HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-04-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 3921.
.,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
0 e
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3921
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AFFORDABLE TWO AND THREE BEDROOM UNITS IN
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE E ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD BETWEEN FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE
AND THE CITY'S EASTERN BOUNDARIES
CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE E
CASE NO: SDP 95-12
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 95-12 FOR 20
WHEREAS, UDC HOMES has filed a verified application with the (
Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for :
Development Permit approval as shown on Exhibits "A - VI dated April 17, 1996 on
the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference ("SDP 95-12"),
as provided by Chapter 21.53 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the P1:
Commission did, on the 17th day of April, 1996, consider said request on property des
as:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19,
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
and a portion of Certificate of Compliance FileRage 87-385114
recorded July 9,1987 all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San
Diego, State of California.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tesl
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission conside
factors relating to SDP 95-12.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
e
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Comm
APPROVES Site Development Permit, SDP 95-12, based on the folk
findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. All findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3919 and 39:
CT 95-06 and PUD 95-04 are incorporated herein by reference.
2. That the requested use is a) properly related to the site, surrounding!
environmental settings, b) is consistent with the various elements and objecti
the General Plan, c) will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses speci
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and d) w:
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation, in that:
a) The affordable units are consistent with the City's Inclusionary Hc
Ordinance (Chapter 21.85 of the Zoning Ordinance) due to proxim
Palomar Airport Road, a prime arterial roadway, and within 0 - 2 mi
three major industrial centers offering employment opportunities. All 1
facilities, including the construction of Street "I" and Melrose Drive a
as the necessary infrastructure to serve the project and the nec
environmental mitigation will be provided;
b) The 20 affordable units in Village E are located within the Rancho C:
Master Plan area. In accordance with Policy 3.6.a of the Housing El
requiring that 15% of all units approved for any master plan cornmunit
be affordable to lower income households, the 20 affordable units will I
the total number of affordable units required in Village E (15.6 1
Village E will provide 6 three bedroom units; 4 of the three bedroom
will satisfy the three bedroom unit requirements of future Rancho C'
Villages J and K.
c,d) The affordable units will not adversely impact the site, traffic circulal
be detrimental to the surrounding market rate units in Village E sin
affordable units: 1) are disbursed throughout the project; 2) provi
same amenities, parking, and architecture as the market rate units; 3)
require a density increase or standard modifications; and 4) are inte
into the project which is designed in accordance with City standards tc
circulation impacts. The project is conditioned to construct or imprc
roadways required to provide access to Village E as well as the internal
system providing access to all of the units.
3. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommod,
use, in that since the units are integrated into the multi-family planne
development which meets or exceeds all development standards and design t
specified by the Planned Development and Subdivision Ordinances as detel
by Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3919 and 3920 dated April 17, 19!
PC RES0 NO. 3921 -2- I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 @
4. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necess;
adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhoo
be provided and maintained, in that the 20 affordable units are part of the Pli
Unit Development which will provide all of the necessary setbacks, commol
private recreation areas, fences and landscaping required by the Rancho Ca
Master Plan and Planned Development Ordinance, The affordable units will I
distinguishable from the surrounding Village E market rate units except that
of the affordable units are single story.
5. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly hanc
traffic generated by the proposed use, in that ingress and egress to and fro]
project will be provided by a non-loaded public street (Street "I") designated 1
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan to intersect with Palomar Airport Road an
required improvements to the internal and external circulation system requirc
the project will ensure that all roadways conform to City Standards and oper
acceptable levels in accordance with Growth Management standards for
segments and intersections.
Conditions:
1. Approval of SDP 95-12 is granted subject to the approval of CT 95-06 and PU
04. SDP 95-12 is subject to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 3919 fc
Tentative Tract Map, CT 95-06.
2. The project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures whic
required as part of the approved CT 95-06 and PUD 95-04 as contained in Pla
Commission Resolution No(s) 3919 and 3920.
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
.... I
I ....
PC RES0 NO. 3921 -3-
I
,
1'
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 I
@
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting c
Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 17th day of .
1996, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, Ni
Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
h!L?&bd L
WILLIAM COMPAS, Chdterson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. H~LZMLER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 3921 -4- I