HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-12-04; Planning Commission; Resolution 4024i
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 *
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4024
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CAFUSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF FUTURE POINSETTIA LANE
AND BLACKRAIL COURT IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: OCEAN BLUFF
CASE NO.: ZC 93-04(A)
WHEREAS, Ocean Bluff Partnership, “Developer”, has filed a ve
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Ocean Bluff Partner
“Owner”, described as
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-1 TO R-1-7500-Q
Lot 3 in Section 22, Township 12 south, range 4 west, San
Bernardino base and meridian in the County of San Diego, State
of California, excepting therefrom those portions thereof lying
north of the south boundary line of Rancho Agua Hedionda, as
said south line was established May 5, 1913, by decree of the
Superior Court of the State of California, in and for San Diego
County, in that certain action (No. 16830) entitle Kelly Investment
Company, a corporation, vs. Clarence Dayton Hillman and Bessie
Olive Hillman
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City took action to zone the property R-1 and amend its 1
Coastal Program (LCP) to reflect said zoning designation; and
WHEREAS, the Coastal Commission approved said LCP amendment w
“suggested modification;” and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges the Coastal Commission’s resolution o
subject matter; and
WHEREAS, said application constitutes a request for a Zone Change as show
the location map, and Exhibit “X” dated December 4,1996, attached hereto, Ocean Bluff
93-04(A)), as provided by Chapter 21.52 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
c e 0
*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 4th day of December
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all f
relating to the Zone Change.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plz
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of Zone Change ZC ’
(A) which effectuates City acceptance of the Coastal Commis:
“suggested modification” based on the following findings:
Findines:
1. That the proposed Zone Change from One Family Residential (R-1) to One Pi
Residential Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-7500-Q) is consistent with the goal:
policies of the General Plan Land Use Element (Policy C.l) in that it will result in
arrangement of land uses which preserve community identity and are orc
functionally efficient, healthful and aesthetically pleasing”.
2. That the Zone Change will provide consistency between the General Plan and Zoni
mandated by California State law and the City of Carlsbad General Plan Lanc
Element, in that the property’s underlying Low-Medium Residential density (I;
land use designation allows single family residential development except tl
variety of overall housing types may be allowed as long as the overall density
not exceed 4 dwelling units per acre.
...
...
...
...
i PC RES0 NO. 4024 -2-
b e e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of December 1996, I
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Heineman, Mc
Nielsen, Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WILLIAM COMPAS, Chairper&
CAIUSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
PC RES0 NO. 4024 -3 -