HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-05-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 3931* *. e e
m
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3931
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE
186 LOTS INCLUDING 181 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 4 OPEN
SPACE LOTS, AND 1 FUTURE LOT (A PORTION OF
VILLAGE S) ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, NORTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE, ON EITHER SIDE OF FUTURE
MELROSE DRIVE WITHIN THE RANCHO CARRILLO
MASTER PLAN BOUNDARIES.
CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES J AND K
CASE NO: CT 93-01
WHEREAS, UDC Homes has filed a verified application for certain prope:
wit:
Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian and a portion of Sections 18 and 19,
Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of
California.
with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative '
Map approval as shown on Exhibits "A"-"CC", dated May 15, 1996, on file in the Plar
Department and incorporated herein by this reference as provided by Chapter 20 of the Car:
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of May, 1996, h
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testin
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fa'
relating to the Tentative Tract Map.
....
't
L..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Ple
Commission as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Pla
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Carlsbad Tentative Trac
93-01, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditior
Findines:
1. That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivisi
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan
applicable specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the
Subdivision Map Act, and will not cause serious public health problems, in that i
residential, low-medium density, single family subdivision designed in accord
with the Subdivision and Planned Development Ordinances and in compliance
the recommendations of the required technical studies for soils and drainage, as
as provide all public improvements necessary to serve the demand generated b
development.
2. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the General
and the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development sinc
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the de
proposed, in that the project is consistent with single family development design
for Villages J and K by the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and the mass grading ,
approved by Hillside Development Permit, HDP 91-17.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
easements of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by
public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivisic
that the project has been designed and structured such that there are no coni
with any established easements.
5. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the I
Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act).
6. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passiv
natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that the area's domil
western wind patterns/solar radiation patterns will allow utilization of natl
heating and cooling opportunities.
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -2-
I
-4
-I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
7. That the Planning Commission has considered, in connection with the housing pro]
by this subdivision, the housing needs of the region, and balanced those housing
against the public service needs of the City and available fiscal and environn
resources.
8. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause subst
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or
habitat, in that all applicable biological mitigation measures required by Final
91-04 have been incorporated into the project and/or added to the proje
conditions of approval.
9. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of exi
California Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the sewer
drainage requirements of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and EIR 91-04
been considered and appropriate sewer and drainage facilities have been desi
and will be secured. In addition to City Engineering Standards and complj
with the City's Master Sewer and Drainage Plans, National Pollution Disck
Elimination System (NPDES) standards will be satisfied to prevent any disck
violations.
10. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein for Ra
Carrillo Villages J and K, is in conformance with the Elements of the City's Ge
Plan, based on the following:
a. Land Use - The project is consistent with the City's General Plan Reside
Low Medium (RLM) land use designation since the proposed density o
(Village K) and 3.7 (Village J) ddacre is below the density range of 0 - 4 du
specified for the site as indicated on the Land Use Element of the General Pla
b. Circulation - The project is conditioned to complete all necessary onsite
offsite roadway improvements prior to occupancy of any unit in each ph
Additionally, all roadway improvements to serve the Rancho Carrillo M
Plan must be guaranteed and substantially completed prior to occupan
units in Village J and K.
C. Noise - The project provides mitigation to reduce noise levels to 60
within the usable yard area of lots abutting future Melrose Drive, anc
project is conditioned to require compliance with the 45 dBA interior I
standard.
d. Housing - That the project is consistent with Policy 3.6.a of the Housing Ele
of the General Plan and the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance as the Develope
been conditioned to enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement to providt
deed restrict 4 three bedroom dwelling units in Village E and 27 se
dwelling units in Villages J and K as affordable to lower-income household
The provision of onsite affordable housing units results in a project de
PC RES0 NO. 3931 ..3 -
-
-,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
J
0 e
11.
which exceeds the Growth Management Control Point of 3.2 dwelling
per acre and requires approval of a density increase. The proposed dc
increase is therefore consistent with Policy 3.7h enabling density incr
and Program 3.7i allowing discretionary consideration of density incr
through the processing of a site development plan in accordance witL
implemented by Section 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The proposed density increase of 27 units above the Growth Manage
Control Point for the purpose of providing 27 affordable second dwc
units onsite to satisfy 90% of the project's inclusionary requireme
consistent with Policy 3.8 allowing excess dwelling units to be allocated
the top priority being housing for low and very low income households.
e. Open Space and Conservation - The project is consistent with the Ra
Carrillo Master Plan and Zone 18 LFMP in that 186 acres of perform
standard open space will be provided throughout the Master Plan.
f. Public safety - In accordance with the Rancho Carrillo mass grading
(HDP 91-17) and the Villages J and K grading plan and final soils repor
unacceptable soil conditions shall be mitigated to facilitate construct
Standard engineering grading conditions will be required for all reql
grading.
The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan
applicable local facilities management plan, and all City public facility policies
ordinances since:
a. The project has been conditioned to ensure that the final map will not be appr
unless the City Council finds that sewer service is available to serve the pro
In addition, the project is conditioned such that a note shall be placed on the
map that building permits may not be issued for the project unless the Di
Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot L
within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Di:
Engineer is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element o
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this pro.
b. Statutory School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school faciliti
the San Marcos Unified School District. In accordance with the Zon
LFMP special conditions for schools, the project is conditioned to req
that an acceptable school site is deeded to the San Marcos Unified Sc
District if it is warranted and that a financing plan be approved by
Marcos Unified School District guaranteeing the construction of neces
elementary school facilities in Zone 18 prior to final map recordatio~
grading or building permit issuance, whichever occurs first.
I c. All necessary public improvements have been provided or are requirec
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -4-
~
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
conditions of approval.
d. The developer has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appro
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and pal
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be ava
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
12. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, 01
construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any addi
requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuz
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availabil
public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts created by the project.
13. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part f
Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 18.
14. The Planning Commission finds that:
a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guidl
15 168(c)(2) and (e), and 15 183;
b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-01,
Rancho Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 91-04);
c. there were EIRs certified in connection with the prior 1994 General
Update and Rancho Carrillo Master Plan;
d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as signil
in the prior EIRs;
e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR 1
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist.
15. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or PI
alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 and EIR 91-04 which are appropriate tc
Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project.
16. MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significant
adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of overri
considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to 1
effects, no additional environmental document is required.
17. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) fo:
McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April, 1994, in that as conditioned the appl
shall record a notice concerning aircraft noise.
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -5-
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
18. That the project is consistent with the City's Landscape Manual, adopted by City Cc
Resolution No. 90-384.
19. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Devt
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are im
to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent a~
degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the projeci
20.
21.
The project, as designed, implements certain objectives and mitigation mea
established by the General Plan Master EIR to reduce cumulative air qualit
circulation impacts as applicable to a residential project of this scale. These inc
providing links to public sidewalk systems that connect with transpoll
corridors, and future schools, parks, and trail systems; providing for safe pede:
and bicycle movements within the project: and designing the projel
accommodate pedestrian spaces as well as proposed parking areas and bui
locations
Lot 135 cannot be served adequately with a public street due to unfavo
conditions resulting from its location adjacent to the intersection of two ar
roadways which limits safe direct ingress and egress to those roadways from th
which would thereby preclude the necessity of the panhandle configurat
Further the relocation of the alignment of Poinsettia Lane to the north a
direction of the school district limited the frontage available for Lot 135 at thl
de-sac of "B" Street. The proposed lot configuration does not affect the abil
provide full public street access to other properties within the same block.
Planning; Conditions:
1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of the Tentative '
Map for the single family lot subdivision project entitled "Rancho Carrillo Villa
and K', Exhibits "A"-"CC" on file in the Planning Department and incorporated b
reference, dated May 15, 1996, subject to the conditions herein set forth. St
authorized and directed to make or require the Developer to make all correction;
modifications to the approved Documents, as necessary to make them inte~
consistent and conform to City Council's final action on the project. Development
occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed develor
substantially different kom this approval, shall require an amendment to this approv;
2. Approval of CT 93-01 is granted subject to the approval of PUD 95-05 and SDP 9:
CT 93-01 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resoll:
No. 3931 and 3932 dated May 15,1996.
~ 3. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and I ordinances in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
I -*-. PC RES0 NO. 3931 -6-
ll a e
"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
4. The Developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24-inch x 36-inch, mylar
of the Tentative Map/Site Plan as approved by the final decision making body.
Tentative Map/Site Plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City.
Map/Plan copy shall be submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to bui
grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
5. The final map shall not be approved unless the City Council finds as of the time 0:
approval that sewer service is available to serve the subdivision.
6. The Developer shall pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on Jul
1987 (amended July 2, 1991) and as amended from time to time, and any develor
fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 2 1.90 of the Carlsbad Mun
Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or Fac
and Improvement Plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public fac
fee dated September 5, 1995, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk a
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will n
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
12 7. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are rec
as part of the Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments mz
13 that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits, including but not limited t
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
following:
a. Prior to recordation of a final map within Zone 18, a parks agree
between the City of Carlsbad and Zone 18 property owners shall be en.
into;
b. All future development in Zone 18 will be required to construct any fi
Zone 18 storm drain facilities identified in the current Drainage Master
and revised Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer;
c. Prior to recordation of first final map, a comprehensive financing
guaranteeing the construction of circulation improvements inch
Palomar Airport Road, Melrose Drive, and El Fuerte shall be adopted b
City Council.
d. Prior to recordation of any final map, the deeding of an acceptable schoo
to the San Marcos Unified School District, if it is determined that a s(
site is warranted and a financing plan approved by San Marcos UE
School District guaranteeing the construction of the necessary elemel
school facilities in Zone 18. As provided in the Zone 18 LFMP, if
reimbursement and/or school fee credits are to be given, the sc
agreemedfinancing plan shall provide a mechanism to do so.
