HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-07-01; Planning Commission; Resolution 4288L ll 0 0
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4288
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FROM RESIDENTIAL
HIGH DENSITYICOMMERCIAL/OFFICE (RHICIO) TO
RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY (RM) AND
RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY (RH) ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL,
NORTH OF FARADAY AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF THE
FUTURE COLLEGE BOULEVARD IN LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 15.
CASE NAME: TERRACES AT SUNNY CREEK
CASE NO: GPA 96-01
WHEREAS, CanAm Properties, LLC, “Developer”, has filed a
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by CanAm Propertit
“Owner”, described as
A portion of Lot “B” of Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City of
Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, per Map
thereof No. 823, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of
Said County November 16,1896, and Lots 1 through 10 of CT
83-36 per Map No. 11242 as recorded in the Office of the
County Recorder of San Diego County, May 23,1985.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Genc
Amendment as shown on Exhibit(s) “GPA 96-01”, attached, TERRACES AT
CREEK, GPA 96-01 as provided in Section 21.52.160 Government Code Section 65.35
seq. of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of June 15
day of June 1998, and the 1st day of July 1998, hold a duly noticed public hearing as p
by law to consider said request;
~
‘, .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tt
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
relating to the General Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Con
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of TERRACES OF SUNNY CREE&
96-01. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to
necessary corrections and modifications to the General Plan Amc
document(s) necessary to make them internally consistent and in conforn
final action on the project, based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein
amendment to the General Plan Land Use Designations as shown on Exhibit GI
is in conformance with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the folk
a. Land Use Element
1) Goal A.l (Land Use Goals) “A City which preserves and enha
environment, character and image of itself as a desirable res
beach and open space oriented community.” The proposed
will not obstruct open space views from El Camino Real ani
designed to take advantage of views into open space to the ear
site.
2) Goal A.l (Growth Management and Public Facilities Goals)
which ensures the timely provision of adequate public facili
services to preserve the quality of life of residents.” The
includes provisions which ensure that all necessary public :
will be available concurrent with demand. The project h
developed to be consistent with and implement the Zone 1
Facilities Management Plan.
b. Housing Element
1) Goal 2 (Quantity and Diversity of Housing Stock) “New
development with a diversity of types, prices, tenures, densi
PC RES0 NO. 4288 -2-
*.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
0 e
locations ...” The project includes both multiple family attac
single family detached housing types at densities ranging 1
du/ac to 22.9 du/ac.
2) Policy 3.6.a (Inclusionary) “A minimum of fifteen percent of a
approved shall be affordable to lower income households.” Cc
tent with this policy, this project will provide 31% of its units :
affordable units.
C. Circulation Element
1) Objective B.l (Streets and Traffic Controls) “To provide an 2
circulation infrastructure concurrent with or prior to th
demand for such facilities.” This project is conditioned to con
fair share of circulation infrastructure as described in the :
LFMP.
2) Policy C.l (Streets and Traffic Controls) “To requi
development to comply with the adopted Growth Man;
performance standards for circulation facilities.” A transp
analysis has been prepared for the project which shows the 1
compliance with Growth Management performance Standards
3) Policy C.4 (Alternative Modes of Transportation) - “Link
sidewalks to the network of public and private trails system!
project provides a linkage for public sidewalks and t
surrounding development.
2. That the project will provide sufficient additional public facilities for the dt
excess of the control point to ensure that the adequacy of the City’s public facil
will not be adversely impacted, in that the Zone 15 LFMP has been amended t
the land uses proposed by CT 96-02 and the revisions ensure adequate pro’
public facilities prior to or concurrent with need for all development of the
area.
3. That there have been sufficient developments approved in the quadrant at densitic
the control point to offset the units in the project above the control point so that g
will not result in exceeding the quadrant limit.
4. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordin2
be constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need
created by this project and in compliance with adopted City standards, in that tl
15 LFMP (as amended) contains a phasing plan as well as a facility financi
to ensure the coordination of development with the provision of necessac
facilities and services.
PC RES0 NO. 4288 -3 -
7. 0 0
t.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Conditions:
1. Approval of GPA 96-01 is granted subject to the approval of EIR 98-01, ZC 9
SUP 96-02, and SUP 96-03. GPA 96-01 is subject to all conditions coni
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4287 for the EIR.
190(B), LFMP 87-15@), CT 96-02, SDP 97-02, PUD 96-02, HDP 96-02, SU
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of July 199s
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Heineman, Momoy an
Compas
NOES: Commissioners Nielsen, Savary and Welshons
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
l3 II
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I
,q ?,. /I ‘Leg.( i*F" 97 "y? &&&fee 9 7-
t ,CL* wAJ=&&.;P 3 3
BAILEY NOBtE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOBMILBR
Planning Director
I PC RES0 NO. 4288 -4-
... .
t : .
a I I / ,I,
EXISTING
PROPOSED
)-JLM os
I! L
@
TERRACES AT SUNNY CREEK
GPA 96-01