The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1996-05-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 3932p Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I I 0 @ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3932 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A 186 LOT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH 181 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS AND 27 INCORPORATED SECOND DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, NOlRTH OF FUTURE POINSETTIA LANE, ON EITHER SIDE OF FUTURE MELROSE DRIVE. CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRIL,LO VILLAGES J CASE NO: PUD 95-05 WHEREAS, UDC HOMES has filed a verified application for certain prc AND K to wit: Portion of Section 24, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian and a portion of !sections 18 and 19, Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, all in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California. with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to th'e Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Plannec Development approved as shown on Exhibits "A"-"CC", dated May 15, 1996, on file i Planning Department and incorporated herein by reference (PUD 95-05) as provid Chapter 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of May, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; an( WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission consider factors relating to the Planned Unit Development. .... .... ,4 .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I I ~ e 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the P1i Commission as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Comn RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Planned Unit Development, PUD based on the following findings and subject to the following condition Findings; 1. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consister Chapter 21.45 of Title 21, the General Plan, the Rancho Carrillo Master Pla all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the family low medium density residential project implements the designated G Plan and Master Plan land use and incorporates all required development star and design criteria specified by the Planned Development Ordinance. 2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to p a service or facility which will contribute to the long-term general well-being neighborhood and the community, in that the single family developmer contribute to the balance of housing types in the City. 3. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welf persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improve in the vicinity, in that the project is conditioned to comply with the Zone 18 Facilities Management Plan ensuring that the necessary public facilitie infrastructure will be provided concurrent with demand and that grading will accordance with the provisions of the Grading Ordinance and the recommend of the geotechnical analysis. 4. That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum develo. standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in S 21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained Design Guidelines Manual, in that the project provides the necessary public widths, conveniently located private recreation areas, adequate resident and parking, setbacks, and landscaping. 5. That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the n topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resourc the site, in that the project grading is consistent with the approved Rancho C: Master Plan Hillside Development Permit, HDP 91-17, and units will p: variation in architecture and roof colors as well as landscaping and uniform ft on HOA maintained slopes to screen structures from surrounding roadways. I .-.. PC RES0 NO. 3932 -2- 3 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 0 0 6. That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of tl is compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonj disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that the project is consistent wi development approved for Villages J and K by the approved Rancho Carrillo I! Plan. Villages J and K abut future Melrose Drive and are surrounded by Rancho Carrillo Master Plan villages designated for single and multi-: development, as well as the designated school site. 7. That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well inte; with the project and does not dominate the project, in that its road desig provide automobile and pedestrian access to each of the units via a public system as well as satisfy guest parking requirements in proximity to the indi units. 8. The Planning Commission finds that: a. the project is a subsequent development as described in CEQA Guid 15168(c)(2) and (e), and 15183; b. the project is consistent with the General Plan Master EIR (MEIR 93-0: Rancho Carrillo Master Plan EIR (EIR 91-04). c. there was an EIR certified in connection with the prior 1994 Genera, and Rancho Carrillo Master Plan d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyz significant in the prior EIRs; e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or a Supplemental EIR CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 or 15163 exist; 9. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or p alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 and EIR 91-04 which are approprii this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subsequent Project. 10. MEIR 93-01 found that air quality and circulation impacts are significanl adverse; therefore, the City Council adopted a statement of over1 considerations. The project is consistent with the General Plan and as to effects, no additional environmental document is required. 11. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) fc McClellan-Palomar Airport, dated April, 1994, in that as conditioned the app- shall record a notice concerning aircraft noise. 12. That the project is consistent with the City’s Landscape Manual, adopted by Council Resolution No. 90-384. PC RES0 NO. 3932 -3- * * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 e 13. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Devc contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are im to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent ar degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project Conditions: 1. Approval of PUD 95-05 is granted subject to the approval of CT 93-01 and SDP 9: PUD 95-05 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resol No. 393 1 for the Tentative Tract Map, CT 93-01. 2. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are req as part of the approved CT 93-01 and SDP 95-13, as contained in Planning Commi Resolutions No. 3931 and 3933. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla: Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of May, 1996, b, following vote, to wit: AYES : Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Erwin, Monroy, Noble, Savary and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: Commissioner Nielsen ABSTAIN: WILLIAM COMPAS, Chai4erson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 8. I PC RES0 NO. 3932 -4- I