27 8. The Developer shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan in conformance
28 the approved Preliminary Landscape Plan and the City's Landscape Manual. The
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -7-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
I
0 0
shall be submitted to and approval obtained from the Planning Director prior 1
approval of the final map, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first
Developer shall construct and install all landscaping as shown on the approved plan
maintain all landscaping in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trasl
debris.
9. The first submittal of detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be accompanied 1
project’s building, improvement and grading plans.
10. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer and successive owners
agree to hold the city or any other public service agency harmless from liabilil
any damage to the driveway of Lot 135, when being used to perform a p
service.
1 1. This approval shall be null and void if the property subject to this approval is not am
to the City of Carlsbad CFD No. 1 within 60 days of the approval. Additio
annexation must occur prior to the issuance of any grading, building or other permit.
12. The Developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
13. All sales maps that are distributed or made available to the public shall include but n
limited to trails, fiture and existing schools, parks, and streets.
“Prior to approval of the final map, the Developer shall provide an
irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Carlsbad for a trail easement
for the citywide trail shown on the tentative map located within Lots 1 18,
185 and 186. If prior to final map the City has a funding mechanism for
trial maintenance and liability and accepts the dedication of the trail
easement, the Developer shall be required to construct the trail
improvements prior to occupancy of the first unit and the City will assume
responsibility for trail maintenance and liability. If however, prior to final
map the city does not have a financing mechanism in place to fund
maintenance and liability for the city wide trail system, the Developer
shall be required to provide adequate security through bonds, letters of
credit, cash or other acceptable security for the trail improvements.”
14. Prior to final map, the applicant shall establish Master and/or Village homeov
associations and corresponding covenants, conditions and restriction. Said CC&Rs
be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. The following items sha
included in the CC&Rs:
Master HOA
a. Master Homeowner’s Association maintenance of the Recreational Ve
Storage Lot (Lot 104 of CT 93-04).
~
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -8-
..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
b. The CC&Rs shall prohibit the storage or parking of recreational ve
within any of the Villages except in approved RV storage areas.
c. The Master Association shall control the operation and maintenance d
recreational vehicle storage area, entry signs, common slopes and
common features as identified in the Master Plan.
d. The provision of the Master CC&Rs shall be binding to the provisions (
CC&Rs for the Village Associations and may not conflict. Slope areas u
individual villages shall be maintained by the Master Association if ex]
to major streets. The developer shall submit a master maintenance
showing all areas to be maintained by the Master Association to be appl
by the City Engineer prior to any final map approval.
Villave HOA
a. No private development shall be permitted within open space Lots 117,
184, and 186 inclusive.
b. The CC&Rs shall include provisions specifying that individual owne
property may replace original fencing on their property, however,
changes are required to comply with a uniform fencing and wall desig
the project. The replacement of any fences or walls within this project 1
be consistent with one of the fencing or wall design types as shown ir
Master Plan.
c. Provisions for HOA maintenance of any Open Space Lot not maintaine
the Master Association.
d. All open space and landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy
thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris.
The CC&RS shall not be modified without the express written approval oj
Planning Director.
Signs and Identification
15. Building identification and/or address shall be placed on all new and existing buildin:
as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification a~
address shall contrast to their background color.
16. Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in conform
with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval of the Plan
Director prior to installation of such signs.
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -9-
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 !
~
0 a
17. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Rancho Carrillo Master
Signage shall be located in conformance with the Landscape Concept I
Exhibit unless otherwise approved by the Planning Director.
Environmental
18. The Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all miti:
measures identified in the Final EIR 91-04 that are found by this resolution to be fea
19. The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, the attached R:
Carrillo Master Plan EIR 91-04 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Prc
(Exhibit "X") certified by the City Council on July 27,1993.
I
20. The Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the project Site wi,
project as described in the Final EIR 91-04, except as modified by this resolution.
2 1. Paleontology:
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retain
perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the grading pla
determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil resources. A copy (
paleontologist's report shall be provided to the Planning Director prior to iss
of a grading permit;
b. A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic inspections (
site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the small nature of some of the fi
present in the geologic strata, it may be necessary to collect matrix samplc
laboratory processing through fine screens. The paleontologist shall
periodic reports to the Planning Director during the grading process;
c. The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the area
exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluation and, if necessary, salvage artifs.
d. All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution w
research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego Natural History Must
e. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading activiti
the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director and City Engineer.
22. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct the comml
themehoise attenuation walls shown on the Landscape Concept Plan Exhibit, c
May 15,1996.
23. Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall submit a detailed 1
study addressing necessary interior noise mitigation measures for Villages J an(
Prior to issuance of building permits the following mitigation shall be ensured:
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -10-
!
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
the interior noise levels shall be mitigated to 45 dBA CNEL when openings
exterior of the residence are closed; (2) if openings are required to be closed tc
the City standard, mechanical ventilation shall be provided; and (3) all u!
exterior space above the first floor shall be mitigated to the adopted City stanc
24. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building pt
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this pr\
may be subject to noise impacts from the proposed or existing Transportation Co
Attorney (see Noise Form #1 on file in the Planning Department).
(Melrose Drive), in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director ani
25. Prior to the recordation of the first final tract map or the issuance of building pe
whichever occurs first, the Developer shall prepare and record a Notice that this prc
is subject to overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating from McClellan-Pa
Airport, in a form meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City An
(see Noise, Form #2 on file in the Planning Department).
26. The Developer shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales and/or rental o
associated with the new development. The number and locations of said signs sh
approved by the Planning Director (see Noise Form #3 on file in the Pla
Department).
27. Prior to final map approval or issuance of a grading permit, whichever occurs
the applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Preliminary
Assessment (pp 39-40) dated December 1993 performed by GEO
Environmental Consultants which include the performance of additional labor
tests to confirm that the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (STLC) of :
DDE, and Toxaphene does not exceed the values promulgated by Title 22 if soil
be exported from the site. A report detailing the results of the remedi,
program, if necessary, shall be submitted to the City.
28. Prior to approval of the final map, the Developer shall be required: (1) to consult wit
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the impact of the proje
the Coastal California Gnatcatcher; and (2) obtain any permits required by the US1
The issuance of a permit by the USFWS for the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan
grading project would satisfy this requirement.
Housing
29. Prior to the approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a map i
being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or units
Developer shall enter into an Affordable Housing Agreement with the City to providc
deed restrict 27 second dwelling units as affordable to lower-income households fc
useful life of the dwelling units in accordance with the requirements and process set
in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The draft Affordable Hol
Agreement shall be submitted to the Planning Director not later than thirty (30)
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -1 1-
I
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
after final map submittal.
The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to participate in an 1
combined inclusionary project in Village E to meet their 10% three bedroom
requirement (4 units), in accordance with the requirements set forth in Chaptel
21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and C
Council Policies 57 and 58. Prior to the City Council approval, the developer SI
submit a signed Affordable Housing Agreement to the Housing and redevelop^
Director. The recorded Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding on all fi~tu
owners and successors in interest.
30. The Developer shall construct the required inclusionary units concurrent wit
project’s market rate units, unless both the final decision making authority of the Cii
the Developer agree within an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate sck
for development.
3 1. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are re(
as part of the approved project for Village E, to include CT 95-06, PUD 95-04, SD
12 as contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3919,3920,3921.
32. To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities at loca
subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District (NCTD), if
facility is required by NCTD. Said facilities shall at a minimum include a bl
free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop sign. The bench and pole sh:
designed in a manner so as not to detract from the basic architectural theme (
project and said design shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Direct01
North County Transit District.
33. Prior to final map, the applicant shall submit for review and approval b3
Planning Director, an agreement which will establish the timing and phasir
construction for the recreational Vehicle Storage facility. Prior to occupancy o
first unit within Villages J and K, at minimum, 4,160 square feet of recreat
vehicle storage space shall be provided on Lot 104 of Village Q unless an ox
temporary recreational vehicle storage facility has been approved by the Plan
Director.
34. The buildings shall comply with the latest edition of the Model Codes adopte’
the City of Carlsbad at the time plans are submitted for building permits.
General
35. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, 1
implemented and maintained over time; if any of such conditions fail to bc
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the rig1
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance c
future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occup
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -12-
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
i
i
0 0
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litiga
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violatiol
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's apprc
this Resolution.
36. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections
Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of bu
permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein.
37. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integratt
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and strec
substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction
Directors of Planning and Building.
38. The Developer shall submit a street name list consistent with the City's street name I
subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map approval.
Engineering; Conditions:
General
39. This project is approved for up to five final subdivision maps for the purpos
recordation. All public facilities required to serve each unit and meet City stank
shall be guaranteed for construction prior to recording of a final map for that u
40. If the developer chooses to record a final subdivision map out of the phase shown c
tentative map, the new phasing must be reviewed and approved or conditionally appl
by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
NOTE: Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following engineering cond
upon the approval of this proposed major subdivision must be met prior to approva
final map.
