Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-01-06; Planning Commission; Resolution 44501 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I 27 28 a e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4450 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TO ALLOW FOR THE EXTENSION OF FARADAY FROM ITS EXISTING TERMINUS TO FUTURE CANNON ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 8. CASE NAME: FARADAY ROAD EXTENSION CASE NO.: CDP 98-39 WHEREAS, the City of Carlsbad, “Developer”, has filed a verified aj regarding property which consists of Faraday Road Right-of-way (“the Property”); a WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 6th day of January, 1 a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all 1 and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered a relating to the Negative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Commission as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission hereby APPROVES the Mitigated Negative Declara Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program according to Exhf dated July 2, 1998, and “PII” dated May 29, 1998, attached hereto anc part hereof, based on the following findings: Finding: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed and cc the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the environmental impacts therein identifie project and said comments thereon, and the Mitigation Monitoring and I Program, on file in the Planning Department, prior to approving the project. the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, the Planning Commission finds that tE substantial evidence the project will have a significant effect on the envirom 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 hereby APPROVES the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation M and Reporting Program. 2. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Decla Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accord requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State Guidelinc Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad. 3. The Planning Commission finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration rc independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad. Conditions: 1. The project is subject to the mitigation measures listed in the Environment Assessment Part I1 for the Faraday Road extension project dated June, 199 Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, the Project il Monitoring and Reporting Program. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of January 19 following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Noble, Commissioners Compas, 1 L’Heureux, Nielsen, Savary, and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: , BAILEY NOB CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: 1 PC RES0 NO. 4450 -2- e e - City of Carlsba( MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Address/Location: South of future Cannon Road and north of the existing terminus Faraday Avenue. Project Description: The construction of a 5,400 foot segment of Faraday Avenue i: split alignment. The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described proj pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act t the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said reviev Mitigated Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a significant impact the environment with mitigation) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for tl action is on file in the Planning Department. A copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in 1 Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from 1 public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Christer Westman in 1 Planning Department at (760) 438-1 161, extension 4448. DATED: JULY 2,1998 CASE NO: CDP 98-39 CASE NAME: FARADAY ROAD EXTENSION PUBLISH DATE: JULY 2, 1998 MICHAEL J. HODMILSR Planning Director 2075 La Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 (760) 438-1 161 * FAX (760) 