HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-06-07; Planning Commission; Resolution 4779I 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 4779
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PERMITTING THE DELETION OF A TRAFFIC MITIGATION
MEASURE FROM THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM APPROVED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1999 TO CONSTRUCT
WITH A TOTAL AREA OF 250,093 SQUARE FEET ON A
25.28 ACRE SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD EXTENDING FROM AN AREA
WEST OF HIDDEN VALLEY ROAD ON THE WEST TO
AVIARA PARKWAY ON THE EAST IN THE COASTAL
ZONE AND LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 5.
CASE NAME: KELLY CORPORATE CENTER
CASE NO.: SDP 97-25(A)lCDP 97-52(A)
WHEREAS, Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC, “Developer,” has file(
verified application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property owned by Kelly Ran
Corporate Center I, LLC and the Kelly Family Trust, Trust 3, “Owner,” described as
FOUR TWO-STORY MULTI-TENANT OFFICE BUILDINGS
Parcels 1 & 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No.
494 & Parcel 2 of City of Carlsbad Boundary Adjustment No.
388, excepting therefrom the portion lying easterly of Aviara
Parkway
(“the Property”); and
WHEREAS, a Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigati
Monitoring and Reporting Program was prepared in conjunction with said project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 7th day of June, 2000, helc
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimo
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff, a
considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all factr
28 relating to the Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration.
II 0 e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planni
Commission as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planni
Commission hereby APPROVES the Subsequent Mitigated Negatj
Declaration according to Exhibit “ND” dated May 1, 2000, and “PII” dated Ap
24, 2000 and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attach
hereto and made a part hereof, based on the following findings:
Findings:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad has reviewed, analyzed a
considered the Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration, the environmental impa
therein identified for this project and said comments thereon, and the Mitigati
Monitoring and Reporting Program, on file in the Planning Department, prior
APPROVING the project. Based on the EIA Part I1 and comments thereon, 1
Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence the project will havc
significant effect on the environment and hereby APPROVES the Subsequt
Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporti
Program.
2. The Planning Commission does hereby find that the Subsequent Mitigated Negati
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepar
in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the St;
Guidelines and the Environmental Protection Procedures of the City of Carlsbad.
3. The Planning Commission finds that the Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declarati
reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbac
4. The Planning Commission finds that all feasible mitigation measures or projl
alternatives identified in the MEIR 93-01 which are appropriate to this project have be
incorporated into the project.
Conditions:
1. The following mitigation measure contained in the Mitigation Monitoring a
Reporting Program adopted by the Planning Commission through Plannj
Commission Resolution No. 4601 is deleted:
“Prior to issuance of a building permit, construction of Cannon Road Reach 2 sh
be underway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.”
2. The Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of all the remainj
mitigation measures contained in the attached Kelly Corporate Center Mitigatj
Monitoring and Reporting Program.
1) PC RES0 NO. 4779 -2-
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planni
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 7th day of June, 2000, by 1
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chairperson Compas, Commissioners Baker, Heineman,
L’Heureux, Nielsen, Segall, and Trigas
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
I 10
11
l2 WILLIAM COMPAS, Chairperson
13
14
15
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
, -
MICHAEL J. H~MIL~R
Planning Director
PC RES0 NO. 4779 -3 -
e 0
- City of Carlsbad
SUBSEQUENT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project AddressiLocation: South side of Palomar Airport Road extending fiom an area west
of Hidden Valley Road on the west to Aviara Parkway on the east.
Project Description: Deletion of a traffic mitigation measure requiring the construction
of Cannon Road Reach 2 to be underway to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit for the
approved Kelly Corporate Center which consists of four two-story
multi-tenant office buildings with a total building area of 250,093
square feet.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and
the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said review, the
initial study (EIA Part 2) identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1)
revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the applicant before the
proposed negative declaration and initial study are released for public review would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment
would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the City
that the project "as revised" may have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a
Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification
for this action is on file in the Planning Department.