I 41. All concrete terrace drains shall be maintained by the homeowner's association (
commonly owned property) or the individual property owner (if on an individ
owned lot). An appropriately worded statement clearly identifying the responsi
shall be placed in the CC&Rs.
42. The developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, off
and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its ai
officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the CiQ
Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City u
the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act.
43. Rain gutters must be provided to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage cow
street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -13-
a 0 e
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
44. The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors at all street intersectic
accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following statement
project's CC&Rs:
"No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30-inches aboJ
street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a
distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, SI
8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition."
The above statement shall be placed on a non-mapping data sheet on the final map.
45. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City's anti-gl
program for wall treatments that is in effect at the time of building permit issur,
FeedAgreements
46. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any buildable lot within the subdivisio~
property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with
Council Resolution No. 91-39.
47. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required.
48. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City han
regarding drainage across the adjacent property.
49. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
written consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries 0'
subdivision plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landsc:
District No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
Grading
50. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed constructior
within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the
Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all condition:
requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation.
51. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs firs1
developer shall submit proof that a Notice of Intention has been submitted to the
Water Resources Control Board.
52. Upon completion of any phased and/or project specific grading for Village J:
applicant shall ensure that an "as-graded" geologic plan is submitted to the City Engil
The plan shall clearly show all the geology as exposed by the grading operatior
geologic corrective measures as actually constructed and must be based on a contour
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -14-
li
-4 I/ e 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
which represents both the pre and post site grading. This plan shall be signed by bc
soils engineer and the engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a 24-
36-inch mylar or similar drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
53. Prior to the affected final map approval, the owner of the property on beh
itself and all of its successors in interest shall execute and record a noti
disclosure and a hold harmless agreement on Village J noticing any future own
the presence of a mitigated geologic hazard and indemnify the City of Carl
agents, officers, and employees from any action that may arise through
subsequent geologic failure, ground water seepage, or land subsidence
subsequent damage that may occur on or adjacent to Village J, due 1
construction, operation, or maintenance. A notice to this effect and a referer
the recorded document shall be included on a non-mapping data sheet c
respective final map.
54. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the subdil
unless a grading or slope easement or agreement is obtained from the owners (
affected properties and recorded. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or
easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the developer
either amend the tentative map or modify the plans so grading will not occur outsic
project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative m
determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Dedications/Improvements
55. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provid
installed prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit as may be requirl
the City Engineer.
56. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public street:
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shL
granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost ts
City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
57. Direct access rights for all lots abutting Melrose Drive, Poinsettia Lane, "C" Stre
Village J, and "B" Street, "D" Street, and "H" Street of Village K shall be waivc
the final map except for access points to Village S, or other designated access p
as approved by the City Engineer.
58. The developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Poll
management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Manage
Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to disc1
to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engir
Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenar
I I Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The developer shall provide
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -1 5-
.-,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
the following:
a. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work
established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic
hazardous waste products.
b. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, mot0
antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other
fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm
or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungi
herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shal!
Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respl
containers.
c. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface poll.
when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements.
59. Drainage outfall end treatments for any drainage outlets where a direct access ro:
maintenance purposes is not provided, shall be designed and incorporated intl
gradinghmprovement plans for the project. These end treatments shall be designed
to prevent vegetation growth from obstructing the pipe outfall. Designs could consis
modified outlet headwall consisting of an extended concrete spillway section
longitudinal curbing and/or radially designed rip-rap, or other means deemed approp
as a method of preventing vegetation growth directly in front of the pipe outlet, t
satisfaction of the Community Services Director and the City Engineer.
Master Plan Improvements
60. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the City Engineer may ret
an engineering evaluation of the stability of the existing Bressi Dam. The evalu;
shall be conducted by an appropriate registered engineer. Any recomme:
improvements to protect the existing dam, if required, shall be completed tc
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
61. Prior to final map approval, an adjustment plat shall be recorded to align
western subdivision boundary line with the proposed centerline of "I" Street.
~
~
62. Prior to submittal of a grading plan for the project, the developer shall submit
receive approval from the City Engineer for a phased grading map clearly deta
the limits and quantities of grading for this project.
63. Prior to final map approval, the following improvements, as required in the Ra:
Carrillo Master Plan (MP) and Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) for 2
18, shall be guaranteed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. T
improvements, unless otherwise modified by the final decision making body, sha
substantially completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to occup:
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -16-
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
0 0
of the first dwelling unit within the entire project.
a. Melrose Drive - Alga Road to Palomar Airport Road
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to prime a1
standards.
a Construction of a median and two lanes in each directior,
intersection improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineel
b. Poinsettia Lane - Melrose Drive to Zone 18 Western Boundary
0 Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width to major ar
0 Construction of full major arterial standards from the intersc
standards.
with Melrose Drive west to the entrance to Village J and the s
site.
c. El Fuerte Street - Through Zone 18
a Complete grading to ultimate right-of-way width.
0 Construction of one lane in each direction from the sout
boundary of the Master Plan to the entrance to Village T.
d. Sewer Facilities, including:
0 Sewer main in Melrose Drive
0 Sewer main in or adjacent to Poinsettia Lane
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section A
0 Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section C
a BuenalSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section D
0 BuenalSan Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section F
Buena/San Marcos Trunk (BSMT) 1, Section G
a North La Costa Lift Station
e. Water Facilities, including:
i
0 A portion of the proposed potable 24-inch main in the ft
0 The proposed pressure reducing station at the southeast corm
a The proposed potable 30-inch transmission line in the prop
0 A portion of the proposed reclaimed 8-inch main in the prop
0 The proposed reclaimed 38-inch main in the proposed alignment '
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
Zone 18.
alignment of El Fuerte within Zone 18.
alignment of Melrose Avenue.
Fuerte within Zone 18.
~ pc RESON** 3931
-1 7-
-3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
0 e
e The proposed potable 12-inch main from Melrose to El E
through service Area E.
f. Drainage Facilities, including:
e Proposed double 5'8 5' box culvert under Melrose Drive.
e Retention basins, channel and flood control improvements necc
to mitigate for erosion and protect downstream properties
significant impacts.
64. An all-weather access road from a paved public right-of-way shall be construcl
drainage and utility improvements in accordance with the following parameter
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
0% - 6% grades may consist of a minimum of 6-inch decoml
granite
6% - 14% grades shall consist of a minimum 4-inch asphalt concrett
4-inch of decomposed granite
14% - 20% grades shall consist of a minimum 4-inch portland ct
concrete over 4-inch of decomposed granite
65. Prior to final map approval, public open space easements shall be placed o
conforming tentative map on slopes adjacent to all public roadways tl
satisfaction of the City Engineer and in conformance with the Rancho Ca
Villages J and K Landscape and Maintenance Responsibility exhibit.
Phases 1 and 2 Improvements
66. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements
be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with
standards, the developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appro1
security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map an
following improvements:
a. All streets shall be public streets and shall be constructed in accordancc
City standards and the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan.
b. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing
striping plans.
c. The intersection of Palomar Airport Road and "I" Street shall be imp]
to its ultimate configuration, and shall include the following:
Fully actuated traffic signal with signal poles and mast arms ins1
at their ultimate intersection locations
e Median improvements and installation of left-turn lanes on Pal
~ PC RES0 NO. 3931 -1 8-
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
I,
0 e
Airport Road
accommodate a future eastbound through lane
additional turning lanes, as determined by the City Engineer.
e Transition area on the south side of Palomar Airport Ro
e Improvements and appropriate transition on "I" Street to provit
The City will enter into an agreement with the applicant to obtain proporti
share reimbursement for the above traffic signal from benefiting property own
the north and south of Palomar Airport Road.
67. Prior to final map approval for any portion of Village K, the developer shall pr
evidence that an easement has been obtained for secondary access to Village K.
68. Prior to occupancy of the 51st unit or prior to occupancy of any unit located
or greater from the intersection of Palomar Airport Road and "I" Street, secor.
access shall be provided to the project as shown on the tentative map, in accorc
with City standards and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If this secor
access is removed or eliminated, then an alternative secondary access sha
provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Phase 3 Improvements
69. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements
be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with
standards, the developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with approp
security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map anc
following improvements:
a. All streets shall be public streets and shall be constructed in accordance
City standards and the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan.
b. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing
striping plans.
c. Melrose Drive shall be improved along the project frontage to includc
following improvements:
~
e No. 3 northbound through lane
e Northbound bicycle lane
e Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
e Street lighting
0 Raised landscaped median
0 Landscape area between sidewalk and west right-of-way line
e All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lane
sidewalk.
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -1 9-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Phases 4 and 5 Improvements
70. Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements
be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In accordance with
standards, the developer shall install, or agree to install and secure with appro.
security as provided by law, improvements shown on the tentative map an
following improvements:
a. All streets shall be public streets and shall be constructed in accordanct
City standards and the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan.
b. All street improvement plans shall include separate traffic signing
striping plans.
c. Poinsettia Lane shall be improved to full major arterial standards fro1
Village J entrance at "C" Street westerly to the Zone 18 western bounda
d. Melrose Drive shall be improved from the northern boundary of Vill;
south along the project frontage to Poinsettia Lane to include the folla
improvements:
e No. 3 southbound through lane
0 Southbound bicycle lane
e Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
e Street lighting
e Raised landscaped median
e Landscape area between sidewalk and west right-of-way line
e All utilities generally placed beneath the required travel lane
sidewalk.
e. A fully actuated traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Me
Drive and Poinsettia Lane.