438-08 0 0 v ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART 11 CASE NO: DATE: May 29, l! BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Faraday Avenue 2. APPLICANT: Citv of CarlsbadShem Howard 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2075 Las Palmad(760) 438- 1 16 1 ext. 442 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMI’ITED: 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: See Page 3 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this proje involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Imp; Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning 0 TransportatiodCirculation Public Services rJ Population and Housing Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systems Geological Problems 0 Energy & Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water 0 Hazards Ix] Cultural Resources 0 Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 13 City of Carlsbl June 19! e 0 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. M I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigat measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIT DECLARATION will be prepared. [7 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. 0 I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earl document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigati measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An EIR required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. 0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on t environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potential significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant applicable standards and (b) have been voided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier E1 including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed proje Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. ip/zo\ qb Planner Signature Date I Christer Westman @/w/% Planning Director%%ignatur& Date Michael Holzmiller Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draji Mitigated Negative Declaration 14 City of Carlsbc June 195 e 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the C conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significl effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the followi pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and hum factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with infomation use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negat: Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. 0 A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that 2 adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following ea question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced informati’ sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. “No Impact” answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. 0 “Less Than Significant Impact” applies where there is supporting evidence that t potential impact is not adversely significant, and the impact does not exceed adopt general standards and policies. e “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporatic of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to “Less Than Significant Impact.” The developer must agree to the mitigation, and tl City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce tl effect to a less than significant level. e “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that i effect is significant. e Based on an “EIA-Part 11”, if a proposed project could have a potentially significz effect on the environment, but &I potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzt adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicab standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigatc Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upc the proposed project, and none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to ( supplemental EIR are present and all the mitigation measures required by the pric environmental document have been incorporated into this project, then no addition environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). 