The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2000-02-16; Planning Commission; Resolution 47221 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 0 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4722 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MINOR MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE RANCHO CARRILLO MASTER PLAN ON THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF MELROSE DRIVE AND CARRILLO WAY IN LOCAL FACILITIES i MANAGEMENT ZONE 18. CASE NAME: RANCHO CARRILLO VILLAGE L CASE NO: MP 139(I) ~ 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, D. R. Horton San Diego Inc., ”De~eloper~~, has filed a verifi application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by D. R. Horton San Die Holding Company, Inc., a California Corporation, “Owner”, described as 12 13 14 Lot 240 of Carlsbad Tract No. 93-04 Rancho Carrillo Villages “L and M” in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 13838 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County August 23, 1999 as file no. 1999-582013 15 16 17 18 19 20 139 and Chapter 21.38 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and (“the Property”); and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Master PI Amendment as shown on Exhibit “A” - “HH” dated February 16,2000, on file in the Carlsb Planning Department RANCHO CAkRILLO VILLAGE L, MP 139(I) as provided by ll 21 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 16th day of February, 201 22 consider said request; and 23 24 25 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Plann: 28 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimc and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all fact1 relating to the Master Plan Amendment. II I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commissil APPROVES RANCHO CARRILL0 VILLAGE L, MP 139(I) according Exhibit “X” dated February 16, 2000, attached hereto and made a pa hereof based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. The proposed Rancho Carrillo Master Plan Amendment is minor in nature accordance with the provisions of the Master Plan in that; the area of the Villa does not change; the product type does not differ from that allowed by the Mas1 Plan; realignment or modification of internal streets does not occur; and t amendment is not a requirement to satisfy any state or federal agency; and that t amendment does not change the density or involve an addition of a new use group of uses not shown on the original plan or the rearrangement of uses witk the master plan. 2. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformar with the Elements of the City’s General Plan, based on the facts set forth in the st report dated February 16,2000 including, but not limited to the following: A. Land Use - The proposed addition of special design criteria to the Ranc Carrillo Master Plan Village L development standards does not change 1 land uses prescribed by the Master Plan. The project is consistent with 1 City’s General Plan Residential High (RH) land use designation for the s since the proposed density of 15.8 dwelling unitdacre is within the dens range of 15 - 23 dwelling units/acre and below the Growth Managemr Growth Control Point of 19 dwelling units/acre. B. Circulation - The project is served by Carrillo Way, a local street, a Melrose Drive, a prime circulation arterial roadway which has bc completed, and the project is conditioned to complete all necessary ons roadway improvements prior to occupancy of any unit. C. Noise - Project noise levels that exceed the City’s 60 dBA CNEL standi along Melrose Drive have been mitigated to the standard through the use a combination berm and solid 6’ masonry wall. 3. That all necessary public facilities can be provided concurrent with need and adequ provisions have been provided to implement those portions of the Capital Improvem Program applicable to the subject property, in that public facilities necessary for development of Rancho Carrillo Village L have been completed in accordance yc the Rancho Carrillo Master Plan and Zone 18 Local Facilities Management Plan. 4. That the residential and open space portions of the community will constitute environment of sustained desirability and stability, and that it will be in harmony wit? provide compatible variety to the character of the surrounding area, and that the s’ proposed for public facilities, such as schools, playgrounds and parks, are adequate PC RES0 NO. 4722 -2- 1 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e 0 serve the anticipated population and appear acceptable to the public authorities havj jurisdiction thereof, in that the findings of Planning Commission Resolution 4167 j Rancho Carrillo Master Plan Amendment, MP 139(F) are applicable a incorporated herein by reference. 5. The proposed modifications to the Village L special design criteria allowing reduc front yard setbacks to a minimum of 10 feet and reduced driveway widths tG minimum of 24 feet for motor court driveway entrances are justified in that t project is designed with a more interesting street scene because: 1) front ya setbacks vary from 10 to 16 feet; 2) all garage doors face interior motor COUI thereby eliminating garages fronting on private streets; 3) the looped circulati pattern limits the number of multi-plex units fronting on a private street before t street changes direction, 4) front building and roof elevations are designed WI variety and interest, and 5) the driveway to the motor courts is 24 feet wide with t garage door to garage door 'width of 33 feet is adequate room for vehicle turni movements. 6. That the area surrounding the development is or can be planned and zoned coordination and substantial compatibility with the development, in that the Village project is buffered from surrounding development within the Master P1; boundaries by open space and Circulation Element roadway (Melrose Drive). 7. That appropriate measures are proposed to mitigate any adverse environmental impact noted in the adopted Environmental Impact Report EIR 91-04, for the project, in that applicable mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project, and Mitigated Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director to mitigate traf and noise impacts will ensure that potentially significant impacts associated with t development are reduced to insignificant levels. Conditions: Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to final map 1 issuance of grading permit, whichever occurs first. 1. This approval is granted subject to the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaratic and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, CT 99-11 and CP 99-08 and subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 472 4723, and 4724 for those other approvals. 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require Developer to make, all correctio and modifications to the Master Plan document(s) necessary to make them internal consistent and in conformity with final action on the project. Development shall occ substantially as shown in the approved Exhibits. Any proposed development differe from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. ... ... ~ PC RES0 NO. 4722 -3 - f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 l e e NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the “imposition” of fc dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience “fees/exactions.” You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Sect 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timc follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified feedexactic DOES NOT .APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor plannil zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with f project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any feedexactions of which you have previously been gi\ a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously othenv expired. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Plann: Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 16th day of February, 2000, by following vote, to wit: AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Nielsen, Trigas and Welshons NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: WILLIAM COMPAS, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: v MICHAEL J. HXZMIHER Planning Director PC RES0 NO. 4722 -4-