A copy of the Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file
in the Planning Department, 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, California 92008. Comments from
the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to the Planning Department within 20
days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Don Neu in the Planning
Department at (760) 602-4612.
DATED: MAY 1,2000
CASE NO: SDP 97-25/CDP 97-52
CASE NAME: KELLY CORPORATE CENTER - DELETION OF A TRAFFIC
MITIGATION MEASURE
PUBLISH DATE: MAY 1,2000
MICHAEL J. H~XZ"ER
Planning Director
~~
1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 - (760) 602-4600 - FAX (760) 602-8559
e 0
SUBSEQUENT MITGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 15162 OF
THE CEQA GUIDELINES
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO: SDP 97-25(A)lCDP 97-52(A)
DATE: April 17,2000
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: Kelly Corporate Center - Deletion of a Traffic Mitigation Measure
2. APPLICANT: Kelly Ranch Corporate Center I, LLC
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2141 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 300,
Carlsbad, CA 92008; (760) 929-2900
4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: January 25,2000
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On September 1, 1999 the Planning Commission approved a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Site
Development Plan and Coastal Development Permit to allow the construction of four two-story
multi-tenant office buildings with a total building area of 250,093 square feet. Individual building areas are 72,593 square feet, 50,000 square feet, 50,000 square feet, and 77,500 square
feet. A total of 1,006 at grade parking spaces will be provided. The total site area is 25.28 acres.
The project site is located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road and extends from an area
west of Hidden Valley Road on the west to Aviara Parkway on the east. The approval included a
mitigation measure requiring that “prior to the issuance of a building permit, construction of
Cannon Road Reach 2 shall be underway to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.” This proposal
is a request to delete this mitigation measure based on the results of an updated transportation
analysis.
SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” or “Potentially Significant Impact
Unless Mitigation Incorporated” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use and Planning TransportatiodCirculation [7 Public Services
17 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources Utilities & Service Systems
Geological Problems [7 Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
Water Hazards
0 Air Quality [7 Noise
Cultural Resources
0 Recreation
_I u Mandatory Findings of Significance
1 Rev. 03/28/96
0 e
DETERMINATION.
(To be completed by the Lead Agency) - u I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared. . u I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. - u I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one potentially significant effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. A Mitigated
Negative Declaration is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be
addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially
significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Master Environmental
Impact Review (MER 93-01) pursuant to applicable standards and @) have been voided
or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Master Environmental Review (MER 93-01),
including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. w Substantial changes occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which no longer require one of the adopted transportatiodcirculation
mitigation measures to be implemented.
LXf Y-z5"00
Planner Signature Date
4J ab100
Date '
2 Rev. 03/28/96
0 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 1 1, Section 15 162 requires that when an EIR
has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be
prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines on the basis of substantial evidence in
the light of the whole record, that one or more of several situations has occurred. For this project
a revised circulation analysis has been completed for the project based on recent traffic count
information and which does not rely on Cannon Road Reach 2 being part of the circulation
network. The analysis includes additional projects proposed in the area. The environmental
mitigation monitoring checklist approved for the project is attached. All the mitigation measures
listed on the checklist still apply with the exception of the Palomar Airport Road/El Camino Real
intersection fee which has been deleted based on the City Council repealing the moratorium
related to the intersection failure and have been included for information purposes only.
Analysis
A report titled, "Transportation Analysis for Kelly Corporate Center Prepared for The Kilroy
Realty Corporation - March 3 1, 2000" by Urban Systems Associates has been reviewed and
accepted by the Engineering Department. The report analyzes the potential impacts of the Kelly
Corporate Center Project on the circulation system.
Although observation of the traffic flow on Palomar Airport Road would appear to be negatively
impacted, by methods generally accepted statewide, the measurements of the capacity on the
roadway are either acceptable or, with construction of additional capacity guaranteed, will be
acceptable.