0 When “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked the project is not necessarily requirc to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier E1 pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a “Statement ( Overriding Considerations” has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. 0 A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence th, the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 15 City of Carlsbc June 195 0 e 0 If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, 2 those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In t case, the appropriate “Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporatc may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. a An EIR must be prepared if “Potentially Significant Impact” is checked, and includ but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect i not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, a the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less tl significant; (2) a “Statement of Overriding Considerations” for the significant impact 1 not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not redt the impact to less than significant, or; (4) through the EIA-Part I1 analysis it is 1 possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially signific, effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of. form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attenti should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determin significant. Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Drafr Mitigated Negative Declaration 16 City of Carlsb June 191 0 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:. a) Conflict with general pian designation or zoning? (Source #(s): b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I7 11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or population projections? 0 0 indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area 0 0 or extension of major infrastructure)? housing? 0 0 c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 111. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? n o 0 d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? e) Landslides or mudflows? f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable -soil g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soils? i) Unique geologic or physical features? U 0 o 0 c3 0 conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? 0 cl €3 0 0 IXI (x1 [XI [XI 0 IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? 0 [XI 0 0 0 IXI Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 17 LessThan Nc Significant Imp; Impact E 0 E 17 E IXI C 0 E Ix 0 ix cl ix IXI C 0 C w C 0 Ix c1.c 0 CI 0 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 0 IXI 0 City of Carlst June 19 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors? existing or projected air quality violation? VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? transportation (eg bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak d) Wetland habitat (eg. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension 18 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Potentially Significant Impact 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Potentially Sign-ificant Unless Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ixl 0 [XI 0 0 LessThan No Significant Impac Impact 0 (XI 0 Ixl Ixl 0 @O [XI 0 0 IXI IXI 0 0 IXI 0 [XI 0 IXI 0 IXI 0 €a 0 [XI 0 [XI 0 Ix1 0 [XI CI IXI 0 0 0 Ixl 0 0 0 lxl 0 IXI City of Carlsb, June 19! e 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). Potentially Significant Impact VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ineficient manner? 0 c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? proposal? 0 0 IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazards? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? 