HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-04-07; Planning Commission; Resolution 4469..
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
e 0
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4469
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SDP 98-17 FOR
124 AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN VILLAGE B -
PHASE I1 OF THE RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER PLAN ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AND MELROSE
DRIVE IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18.
CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILL0 VILLAGE B -
PHASE I1
CASE NO.: SDP 98-17
WHEREAS, Continental Ranch, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a
application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Continental Ran
“Owner”, described as
Lots 206 and 208 of Carlsbad Tract No. 97-02, Rancho
Carrillo Village “A-D”, In the City of Carlsbad, County of
San Diego, State of California, According to the map thereof
No. 13582, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Diego County, June 10,1998.
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Dew
Plan as shown on Exhibits “A” - “R” dated March 3,1999, on file in the Planning Del
RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE B - PHASE 11, CT 98-15, as provided by
21.06/Section 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 3rd day of March, :
on the 7th day of April, 1999 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to
said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all t
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
relating to the Site Development Plan.
L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 0
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the F
Commission RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF RANCHO CAR
VILLAGE B - PHASE 11, CT 98-15, based on the following findi~
subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
1. That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and envirc
settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the General E
not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the area
the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site, surrour
traffic circulation, in that the proposed land use is consistent with the Gene
and Rancho Carrillo Master Plan; the multi-family units are compatible i:
and materials to the adjacent proposed multi-family units; and the projec
generate approximately 992 ADT which can be adequately handled by
public and private streets designed in the project as well as the existing cir
system consisting of Palomar Airport Road and Melrose Avenue.
2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate tl
that the 7.3 acre site is a flat, rough graded pad, with no physical or enviro
constraints, graded in compliance with HDP 91-17.
3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary
the requested use to existing or permitted hture uses in the neighborhood
provided and maintained, in that the buildings are set back fifty feet from :
Airport Road and Melrose Drive; the site includes a portion of the mas
perimeter masonry noise attenuation walls and also provides village sei
fences constructed of wood; landscaped common areas and courtyards
between the buildings are provided; and that topographic changes sepal
buffer the site from the adjacent multi-family and transportation land uses.
4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle ;
generated by the proposed use, in that the project, as designed, has gooc
circulation; and the proposed private and public streets will be sized to 1
land use demand.
5. That the project is in conformity with the general plan and its adopted poli
goals of the city and that the reduction of the development standard (pur
section 21.53.120 of the CMC) in private street widths from thirty feet to
four feet would not have a detrimental effect on the public health, safety and
in that the private streets are cul-de-sac streets which do not permit througl
The twenty-four foot private drive width allows adequate safe and efficier
PC RES0 NO. 4469 -2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0 a
circulation as the reduced width is adequate for vehicles backing out of gar2
provides adequate separation for two way traffic.
6. That the project is in conformity with the general plan and its adopted poli
goals of the city and that the reduction of the development standard (pur!
Section 21.53.120 of the CMC) of the front yard setback from twenty :
private streets with over twelve units, to five feet, would not have a det~
effect on the public health, safety and welfare in that the units are located on
streets that do not have through public traffic and that the garages are e
with automatic garage door openers.
Conditions:
1. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all co
and modifications to the Site Development Plan document(s) necessary to mi
internally consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Devt
shall occw substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed devt
different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval.
2. Approval of SDP 98-17 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Tract mr
and Condominium Permit CP 98-08. SDP 98-17 is subject to all conditions c
in Planning Commission Resolution No. 4467 for Tentative Tract map 91
Planning Commission Resolution No. 4468.
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition”
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for conve~
“fees/exactions.”
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexac
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Codt
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Mar
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure I
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside,
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/(
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor 1
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously be
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously (
expired.
...
~ I ...
PC RES0 NO. 4469 -3-
a e
1 I) PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of April 199
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, Savary,
Segall
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioner L’Heureux, Nielsen, and Welshons
ABSTAIN:
/
COURTNEY E. HEINEMAN, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Planning Director
, PC RES0 NO. 4469 -4- I