For Interstate 5 and Palomar Airport Road, the City Council has previously adopted overriding
considerations for the impact to those intersections. 1-5 and Palomar Airport Road are regional
roadways and those particular intersections are controlled by Caltrans and not the City. The
intersection of Paseo Del Norte (PDN) and Palomar Airport Road, although appearing to not
have capacity, does have sufficient capacity. The reason for the apparent failure is the impact of
the traffic backing up at the 1-5 ramps, and ramp intersections, causing a line of vehicles from 1-5
through the PDN intersection.
The current level of service, which is the measure accepted by the City's Growth Management
Plan, for the PDN intersection is "C" in the a.m. peak and "C" in the p.m. peak. The lane
capacities for Palomar Airport Road are 2,000 vehicles per hour, per lane. With the three lanes in
both the eastbound and westbound direction, the capacity for the through lanes would be 12,000
trips per hour, with left-turn lanes having 1,800 vehicles per hour capacity and with the dual left-
turn lanes the turn capacity would then be 3,600.
Currently, the a.m. peak volume for through lanes at PDN is 3,550 vehiclesh and for left-turns
is 291 vehiclesh. In the p.m. peak, the current volume is 3,524 vehicledhr in the through lanes
and 354vehicles/hr for left-turns. With the capacity of the through lanes at 12,000 vehiclesh and
the actual volume of traffic at approximately 3,500 vehiclesh, it is shown that there is capacity
at the intersection for the through lanes. Likewise, with a capacity of 3,600 vehiclesh versus
existing peak turns of 350 vehiclesh, capacity is available for additional traffic.
At the College Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road intersection, the situation is even better than
at the Paseo Del Norte intersection. The level of service in the a.m. peak is "B", with a p.m. level
of service "C". The a.m. peak through volume is 2,300 vehiclesh, and p.m. peak through
3 Rev. 03/28/96
0 0
volume 2,900 vehiclesh. Left-turn volumes are 1,100 vehiclesh and 339 vehiclesh,
respectively. Again, there is sufficient capacity at this intersection.
The next impacted intersection on Palomar Airport Road is at El Camino Real. Currently, the
level of service, as measured for growth management, does not comply with standards. The
design and funding for construction, of additional turn lanes to meet the standards, is in place and
will be constructed within the year. The level of service at El Camino Real and Palomar Airport
Road in the a.m. peak is "F", and "E" in the p.m. peak. The main problem for the unacceptable
level of service is in the right-turn movements at that intersection. The construction scheduled for
this intersection would install a second right-turn lane for the two most critical movements. This
will bring the level of service into acceptable ranges.
In summary, from an environmental review standpoint, any additional proposed projects that
would add traffic to these intersections, and thereby considered impacting the intersections,
would not have a significant impact. A finding of insignificant impacts is appropriate.
Attachment
4 Rev. 03/28/96
a 0
h(
t- Q,
P
9
n Y
9
n n
i/j of W m 2 3 z
LLI 4 LL
v)
IC
Q)
to
L
c, Q)
S 3
Q, CI !!
z
z
2
0
0 > - -
iLi z
I- o W 2 a
0;
n
6
..
