?l m pa City policy.
Checkpoints. 1) Appmvll of taltative maps. 2) Tmpatkm ofamtmctd improvements.
Responsible Portit. 1) City Planning and - Deepoppcpg. t) City Engineaing Department.
Sanetiom. 1) No approval without proper barrias as a walitbm. r) No issuance of subsqua
permits.
..
Impact. Second floon of some residential units m to Circnkh EIaaent roadways codd
experience intcMr mise Iwds in excess of the 4S dBA CNEL mnrit.d
3 Miligation. PropoJcd tmasive maps shall be sbwn to have designs fbr muiti-jtory residences next to y- .I. Circulation El- &ways which would rhicre ipmiar no* 1- of 45 dBA CNEL ot laS fot
secondorhigbmxh Aarwcialsmdiesto~annphmmaybercquiredbythcCity
Engineer.
Checkpoints. 1) AppFwri of- maps. 2) lmpcrbn of- improvements.
Responsible Pa. 1) Ci planning and Eqh&q Dcprrrrpcnr. 2) Building DepumrePt.
Sanctions. 1) No aopnwrl without pmper banias a a copditjol. 2) No issuance of sub sap^
permits. \
0 0
. .I
PrblirFmdsaVica
L. Public Facilities and servicer
Impact. ~~CisapotcntialforthelSMP~amamiSaprrt~utobteX~ 1. i dependingonthe~0fdcvelopwol~tbesmprofodrafFlbPeprrklaadin~'rsyParkDisok
. 4.
MtXgafiun. Prior to the recordation of any find mq umk tie bkta Plm, sufficient parkland si
be dedicated within Zone 18.
CheckpoiMs. Recordation of firs final map ppda tht hke pl?n.
Responriblc Pwties. City PIanning, Engineaing, 8d Pab and Mu Departments.
Scmsionr. No recordation of find rmp widrord dsdiclrion of dam parkland within Park Disa
4.
~~~
Impad. The LFMP performance staadltd rapb thrt a schod site in Zone 18 be deeded to the
Marcos Unified School dbct (SMUSD) Ird tfu a fbmciag pltn be appmed by the SMUSD p
torecordationofany~mapotissutnaof~~otbrildinOpamitinZoaet8.
1. fl L( Mitigorior. Cornpiiance with the Zont 18 rrqoinment
Chackpoinfs. 1) Recordation of the first hi mrq unda the Idaster Ran. 2) Issoancc of any
grading or building parnit in the Masts Plan aru
RespomibZe Putties. city Planning And Enginuriq Degtmprma.
Sanaions. No Fa map recoded witfiout LFMP reqthnm being mk
Impact. Sewage gc#ntion could excad umaaa capcity if nridmciil dweiopmmt ocfllls in '
Master PI= ara a$a m.
, ,? Mitigation. Implcmmr~specifiedintheLFMP~~~~~gthepotar
1. I. impact to be reaiii
Checkpoinit. 1) Submitaioftermivempsldta2UB. 3) ~oftaxaivemapssubmia
after 2005.
RespoNiblr P&. 1) City~anningawiEngincainODcprmama. 2) City Planning and
Enginesing Deparm#ms.
0 0
p319rFwiltihondScrriar 1’
Soncrions. NoqOrovzlofw#yivemapsafm20[15rihranrrlirirra~~~~* LFMPtequirancno. -.
M. Solid Waste Disposal
Impact. Depcndi on regional planning for them oftmdar -, there is a poteatitl fo solidwastegenaatedfiomthe”CrPlllllpCltDrrrmldiSPQI3j~.
Mirigcliion. Appii- for untaive maps pfqcsal ib m Ph ICI sh?ll dm= that
\i b\ . ‘,, means of feasible solid waste disposai an avaihbk
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tartative maps for tha Wsm Pb PtL
Responde Pa*. 1) City Planning and Enghdq Dc9rrrnrara
Sundions. 1) No approval of tcnrative maps with8 damonrtrrtlon of ditil~ disposai CWw.
\