71. A copy of all of the above improvement conditions shall be placed on a non-map
data sheet on the final map per the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdiv
Map Act. Improvements listed above shall be constructed within 18 montl
approval of the secured improvement agreement or such other time as providc
said agreement.
72. All improvements required by these conditions must be specifically shown 01
conforming tentative map exhibit to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Fire Conditions:
73. An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles shz
provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the Fire Chiel
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -20-
I1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
A
0 e
access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or other reasons, ht
in the interest of public safety, require that construction operations cease unl
condition is corrected.
74. All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational
combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
75. Prior to final inspection, all security gate systems controlling vehicular access sh
equipped with a "Knox", key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall CI
the Fire Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to installation.
76. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall obtain fire depar
approval of a wildland fuel management plan. The plan shall clearly indicate me
proposed to mitigate and manage fire risk associated with native vegetation grc
within 60 feet of structures. The plan shall reflect the standards presented in th
suppression element of the City of Carlsbad Landscape Guidelines Manual.
77. Prior to occupancy of buildings, all wildland fuel mitigation activities must be cox
and the condition of all vegetation within 60 feet of structures found to be in conforn
with an approved wildland fuel management plan.
78. The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following requirem
A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements and at leas
existing intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict street center
hydrant locations and street names.
Water Conditions:
79. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system sh
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands c;
met.
80. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which wi
collected before and/or at the time of issuance of the building permit. The San 1
County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of applicatio
meter installation.
8 1. Sequentially, the Developer's Engineer shall do the following:
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requireml
Also obtain GPM. demand for domestic and irrigational needs from appro1
parties.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Plar
Department for processing and approval.
c. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and reclaimed water improvement pls
meeting must be scheduled with the District Engineer for review, commen
PC RES0 NO. 393 1 -21-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 @
approval of the preliminary system layouts and usages (i.e. - GPM - EDU).
82. This project is approved upon the expressed condition that building permits will :
issued for development of the subject property unless the water district servir
development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are avail:
the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue
available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the final map.
83. The developer shall be required to adhere to all conditions of the water and sewer an
on file at Carlsbad Municipal Water District Engineering Department.
84. The developer shall install minimum 8-inch DIA waterlines in all public str
Exact sizes shall be established via a Villages J and K analysis.
85. These villages must provide all offsite water, sewer and reclaimed systems
Code Reminders:
Fees
86. The Developer shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by St
completely independent of other proposed developments.
20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Final Map Notes
87. The following note shall be placed on the Final Map: "Prior to issuance of a bui
permit for any buildable lot within the subdivision, the Developer shall pay a one
special development tax in accordance with the City Council Resolution No. 91-39."
88. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the final map as non-mapping dz
a. This subdivision contains a remainder parcel. No building permit shall be i-
for the remainder parcel until it is further subdivided pursuant to the provisio
Title 20 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
b. Geotechnical Caution:
The owner of this property on behalf of itself and all of its successors in in
has agreed to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Carlsbad from any a
that may arise through any geological failure, ground water seepage or
subsidence and subsequent damage that may occur on, or adjacent to,
subdivision due to its construction, operation or maintenance.
The project is subject to all applicable provisions of local ordinances, including bu
limited to the following:
PC RES0 NO. 3931 -22-
1
a e
1 89. The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this pro,
prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided in acco: 2 with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer.
3 90. Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these conditic
interest to permit the improvements to be made without acquisition of title or intc
4
The developer shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 5
located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has sufficient ti
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
91. Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the d
the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the discretion of thl
Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may impose new conditio1
may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section 20.12.1 10(a)(2) of the Cst
Municipal Code.
City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be reques
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of May, 1996, I
following vote, to wit:
~
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, r\
Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Nielsen
-I9 I1 ABSTAIN: None
20
21
22
23 WILLIAM COMPAS, Chairperdon
LO&&+L, ) I . &WLfl&”
24
25
26
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
27
20 MICHAEL J. HMZMILUR
IJ PC RES0 NO. 3931 -23 -
- - e 0'
~&ocarrino~plvl
Environmental Impact Report 'UOBcTi Mitigation Monitoring and Repom Prow
-.
.~ .I ,.,. . ..
A. Agriculture
~~ ~ ~~
I
Impact. Possible soil contamigation from agxidmi.chuaicrJt formerly usai or stored on th
io. 1. site.
MiQatian. 1) Submittal of soils report with mitigaim~&rnma~dations, ifncc#sary, to Ciq
Planning Department ana lxxy Halth Dcpuanart. 2) Mitigation to k madc a condition o tentauve maps approval under the Maria Pkm 3) Repart QI cornpiad rrmediation to bc
submitted to City Planning Department and Couaty Hralth DepYanmt upon completion.
Lvmor ph Impiemenwn. A wi~~ report for t& property awed by corrtincnt~ EO= am
the property being dedicared for park purposes bas becn Itcdvtd by the Planning Department Any mitigation quid for mils c~lltamimion isiiaed by tbit report will k remedied pH0
to issuance of a grading permit. Impacts may oc~prif~onaipcsoddt concatratioas ando
hazardous waste matehis or coalainexs ae fa& dwiq devtlopmcnt, in which case ti'!(
referenced mitigation would be applicable. soik qm fm der properdes within the Mastel
Plan will be required with the submid of tmotivt maps.
Chrckpoinrs, 1) Submittal of eaffi tmtttin akfivision map under tbe Master Plan. t
Appmvai of each tentative map under the Muter Plar~. 3) Compkion of cmuuction of each
tentative map subdi*sioa. ,. , . . ,.~ ." :.I.. .'
Responsible Pam. 1) CiQ Planning and Enpinraing lkprmunts.
Smcrions. 1) No rntative maps to be approwd without neatssvy conditions, 2) No fina maps, building or pading penniu issued until lanrdiatian sqon submiaed
_A r - ..
.-,. ~ , ,.,. ...., ..
Impact, Possible conflict between dia - of Mzsta phn. devdqmeat and continua
t *J agricuiturai use of other portions of the site, iacie agxicdtud cfianicai use, iniganon p. * runoff, and odor.
Mirig&n. Eachtmtativemtp~~pmvi&alisbf~?adimpaacriruiazpcciftcr
in the EIR, such as acce~drainagt, and bag, to amzc tbe.phsing deveioprnent i: compatible with continued agiculturai ruc.
hZaszer Plon Imp2aw-n. There wiil be 110 implctif sppiiCyrt(3) indicates that consisten1
with iu ptacrice since 1991, it inmd~ to Ibanda~ firm use.
1
0 0
Checkpoinu, 1) Submittal of eadl tmptiw SuwiviSiOa q rmda * MVtcr Plan- ~ Appro~of~~~wmapundtrtbeMzmPPk 3) ~ofeafft~~ve~
subdivision. - . .
Responsible Pw. 1) City Planning anti hgineaing -
Suncrions. I) No mtative maps to be tpproved without lyassy -s* 3) hrpecria
of construction by grading inspecton. No building PVmiU ~SS& uadi Pafi’JnnanCe criteria at
implemented.
~~ ~
B. Biology
~ ~~
Geneml Norr, To atsun the impfanmotion of dl mitipian for ptmfial impacts to biologic
resources, the appiicant for each tmcative map proporcd rmder tk Mvor Ph shall prior 1
that a quaiified consulting biologist has been retained to monitor aU dmnt mitigationT a~ntl
compliance with mitigation nquiranents, Npcrvise iqiarmtarim of mitigation, and file
report on mitigation compiiance with tht PIaaning DireEtor up completion of lMjl components of biofogid mitigation nguirrmcn~
i;, ’ approval of each mtativc map, as appropriue, show evidence to the Citv bing Departma
~~
..
.- Impuct. Irnpicrncntation of the ‘Master Ph will dirrctiy irnprr wcljulaf on-site and, 1 ,? ,- I’ construction of a sewer he in the right of way far Cardo Way co the WS~, off-site.
itfiligarion. The applicant for the project shail eitbanstoh and cnhznrr- riparian habitat at a
- appropriate area ratio u) impacts or shall patiape in a city-wide mitigation progmm throug the City’s Habitat Managemat Ph Mitigatim &dl be accompkkd to the satisfaction of tf
City and in accordance with the r@rema~ts of section 1600 a sq. of the Caiifornia Fish as
Game Code and Section 404 of the Fedad Qcan Watp.Act
Maszer Pb Implarrenratjon. No mitigarion ra@d for ofzjite unda sewer aiignmer
cumntfy prqmsed by appht north of CartiIlO Way liignmmt. Such aiignmcnt has 1
wetland impacts.
Checkpoints. Approvrri of tfrt firs tentative m?p or grading permit affecting wetlands on- c
. Off-site udu the m Pb.
Responsible Pm. City mylnint urd figineaing Depymrens califibnrh DWat (
Fish and Game, U.S. Army Corps of Enginecn,
San&ns. No ,pding map under the Myttr Plan.
