The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1998-02-04; Planning Commission; Resolution 4242I‘ 0 e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 4242 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PUD 97-02 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND EAST OF MELROSE DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18 CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES C & D CASE NO.: PUD 97-02 WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “De~eloper~~, has filed a application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ran “Owner”, described as That portion of Section 13, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, and all that Portion of Section 18 and 19 of Township 12 South, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Plan Development as shown on Exhibit(s) “A”-“N” dated February 4, 1998 ,on file in the Department, RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGES C & D - PUD 97-02 as provided bq 21.45 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 4th day of Felbrual hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t’ and arguments, if any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a relating to the Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Cor RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of RANCHO CAFUULLO VILLAG D - PUD 97-02 and the Villages C $i ID Design Guidelines, attachel and made a part hereof, based on the following findings and subjel following conditions: Findings: 1. All findings contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4241 shall findings of this permit and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consis Chapter 21.45 of Title 21 , the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master p: all adopted plans of the City and other governmental agencies, in that the p proposing densities within the Growth Management Control Point; prio recordation of any final map the deeding of an acceptable school site to Marcos Unified School District and a financing plan approved by the San School District guaranteeing the construction of the necessary school facilit occur; the mitigation of onsite surface runoff so as not to affect on an( downstream properties is required; major offsite sewer line construction is 1 and so conditioned; prior to recordation of the final map an affordable agreement must be entered into which provides for and deed restricts dwelli as affordable to lower income households for the useful life of the dwellir over 35% of the net developable acreage has been left as open sp: construction of Melrose Drive and access to this subdivision from it is r prior to occupancy the construction of noise walls to meet the standards cc within the General Plan is required; a parks agreement between the Carlsbad and the property owners has been completed; and all densities, s parking, recreational space, streets, and storage meet the minimum standarl Planned Development Ordinance. 3. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to p service or gacility which will contribute to the long-term general well-bein1 neighborhood and community as noted in Finding Number 1. 4. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare ol residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvemenl vicinity, in that a) all necessary mitigation of adverse environmental imp incorporated into the project's design or are conditions of approval; b) the p conditioned to construct all necessary public improvements; and c) the p' consistent with all applicable City design and development standards. ~ ~ -*. I ~ PC RES0 NO. 4242 -2- c 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5. That the proposed Planned Development meets all of the minimum dew standards set forth in Chapter 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section 2 and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the Guidelines manual, in that 1) the project is consistent with the Planned Deve standards for building height, private recreational open space, recreationa parking and guest parking; 2) the design is compatible with surrounding 1: and circulation patterns through its opportunity for connection with 1 adjacent single family development and provides for adequate usable opt that is readily accessible to residents; and 3) the Master Plan allows for architectural review. 4. That the proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with th topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resoura site, in that the grading design preserves the major ridgelines and is consist I) the natural topography by allowing the canyons and hillsides to remain space, considering the necessity of arterial circulation development. 7. That the proposed project’s design and density of the developed portion of tl compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmo disruptive element to the neighborhood, in that due to the timing of construc size and product type location (in the northwest corner of the project adj two arterial roadways) the project will set the precedent for surr development type within the Master Plan and the adjacent existing neighbo~ 8. That the project’s circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integr; the project and does not dominate the project, in that the private streets allov pavement width and modified sidewalk provision thereby decreasing th surface, while the public streets are designed to provide maximum access double loading. 9. That the required visitor parking is located on the adjacent “Village C, & street system. Conditions: 1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all cc and modifiqtions to the Planned Unit Development document(s), as necessary, them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the Development shall occur substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this app 2. Approval of PUD 97-02 is granted subject to the approval of CT 97-02. PUD subject to all conditions contained in Resolution No. 4241 for CT 97-02. ~ PC RES0 NO. 4242 -3 - J e 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Elevations, floor plans, and building layouts shall be submitted in compliance standards contained within the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan, and shall comply Village C and D Design Guidelines. 4. All accessory structures shall comply with the development standards containt Section 21.10.050(1)@) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 5. All dwelling units shall have a permanent foundation. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 4th day of February, 199 following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compas, Heineman, h Nielsen, Salvary, and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: BAILEY NOBLE Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: W MICHAEL J. H~ZMILLER Planning Director ~ PC RES0 NO. 4242 -4-