HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-08-06; Planning Commission; Resolution 41509
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
a 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4150
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE
CONSTRUCTION OF 60 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON
TO REVISE THE ARCHITECTURE, FLOOR PLANS AND
LOCATION OF NINE APPROVED SECOND DWELLING
UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD BETWEEN PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD AND CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS IN THE ZONE 20
SPECIFIC PLAN AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE.
CASE NAME: EMERALD RIDGE EAST
CASE NO.: SDP 95-1 1(A)
WHEREAS, Ladwig Design Group, Inc., has filed a verified application
the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Monarch Communities of Califo
“Owner”, described as
DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. SDP 95-ll(A) TO ALLOW THE
PREVIOUSLY SUBDIVIDED LOTS WITHIN CT 95-05, AND
A portion of Lot “B” of Parcel Map No. 2993, in the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, filed in the office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County August 23,1974 as File No. 74-
230326 of official records, and a portion of that certain parcel of land
delineated and designated as “Description No. 1,103.91 acres” on
record of survey Map No. 5715, filed in the office of the County
Recorder of San Diego County, December 19,1960, being a portion of
Lot “G” of Rancho Agua Hedionda, according to Map thereof No.
823, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
November 16, 1896, a portion of which lies within the City of
Carlsbad all being in the County of San Diego, State of California
excepting therefrom that portion, if any, lying within adjusted Parcel
1 (Kelly Property) described in Certificate of Compliance recorded
June 27,1996 as File No. 1996-0323495 of official records of San Diego
County.
(“the Property”); and
~ WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Develop
Permit Amendment as shown on Exhibits “A”-“W” dated August 6, 1997, on file ir
Planning Department, SDP 95-ll(A), Emerald Ridge East as provided by Chapter 21.06 c
Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of August 1997,
a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi~
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fl
relating to the Site Development Plan.
WHEREAS, on June 5, 1996, the Planning Commission approved, SDP 9:
as described and conditioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3937.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commi
APPROVES Site Development Permit Amendment, SDP 95-11(A) based c
following findings and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. All findings of SDP 95-11 as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No.
shall apply as findings of SDP 95-ll(A).
2. That the Planning Director has determined that the project is exempt fiom
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 1511
the state CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant impact 01
environment.
3. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and envirom
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area in T
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surroundin:
traffic circulation, in that the single family units on previously subdivided lots
compatible with surrounding single family development and designed in accord
with Specific Plan 203 and Hillside Development Ordinance architectural stand
to ensure architectural variety and exterior colors and textures which blend wit1
surrounding natural landscape.
4. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the u,
that the three floor plans for single family units can be accommodated withi]
~ PC RES0 NO. 4150 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
revised building envelope of each previously subdivided lot as shown on Ex1
“A”-“C” dated August 6,1997.
5. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to 2
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood w:
provided and maintained, in that the placement of single family structures adhc
all setback requirements of the R-1 One Family Residential Zone as well as th
fire suppression and habitat preservation setback required by CT 95-05 (Emc
Ridge East Subdivision Map), and architectural elevations adhere to
architectural standards of the Zone 20 SP 203 and Hillside Development Ordin:
Additionally, uniform fencing around the perimeter of each lot which is consi
in color and texture with the surrounding natural landscape will aestheti
enhance the development.
6. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all t
generated by the proposed use, in that the 60 single family units and 9 second dwc
units on previously subdivided lots would not generate additional traffic be
that analyzed and approved as adequate by CT 95-05 (Emerald Ridge
Subdivision Map).
Conditions:
Planning:
1. The Planning Commission does hereby APPROVE the Site Development
Amendment for the project entitled Emerald Ridge East (Exhibits “A”-“W” (
August 6, 1997 which supersede Exhibits “A”, “J” and “K”, dated June 5, 199
file in the Planning Department and incorporated by this reference, subject tc
conditions herein set forth. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Deve
to make, all corrections and modifications to the Site Development Plan document(
necessary, to make them internally consistent and in conformity with final action o
project. Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits.
proposed development substantially different from this approval, shall requir
amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of SDP 95-ll(A) is granted subject to approval of HDP 95-12(A) and
97-03. SDP 95-11(A) is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commi
Resolution No. 3936 for CT 95-05 except Condition No. 52 which is amende
Condition No. 3 below, and Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4151, and ‘
for HDP 95-12(A) and CDP 97-03.
3. Prior to approval of the final map for any phase of this project, or where a m:
not being processed, prior to the issuance of building permits for any lots or u
the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to deed restrict 9 se
dwelling units (including: Lots 5, 11, 18, 24, 27, 36, 42, 52, and 60), purchase
Affordable Housing Credit in Villa Loma, and the payment of a fee equal to
times the average subsidy needed to make affordable to a lower income house’
PC RES0 NO. 4 150 -3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
one newly constructed typical housing unit as appropriate, in accordance wit
requirements set forth in Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, the
20 Specific Plan, and City Council Policies 57 and 58 dated September 12,
Prior to final map approval, the developer shall submit a signed Affordable Hol
Agreement to the Housing and Redevelopment Director. The recorded Afforc
Housing Agreement shall be binding on all future owners and successors in inte
4. Building footprints shown on Exhibits “A”-“C” shall represent the preferred
plan except on Lots 1, 4, 6, 9, 26, 55, and 57 which shall be developed wit1
approved single story structure (Plan 1) only, and Lots 5, 11, 18, 24, 27, 36, 4:
and 60 which shall be developed with second dwelling units (Plan 2) only. Pri
the issuance of building permits, an alternate approved floor plan may be appr
by the Planning Director on any lot except Lots 1,4,5,6,9,11,18,24,26,27,3(
52, 55, 57, and 60 which is consistent with the following: a) observes all
suppression and habitat preservation setbacks required by CT 95-05; b) provic
15’ structural setback from the top of slope on lots adjacent to Hidden Valley R
c) complies with R-1 zone standards; d) driveways do not exceed 24’ maxi]
width; e) retaining walls do not exceed 42” in the front yard setback nor the h
shown for any lot on Exhibits “A - C”; f) retains the RV spaces shown on Ex1
“A -C”; g) where possible, accommodates the optional patio covershalcony d
shown on the approved building elevations; and h) the exterior color scheme
unit mix variation is maintained in accordance with the color board and (
scheme on file in the Planning Department.
5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for model units or the first phase of u
whichever occurs first, the Planning Director shall require that the approved PI
floor plan with the second dwelling unit shall be included in the model units or
phase of units to be constructed, whichever occurs first.
Engineering:
6. The owner shall grant a covenant of easement for a shared access and mainten
easement for Lots 44 and 45, as shown on amended Site Development Plan SDI
11 (A).
Fire:
7. Prior to occupancy of buildings, all wildland fuel mitigation activities must be comr
and the condition of all vegetation within 60 feet of structures found to be in conform
with an approved wildland fuel management plan.
8. The landscape plan must be approved by the fire department prior to building pel
being issued.
...
~ 1 PC RES0 NO. 4150 -4-
e 0
1 I1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plan
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of August 1997, b:
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Compas, Heine
Monroy, Noble, Savary and Welshons
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
I.4.."- .x <*N
*,'..p-~="%
"/- p,""-
i /.' 'hk"/-"---" -%"s** "
/'i ,+*[Ab.
(i " /f</? \
,. /
ROBERT NIELSEN, Chairperson
~ CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION I
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
ATTEST:
\\
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
28 PC RES0 NO. 4150 -5-