0 0 17 0 cl X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? cl 0 XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 cl n e) Other governmental services? U 0 XII.UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 Potentially Less Than No Significant Significant Impat Mitigation Incorporated Unless Impact 0. OH 0 0 IXI 0 0 IXI 0 0 Ixl 0 0 [x1 D o IXI 0 0 El 0 0 Ixl 0 IXI 0 0 0 [XI 0 0 Ixl 0 0 [XI 0 cl ixI w 0 0 0 IXI 0 Ixl 0 0 0 IXI 0, 0 El 0 0 IXI 0 IXI 0 Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension 19 City of Carlsbc Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration June 19! 0 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources). f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic or vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrate negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the would affect unique ethnic cultural values? potential impact area? XV. RECREATIONAL. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause the substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 20 a Potentially Potentially Significant Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I23 0 0 IXI 0 Ixl 0 0 0 0 0 cl 0 El 0 0 0 Ix1 0 0 0 Less Than No Significant Impa Impact 0 [XI 0 1xi C w c Ixl C 0 c 0 0 0 Ixl 0 Ixl 0 [XI 0 Ixl Ixl 0 0 Ixl 0 a City ofCarlsb June 19: e 0 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEC process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negati declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)@). In this case a discussion should identify t following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are availal for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above check1 were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursw to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed 1 mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigatil Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address si1 specific conditions for the project. Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension 21 City of Carlsbc Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration June 199 0 0 LIST OF MITIGATING MEASURES GEOLOGY 1. Information and recommendations provided in the Leighton and Associates, Inc., projc geotechnical/soils report shall be incorporated into plans for site grading and construction. 2. All grading and subsequent development plans shall be reviewed by a certified enginc and/or engineering geologist prior to finalization to determine the need for additio~ measures and/or analysis. During the review, special consideration shall be given to 1 loose, potentially compressible surface deposits in the form of topsoil, alluvium, slopewa; undocumented fill soils, and landslide debris. Such materials will require remedial gradi where encountered. WATER 1. Prior to approval of final design, a runoff control plan shall be prepared by a licens hydrology engineer. The plan shall identify temporary and permanent erosion cont measures which will be utilized during construction and to be included in the improvemt plans for the project, to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. BIOLOGY 1. Sage scrub impacts shall be mitigated on adjacent parklands or through off-site purcha The 6 acres of sage scrub directly impacted by the road can be effectively mitigated wit1 the study area. A 2:l replacement ratio is recommended given the good quality habi proposed to be removed. A gap is proposed between golf links 13 and 15 on the propos Carlsbad Golf Course project to the south. This has been previously proposed as a mitigati area for the golf course (these links would be situated below the road). The gap provides opportunity to connect the riparian habitat at the base of Macario Canyon below the propos route for Faraday Avenue with sage scrub/chaparral above the road and within the study ar~ Areas above (i.e., north) the road within proposed parklands would be an optimal place provide mitigation. This would improve corridor linkage spanning the canyon