W
W z d z 0 k n z 0 0
lii l- a
2
-I a >
a a a
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page I of 5
352- mcn .F' E =ma, €S U-J cllm ,o .o Q
& .& z
Z2a.l
$ €5
uo
uo
3Q
.& $ ; +
" c '3 20
mE -5 .P a,
Q'= u)
sz E LE2 P 5 '5
Fa2 250
agg
u)2 E E".,
c go 6-z a,
a2 v)
om%
was
-m=
Q* .& Q+ L
rcY s 000
'3 -0 -h e a, c
6
6 m=
+ a,+
" a, u s-
SE m 0 u- 8: 2 a,
8ajE
2gE
3-E 7 n u).Pmcq 2 gc-
E92s
.- 02 Fg 8% - moo 22 Q, u) $2 8
€ma5 =E$$ paw -s€mU s c a,E a, g E.2 -
'5 a,'Q
.s 0 a,
a, ci= .-
SQ
s .- .e a3
mo - a,"oc\l
,-a, Qg
v)+ 30
0 Eo '=moa, m "cl) sa,
m.5 II: n s s.2 =I
ou mo - a,:ea
c a," a)cu)-
FZSZ
(0- - Pz E;;;
(I) 5 z 2
c 0 z
.- s *a, $24
$E >a,
E -
S
:E v)
c gg F v>
u)E Is) .- C a, .s Is)
$€ 5 2% Q) r: m .G
c c C m
.-
- sg; a
u) C .-
.+I bg
=2
.- s""$ e V a, .7
a a 2
zuz&.g hU a, E S.g)"S ii= r v)
z.sw-zau a, sa< ar
i= m2 O.rnU', v)uuc "-FYy~ Q$ zs mm rra, 333 a$ 52.~ m K b L 0 .El a, 42 2.5 z .$ z-3 u 0 xzu.F- *%~~c" -<$$ :$ L a, szggg F gu Q 2- L C%.c o 0 Q >sz 0 E a€ ug c 3a.5~~3 a, v-u 6 6 ggsz m g5zsg25g v) mz$$& QL g!?? 9 2 -.2Ez "a& L armQ aLQ;
ii= mi
=ax3 mal- sp," 0 sa, am z a aj Qm x= cz
oar m .Ji E5 a, 5 ra a,
m.&$ = 8%
a,J2 SZ5 ha, UJ h 5 a,-ije a v) L+5sa+ a.2- up 2% aau-x7Y% $
s 0 -g5~*s'Esa, v).!4s "a$cea,u)sF 5-22 $ v) m g.&
.- e6FZ.Fzs ha .Eg E%$% sr Qgz i 2
6.5 szu a, e.- L a,au.zEm LF%Oa, Q) 0 CIS Qa, Emu m m g
p=>g;sks O$Tzga,-
a, aQLCOU Q.= s a,O)=*-
&os.+
m $5-0' K - mga == CF(j) Od a, $ I= QQ E > m 0 $QLQ 2 x=U rg=.6 gQ r: mzacuu€a"mO 3 CL+ v) m g q.Za.;j:6 gz v)s s= ag.gc om > QK m.E 2 ga, 2 UCa,
.- m La mCEs o-O5Coa,ii~~,-~ m gag; 3-a- ,us2 v)K2 x> om ZL.~ OlY m.kQ% v) 0 ([I m
" = arE~~~.5cE$ r a- L ma m 9 o sz$ QW,r;-Qo ._ -0 tmrtj-r s-2
0-5 h0 C cz 0 k Qg o EZ x E ~5% E 2 G
zzzz zg:~ 2 ha"~,~~n$z gs:
;;j USE $sa$- - .- +
0
1yaE .- gz I;5 0 m 0 5 E gz 6ftt 1 cQ? ESU.Q.!3 $ m m
a, QL S? gz.&z 22 mu)~Q~~s.c a,C 5 a, v)5 =.x.- v) a, c.5~ J= LC L 1-?32gk!.!!$8 ZiEiS?ohFoEEEFo
% s
d L
c WP $5
0
- kg
.- E% s2 $5
2 .g gE
g .G
Ed F 520
a
v)=
ao)
0
.- m .c
.mo v)
20 0
c s 3 Em, c-z 2% cn 3 :2 .E
c$ v) O-$
c-0 II .- '0
93L .- "
$ se
E$?
UZg
&E
$36 - E v) II
Zrn .-
>of
- ki
g
2 0 e
m a S
0
C
.- L
c .-
E L e
0 W
v) S 0 Q v)
-
22 5
$5 - z 0- iF
tn "-5 f
5.G $2
g Fll
c W 0)
.-
.. 3 E .
cu1
m on 2
~ .P /in .g 0; cn= g
w
5 II 5 - Q) .:
w+T
a 0
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING
s v)
m 5 IY
8 0 .- C x23 Ea Q)E >D
E
8
-
8
sc ow
3m
a SEi
a2 .- 80 a 0)
L E
a
S
.- 8 .G .- Sr E S
ggs 26 m a -
a 8 .-
c bg.