0 0
Impact. ut pmject is not -fig& 10 -MY d populations of sa ~iq
thornmint and thread-leaved brodk, development wilt e impact those spedct
7 *3 7 *3
“in‘gorion. T~ pay miti* m, the -a w for San Diqo thornmint 111
thw-Iav& b“ rh211 k impiCmentcd, rnodificd ?s m in the a and ahcr revia
and acceptance by CDFG, as condibu of m of tmnh rmPa under *e Masur Phm To the maximum exmt podlc, mitigation SWI k accompM Piior to consvuction *UI~
in impacts.
iwaser Plan Implrmekn. Via T ad U h~ kcn -nfigd’ to avoid impact I
thornmint. Village G ha^ k~n reconfigured to minimize m k~ B&a*
ateckpoinfs. 1) Submiteal of tcngtive maps. 2) Apprw?l of trnntive maps. 3) Prior t
construction causing impacts.
Responsible Purrp. 1) City Planning and Engineering Depamcnt~. 2) City Planning ap
Engineering Departments. 3) City Planning urd &@leering Deprt~~nt~, consulting biotw
Sanctions. I) No appromi of MMVC maps for Village G without acceptabIe mitigatio
reviewed by California Depurmcat of Fish and Gunc.
..
.. . :
Impact. Potentia for f~nue dimtrbmce of up spacc’arr;rr..
7- -I &kt ih’grrton. Dedication of an open space easement ~vtt rr;ltunf apn space, biological mitigatioi
I arms, buffer anas,’ and ruturaii arcas t~ avoid - of the natural habitats at
.condition of tentative maps.
Cftockpoints. I) Appmd of tmtarive maps.
Responsible part^. 1) city planning and Engincaing -ts.
Sanctions. 1) NO w of mtafive qs’without depiction of acceptable open spac
easements and condition m dcdica~ consemuion ~funmtt m natumi op~n space.
\
~~
\
0 e
Impua. Possible predation or disturbance of Uifimia gna!cWhers 05 otk sensitive wiidl;
species by hxe nsiduro or domestic plr
“zsrer Phrr Implanmfazion. No apprwli d TQGU~X M?pt for a&coed via itbo
mitigation condition, if any, required by Cdifmtk. Depvtment of FA and Game ot U.
Department of Fi and Wildlife.
M*gm*on. As demnined by above rrfaawrd apcy.
ffzeckpoints. 1) Approval of tentative maps.
Responsible Portg. 1) City Planning and -g Depamnats.
- ._
f ., ,I -2 (2
Sanctions. 1) No Tentative Map approved withatt mitigation, if any, imposed by nfmcc
Iead agency set forth as a condition.
Impact. Possible invasion of naave piant arus try WS-&VC landsqlng spccie~.
ACffligafzon. As a component of the bdscapmg PIyU for affected viillagcs, revegeration pi;
:I for disturbed and mitigation areas W be pxqxd by a qualifiai bidopt, and landscapir
r; plans for tentative maps sM1 be tnriewcd by tbe bioi- - -,- L.
ffwckpainfr. 1) Approvai of tentative ra;ipt 2) Comp&on of laadsQping and rcvegetatio
Responsible Party. 1) City Planning and wg Depamnan, conrulting bioiogist.
Sanctions. 1) No approval of tentative lnaga witbout wry Iandscqing and re~qetatic
- pians.
Impact. Possible diffurbancc of native habitat tnrs during gradinq and construction.
9. ! Atf~gafcm. = Consuiting biologist sbaU supvise surveying and cnfiing of native habitat arc;
\i and monitor grading and construction.
1
- 0 * _:.
~ , -( ;' .'t tr :
cltcckpointse 1) ~ppiovll of tentative maps. r) Rcpat by amdting biologis~
Responsiblr me 1) city PlYlning and ~apin~aing'~epttna~~.~ 2) ' coluuibg bi010gin
Sanctions. 1) NO m of mtltive lntp witbout. propr mitipia~' condition. 2) E
issuance of building or occupcy permits until coosuiting bioiogirt's nport b submitted to d Planning Depamnent, .. . . ..
.. .. -I ...., 1- ... * 3 -. . ,. .. ...
.-
".
..
._ . . . , . i_ . .; ~ . ---. . , ., ,. ', , _c . 5 ' ..
Impatt. Potentially significant noise and aaivity impacts to Gnaachcr during grading a
consmaion. ~ .. .. .. . ,.. ,_ . .. ,"
0- c; 1Wigution. Due to conflicting biologist's opinions regding mitigation, &inai mitigation pia
if any, shall be as approved by U.S. FM and Wildlife andlor Wornia Depanmmt of Fish a (: '
Game, as appropriaE . . .. ~; ,.. , '"* ... 2 . '
ozeckpoinzs. 1) Approval of mtarive maps. . .~. -. .. - .. - . .. ..
Responsible Puw. 1) City Planning and Ea-g Ikpamnentt. ' "
Sanctions. I) Halt or redirect grading OT cOllSeNctiOn in rrsaictcd ea, if my. .. .. .. -. . _, . , ..: , ... - ,
.. .. . .. ~. ,. : \.. - .
Impact. Possible disturbance of wildlife rpdcs by OUtQor lighting. .,
P ?.A "\ Mtigatian. Outdoor lighting near native Miat ucaf should be shiefded and directed sui I/ from conservation casement areas.
, .... . . .. .. - . i
- -Cfrackpuinzs. I) Approval of tcntative maps. 2) G&g and impvanat plan checks.
Construction of improvements near codon easement are;u with report to Plan Depanrncnt bi consdting biobw . .- . , .- . .,. I - ' "
.- .. ..
.. .
-.>
c
1
-c 0 0"
Respansible Pq. 1) city pkerniaz and EngineainL -, t) .-ting biologi:
. ._ .., 5, , , ., . . ., 1 . . 1 . i .,._ L ::-.ps,, .," ." , I.- , - . . I. ... .- .. sanctions. 1) NO amv ~f me nup wi- m &ti+. ' 2) No appm
of grading ~f imp~v~ pbs without - rniti.uira mrdfird_ 3) NO lo~~lllce
building or occupmcy ma witbout propcrfy am- mitigation.
... ____- .... .._ "__._^ ........ _Ai< ....L......"+. ..... '_ ....
I.
~,
~ ..... ..... ..j .... , .... i . : ... .,
Impact. Potentid for impacts to off-site suuitive h;ibitn a from erosion and stdimcntati
.... .. ,,,: , from the project. ..... -Y :" . i ..... .>, .. ..
.. ..... ,, c - j _,, . ,. : , .. i 8, .. I .. ;< : . , '. i a.3 . ../ ,., .A,,, <
.. Mitigaton. See hydrology and water quaii~ mi- . .' . _I
. . ?.,. I. '' ..
If checkpoints. See hydrolow and.wWr quaiity miti@-' :. .' .' ,+.:,. , . ?''- "' ' ' . .
~. .... _i ...... . , .,, 8. .I ,,'a;.. , .c ,. _. ..... ?- ..
Responsible Party. Set hydrology and water quality mirigation. ,. _* . I ' . ., ... .- ~ ' ., . . , *., . ?' e+,,-., :' - -1
-1
..I. -
SUJlctions. See hyd& ad water quality miti@=, -.,,. .<: - . *-"- .,.t ...... *f,;". .. 'L;; .. ..* , .<,-.
... ... -1- ,: . .. .... ;;. .. i ii . ~ -. .
~ ~~~ ~~~
.. I ._. .: . ,. . C. CuIturaf Resouras - :
~ ~~
hJOCt- Possibk ~nWi dut U) increased hum prrsence a a&aeo~ogi& sie SI: 12,740B. . ..... .. . ........ .. L I. \ .. ... .. : :. ,.,J < C.:.
.:,. '._ n...
a.
._
I.
. 1' .. -.
Y Iu*gmOn. ThC site &dl be capped With fabric, soil, and eon as a condition of tf
tentative map including ttrt site Work must be SU~ b a a& mmlogin ntainf ... by the tentative map- appiiant. . _." . ,... ;: .. 2. . .I : .. . ./.I . .. .:. ... :\ i .. .~., - .. ........... : .. ':'. ;,.hi, :;;:.:;, .;.. ... .. , .. *.. ... _.: ..... I.
.I
Mater Plan Impiemetotio.. TW site is 1- OQ site to k dcdicatad to Cim of carfsb:
for par~and. fhe capping of w site W~U tx thc"ty ~fthc ciy of &I~w. ... .......... :?:. .I .:. . I- . .. _. . (>. ,. ., .. ... Cltrckpoints. 1) SubmiG of dtveloprnent plans for @'si&' '2) Appnrral of &ch phn
3) Report by consuiting dudogm submitted t~ CityPlylning DcpYrment upon compIeti<
of work and prior to ammenemat of dcveiopmcm of pprk site.. .... ., ...
Responsibk Pq. 1) City mylning and -: Depmcak. ' '2) City PM
Depanmmt. 3) Codtint ucfr;rcologist, City piywing ;lad -. Depanmenu.
./...
, .... L. ...
...... ... , .. ,.j . ~~" .... :' .. 3'. ......... ., . . ..
.- .~ "I> ... ,,
...
\
-
0 0 .:
.. .. . -. .. . 3; ?.:: :: i <.:..:
S~nctionr. 1) NO appmva~ of silt wqrnent ph ~itbart mitigatitm &no 2) NO pdir
Permits to be-issued until mitigarion nport by Consuitxq archadogut is submi@ to ci Phnning Depamncnt. . . .. , , . '. , . ... ._. . '- . : .,. . .. .- ' 1 - '. ' .. .
