HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-04-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 40810 0
L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4081
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO THE NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT
DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR THE POINSETTIA
COMMUTER RAIL STATION PARKING LOT ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE NORTH
COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY.
APPROXIMATELY 2100 FEET NORTH OF POINSETTIA
LANE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 22.
CASE NAME: POINSETTIA COMMUTER RAIL STATION
CASE NO.: CUP 93 -02X 1 (A)
WHEREAS, the North San Diego County Transit Development B8
“Developer”, has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property o
by North San Diego County Transit Development Board, “Owner”, described as
That portion of lot 1 in section 29, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, in the
County of San Diego, State of California, according to the
official plat thereof, lying northeasterly of the northeasterly
line of the 200 foot wide right-of-way of the Atchison, Topeka
and Santa Fe Railway Company and a parcel of land being in
the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California,
and being a portion of the east half of the northeast quarter of
section 29, Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino
Meridian, according to the official plat thereof (all outside of
the railroad right-of-way)
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, on May 4, 1994 the Planning Commission approved CUP 93-
described in Planning Commission resolution No. 3643; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Conditiona
Permit Extension and Amendment, as provided by the conditions of approval of CUP 93-0
Chapter 21.42 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 2nd day of April 1997, tl
day of May 1997, the 18th day of June 1997, the 16th day of July 1997, the 20th d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
August 1997, the 20th day of December 1997, and the 15th of April 1998 hold a duly nc
public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, North San Diego County Transit Development Board ha
acknowledged that the City of Carlsbad has jurisdiction to issue, or require that Nortl
Diego County Transit Development Board obtain any sort of permit and/or approval
the City for the construction and/or continued operation of the Poinsettia Commuter
Station and related uses and improvements. North San Diego County Transit Develop
Board has therefore, protested; (1) the City’s position that North San Diego County TI
Development Board apply for a Conditional Use Permit, permit extension or modific
for the Poinsettia Commuter Rail Station parking lot; (2) the terms and conditions t
Conditional Use Permit as stated in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3643 a1
modified by this Planning Commission Resolution No. 4081; and (3) the right of the C
revoke the Conditional Use Permit in accordance with its terms; and
WHEREAS, the City has been advised by North San Diego County TI
Development Board that it reserves the right to challenge any enforcement o
Conditional Use Permit by the City or other past or future action on the part of the
related to the permit and/or any approval from the City for the construction a
continued operation of the Poinsettia Commuter Rail Station and related uses
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that some railroad activities perfo
by North San Diego County Transit Development Board in the operation of the Ca
line through Carlsbad and at its stations in Carlsbad may be exempt from local lanl
I 1 PC RES0 NO. 4081 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 e
permitting authority; but does not acknowledge that the activities regulated by this
are of that type; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testi
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all f.
relating to CUP 93-02xl(A).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Pla
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Pla
Commission APPROVES POINSETTIA COMMUTER RAIL STAT
CUP 93-02xl(A), based on the following findings and subject to the follc
conditions:
Findings:
1. That the commuter rail station parking lot is necessary for the development c
community because it serves a transportation node, is essentially in harmony wii
various elements and objectives of the General Plan because it implement
alternative form of transportation to the automobile, and is not signific
detrimental to existing uses specifically permitted in the adjacent zone to whic
proposed use is located.
2. That the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the existing parking lot.
3. That all the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessa
adjust the parking lot to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood have
provided and will be maintained, in that the project has completed all of the phJ
improvements required by the original approving resolution.
4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all t
generated by the use.
5. That current levels of operation of the parking lot consistent with the conditio
approval, will not have a significant adverse effect on adjoining exi
developments.
~ PC RES0 NO. 4081 -3 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
~
27
28
e e
6. That the need for the parking lot is generated by the adjacent rail station an
operation of that rail service is physically tied to the operation of the parking IC
7. That the Planning Director has determined that the project is exempt fro]
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Sc
15301 Class One Existing Facilities of the state CEQA Guidelines and will no1
any adverse significant impact on the environment.
8. That the need for the parking lot is generated by the adjacent rail station an
operation of that rail service is physically tied to the operation of the parking lo
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all cone
and modifications to the Conditional Use Permit document(s), as necessary, to
them internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project.
proposed development or operation different from this approval, shall requi
amendment to this approval.
2. All prior exhibits and conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 3643
remain in full force and effect except as modified below.
3. This Conditional Use Permit extension and amendment is granted for a period of fi
years from May 4, 1997 to May 4,2002. This Conditional Use Permit shall be rev
by the Planning Director periodically to determine if all conditions of this permil
been met and that the use does not have a Substantial negative effect on surrou
properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines th
use has such substantial negative effects, the Planning Director shall recommend th
Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard
additional conditions to reduce or eliminate the Substantial negative effects. This p
may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use
Substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the public’s healtl
welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit mi
extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed five years upon \;c
application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date.
Planning Commission may not grant such extension, unless it finds that there a
Substantial negative effects on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and wc
If a Substantial negative effect on surrounding land uses or the public’s health and w
is found, the extension shall be denied or granted with conditions which will elimin
substantially reduce such effects. There is no limit to the number of extension
Planning Commission may grant.
~
4. Conditions No. 1,3,5,6,8,9,13,17,18 , and 19 of Planning Commission Resol
No. 3643 shall be deleted.
I -.- 1 PC RES0 NO. 4081 .4-
0 *
1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pla
2 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of April 1998 1
3 11 following vote, to wit:
4
5
AYES: Commissioners Compas, Heineman, Monroy, Savary, and
Welshons
6 NOES: Chairperson Noble and Commissioner Nielsen
7
8
9
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
10 ,
11
12
13 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
14
15 ATTEST:
1 16
17 MICHAEL J. HZLZMMLER
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4081 -5-