=2
.- Gg C 0 a
Q Q
" 2
azo v)z 0- -a >E a.; 8 3 -.S!'Ern -.E m.Q gx= 3- 0 as sa 0 E." 8 u - 2 mwuzazc m.-e 5- a.E o,=t
'E+v)>QL Q) EoFc %E& a amsg y
v) OK 503 l-0 ,= 2s 2W522 -55tij 2 FZ~ bo m,rg %E v)- v) 0 am Qa Q) a0 v)U L-- a, tij .L- sl.G G .a, 8 a, zE3 m.$OF..O .- i a Fa tu a) v)- as k azs s m an-,a- m- 8 $ a 3 v) SF .Ern 0 0
e OULLI zaa,=oa uQ)ta30 a €&C- L p3 L
L&P=c 3+-= S.G E3E m c.= .zo s-ec m,o b
Q)c (lJ% &,.E a >s a v) 8 >E-=
3 .g.Z 6 gEsg aw an 8 055 so$ a.2
I v)~m8n&-j.'EasE=-a
3 .Goa, s 8 a20s a.= a4 mog *mngS'E p-m zngg&Sg = m.gv)Z c--- L2z aTij5ammo0'5 2
2a,o e-'0 oEn,Q)>a>c Q, (lJ=os>-8s-
8%3% % .Qxo.om.k "4 a8 Ln an,~~.'mcW m g 8 &z-G=;; a= 8.E v) cn=m 0 Gn
.- 25 (U a s 0 a2c Fa2 0% != g Fa$% g.g
EwSa E 2 2 v)e CUs v) g.gg.G-r.G 2= urn
2 a>i5p35ka 0.k ac tu E c m L g 5 v)= m-v) .- ax32 : a.GwE a$ v) a,
oq2a aye aosm
Daubs .+-ma,
ma .LC8 cc
E SUE .- 2 ZgaeumEEK mma333zIggz.E
czQ 2 b.2" L a
m v, +aQ ~,~a58Ec~ t .E2
m Q) (lJQ tu "%sS a= 8 0 a, .E m
c - (IJ- oce--Q m Fszzc 3Fo Q) 2 2s
.cI 0 >~tukLOc~a*- m,m,v)e~ on3 .g= g5Eg.S S me3 .-
m rn 2 goo23 c%uo sag 3 os 0 2 a, 2 QE ;:$$E;? 3u Q .-
s&& a 0 0) QLa)w 3.5 Q) no
.- I;:.:= :;x II: 0 8 Q)u) I; 1 at-m m 0 (ZI
v),,uu 8- au 8.E
OmZ3Em82?ij~)51 &.~~LOSSI-~S'E
-
CHECKLIST: Page 2 of 5
s 5
u- L - UP
a,o
0
CL
- 5f
._ E; =E a, 2s
2 'E zu) g .E
Ed F 59 0 ZV%
.c- s 3 Em, c-z a,s m
II .- 5 e: v) .- 0-g
v) '= mm Jz .m c
0
.- m
mu v) ._
$gs
f 25
- 5.2 E?
c .-
4"
n8; E .u, "c.9 a,- 5 &E !E
>[r:
- L m 3 0 ._ r, Q m
u) s .- 8 ._ + c E
P
P
L
- Ill
07 c B v) 2 s 0 c a, $2
;E
W0-5 g
3 $0 z
ZO - m-
.. 2 E
=.E a, m s a)L1u)
I c II
L
~ .o 1F' 'H 0; u) E g
I.
- a, .? 5 II b
w+-H
.- L
z
E n
5 ._
- -
v) z 2 2
-
C C .- + z2
&E
S is,
>a - 2 -
C 0 SF p 3R
v)
-
oz .- ca:
SR .- +.T %E 2:
-
m S
La: .-
85 st- .-
2
-
e S tn Q P
S 0
0 rn
.- U .- U 5
- -
- -
-
! i
!
! L
!
!
