HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-10-06; Planning Commission; Resolution 4630*
f
0 0
1 I/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4630
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CAIUSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SITE
ACRES INTO 21 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND ONE OPEN
SPACE LOT WITH 21 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF
POINSETTIA LANE BETWEEN AVIARA PARKWAY AND
BLACK RAIL ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION
CASE NO.: SDP 99-05
DEVELOPMENT PLAN SDP 99-05 TO SUBDIVIDE 27.7
9 11 WHEREAS, Standard Pacific Corporation, “Developer”, has filed a
10
11 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Ronald L. Roesch, ’
12
13
14
15
described as
That portion of Section 22, Township 12 South, Range 4 West,
San Bernardino Base and Meridian, irm the City of Carlsbad,
County of San Diego, State of California, according to official
plat thereof, as described in Certificate of Compliance
recorded March 11,1997 as File No. 1997-0106633 official
16
17
18
19
20
21 21.06/Section 21.53.120 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Site Dev
Plan as shown on Exhibits “A” - “AA” dated October 6, 1999, on file in the
Department, ROESCH PROPERTY SUBDIVISION, SDP 99-05, as provided by
22 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 6th day of Octobc
23 hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
24
25
26
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all tc
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered a
27 11 relating to the Site Development Plan.
28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
.. 0 0
* II
1
2
3
4
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the I
Commission APPROVES SDP 99-05 - ROESCH PRO
SUBDIVISION, based on the following findings and subject to the fc
conditions:
5 11 Findinys:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1. That the requested use is a) properly related to the site, surroundings and envir
settings, b) is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the Genera
will not be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in th
which the proposed use is to be located, and d) will not adversely impact
surroundings or traffic circulation, in that the subdivision density is 3.2 dwell
per acre in conformance with RLM General Plan designation. The 21 sing
residences are consistent with and located adjacent to existing sing11
development and the open space lot creates connectivity with preserved op
to the north in accordance with Specific Plan 203 and the City’s draft HMP
to the development conforms to SP 203 and the project is served by an
major arterial roadway which operates at acceptable levels of service. The I
also conditioned to pay its fair share of the Palomar Airport Road/El Cam
intersection short term improvements to mitigate the failure of that intersec
2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate t
that the project will disturb approximately 6.5 of the 27.7 acres and the r(
21.87 acres will be preserved in open space .
17
18
3. That all yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary
the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhooc
provided and maintained, in that the project complies with all City stand
setbacks and landscaping. Uniform perimeter fencing is proposed and t:
19 family structures are consistent with SP 203 architectural guidelines.
20 4. That the street systems serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle
generated by the proposed use, in that ingress and egress to and from the prc
access to Poinsettia Lane, a circulation arterial roadway which opc
acceptable levels.
21 be provided from a non-loaded public street (Brigantine Drive) providi~
22
23
24
Conditions:
Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to fina 25
1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Dc 26
issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first.
27 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, ZC 98-12, LCPA 98-05
19, HDP 98-21, and CDP 98-86 and is subject to all conditions contained in
28 Commission Resolutions No. 4626, 4627, 4628, 4629, 4631, and 4632 dated
6,1999.
PC RES0 NO. 4630 -2-
8 e .
1
2
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” 3
4
dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convt
“fees/exactions.”
NOTICE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these feedexac
you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Cod
66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Ma
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure
follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside
annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees,
DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor
zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection
project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously bc
a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously I
expired.
13
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 6th day of October, 199 14
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
l5 following vote, to wit:
16
17
AYES: Vice Chairperson Compas, Commissioners L’Heureux,
Segall, Trigas, and Welshons
l8 )I NOES:
19
20
21
22
ABSENT: Chairperson Heineman
ABSTAIN:
23
25 CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
WILLIAM COMPAS, Vice Chai4erson 24
d& Am?&&.&/
26 (1 ATTEST:
27
28 MICHAEL J. HOYZMKLER
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4630 -3-