HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-09-17; Planning Commission; Resolution 4164C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4164
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CARLSBAD
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO ESTABLISH A
CITY’S COASTAL ZONE OUTSIDE THE VILLAGE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND LCP SEGMENT
CASE NO: LCPA 97-01
WHEREAS, California State law requires that the Local Coastal Pro:
PROHIBITION ON DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANTS IN THE
CASE NAME: DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT PROHIBITON
General Program, and Zoning designations for properties in the Coastal Zone be in confom
and
WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad has filed a verified application fc
amendment to the Local Coastal Program for all properties located within the City’s coastal
but outside of the Village Redevelopment area and LCP segment; and
WHEREAS, said verified application, proposes a zone code amendme
establish a Citywide prohibition on Drive-thru Restaurants, constitutes a request for a
Coastal Program Amendment as shown on Exhibit “Y” dated September 17, 1997, atta
hereto and Exhibit “X” as attached to Planning Commission Resolution No. 4163, he
incorporated by reference, and Exhibit “Z” as attached to Design Review Board Resoll
No. 257, hereby incorporated by reference (LCPA 97-01), as provided in Public Reso
Code Section 30574 and Article 15 of Subchapter 8, Chapter 2, Division 5.5 of Title 1L
California Code of Regulations of the California Coastal Act Administrative Regulations); a
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 17th day of September 1
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
...
~ ...
a 0
i
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all E
relating to the Local Coastal Program Amendment.
WHEREAS, State Coastal Guidelines requires a six week public review peril
any amendment to the Local Coastal Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) At the end of the State mandated six week review period, starting on Jul
1997, and ending on September 4,1997. No comments were received.
C) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Comm
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of LCPA 97-01 based on the following fin1
and subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the proposed Local Coastal Program Amendment is consistent with all applj
policies of all segments of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program, in that the prohil:
on Drive-thru Restaurants will not impact coastal resources or affect public a
provisions to beach or shoreline areas. The Village Redevelopment segment c
City’s Local Coastal Program and the Village Master Plan and Design Manu2
being amended by LCPA 97-07, in order to implement the Citywide prohibiti
the Village area.
2. That the proposed amendment to the Mello I, Mello 11, East Batiquitos,
Batiquitos and Agua Hedionda Lagoon segments of the Carlsbad Local CI
Program is required to implement the Citywide prohibition on Drive
Restaurants in the coastal zone outside the Village Redevelopment segment.
3. That the proposed LCP amendment effectively implements the Citywide prohil:
on Drive-thru Restaurants in the coastal zone by: (1) amending Title 21, the C
zoning ordinance which regulated coastal zone properties (Exhibit “X”); an
adding Drive-thru Restaurant prohibition text to the policy sections of the Mt
Mello 11, Agua Hedionda, East and West Batiquitos LCP segments (Exhibit “Y’
4. That the Planning Director has determined that the project is exempt fion
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 1
PC RES0 NO. 4164 -2-
0 0
<
1 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines and will not have any adverse significant imp;
the environment. 2
3
4 1. Approval and implementation of LCPA 97-01 is based on the approval of ZC
02, ZCA 97-03 and LCPA 97-07 including final Coastal Commission approvals,
5
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting to the P1a 6
7 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, held on the 17th day of September 1997, by the folk
8 vote, to wit:
Conditions:
9 AYES: Commissioners Heineman and Monroy
10 NOES: Chairperson Nielsen, Commissioners Noble, Savary and Wels
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ABSENT: Commissioner Compas
ABSTAIN: None
~ >, ,"&."L "". /.- ' ~ /' ~
..\
,/*r <:.; ,,'/
,.I ,,: -,,I-, '
JCT r,i. T, <. ;l ;.' j!
I. " ..
7'' .. C- -
f I,
'3. ,;ur"..5.s - .- ..~~~~~~"~-,-.~~~~~~~:~~,..~,-.~.,.~
"7, I
" ..__. i-; ."_ I- j ,_,
c 9.'
~ ROBERT NIELSEN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
-J MICHAEL J. HOLZMIMER
Planning Director
~ PC RES0 NO. 4164 -3 -
m m 0 EXHIB
September 17
J
TEXT CHANGES TO THE VARIOUS LCP SEGMENTS
REGARDING DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANTS
Mello I
The Mello I Land Use Plan is amended by the addition of the following policy language
to Sections 1, 2 and 3, to read as follows:
Section 1 (Standard Pacific), add a new policy:
“Policy 6 - Drive-thru Restaurant Prohibition
Drive-thru Restaurants are prohibited as an allowed land use. ’’
Section 2 (Occidental Land Inc.) Policy No. 1, Subsection 2 (b) is amended to read:
“Commercial uses may be allowed on the two parcels south of Poinsettia Lane and adjacent to I-
5 on both sides of the freeway provided that 35% of the land areas devoted exclusively to tourist
commercial uses. Drive-thru restaurants are prohibited as an allowed land use. ”
Section 3 (Rancho La Costa) Policy No. 1, Subsection No. 2 is amended to read:
“ The land uses allowed by the Master Plan shall be compatible with the City of Carlsbad
General Plan as amended and as adopted as of March 1,1988, to provide a combination of
residential, commercial (including visitor serving) and open space uses. Drive-thru Restaurants
are prohibited as an allowed land use.”
Mello 11
The Mello I1 Land Use Plan is amended by the addition of new policy language to Section No. 1
(Allowable Land Uses) to read as follows:
“Policy I-3 Drive-thru Restaurant Prohibition
Drive-thru Restaurants are prohibited as an allowable land use. ’’
Aaua Hedionda Land Use Plan
The Agua Hedionda Land Use Plan is amended by the addition of new policy language to
Section No. 3(Land Use Plan) to read as follows:
“Policy I. 1 I Drive-thru Restaurants are prohibited as an allowable land use. ’’
East Batiquitos Lagoon
The East Batiquitos Lagoon Land Use Plan is amended by the addition of new policy language to
Section B.l (Land Use Categories), subsection (l)(a)2) to read as follows:
“Commercial portions of Planning Areas 10 and 1 1 that are subject to this plan are designated
Recreation Commercial (RC). In addition to the uses permitted under this designation, other
uses may include restaurants. Drive-thru Restaurants are prohibited as an allowable land use. ”
e e
The East Batiquitos Lagoon Land Use Plan is amended by the addition of new policy language to
Section B. 1 (Land Use Categories), subsection (3)(c) to read as follows:
“(e) Drive-thru Restaurants are prohibited as an allowable land use.”
West Batiquitos Lagoon
The West Batiquitos Lagoon Land Use Plan is amended by the addition of policy language to
Section “A” (Land use Categories) to read as follows:
“The following are the proposed land use “Planning Areas”, each providing a brief description.
The “Planning Areas” correspond directly with the planning areas approved with the Poinsettia
Shores Master Plan. All development in these planning areas are subject to the provisions of the
Poinsettia Shores master Plan as adopted by the City of Carlsbad and certified by the California
Coastal Commission. No development inconsistent with the Master Plan shall be permitted. The
planning areas identified below will replace the former planning areas established by the BLEP
Master Plan. See the attached map for the location of the Planning Areas described below.
Drive-thru Restaurants are prohibited as an allowable land use. ’’