-
!
i
I I
-
I L 4
-
- -
a 0
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 3 of 5
I I
I
m S
S C m
.-
ii
5 &
0
-DL 9s sz
- $g
.- E% =E a, xg
c .o, g! .= E
mP ;
E+ 8
$90 Z-D% .- 0-0 v) .= c 3 Em, 8-5 cus 0)
II .- 5 cx v) 0-$j
In .a mm
a, .-
C
.- m
2;g
.- .d= g3I a, S-O
$2 P
Eq z .II! u52
&E
Em
am E
>E
+. 0 a,
Q
.- 2
ocnxm,>;mv,a,e.=u~ *a,a,a,om+a,~mza,a,~-~ .- gT.GZu 8.E mcp,$.E ?."'.G w L. OD >= c mzS11a, e
=. l3 Q.20-5 F?u%-9$ FU F gg ggc 3 9+=.2 3- oc $ -0 g 2 gza a, - - naf3u$o*umoe 3 a, sa a, 0-2 <&S:*.E$mo $ma,
a,+ wag mc x.- a,u"4 0 ._ 3Eua,kK-g*$ cna, a.2 g275 >m m 0- as SEz-JX+m m .E
a,cQ> wrmgug3"a, 03waa * u) 2 p5 a,I=i-" %+-u~rW
mns Y- L 0 3 &$* z * cnua S&a, K.& m u) (IJ mJ)o m L
+=~o-*mcncu~s*g* *m e i?? O.Pa,a, 2 8 > m-0 suc.r *T;r 0
QcJzsaz e5 a, a, * o- 0 *_I a,+z.E 0 55.. QO Y- 3 3 E c .- €5,~ a= o m+zm'~ 0 > 8 c rsn5 a, gg+ .- 3 a
"4 2~ ov> m C mCI m K :mu moa,.- a, * u)>5 m a, 0 mcx !?g 2 ' 5gg-z w au 73 r= 2 Qo.E 2 * * a,.ha = $+ oms2 01 g $2 .- "* a, 0-0 $g a, a, 05" 3 a,z c Q* 0-u a, *-- K Qa, a, a,,.&c05 * E mn ZL! m=.+ u
w'X"E.~a,a~>o~&$cDo 3m Qs$gs$Ez> UK
c 5 m"j3.23 pu L P-m awn g O'E p.s m s m>- $ a,"" mg$.= a, s"es a, u)" 0.- *g
m 2.g 5 2: -.E 3.E ,9 m &a gz "I m .- c bu- g2x a,* K
I- o ca cn m~u.~u o~ ma3.E E~S E a3 ~K.Eu~ o ooooa,La)3 3(IsoZ= oa,oo<=20 cum0
m2 E osL2 e m
-e % u)z.k a, aaa m o a, a,n.~.~ b$ g a, a,k%~ V) rm o c
a,u * a$~$& Q- a, a, 0 0 0 a, - 5% a)- K mz 5 2 a,s- @ l3 OK 0 3 2 zc 3 a,s as0 mK"4 3a ([I u) g
- .- uz 22s K Q
0
"4 -Q!??'sLa,oa,.& GSmcsa,zm~~(oma,oN a, 7JwcUo " m 6a,O va,E a, a, K"*%2>~~uoP.,Ka,m~oV)oQoE 0 .g 3 .r a, (Is -e x
> a, a5
0'50 0- =. v, cma m
c m0c m cn
*1
KL a, e*eu
m a,mg!"grn.kKwa, -o w Q$=.C- OrnOa, O"-F5 mFmpEa,E,,aa3 m'2g mE n o? L.O?e,*K oz8g
2.5 a, 2-KS a, v) ar 1 c a,mao--, o
Cn L u 0 ca 00 ma mm K a, 0s 5.gsek.G $5 gz 3
&Ks
- Lo II
- z S
r 0
m Q m
.-
.- F
?
z - .- C
P
0
I
- a,
cn C 0 a 0) g! s 0 t: a, u) 2:
bjzggi
c 62.3 5.r a, m m go g 2 8 II
% j "n.2
.o .g u)E
'i3 0 s- 3E Ea,
oc
- CI 1;:: f a, II 'E 5
mcH
8 .- - 0
m E P c " I1 ~
e e
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 4 of 5
- -
3 In
E" 2
-
S C .- c %.E %a: a,?