-.. . . , , /.. .. .. .*.._.1_1 - .. ,
4 .. "
It "
- . _.. -. -.._ .- .~- _,-_ . - .. . .-.. ~. i
Impact. Direct impaczs of deve.iopment.on archadogid site SDr469tB. .,.
Mitigarion. A dam may program as specifid in tie= must be required as a Gnditic of the tentative map including the site. Work mp~t be sqxmsai by a qualified arrhaeologi
retained by the mtadve map applicant and a>mptaad priarm any construction affecting the siu
L'l ~~~er Phn Impternentation. ~itigation of thit site 4 not be required unles~ 'this' area j
disturbed by onsite riparian mitigafion.
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of appiicable tentative 6. 2) Report by consuiting artfiacofogi
. submitted to City Planning Deqartmart upon cornpiam of work and prior to any m"rading fc
construction affdng the site.
. ., . .. , __ , . . . ~ L -.'. ' 'j
.... .
-. ~. .. % .. I .: :. ?'. . . 1. $ ". . <.
. , ,..,. . -,,<-,:. . 1 7. - -?.I RqJonsibk POrrp. 1) NO apprO%ti of ?en&tive mtp &a mitigation pb. 2) No bddin
permits to be issued until mitigation npon by. ca&iq =-io@. is submitted to Cil Planning Department.
.. . .. . ,,...I. ->.-,.- .. , ... . . ,.., ~ . ... ,, :;. ' . .-
. .-. I, -
. ...
Impact- Direct impacts of devcfoptmt on archacologicll su. SDI-4687.
Min'gazion. Capping of the site & specified in th. ElR. as a condition .of-my tentative ma
,$ affecting the site. Work must be @sed by a quaiiW archasoio~ =rain& by the untativ
) map applicant and completed prior to any consda affkaing tht Gte.
Checkpoints- 1) Submimi of appiicabk tmtarive map.. 2). Approwi of 'applicable tmtati~
map. 3) Report by coruuiting -i@ atbmined t~ city manning oepamnent upc
completion of work and prior to any grading OT - ag the fie . :*
C7zeckpoinfs 1) .Submittal of applicable mtative map.. r) Am of appiicable mtatit
map. 3) Report by consulting ardumlogist sub- to City Pfanning oepamnart up
compfcrion of work and prior to any pading or m affecring the itt. ',
Responsi&Ze Pw. 1) city Ph&ing and Engineainq Dcp~rmeno. 2) Consultir!
_, . , ~ I _% . , .: . i -I ." .. . .* .. , . I ..- - . . ,.. . -_ , ,L_ . .,. s ~ . .
r. 'L
" .. . _. . -. . . . .- ._ - I._ ...,, i" i. .~. __. ..I i.' ' 2 "" ,.. .
,. . _... .-",;--- ,, v~; ., , . .
.I ,. -,, .* . I :- I . ,. . - " -. _. '
-. .?.>e ., . ". . .... -.,. .. .
' archaeologist.
\
a 0'
Sancrions. I) Submiuai of me map tm mtpb without &gatinn pian. ,2) 1 approvaloftcntuivempwithoutmirigatimphL 3) Nobddiqpamiutokrlmrrlun
mitigation qort by consuiting ashamlogis is sllbmitted to City pknning Dcpammts.
Impact. Encroacfrment of p-sai devdopamt of dw Maser pr?a on the Nnj, 'ax California" setting of the Lro curill0 hisroric sk
Mitigation. Establishment and impIemcntatioa of a m design district as required undl
Land Use Compatibility in this mitigation mmhxiug and reponing program.
Checkpoints. See Land Use Compatibili&aCta. . '
Responsible Party. See Land Use Compatibility SCctiQL
Sanctions. Set Land Use Cornpaability seuh
" . :4
3
D. Paleontological Resources
Impact. Potential duuuction of significant fads, qxciaily in the Santiago and Lusarc
Formation, by grading and conmaion.
Jfitigmon. Monitoring of grading by a ~iaioght, with re#way and curation of an
significant fossils discovered, as specified in the EIR bfonitoxing is to be performed under th~
direction of a qualified pdumtoiogist retained by the appiicant for cach tentative map.
' i)
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of appiicablc tenark map. 2) Report by consulting paiontologi!
upon completion of grading.
Responsible Pam. I) City PIanning and Ea-g Depyrmcnts. 2) Consultin;
paieontologist.
.. i
- e e-
.. \. , J. . _. .. * .- .~
smerions. 1) Appnwzi of tcnprive map ax cmrpkm without xnitipia p&a. 2) No buildi
-its to be issued una snitigatioa repon by amulting paicondogs it nrbmiaed to C
Planning DepYrmerrt . .. _. .- .. .. . ,,.~ -.<,v -..- , ’
-. . .- i
1.
E. Rydrology and Water Quality . :.
.. ..
Impact. Major drainage facility cluign will be requind to. tvoid po& advase effects
erosion, Kdirnantion, sawing, act nooding fr~ar b devcfo~ed zitt.
Mitigotion. As a condition of. appmai Qch OCIltativc nup, tbqpiicant shall submit
hydroiogy analysis addrtsting quid flood attmuarion, runoff flow ruiuctiodsiltation, d: .. r \ proper sizing of drainage Was. 5-
Mmer Plan linpiementafion. Applicant my dmit one hydroiogy analysis for the at
Master Plan area. ..
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of each tantive map.
Responsible Paw. 1) City Enginering DepumKnt, 2) aty Enpeering Deparunent.
Sanctions. I) Tentative Map amdition of rppmvai, . . . , . :.; ” , : ,. ’.
I,
_: /*.
.. . .- .
.,
, .. .. ..
.. , - .. I , . _>_ . .. . . ., . , i 7,
Impocz. Major drainage facilities wilI have 00 be constructed to avoid poundal adverse effu
of erosion, sedimentation, sauing, and flooding from the developed site.
r’ 7
.. . . :., ~ .. ,: : .. .
/ I 1- Master Plan Impiemm&uzon.~ Appiicant may submit one hydroloiogy analysis for the enc
Master PIan area.
.. . .. -. .. . . .. ., ,. . ..
Mitiguzion. The finai decidoa-mzldng body shall approve a Filrrrncing PIan addressing t
source and use of bds for the amstmuh of In required &&age fWities prior to ncordi:
the first Finai Map or the issumce of thc fixst piing or buiIding pamit, wfiichevais first
Oieckpoints, Recording of first final m?p ar issuance of first grading or building permit. ea
ttnutive map.
’ Responsible Paq. City Enginering Deoprrmcnt
Sanctiqns. No reording of fhi map a iwrana of grading or build@ permit without
Financing Plan guarantee for cawwiaa of rcqmrai dnia;ige ficilitics.
t
e a 0
f.paeo pom~;rl md~ w flm - to m in LC6 CdIh Rmch Park.dm U:
mnofffromthedeveiopedsiteaotaml:tbtdmnagexahof*prdr .,.
L~itigudon, An hyhlw ~YJU for t& drirnyc south of fb @ w k submhd wid
* theappiicabtc~~~m?porpriorb~of~~pcnnitfarM~
gradingpennitaffectingdreyclurd~ooncunmrarithtbc~ofthe~~ r, ’’ Avcnut,Md~~~~syspcrn~be~plia~dr~~oftfK~
area.
fftuckpohtfs. I) Approval of applicrbh tentative mapt. 2) & of first grading w
Responsible Puny. 1) Engineuing Department 2) mg Deptment.
Sanctions. 1) NO appmd of tentative map witbout propr-- ryff~m shown. 2) ~a
issuance of building pennlU until dramage system impiemaUd.
?
‘r
* 0- a. ,
WdWwQualip
Impau. Insmilzrioa of the proposal srmn dnin kcrveea Vi R ad T h Opat Spa Area 13
wouid disturb sensitive biological rcu~cllfes in drr opts space aru
JftXCigcrrion. The storm drain W be rdoared to m south from ViiIqa Q to am& fo a sfom drain in either El Fume Strea or Cbib Strm
Master P!an ImpZememth. mi zoocm drab btt bscn nl0C;rted iprr, per) thrt will be graded a
part of the development of Vilaga Q ad R iukem possible 00 mid SCPSitiVC tubitat.
Chrckpointt. 1) Submirui of temzive mtp fot viilycr Q ami R indudii thc narm drain. 2) Approval of Village Q and R tczIL;Ipivt map. 3) Completion of storm &ai8 conrmtaion.
Respanriblr Pam& 1) City Enoincahrg Deprmrvpt 2) Ci Epgjxteeriq Dqyrment. .3) Cil
Engineering Depamnent.
E L\
Sanctions. 1) Submid of tentative mrp mt cornpie@ without s&wing stum dnin in proper location. 2) No approvd of tentative mtp twithan stoxm drain shown in pmpcr lourion. 3) NO
issuance of buiiding permits for tcmpivc aap until storm dnin ptapafy connrUaCd.
Impacr. Potential for increasd oa-site ami00 ad iacrevai suiimcmmiaa downsam when gro'
surface is disturbed during gdiin~ asmi CD-U.