in an a~ where open agricultural fields currently deter some wildlife movement. A mitigation alternative would be the purchase of sage scrub lands at a 2:l replacement rati within the Carlsbad Highland Mitigation Bank. 2. For each spring prior to construction, a protocol survey for the least Bell’s vireo shall conducted in the riparian woodland of Macario Canyon. Surveys have been conducted the 1998 breeding season and no further surveys shall be required should construction bel in the year 1999. The purpose of any additional surveys is to identify the location of a nesting sites in order to avoid construction related noise impacts. Construction on segme of the roadway that are located in the vicinity of nesting birds shall not begin until ai August 1, when the nesting cycle is completed. Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 22 City of Carlsr June I5 e e CULTURAL RESOURCES Paleontology 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the C: to carry out an appropriate mitigation program. (A qualified paleontologist is defined as individual with an MS or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is familiar w paleontological procedures and techniques.) 2. A qualified paleontologist shall be present at the pre-grading meeting to consult with I grading and excavation contractors. 3. A paleontological monitor shall be on-site a minimum of half-time during the original cutti of previously undisturbed sediments to inspect cuts for contained fossils. In the event tl fossils are discovered, it may be necessary to increase the per/day in field monitoring tin Conversely, if fossils are not being found then the monitoring should be reducc (Apaleontological monitor is defined as an individual who has experience in the collecti and salvage of fossil materials. The paleontological monitor shall work under the directi of a qualified paleontologist.) 4. When fossils are discovered the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall recoy them. In most cases, this fossil salvage can be completed in a short period of tin However, some fossils specimens (such as a complete large mammal skeleton) may requ an extended salvage period. In these instances the paleontologist (or paleontologic monitor) shall be allowed to temporarily direct, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery fossil remains in a timely manner. Because of the potential for the recovery of small fos remains, such as isolated mammal teeth, it may be necessary in certain instances, to set ul screen-washing operation on the site. 5. Fossil remains collected during the monitoring and salvage portion of the mitigation progra shall be cleaned, repaired, sorted, and cataloged. 6. Prepared fossils, along with copies of all pertinent field notes, photos, and maps, shall eitl be deposited (as a donation) in a scientific institution with permanent paleontologic collections such as the San Diego Natural History Museum or retained by the City a displayed to the public at an appropriate location such as a library or City Hall. 7. A final summary report shall be completed and retained on file at the City that outlines i results of the mitigation program. This report shall include discussions of the methods USI stratigraphic section (s) exposed, fossils collected, and significance of recovered fossils. Archaeology 1. Prior to grading, a qualified archaeologist shall be retained by the City to determine 1 significancehmportance of the portion of site CA-SDI-8303 that will be impacted by gradj activity. The determination of significance/importance shall be made through a testi program and shall be consistent with City of Carlsbad and CEQA criteria. The testi Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 23 City of Carlsi June IS e 0 program shall consist of surface collection of artifacts, recording of milling featurt excavation of shovel test pits and 1x1 meter units to determine -site size, depth, conte~ integrity and potential to address important research questions. A report shall be preparl summarizing the results of the testing program. The report shall contain recommendatio. for data recovery for the site if it is determined to be significant/important under City Carlsbad and CEQA criteria. 