The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-12-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 4681’* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4681 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER PLAN WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE MASTER PLAN IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 18. CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE N CASE NO.: MP 139(H) 8 9 WHEREAS, D. R. Horton San Diego, Inc., “Developer”, has filed a verii I1 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by D. R. Horton, San Dil 10 I1 I/ Holding Company, Inc., “Owner”, described as 12 13 14 Lot 164, Carlsbad Tract No. 93-04, Rancho Carrillo Village “N” Phase 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 13800, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on June 10,1999. l5 ll WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Master I: l6 (1 Amendment as shown on Exhibit “A” - “BB” dated December 15,1999 on file in the Carls‘ 17 18 19 Planning Department, RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE N - MP 139(H), as provided MP 139 and Chapter 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 20 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 19 21 22 consider said request; and 23 24 25 26 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 28 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 27 WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testim’ and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fac relating to the Master Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planr . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 0 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commiss according to Exhibit “X” dated December 15, 1999, attached hereto 2 made a part hereof, based on the following findings and subject to the follow conditions: APPROVES OF RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE N - MP 139( Findings: 1. The proposed Rancho Carrillo Master Plan Amendment is minor in nature accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan. 2. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conforma with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the facts set forth in the si report dated December 15,1999, including but not limited to the following: A. Land Use - The proposed addition of special design criteria to the Ran( Carrillo Master Plan Village N development standards does not change land uses prescribed by the Master Plan. The project is consistent with City’s General Plan Residential Medium High (RMH) land use designati for the site since the proposed density of 10 dwelling units/acre is within 1 density range of 8-15 dwelling unitdacre and below the Growth Managemc Growth Control Point of 11.5 dwelling unitdacre. B. Circulation - The project is served by the Melrose Drive prime circulati arterial roadway which has been completed and the project is conditioned complete all necessary onsite roadway improvements prior to occupancy any unit. C. Noise - Project noise levels that exceed the City’s 60 dBA CNEL standa along Melrose Drive have been mitigated to the standard through the use 0. combination berm and solid 6’ masonry wall. 3. That all necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with need and adequ; provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the Capital Improvemc Program applicable to the subject property, in that public facilities necessary for t development of Rancho Carrillo Village N have been completed in accordance wi the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan. 4. That the residential and open space portions of the community will constitute environment of sustained desirability and stability, and that it will be in harmony with provide compatible variety to the character of the surrounding area, and that the si proposed for public facilities, such as schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate serve the anticipated population and appear acceptable to the public authorities havil jurisdiction thereof in that the findings of Planning Commission Resolution 4167 f Rancho Carrillo Master Plan Amendment, MP 139(F) are applicable a1 incorporated herein by reference. ’ 5. The proposed modifications to the Village N special design criteria allowing reducl front yard setbacks to a minimum of 10 feet and reduced driveway widths to PC RES0 NO. 4681 -2- 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 minimum of 24 feet for motor court driveway entrances are justified in that project is designed with a more interesting street scene because: 1) front yz setbacks vary from 10 to 31 feet; 2) the majority of garage doors face interior mo courts thereby reducing the number of garages fronting on private streets; 3) looped circulation pattern limits the number of triplexes fronting on a private str before the street changes direction, 4) front building and roof elevations designed with variety and interest, and 5) the driveway entrances which are 10 to feet long, widen to minimum 39 feet wide motor courts. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 6. That the area surrounding the development is or can be planned and zoned coordination and substantial compatibility with the development, in that the Villagc project is buffered from surrounding development within the Master P boundaries by open space and is in compliance with the Rancho Carrillo Ma5 Plan Special Design Criterion for Village N requiring triplex and/or fourplex UI to ensure compatibility with development along the project’s southern boundary. 7. That appropriate measures are proposed to mitigate any adverse environmental impacl noted in the adopted Environmental Impact Report, EIR 91-04, for the project, in that applicable mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project, and Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director to mitigate traj and noise impacts will ensure that potentially significant impacts associated with 1 development are reduced to insignificant levels. Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final map issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first. 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaratj and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CT 99-09 and CP 99-06 an( subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4680,4( and 4683 for those other approvals. 2. The Developer shall pay its fair share for the “short-term improvements” to the Camino ReaYPalomar Airport Road intersection prior to the issuance of a buildi permit. The amount shall be determined by the methodology ultimately selected Council, including but not limited to, an increase in the city-wide traffic impact f an increased or new Zone 18 LFMP fee; the creation of a fee or assessment distri or incorporation into a Mello-Roos taxing district. NOTICE 27 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fc “fees/exactions.” 28 dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience 11 PC RES0 NO. 4681 -3- e 0 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 You have 90 days fi-om date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Sec. 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to tin follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, voic annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexacti DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor plann zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been gi a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously othen 1 expired- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1999, by following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Heineman, Commissioners Compas, L’Heureux, Nielsen, Segall, Trigas, and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 18 19 20 21 COURTNEY E. HEINEMAN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 22 23 ATTEST: 24 25 26 Planning Director 27 28 MICHAEL J. HMZMIMER PC RES0 NO. 4681 -4- I a e T EXHIBIT “X’ Add the following Special Design Criteria to Page 163 of the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan: 14. VILLAGE N d. Special Design Criteria Front yard setbacks may be a minimum of 10 feet from internal private streets if the project is designed with interior motor courts that provide access to the majority of garages in the project. 0 Twenty four feet wide driveway entrances from private streets to interior motor courts may be utilized to provide access to the majority of garages in the project.