Mitigation. An Erosion and Sui' ;an Cod Plaa [pw be prepared for each development
' - submirtal. approvd by the city Enpirwr, 4 impknartbd dumg coasauaioo. .r
i I
I/ Checkpoints. Approvai of my gr;rdi oc iqrwapem pia in the m Ptaa ~tt~.
Responsibic Pa-. 'City Eapkaiq Depyrmcot.
Sonaionr. No appmvri of q gdiq pami0 without Erosioa ami Sediion Control Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
Impact, P0tcnd;rl imprat of ur&a poUutrPo from t&e dcvdopsd site 1&ctiao wftct qudity in Bariquitos L.agaoa
, L IUitigm'un. Discharge of mmff flsm dm- areas inn, afmrali.rcd cbmds ;rad public educati
\;. informarion distributed to propeq owoar
Muster fin Implrmetotion. A ddd Hlydroiogid Smdy m9n be qmnd prior to issuance t
pading permit for the grading necsmry PI costma the Ciiu E3aaas Rodways.
Chkpointt. 1) Approval of Ippiiie taxache map. 2) Cornpiaim of coPstruaioa of drainas
cilanneis. 3) close of csctow to pmpary OwIyn.
-c 0 e
HydrdoQadWorr~
ResponriMI rordrr. 1) City Engineering - 2) city &gimuiq'Dcg;pmnaa.
3) Developerr .
Shncn*ons. 1) No appmvd of tumive mrpt arimoQ pmpa design of d drabage frcititi~rr. 2)
No issuance of building permits unlat rumfl dmimge Wie pmpdy -.
Impact. Potential for grease, oii, tad other tnffk-rrittcd pdlutms from pad des to reach
Bariquitos Lagoon in runoff. ..
Mitigation. Best managemem pmices MI be e@oyd to pmerx urbu! poUottna from entering
City waterways in cr>mplimCc with Naxi~mai Polllam D- Eliminainn Systan municipal
[. I stomwater permining requirements.
Cherkpoirtts. Appro4 of any grading or imprwuwa pian in the Mytn Ran area.
Responstbie Ponies. City Engineering Dep~mrar 1
Sanctions. No appd of any grading pcrmht widmu! Erosion lad Sedimcnotion Controi Plan
approved by the City Engineer.
F. Geology and Soils -
Impact. Geologic diti~~ potcmi;liIy umide fk devdoprnan on dm site widow mediation
inciude soils unsuitable cot lod-baring w wirh ahuse sccdrm~n potam&. old !Wide arm MC
- cfaystone beds, and hi#-gmundwater in allwid mik. I< ,.
Mintgmun. Remediri miry wiil be add to dish firm footinm hr sirmum md flis and tc
CocTect adverse sertlan~ aad rlluviri sib ova s&ibw prouPdwPn; A so& cngiaeer apd engineering geologist fhrll b reuhed b &a tmttivc map applicun 00 mi- datitcd grading
pians. prepare a deuiiai soil tnd geologic imdgzbm. moaitor coasanajoa, aad assure compiiana
with the Master P!an gwiogic investigathn ad the City Grading Otdintocc.
Ckckpoinrt. 1) Suhm;rnl of erh tamrive mg. 2) Appnnni of creb tcoLltiM mtp and issuance c grading permit. 3) Cmplaiooof corUtZPCCjW.
. Responsible Pa" 1) City Engbwiq Deprrcppea 2) City Eqmmriq Dcpprmcnt 3)
Consulting soils en- and a@neaiq gwlogh, City -.
SMaiunt. 1) Teatah mrp ntbmiarl pot cornpiem aritboat dctiilcd sdi iad gdogic investigation
2) No tentative rmp lpponl widma mil sd pdagic investigpjorr ami qpmprbm codions. 3) No issuance of buildiq pcrmio widtom - of propa midgation.
\
c e e
Air Qdty
G. Air Quality
Impae. Potential for significm dm imp= 10 reghad rir qualii due to increases in pollutant missions caused by projaz de.
Mitigodon, Impitrneatltion of Mista Ran mmms ind- bike lrna md pedestriaa tniis, and
provide bus routes and stops I approprltt. .i . (4 '\ requirement for appiicano h fuau~ e mtps m woet wirh NO& m ranti it ~isaia to
Chcckpointt. 1) Submittal of tcnrm'vc maps. 2) Approval of tmtltivc maps.
Responsiblr Panirr. I) City Rvlning axi Eqiaeaing Dcptmncno. 2) city Hag and .
Engineering Dcpanmuro.
Sonaions. . 1) Sub&d of teautive -&ps w cornpie witbotn appropriafe mitigation meuures. :
No approvai of tentative maps without tppliafioa coadidom.
H. Land Use
..I . .
Impart. Development of the Maser Rrr dd -dl a0.b 'cuiy California' sating of Cmi
Ranch Park. including the eiiinaioa ofthe mnhern anxy DD tbe licllcb compourd.
Mirigrztion. A Sped Park Deign Dm &ail be stablthed for devdopmtm surmunding the pa
including speciai conomit on sabacb, lmdscqiag, ami trchiteaprai darils tad UI entry through ti!
park through Village S. The design diia staahts wilI be Wudd in tht Master plan and subsequent tentative rmps will k dd fiJc corrlonrmz by the Phmng Commission.
Checkpoints. I) Apptwrl of &a h4asu Pla8. 2) lsppnnnl of tcmaivc mppr I& inciude part of
the design dispia.
Ruponsiblr Pmiu I) City Phaing.Dcp?nmcnt 2) City Ranning Dcprmncnt
\\%, 'i
..
S~dioni, 1) No~of~e~Rmwitbout~~ofapultdaiqndisaicraad
deveioprncnt stlndvdr 2) No.lppmvll of tamrim rmpr umaiaing ptn af thc deign district without sening for& dbrria ddopmePt saamhis.
..
1'- TheCityof~~aorcvicw~rityova~S,~bmthcpykdesign
disoict,ifitbd~~~a~~b~~SmMucorUmffsd~Disoia,
\
- 0 0
..
fand Use
.Wagdun. ~AgrecmcmwithtbesfhooidirtMoadCSj~smdardsisamura@,buccamt~
enforced by the Planning Commiuioa Wb misrv of all dcnioomep vpidrin be desi- disuia
it is not within the power of the Lad &mcy to asmare rhrt porrible m are mitigatad or tvoidc
.: ChrekpoinLs. No Lead Agency -in0 witbou - with the school disoict. \i /*
Responsible Pom*es. Respousibil'i fist mi6@m ir rithin tb athaity of dct jurisdictioD W
not the City of Carisbad.
SMCtiont. None available to the w af CdsW uxk presas drarmaurca.
Impad. Dedication of be open space link at dm m w of dm propmy, where be link
crosses from one zone to an adj?crat omrrship, is mt assurd da the propoted Master Plan.
Mitigatxion. Assure continuance of the opar space Iint as pan of the !Master plan.
., ..t! 1. Mazer Ran Impiernetotion, Carisbad's Open sprte Ad- tpprovsd tbc open space link
proposed by the Master PSaa at their Febrrrtry 1993 meaiag.
Ciieckpoinu. 1) Apptovai of Mlsm plta 2) ApOmvJ of mve mrp inciuding Village T.
Responsible Pam*a. Planning Deptmam.
Sondions. No approval of M~sra Plat wirhom OPQ space lii
~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~
Impad. Applicants for the Masrer Plan amst okzin a leW from thc Sla Mucos Unified Schooi
District accepting the site ptopassd by Hicam as pmsibie -1 site area in compliance with he \ Zone 18 Local Facilitia Manag- plra
!
',,A ' Mitigoiio~ An" with tb U m Unifid scbooi Dlsrrin ~t pm Of WtW Ph appmv:
c7Ue;Lpointt. Approval of &sa Ph
Rtspodh P&. hmiq Dcetrrmepr
, s~ctiant. NO appro~i of- ~ta rirf~m t~ncmen trrirhtht scbo~l dis~ia thu compiies w'
the Zone 18 Locai Facilities Maaqemex Plan.
1
-
-
0 e
_.
VurtAmhUicr/Gmding 1 - -~~~ ~ L Visual AestheticdGrading ..
Impact. Grading proposcd by the MISDCT Ran rsqpirer tW@ jurrifyinf gmiing voiumes to be
%- \ approved by the Plvrning Direat and City kurnen ;rt#dinl rn the HW Dcvelopmcnt Ordinur
Mitigotion. Approval of Wing? for tht proposd gdiq vdma prior t~ approval of the Master PI=.
Checkpoints. Approval of Masfa pfia . _”
Responrible Pam’es. Planning Dirrctot and City Eagineu. ..
Scuruionr. No approval of the Muta Plan without the rapired finding.
,.
~
Impaa. Proposed grading fix the Ma PIzn wouid ad Widt Dcvdopment Ordinance
allowances for stope height and eacfoachmau inm 40 perrtn dopa witbut specified findings by &I
dexision making body.
’j. 2- Atlitigon’on. Approval of Wigs for ,be propod gmhg cmmrrux with approval of the Master Plan.
Checkpoints. Approval of the Mma pltn. ..
Responsible Pamk Decision making Body.
Sancrions. No approwi of the mer Plan without the requid tiadimp.
Impad- POtenziai m 0f IWter k dtvtlop- on tila My fePSitiYe CarrfiIo Ran& Park site, including Village S, 0, amj Q.