2. If as a result of the testing program identified in Mitigation Measure 1, site CA-SDI-8303 determined to be significanthmportant, then a data recovery program shall be implement€ The data recovery program shall be implemented in accordance with the recommendatio for data recovery as provided in the testing report required under Mitigation Measure 1. ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM A mitigation monitoring and reporting program has been prepared for the project and is bow under separate cover. Faraday Avenue Roadway Extension Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration 24 City of Carlsbc June 199 0 0 APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES Ah CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. 12) It=tj48 Date Sherri Howard Associate Engineer Faraday Avenue Roadwq Extension 25 Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Carlsbl June 195 I- % ZY -I "8 ix Luu La; q$g 2%: 2:g 500 Egg 200 eE SG 2'3 E SJK I >. m m m ea B .- - C E F a0 hrY sgg 5 or uc 6: < a 6Q: I C o at Ez :s 0% i5v) 'fl B m a+ fi #E3 5% E >o 5' u J2 z KLg u .= - .- * m c U - v) C u m= 0 v) $8g (I) .G 5 r- - . Le 08 zEa 22 'E pa %-X So? 00 0.- On z: 2.E Od U z: '0 Ti zz u Q0 00 c .G 2 0)- a OE .- - a. 8 2% $0 a Q X x X I -0 a 08F u.% a '5 e m e Q=.G ul *x E c+ v, 0, 2ui a a :mu .- mma = 2 aEm c a 0 a0 ESE!L;; m 5 =8$ -E 2552 rn3ZUK .- s g&.22g q 5g E o .9"$gg E as 9% zz:gg g gK" mJ(Jo= G .G m.G 0 7 (\j 7 - i5 2%+zaa m az &- gg: 2.g m.gg -K .$?)O&Sce a%$ a+ Em gu,& puce :!&% P i7j '5 .- a "F x05 Emc.G - +- 5 8 E2 *.- 5: ox= m- z 0 - c QC-tJ c. m L..- -8 0 mLW aa, 5Zb *KO= 85 %cum mK-e amE 2K% l6zu nz Emt I"~,oZLEB~ iE 2.G5 m,$z - alz asaz uia am ZE sa x m - 0 0 a c3 c- 0 *= oa 5-E aE uo i=- 20.0 =2cz goo0 L c- pz .E - als 0 Q)I I, Kaoo .- c 0 .- - z.0 b .' cs 552.- azoc erz 0 .e u oa& 2g=h c 't L 20 $: S.Ek c a< a"= E.&: EB m0z.s 'Cat-OOC Earnonu 0, I I I Q .- 7 ([I '5 .. u) 2 >E &-E E woly <Eha %€no, gz.2 0 g zz$ ply go 9 0- u 2"& E .E s u- e a !j$gEa rnazaa BESZ cn 0 a L.L "OK a -3 .e u E a m0 mu a CD SOW cc 0 a" r m 0 .= C .= 0- E =J a0 2.E 2 0" 2 ca 2 0"s ELLg IT ne ac 0 E2 ;$I 'a zm &iii - .- - v) C U K U - v) c -32 a& m E- z u .= 5 30" o' s 1== mK ctrn .c c" 2 gg v) .- u c u, ZY 00 v)w zx wo J z= WP~ S-IK %$g 2%: 2:g 500 Egg $00 2z SZ 22 5 oP + z 2 r 2. 0g.2aka g 0 Z~O zfxa -0-m- .- So? egg? o= -5 gg 8 2% .cr 2 -0 m- n no 50 c a0 .- - a. a Q x I o= 39 a- a a& m w O%E g2 2 a; 0) a 8Z 'g~~Ov).&.~ C a,"oOCU lDO-U.-oz&a-u - ;; gum Q) v) 3 v) 2:; :: t 25 E$ g &z -U gg a 6 cU g $3 gg mg2 C $32 Xm.r$g m55 '~sJ:"mv)gQaaBg5--0 25um&?a u v) o+o ao-~~a-~=-LUoCv)a~o)@ -mo- 0°3.20)u= Qsg 3g ocs 0) 2 -- ,$..E.B~ 0 c.g%zn% a.gggz~,g K a o nv) ?rrr 2 mfob .- L v) mu n= L- m-zz~ ~2 k ~~si z L a-g.gg k00- mg3$*.B$ :.s$+ g= arn.z= ?.!?x a- 2 2- c Q) 0 gg o) U32CX o) m a Urn!= 0 as3 v).2- 3 6 :6 0) L m g.gsgy@i;a "2 g gag?$ a &?e$$ gg CD a m= a ml n-m 21= guz E gu n= u) wc 0- 2 u 3 z CE mu - en UQ,~~X~%S 2 C Ega U4z 2, g $:a gzzg." 0 f~ E' 3'0 C lz .=c.tQ) ?i;,O"$ CU G0.p C .~ 11 n n~ 0 062~ a - tE $->no gsu ,,, c 3 n.m a o) om .G2G %%Ee alz 2 x E 2rna on msgcz$.g92&8mtG .got- v)Lg mu 3.LZ a5 mz.=gE Q) m mo L -CJ UJ m ne aa'6n mu+ E=+-Sou. ma nn.E $$E a n2z cn.,xua"oago E Emom %.Kg 8 gz 5 2-r.g.Fa v) c g gg g.0 he'% E EZgg .- = m- 0 LC@ C"'j .- v) a mz: '5 E&zzg g 2gsgg% $S o) c t- - ZCC fZ"E!& 0 Q2a In .- m a$ g.Es5 zgg: k=mmc - t o'sr: 3.E 0- c a.%k2 m " m nE.> rPnoob w 0 ov)++ +nmmo~ OmfW -x am sa 2s? 2. m 0 0 - .- m C .- 2; g7i gg ._ a0 g r;: CZ SI3-50 eno E .r ZECP Boo0 mci, at I I Zmno E 0 sf2 o.P=, ss!2 - UZ 0 .o a2ok 2 C" LL 0 'P" m", o E.E. np): S.E, c n 0,. 'En+OO( Zamool .- - 't CS L $0 "05: 01, I1 U .- z m '5 .. fn F! >F&-g ngvz gE-gK -ufx g g?.$Kg e$ ggg 'o%zbo go to- 0 coli g E?!?." 4 Qxa ZEna =KK - u (u .