HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-11-06; Planning Commission; Resolution 4003*
L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1s
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2s
e a
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4003
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF XANA
WAY BETWEEN CORINTIA STREET AND ALGA ROAD IN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 6
CASE NAME: BROOKFIELD MEADOWS
CASE NO.: SDP 96-07
WHEREAS, Okon Development Co., “Developer”, has filed a vel
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Edgecrest Investm
Ltd., “Owner”, described as
Lot 224 and a portion of Lot 223, Carlsbad Tract No. 84-23, in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
according to map thereof No. 11241, recorded in the office of
the County Recorder of said County
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Develor
Permit as shown on Exhibits “A”-“O” dated November 6, 1996, on file in the Pla
Department, Brookfield Meadows (SDP 96-07) as provided by Chapter 21.53 of the Car
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of November
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all f
relating to the Site Development Plan.
...
...
~
I.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commi
DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Site Development Permit, SDP 96-07 1
on the following findings:
Findinzs:
1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and environrr
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan,
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in v
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact traffic circulation
will adversely impact the site and surroundings in that the project does not prc
adequate distance between structures to comply with PUD regulations (Chi
21.45) as clarified by Administrative Policy No. 16, and does not comply wit1
Small Lot Single Family Guidelines pursuant to Council Policy No. 44.
2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the u
that the site with the proposed design and the proposed number of units doer
provide adequate distance between structures to comply with PUD regular
(Chapter 21.45) as clarified by Administrative Policy No. 16, and does not COI
with the Small Lot Single Family Guidelines pursuant to Council Policy No. 44.
3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to a'
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood wil
provided and maintained, in that the project does not provide adequate dist
between structures as required by the PUD regulations (Chapter 21.45) as clar
by Administrative Policy No. 86, and does not comply with the Small Lot Si
Family Guidelines pursuant to Council Policy No. 44..
4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all tr
generated by the proposed use, in that the proposed circulation system will pro
adequate access to all units, adequate room for vehicular movement, &car gar
for each unit for resident parking, and adequate guest parking in a manner whic
dispersed throughout the project for maximum convenience.
,..
...
...
PC RES0 NO. 4003 -2-
”
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
* (I,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of November 1996,l
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Commissioners Heineman, Monroy, Nielsen and Savary
NOES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Noble and Welshons
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WILLIAM COMPAS, Chaiderson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOL~MILLE~‘
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4003 -3 -