Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-21; Planning Commission; Resolution 3980I (I rn II! C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3980 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR GRADING TO ALLOW THE TOWNHOMES ON SMALL LOTS, 42 OWNERSHIP POSTAGE STAMP LOT TOWNHOMES AFFORDABLE TO LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, AND ONE FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY SITE, ALL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 20. CASE NAME: SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS CASE NO.: HDP 92-03(A) WHEREAS, Sambi Seaside Heights LLC has filed a verified applicatio DEVELOPMENT OF 137 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, 98 certain property to wit: The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60 acres of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government Survey, approved October 25, 1875, according to the Official Plat thereof with the City of Carlsbad which has been referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Hi Development Permit Amendment for grading to allow the development of 137 sta1 single-family lots, subdivide and construct 98 townhomes on small lots, constru “ownership” postage stamp lot townhomes designated as affordable to lower ir households, and designate 1 future community facility site along Hidden Valley Road, property generally located east of Paseo del Norte, north of Camino de las Ondas, and of Palomar Airport Road, in the RD-M-Q Zone and R-1-10,000-Q Zone in Local Fac Management Plan Zone 20, as shown on Exhibits “A”-“KK”, dated August 21, 1996, ( in the Planning Department and incorporated by this reference (“Hillside Develol I ll e 1) ‘ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Permit Amendment for Sambi Seaside Heights” HDP 92-03(A) as provided by Se 21.95.030 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 21st day of August 1996 a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all G relating to the Hillside Development Permit Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla Commission as follows: A) That the above recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Corn RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, of Hillside Development Permit Amend HDP 92-03(A), based on the following findings and subject to the follc conditions: Findings: 1. The Planning Commission finds that: a. the project is a subsequent residential development within an appl Specific Plan (SP 203) pursuant to Section 15182 of the CEQA Guidelinc b. the project is consistent with Specific Plan 203; c. there was a Final EIR certified in connection with the prior approved Sp Plan 203 (EIR 93-03), the General Plan Update (MEIR 93-01), a Mitigated Negative Declaration approved for CT 92-02; d. the project has no new significant environmental effect not analyzed as signi in the prior EIR and Mitigated Negative Declaration; and e. none of the circumstances requiring Subsequent or Supplemental EIR CEQA Guidelines Sections 15 162 or 15 163 exist. 2. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or 1 alternatives identified in the certified Final EIR 93-03 (SP 203), the General PC RES0 NO. 3980 -2- i I1 a * 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ Update (MEIR 93-01), and the Mitigated Negative Declaration for CT 92-02 7 are appropriate to this Subsequent Project have been incorporated into this Subse Project. 3. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Dew contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are im to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent ar degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the projecl 4. The project site has been graded in substantial conformance with the appl Hillside Development Permit (HDP 92-03). The findings of Planning Commi Resolution No. 3594 for HDP 92-03 are still applicable to this permit amend] However, to accommodate the changes in the circulation and the residential site 1 some additional grading of the larger rough graded pad areas is required. grading is considered minor in context to the overall grading of the site, it sha exceed the allowable grading volumes, and shall not encroach beyond the envela the existing graded areas. The bulk of this remaining grading is for the relocati the access driveway along the east side of Alga Road and to provide terracing t building pads in Planning Area "A". Additional large manufactured slopes sha be created and there shall be no significant impact to habitat and deed restricted space areas. Planning Conditions: 1. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend APPROVAL of the Hi Development Permit Amendment for HDP 92-03(A) entitled "Sambi Se Heights" as shown on Exhibits "A" - "KK" on file in the Planning Departmen incorporated by this reference, dated August 21, 1996, subject to the conditions here forth. All other conditions and approvals of said prior permit as amended to and not amended by this action remain in full force and effect. Exhibits 'I "KK", dated August 21, 1996 replace Exhibits "A"- "YYY" dated Decembe 1993. Staff is authorized and directed to make or require the Developer to mal corrections and modifications to the exhibits and/or documents, as necessary to them internally consistent and conform to City Council's final action on the PI Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any pro development substantially different from this approval, shall require an amendml this approval. 2. Approval of HDP 92-03(A) is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-02(A), SD 06(A), and PUD 92-03(A). HDP 92-03(A) is subject to all conditions contain Planning Commission Resolutions No. 3977, 3978 and 3979 for CT 92-02(A), 92-03(A) and SDP 92-06(A). ... ... PC RES0 NO. 3980 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e * PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 21st of August 1996, I: following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Heineman, Mc Nielsen, Noble, Savary and Welshons NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None I CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: a MICHAEL J. H~ZMILYER Planning Director I 1 PC RES0 NO. 3980 -4-