S
>a C E - -
C
:E Sn
VI
?ti
-
wti .- sa:
.- ct 6E gz 2;
-
w S
La: .-
.- -os SF 2
-
E 3
v) Q s
C 0
0 m
.- .Id .- .- I
.Id
- -
- -
-
I j
!
I
L
!
!
!
i
I I
-
I L
5
-
_. -
~~
w S
S S cu
.-
- n
+ 0 a, .-
n 2
6.G n a, 22 0 m 0 a, m.& a, 3 ([I KY >rC
SZ-5 m Qgs m
J u 22 &ma, m.'u
O$.-Csn 2 0 La-
a, 0.2 Qa, mr;.+ n
.- i! ~~~.~~s~a~~ ogm uoLcE+p w a, m.a, &m-c 0 2s n n.5 pa 5 QZG.22
mt- a,ssos G-E & m a3 a,- 0.t a,'Z "no m g 3 EE y%g =%.a, L L u) L 0.- L 0 .E2 $2 EF 2 8ESS
+ a, m m cU m- 0 m3.g "m qE;ypgu L'0-5.3 u- m 5
a,ou Q.a-3:E $2 g .- NO 5 8 kqjl an% .- EU5,U mo k3A 82 m
Eoa,+mg928$
LS
!!!$$E e *.E 3u5; a g$
K C5m"-O+
s=C QL+~UG Q) Q-
-a
% 0s Qo .- K,Oa ,Loms9s> +IC
-&% K$Qa,> m m p
0 2 m, QK )rQZ > "2 a, QU Qa, m.-
k as- m mn m 3.54
h a
- -
- -
w C
S S m
.-
ti
w S
S S cu
.-
- n
L c 0 a, .-
n g
c 0 a, "
n 2
I
a,U.=-LV)
uoQga,.s; ccQ gg
KK,CDU)UhCU)WUg ::ggms " o al
.- :gs" am!? 2i-s 0.- g5sg :% a,JS'52 "4;; $ $ mu fu m ?= 2 .p.%=
cum3, 3sg m5g %?E a, -"smP .- a, K a, 0-
2 msfa,.go 3 c- 822 5 m .v,
a a Kg6 :"."E sn L- m ag)a -K- s=uc a, srC=.O om
mlL as'* COO.& Qua mzuz (A 0 K u) mc (0 c -c 3a,u O+L" K v)- mu u) Ue m-
Sn n 5 $E 2 m Q.2 ~-6 - E- su
a, OCl KO 00.2 a a, kcmg !z
L+25
m8Lnsc K+O a, K +U$,%gz% 0 .- m 2 2 az as
a~acu-zoz~3
Emm'L L 0,Oua: m.E gg m €E.& Dl=" K Dl> mF.3 al
J=.-u E 2 0.2 u .- gozC.E
zz mz 0 L 05%
0 a, 0 !=Em E :& an- fu gg 2 2.22 0 a, €5 z 5 g= m L'E motij g.c5 I a a,q z *zs c gr c
"0- ma,+ m g) m- 2 8- g .Qua aiF 0 5-z "-2 D.s;C" L m L Q,
0." 3 3zc.5- a E bue =2 $ cc
2 EX (g.s .Eaa,,m Q, xII2 gZ a, >E-%
m-n cEEE.~c~~h~ '5 p oJ .g5 fu cr)
on a)-=+ L a, 0 m- > c
"'E- 2.F n - - ms!z 5 E- - .-
€4 z $$+ K3 E m 2 g-2 WOKm .-
- a, .a a, 2.G C a, C
ma,Ka,U On .- KC a, (L, a@
&L.2auaal m+xka% ,338a,OQKE I
8 uc .-
La omsoa, otKK
K 'E 5
K~"V)OES~-oo~C 033 a m3.40 nrna.2 COO m 395 8gn ma
h b 1s
- -
-
-
-
-
-
I I
i i I !