Auih&uion. Appliubh w maps m indica 1p we dmilal ttadsc3pe pian to nduce
. - *?_ potential imp-. fmplcznar Spead pat Design D’i rseommrpdsd in E3R m Use secdon.
’\
* acCkpoinu. 1) ~~bmitd ofapptide tcantive map. t) ~pp3wrl afappiictble ttntative maps.
Respanriblr P-. 1) Cjfy PltpainlDcpuancnt t) City Phuuiag Dqamea.
s~crio~. i) ~en~nin lprp - 1~n c~mp~m withoot wtd w plm. 2) NO
approval of tcmative map rnbap lppropriate daaiIed laxisape ph.
" 0 e
W ArahriafWng
-.
~mpcrcr. ~~tclltid~y sidficur impact of em^ vchid~ sotage in Opar SP~ - 13 00 vie from existing rcsidtncu,
itiitigarion, Daaikd lrndsupc piin as part ofamrciw map fot Wage Q tab R DD effcaivdy
-e '\ screen views of rccr-d vhae mngc \ /
Checkpoints. 1) Submittal of-mtaive mtp 'w rserrmioaai vchidra SODW. 2) &Prod 0
tentarive map induding ruxeaiond vchidt -
Responsible Puctiu. 1) City Rlnning Dcprmacor t) City Plmnin. hpfmncas-
Sandionr. 1) Submittal of tcnPtive mrp Iy3t eompi- WitbOQ approprire Imdscagiq pim. 2) I
appmvd of tentative map withorrt appmpritte ttpdscsing ph
Impact. Potential significant visual impact of mise men ova six fsrr in height.
"Xgatiun. Detailed laadsaping pian for tatmive mpp~ to providt adcqploc COVQ, tmre, and
variation of vepctztion to scrcco db. c ,I ' Checkpoinu. 1) Submiatl of any tcQotivt mp st#winl ma barriar mu si% feet in height. 2)
Approval of any tcntltivc map &owing mise hias ow sir fen in be#^
e RespondZe Parties. 1) Ci Plamiag ami E@&ng Dqurmurtr. 2) Gty Planning and
Engineering Departmaus.
Sunmum. 1) Submid of rppiiubic tmtpiyc rmp not compiete widmt tppmpriuc lardscaping
plan. 2) No appmva~ of appiiaMc uaah m ri\hoot approprirrc kpdsclpbg pia-
X Circulation
hpd= ThU*~~PJonr;trAirportBordrPdR~Rcrlbproj~ahtveaIcvc serviceFintheycrtOOO~peakhnx. No~impmYcPLmtotbisiaasaxionar
*A" :\ ' curready proposed in the w.
I MMgatibn. ThtCiywillcoariaPbmmo~arffkm~~withLFMPstand;
andtoidcntifyaadimpianeacimprovrmcao~toaaeuthestmkd.
chrcLpoin&* CO" diropwaanro.
Rczpansiblr P&. City €&aing Dqanam~
r
-
0 ..
..
vtvl Aa&aia/thdhg
s4nCtiom. Ne~ofbuiid~permitrifGrowth~szadads€bruaf!icIwdsof
semice are na m&
Impcrcrr. Spacing of &e first immectioa on PJOanr Airpat Rod is 200 kt doscr dm City
Staadds rilow. ..
Mitgdn. TerrYtive maps shall comply with City nrrd aiipmaa trd imcnection spacing ntndard
to the suisfkxion of the City Engineer.
Maser Pion impiemetoboa. The location sbwa a0 dm Fogoscd Master Plan hu not been revise
and has been approved by the City krginaz.
Chrc)poi~U~. Approvai of tdve maps. .- .
*
.. 5 '2, .. . . . ,.
. I ... .
.. Responsi2te P&. City Engineering Dcprranrze
s4ncrions. No approval of tQnttive maps thn do oot cow with w mad aiignxnem ad
intersection spacing to the dsfmioa of the C3y Eagmca. .. . ..
..
Impact. As proposal, devdopmm of the Mrpa Ph wdd quire traffic si+ at palomu
Airpon Road/- rod 10 Village E and at Mdrore A~emdesuaaca to Villages H, 0, and L.
H. H .. 3 L+taga&n. Condition temaive maps to coIw1pct a v sw @ impr~vcm~, or
d. determine the need for signah in trafk studies br e ~p3. 1 , ..
ciuckpoin~. 1) submimi of applicable tentative mrps, 2) Appmvai of applicable tentative maps.
Responsible Pattie. 1) City Eagineuiag Dcptnmcn. 2) C3y hghmsing Dcp~rmcm.
..
. . .,
I.
%neOnt. 1) NO m Of&W m * "6 meU.
_I . .. , . "~ .. ~ .. ..
fmpoct. CcraiamvisiomoftheintanrlcirerrLtionslaepdaaibsd'mthaEIRrmybeprrfaabir for eavironmcnd 01 chbry masons.
M-udon. Tdc des Qr applicable t- w M dccaniab in colwtjptioLI with Ci SI
whaher specified chrnfes in the circuipion ptrern w k implaaagd as c~nditin~ of qpiicat
Elnative m$s*
:I q /'
d '\ *
Master PIOlr ImprnnrnbPrlar Revisions to cbr b & wrrioa ad - -e aq
hlMafreadybceo~a~thereco~~afthr,EIRlad.~~bythscifv Eagmneer.
c e e 0. -
.
. ..
G-
ChecLpohis-1) Appmnloftaapivcmrp,. . ., 1 .,....". ~ .. ..,. ..- 1 .. , . . . .. .. .. . . ..:
Engineering Dm. . . . , . . , : :_. ._ :-
. I, ;-?. ,, ' .' ~~ . ., i
Rep0-P- I)~~lad~Dcpmmga.'~2) W'R&ngmd
i, -. > .; . . . &nCrions, I) Norpprovrloftmtaive~vitbappl~~ . .
.. .: -: . .. . . -~ . ,.. ..: . > .,. . ,_: ..
K, Noise .., .. , .,<, , . i ..,.. ... _,. . . . .. .. . ., ,. -~ ..
.. . ,. , ,e ,.
~ .v . . , - . , .. .
RupaMbl.partz&. 1) ciyRmninpaad~~.f)BuiidbgDcpIItmQk
Sa~~criorrr. 1) %~~pmper~~a~~ Nobsuaceofsubsequa
petmio. 1
r e 0
-
hJdicFndi&amdsINim
..
. ., >.
.. . .
L. Public Faaties and serdCes . J' . . I .*. . ., .:
Impar. ThereuapoGmtiJbrbW~~IbtprL.ticUiesIpkexrradrl L i dependinOoatha~ofdavdopmm~IkppaofoehQ~~in~~D~
. 4. .. . "
Mfigdn. Priortothersco&onofanyWnrp&dramRt4 mfRdtmpMtb
be dedicated within Zone 18.
.. -.
c%e*oIhtr. RccorduionOfAnt~"uada~&R1P , ':" ' > ' ' .._
Respanriblr Furties- City Raaning, - 9d prdcr ami Bwpdon Dcpyrmeart.
s~nai~nr. NO recordation of f~ mtg withop M- at *.- laithin P& Dh
4. .. .. "
. ..
Impact. TheLFMPpcrforrruncc~~thtrvbmlIjtb~~~l8bCdCddCdU)tbeS;I
Marcos Unified School disaia (SMUS)) rpd rhr: a m phn be rpprwsd by &e SMUSD pric
torccorduionofmyAnri~oriuurnc4of~~or~pamitm~18.
4 .. t- p Miligarion. ComptirrpEa with the Zom 18 - .~ ,- .
Chccfpoim. 1) Rccotbtion of the firn flmi mq rmlcr~d&asrer Ran. 2) knaace of any
grading or building pamit in dm Mttta pltn TU
Responriblr Punks. City PilMing And EnLirpecrinf hpamms.
.. .._ . . . - __.l._ . .'
._ , i. ,. . .. .. L ,. Sixnaiunr, NoFdmaprrarrdsdwilfKII11LFMP"IIg~ ..
.. , , ... . I
. . -.. . __.. . .. . . *e I.
~mpact ~~~aceui~~~ii~dcnlopmentocnrn~~
Mas= Plaa a * zw.
4 ' ~irigcrdtoa Imp1"~iadlr~branyaarrm"~pwairl
.~
1. i .7 1 impaumbercalii
.. che*ine. 1) Subarirolof"". 2) Apprmiof-mtprsub-
situ 2005.
R~nsi%kP~. 1) Ciipaing~~~ 7).*-&
mm@wDtP"
m
.r
0) 1)
hlirFai&ldadsariar
sh&#. ~qprovriOftatiKiv8~bta2415""rb LFMP" -
M. Solid Waste Disposal
~~ ~~~
fmpuct. DcpcndinOonrrgio~prlfin;ng~th.nILr~~,th~'Ui~
solid~g~~fromrhehirsrrrPl?naaap~d'bnurl~.
\. M*gafiun. Appliam for trmaive mrps pw i dm m plra ICI shall dm- &a p\ means of feasible soiid waste difpour M awiirbk
Checkpoints. 1) Approval of tarraive m?ps 5x tln m Ram ;pcL
Responn'blr Pa. 1) City Planning ?nd - -
Skncziuns. 1) No qpprovai of tenntive mtps widxns dmmmmba of atirrial dsPsd m.
1