-c a, zoa Ir cnazna I- u, z v) z W I- x 0 WP rll ;s su, pa ea J0 zc ?!G a n a 2 >. U a -I Y 0 I z: 2 Q 0 a n Q E 2 z 0 E z t- U 0 : - I .c m 0. 0 m 0 "a re f a $E m o"ij, 2 sa L 0 ug re 0r -0 c as a a C 0 '"3 z2 >a =a ziii - g - .- -I z v) m g$ a -0 .= c as - g 902 %,+vi 2c 0 8s g!&g B c Po" 02 (3 g-0 a r Ul .c E -0 -0 'E QQ) a& zz z2 -3s -3s ism 0 0 am.-- zxq 0 mm0 "$ 02 --tj $5 '0 .g g 0-0 Q) .- - Q IJ)* 2 28 C aJ 2% Q X X x m UKCU OKaJaJoaJ.~ m haJ-0- 2 6 8 z&;pL" S'Sen 3 s:-;s Ez.2mg .- "u n-Q)!jq .P (E iijE 253mm aI~~2F.S~" g E E!:? $2 is C- 0 L &.E cy zn m m- 0 CT .smK 0) %mob 2 CZ 22 mf= z.c.3 3 c. 0 L$p)a m"= m " 0 0)- ~ mas: 5595 2"- K" K" -CW C 2 20 m 0) >g;c.s g ,s %.E$ Q) Q) En~-mma- CQ) amuz d!g QO- 8 2 2 $$+-, g - a- Of -. v) "'I kmZz59 g; e 0) Q) aJu O%.O 0" -.9 gI%zg +.e = C Q2,0aJ3 c >!= C52z C Q) %= s$ fB 8 2 Q)r 0 ??F!.oJ=" 0 % $3 2 m .E$% fZ 5 2% 80% & a2 cE 0 2.2 Ls; 0" c M v) 3 nz 0.9 6 - 8 m:: m hzZosrt a- .= v)XC 00 mo 5! 80 .6,v,o 03.2 Q) v) o.P-05 E v, aJ ws+u ,_ 2 E- n-0 o ~5-"'Q)-~g5 2. a, O'f? df mOQ)8EO 5as&3mz. 6 sE$;&&G !E 0 'og7jEg~~g s+ E:% 9s 59 .E% a@& 8 3 We L " g %'& as Q .-- K mLm Kg2 a3S = v) 0 Q) v) 0) L h'Zo v).g.;: % 0-0) Lma %a ~J=.G$ h~G2 Q) K,,G v)o- Q) * m Q) E2.c ? a, ,p-- Om $~&UI LEQ) FEm .- Q)00-om3cZQ=~03.Ksa2 ZzK L ov) o 0 m mt"u o.E 2 ca 0 n mrl-y) SZZ 52.3 &g,52Z .- ZSSU."r0 "m a 2.: g & Ss E nz an a= b m.-Q)g cram 0, m. - li a- cu' - - (0 mw-ac0.m -- e- v) m m" m v) .- .= = .= 0 m m aJ&h So .e am %CC = v).g aS -- m ' .-mas %??a, t'S=o (0 E m!g 0 d .gz5 02 s a,, s.8 g.$p ; qjg3g- ~gEg)s~03v)o.-Lg n 1 =- 8 0-0 $.E sz C QA8.k > - w C c~ au.3 aJL mo ma .&E 3 L m 0 CcQ)Q)zg aJ= I- 3 E." m~.s?i~ 2 EO :: n~x om, Q) v) v) 0) S a, E 2 5: 2 a 0 aJm ;g sa s S %C m3 OK 50 - c. 3 .- a2 - c- %E 5.5 20.9 p : - ai>- E& a0 0 u mn a€ -0 .- u. C- C QI I ._ C 0 .- c. 0.9 z sys 55 g a20 UZ0; LL 0 a. 2 KO s.g& cat-( Iaac E- e5 3 L L 01 - 08 * zm .. rn w E &- 2 aJ7J EEs. U?i% 3 En gs2 0 C'J E.2 g- -0 =@L 50, 0 0x0, s CE "0 I Q) .- pz, e0 $ v)az c v, ZY zx wo -I 3:: CE Ens sua m u*u P:g 500 zgc 3: s* 32 E nKL w-2 uz >oo sz me 0 g ga 0" m g: 2 zj.L 0,s - .C a o "a, 0 u .= 0 'n zcn ZTti 'D a,+ C !E% cr" a,$ - .- c v) C U - C v) u '= E 0 alc m g3 s ou a,5 c >n 2- .c g 2 86 '5 ell& zg BO2 0 8.g gkg st? c c" 2c h G; zca -0 2s W.-U "v 'D a0 .- - a. Q. n0 c 0)- 50 aS X 2E a, mz v) al alz a0 Cn 8.3ZZ z.q= pge.s.(.s *= t $5 . E- v) v) 6 z"s Lm 3 0 a, a,"- m h- 0 C m E 8O.E u 2s:.zg~z-:-E - v) a& m zmzsLa, -om -- =.E L-0 !g Q>~.% 2 8 0 3 *5"""a,$Ez.c*$~q &u.E.G 0s 'D m.u,- a, a,z 3 - r" oE=O~;orsss- E'=&o m 00 a, ma a O.= 0, CES" Q) %='E c v)sG c .- v) 2 0 0%- c v) m % a, CEU 0) z= 0-u O5 C 0 0) U-0 .- e -*L v) z v) b .= a.? Cz E$ s+= C a;<U 0 Pa,- m is g+ z3 8 0.- 3 . c a,r .- - .- .- * v).- E C".E'g a,G$ - 0 L 0"- 00 a=+ &.E o aeeem-a,u,o .up )r g 5% $2 a+ p; m 0" c 0 ss u m.-.- E p*+ ,= c Q) *.= Cn Q) 2 ~523 8 Q- * ""-0% a.2 =E , a, oz a,% m 0- -gE LO, ri m- e gs aE~Sa,cEsnaEE3~ a.c t= .- a, o - m e- F$Sa &$ - c o* n z '5 0 CnLU LJJ C a, m 3 0 2 am a,u 3a) v), p .c =E io 02 23 !is "' . . 0 c 0 cz E= gg .- a0 g ZCZ, Fori .! F2p; goo, Kmaoc 01 I k- 0 SF; g.nz .- e !&c UG 0 .s .s- 3 c =JO m 8.22 c h L oc ELI-C Iamc I.."g 2 Tuc - 0, I I i .. v) E 5 m '5 >E .-c ggza 4 axc nu05 z€nG g2.g 8 -ma s.G DE %x$ E S0,l E a 0 2gn E a .-c E m-02 g?;: so-a, aa OK3 waza c v, zd "x PI wo + X w > a a s s .z) w z u1 > U > a n a i2 PC P U rn 11 a U 0 L 0 E G 3 0 0 0 K % E z i 0 z z c 0 a 2 E 1 I IC1 * .E m -*w Q 0 mi5 OLg 0"s $E g 4 3 m c2c 38 .= a- m 0 tJ .= W5 0' %> Bs - .- 'Q =a UTii * m C U E CT - m c zij h wt m -0 .= Wtii S >n 5E g&z 0 gg Ez .K v) .c e I I I I . zr5 .e 0 c zE< on 0 -m g 3% G" a$ zz Gm a$ U 0 r+ u .s 2 2 26 X 50 c no 2- nS 22 X .- - W a a- X W c os= O'I LtJ-,= wc,sr- mwr 8r-= a)=.- 0 w mw~w-m~~~~"r $2 "w u- -.=-.K c -m0- rn "5 % ou- c.20-0"- 0- Q) Q) c BE 2 z;s g e!<" 2%: E: mis $ zz E; ggcz (D 0, p= E mS 0 .c 5 g 0 m m 0.L w 3 m E,EF gg-2 m E w.g.&tJ > w, u'f.2d m eg gggs E a$" -0.k 3 w5.c Or8momK8 u~-g ow gco$m2'UKb w- 0 3 AG g QS z >z 8.E 4 gs3 m E om-m2~~urm €5 0 zwzz -2 0 >- g m czg'm L c- a E m : PC m- 0 0 m> (0- s w m0-g m 0 3" t mmnr * 2 2 b &,E " mwyz$.s=L"aw .