I L
D
;
i I
- -
z 5 0 d L
c aP 5b
- $g-
.- Eo =E a, 28
$Jz
.- ::E
,=: e;., 3 p .E
.- " 0-4
In= mm r .m
am
0 2 .E
Eu 0
FJUZ
Em f C3 mu In
II .- t CP
Kd Ul
f :.E
$2 E; EQQ E u) 'I ;zg gm zE .-
>w
- z
5
S 0 .-
Q m
0) C
c 0
C
.- L
E
P
0
L
- a,
v) C 0 c2 Ul 2 s 0 c a m
.- c 2;
iIi z-i g
- ;s €5
5.t: a, m s
80 E g
maul
= 5 I[. c
0 c 8g sa0m = .o 'p m3 mas€ 2 - a, .E SIlZ m E Ego P
r " 0 -
WFZ .c
e e
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST: Page 5 of 5
v)
m %
ii E
C = 0
S $9 sa GE >a,
E -
t :2 3a sri
v)
.- e;
[1 s;
0
,Or .G L E E .- C gs
u) C .-
w 6% gcz H .?
.-
n
$$Q g
a, =: a, QG= E.= Q a,ggEsE
ag9! $goa,<r a,a,OZEZ is" -Or 2 ms a, =-x Obm-
52 bsg &.E ma, h .
.E a, Lag E z5.g g a, m +'E 8% .2SS,OG a, .- c+m[J'.& mJlc 3-L x
E -$E &omuc E5 mu IT
-c
2 S ggLssF a Lk .- L 'E &)Zr5$ 03.-La &Z"L aam3 $2
8 pg cos p'"o~~"sa, rz,E a,"
Q, p3scm 520 gp s 2e.g pz 6
E .5 z $ 'E .g a
1- 3mcL"c .- 0
n c m -3 n 'a, ~CUQO~: r: 'ac a, "mum
s 2a-p
.cI 5z.- Eo m; "PC L Dl= e 6 0.E
.c) oF..v,=cr, oL;sCu g.~na 582 5 e oam SUC-" pa, pa, a,o .- $ m3 $ah- $ at C a, c v, ,$' .- v,m3\cS 0 .- .- am' LL 0 cS* rS
L= L-ox L-a, p SQ:goa, L=
c L 0 E 3 a32 5s Fc 0"- Pzm!p-
.EKo 'QEE SQoO v, 'na,l-:E
:o: a,y,3 a,moa,5a, a, $-, FJlc mZ3.c
''as QhZ Ee +v,
Q e c
0
-m
a, ha, >X a.E $A > ma,a,c QQsc E .o 0
n QQU om gz CCD+ c.~g 0; S ar
Zh n a, xm
+c
.= s
'5 w 5 m
m .a, 2 mc o.=IS)c oomm.rc 0 c .E .-
.-
m .4? a $.zEe 0 00a,.oKa,
W
3s mu szE 6 3 E,, ma a
2 >-
.-
oa,3a)
LC 3 0 a LC 0-z L1.0
3cz
0 c .s
nana,mz nmmkmZ am,^ s h
nun .om v,k-E .cmm .gz?: .ozb'EQ$
n
Y Y
Y
n
cn Y .r
s !5
d I
I a,P $8
0
- Enf
.- 2% =E a, Bg ag ge
.-
-c .-
mu)
0 g .G
Eu 0)
8% E .s mlc .SF 2
E mz
as 0)
II .- b
.- 0-$
mu 0
._
K'% 2;s
f 5.2
c .-
Kb 03
I.-
Egg $3 Q
E u) I' ;E22 a,'%
SLY LE,
E
- %
g
=I 0 .- r
m
u) c .- b 2 K 2
L e
P a,
m c 0 a u)
-
2
0 c a, u)
s
.- $2 5 - 9 ;E ..=I E . "Ore!
=.E a, m c 6g.Z
m 00 E p PI1
0; g % g c&.=
.P 'B u) c
.-
- c /ii' a, 'E
WFI
C .- c 0 ! s