- 0 _%"~39tJ"tJ .- mEs: ww 2 5 Eu C"tJ- Lwc .K- LOO=2.L.:$F a nEnx E m W m E go.- m r" - 22 .~-mm'=W 'w%.KEZEa-w $0" gs ~~5~~m€mamOFcz2€~% W Qaxzr L L€E2 sg 20, Ti Irj om c $ (D $)E , WOzg aEPmosK% $iEZ C 0 m "C .O" .- Em .-cew c .- .- H > gs s;$!z.g "-owzmSw*~,~iwm E :gzz.==.gy m- - , $r& 'r .o tJ i ~~~~ 1 ggEg m W 3 0 ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ 2 am -3 24 rnLlYW WtJ =w m, 2 .g - 25 3.. 1 1" = 1 D r *= 0 0W =E EE $6 ig 1;: CZ a% ZEC E w-s goo, - a1 I p: mn r 0 sc2 0.0 z 3201 5ZE. Utj 0 .! 2 "I LQZI OO%{ E- 3 =.e+ 00 I 1- L- 0; Eat-C Pam; .- * i .. u) ! iz ([I 'i gg 6: hEBC as01 gSF1 0 C'5 1 'E .0 0- I 5Eg I go 8 1 0 6°C E CE 4 Q>< -En< 0- uc .- w ._I $?E; EO: maze I- % 2s R3 z= wo +E 3nd >ea syg Pun eaa 2:s p0 $gz so0 %= 22 eE I n2 - I to cnr zsg m 5 825 0”Q 0 0LLg m C 5 0 c2c c 1J 0 c u .= as 0 B t m,iii 8,. %% - .- 503 - ’a v) - Q iv) c r“ 0.g SiE cc ,(I) >n o ziii c m,r m ’5% z u.= 0 5.0 c U (I) .r .e t I I I ZyZ. zQa 5 %& on .- Bog -m U 28 G0“ -m U On .- 28 00” zz -0 .E E 2 28 X X .- - a a no c 50 0- a 2- 2E aS L I v) f s v) m C 0 m a .- c) .- .- I - a- > - 0- 22 g ‘Z cc z .? - - m g.5s EX 6.2 - m t C(I).GG? .- mugs;; =!2 %&,O am Z 2s v -m,%€a- .e- a 3 v) a- v) r g u) 3 3, m 32- mssm mag c L5z;s - g 6.z.g.Z 222 .?-~U.s:I=G - “‘0 g3-n P) O.s~z 8 m=gz& PfZ&ZD.L g.E= 2 g g2 g a am m X~SOI 252 -a-a= :: E2 gJZf.9 0 mso 3 m 0Ee o p=- az o.co.co.0 -L LC 03 m- u 3 v) EZS-8 v) a= - a.=+ cc -.P z Q5 ‘0CG omLtm.CJ) $2 5 v) WZ n mr, >I- 0”s m.0~ v) m0 c 2 0” f$.co LO c) mug2 gzgmsq 232 €2 “52 $gs.rg.v) v) €UZ% v)Gg 3 mu S.Eg?C 22 -- m?g&$ v) SF Q) a% aL -.e Qv), c - “a)= -0v) rnm3-m”d: <mr,2€3% I ISU, (d I r-: I - (0 =Kc ._ mas - c o= 0 InLW a 5 ‘5 *- zgg$ C w v) m 3 0 2 am v), 22 z .E 5: 2?< mu - 2s 02 3 e 0 f >.’= UP) E: !g$ r ; CB EO%. .- al-5 E& poc I, u ma 1 r .- I 0 U.0k Sf2 55 ln =z 0 5 32L5i: 2 c-2 zG 27 .- E& g.5:: ‘EacC Iamc 01 I I i za >z .-c =Po% 4 Q>c ZEnc --a EsgL ex; E s.g UE 50 ’ ; o $011 E =Q ..v) .p &E ma: 0 C‘5 a -a .-s ST;: 20: ’ w<zn I- 2 ZY ZX wo +5 J gs En$ $2: 22; 2:s $00 $E: yo Sz ns $2 2'3 E ZJE 5 r .G m m -*a, 0 m Q 0 - g 0"s 0"rX =6 5 0- .= czc OLLS a a 0 I o C so" as as 2. g TJ.: c !E5 c &% u .e 'C s CE- U - .- itm c1 v) C -0 - m >n o a- I ;I I I r z0- U v) E ftg 0 8g c m.G% 2lzc Gg 5g qbg z: .- SOc 'i;: 0 U cQa, z?g 2=$ I I I 52 '0 2 E8 0's c .E 2 ~. a .- - n m- a, 2- 22 X a 0 X ~ I v v) 3 v) m 2 8 C 0 m .=! 0, .- - .- I % Cn 0 0 a, - m .? gzzz a 0 zzz.gjazzagg m- cg Ky& - 0 g.g m o E=w." w.Gz ms "2 v)iz E .- 02 Q$ us on mz g.g.2 a, mu :z >.E 0,o.E a, &U & s-0 a, a, Enu ms 0s b-0 a, zl- v)'.=z C 0 0 0 E Q$.Nc- go m-" a= sgr 'i; a, m DE . 5, z* C" m n v) In- 'Ob= E E=-.- -0.20 3g5 €2 €5 c o.= 2 2 e$go .- - 0 m a 2 & 2J.S; ggu $E.., & D-rml- g g, g m 2 c = p! z QEC.2 &~:>rgs"~o v).- m a,clcn~~v)~.~ E 5, m 0 L- 0c 2% sa mg- 3 a,%a&s??j L.E 0 CU'E a,YJ cJe a, -u QI5 00 ca .:= %F= v) v) m- !!I= 05 2z'= cd g m c mpgF;== v) 0 8"0 63w ,,ala, Co~.Sil~~mnv)m,C~ 8 UtZ Q" z0 e ocn L p!*S?C3 g0 a,+ 22 ggr a, mu mr m~.- V) Q) L m n Qm *= m.- c c a-3 p) .E c $05 E V)L a,ti 2 0 =$; cS mow a.F "Z CCq mq a,.=- m-= om." v) ((~,~eaa ,,oo , m no Q- v='z-+ nm~'~ cmox L c c a,.G o o)Z m'ti=O.G K Cl- 0 Q) n ,,,gs$g 0 vv) E'Zz clLLv)Lv)m 0 a UT Q.cnc €42 $?.G;.g4 go >uuv)52 2s umc0-v) 0 sca3 nv)-S 2: a,.= m m EmZm 6 E&$E.G.E c s m.- a, a, E$ g m 2 g a=.g E g a5 z$ a= g.5- , .o u & 2 h & O% gJa,E"v)< m" - am-5 aEcEnou.- SCz" LO2 =gv) on mc m 25.- Q= &z 2% mUmC KgW - L>L tZ 2.G E2 2 cl) $.k a,OcJ€hcigg v)EgG m a,u >mQ0 3 m KL'E mo 8 m o an me g Oiij n ksm'z QL ([1U p! I Is 4 ni I L " .. - -2 .%mu- a8P9 zcc cu-p gz az.5 :a a?i m - c s* Z$.E Fs 5g E g my:& __ m a)$!? 0- Q'- 0 CnLW C w az 329 2s= m cn !! 3 0 am a-0 =a, v), IAL Ea, sa - 3 - "5, 2 .s 30, c zg gg c 5.z 2o.p Cno: .- c &,- EL go0 U c- K mn I, C 0 .- .- SF2 0 .g b 502 320 2 C- crz 0 LO2 5-3 CLl- =am c =J: 5 .- 5.g: 01 I zm 'E .- .. v) e a8 268 b €0 a=% ES p! 0 C'5 z.g g -0 %Y o 20 go I E c= SO 8 coaz "0 -a ._ E?: